Exploring high thermal conductivity polymers via interpretable machine learning with physical descriptors
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The efficient and economical exploitation of polymers with high thermal conductivity (TC) is essential to solve the issue of heat dissipation in organic devices. Currently, the experimental preparation of functional polymers with high TC remains a trial-and-error process due to the multi-degrees of freedom during the synthesis and characterization process. Polymer informatics equips machine learning (ML) as a powerful engine for the efficient design of polymers with desired properties. However, available polymer TC databases are rare, and establishing appropriate polymer representation is still challenging. In this work, we propose a high-throughput screening framework for polymer chains with high TC via interpretable ML and physical feature engineering. The hierarchical down-selection process stepwise optimizes the 320 initial physical descriptors to the final 20 dimensions and then assists the ML models to achieve a prediction accuracyR2over 0.80, which is superior to traditional graph descriptors. Further, we analyze the contribution of the individual descriptors to TC and derive the explicit equation for TC prediction using symbolic regression. The high TC polymer structures are mostly π-conjugated, whose overlapping p-orbitals enable easy maintenance of strong chain stiffness and large group velocities. Ultimately, we establish the connections between the individual chains and the amorphous state of polymers. Polymer chains with high TC have strong intra-chain interactions, and their corresponding amorphous systems are favorable for obtaining a large radius of gyration and causing enhanced thermal transport. The proposed data-driven framework should facilitate the theoretical and experimental design of polymers with desirable properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Thermal properties of materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (95)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, B. et al. Modulating thermal transport in polymers and interfaces: theories, simulations, and experiments. ES Energy Environ. 5, 37–55 (2019).
2. Ghaffari-Mosanenzadeh, S. et al. A review on high thermally conductive polymeric composites. Polym. Compos. 43, 692–711 (2022).10.1002/pc.26420 ↗
3. Xu, Q. et al. Recent progress of quantum dots for energy storage applications. Carb. Neutral. 1, 13 (2022).10.1007/s43979-022-00002-y ↗
4. Qian, X., Zhou, J. & Chen, G. Phonon-engineered extreme thermal conductivity materials. Nat. Mater. 20, 1188–1202 (2021).10.1038/s41563-021-00918-3 ↗
5. Guo, Y., Zhou, Y. & Xu, Y. Engineering polymers with metal-like thermal conductivity—present status and future perspectives. Polymer 233, 124168 (2021).10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124168 ↗
6. Ma, H. & Tian, Z. Effects of polymer topology and morphology on thermal transport: a molecular dynamics study of bottlebrush polymers. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 091903 (2017).10.1063/1.4976946 ↗
7. Xu, Y. et al. Nanostructured polymer films with metal-like thermal conductivity. Nat. Commun. 10, 1771 (2019).
8. Shen, S., Henry, A., Tong, J., Zheng, R. & Chen, G. Polyethylene nanofibres with very high thermal conductivities. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 251–255 (2010).10.1038/nnano.2010.27 ↗
9. Ma, J. et al. Thermal conductivity of electrospun polyethylene nanofibers. Nanoscale 7, 16899–16908 (2015).10.1039/C5NR04995D ↗
10. Lu, C. et al. Thermal conductivity of electrospinning chain-aligned polyethylene oxide (PEO). Polymer 115, 52–59 (2017).10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.024 ↗
11. Singh, V. et al. High thermal conductivity of chain-oriented amorphous polythiophene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 384–390 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2014.44 ↗
12. Cao, B.-Y. et al. High thermal conductivity of polyethylene nanowire arrays fabricated by an improved nanoporous template wetting technique. Polymer 52, 1711–1715 (2011).10.1016/j.polymer.2011.02.019 ↗
13. Liu, X., Lin, C. & Rao, Z. Thermal conductivity of straight-chain polytetrafluoroethylene: a molecular dynamics study. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 159, 106646 (2021).10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106646 ↗
14. Crnjar, A., Melis, C. & Colombo, L. Assessing the anomalous superdiffusive heat transport in a single one-dimensional PEDOT chain. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 015603 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.015603 ↗
15. Zhang, T., Wu, X. & Luo, T. Polymer nanofibers with outstanding thermal conductivity and thermal stability: fundamental linkage between molecular characteristics and macroscopic thermal properties. J. Phys. Chem. C. 118, 21148–21159 (2014).10.1021/jp5051639 ↗
16. Henry, A. & Chen, G. High thermal conductivity of single polyethylene chains using molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 235502 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.235502 ↗
17. Liu, J. & Yang, R. Tuning the thermal conductivity of polymers with mechanical strains. Phys. Rev. B 81, 174122 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.174122 ↗
18. Lin, S., Cai, Z., Wang, Y., Zhao, L. & Zhai, C. Tailored morphology and highly enhanced phonon transport in polymer fibers: a multiscale computational framework. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 126 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0264-2 ↗
19. Li, S., Yu, X., Bao, H. & Yang, N. High thermal conductivity of bulk epoxy resin by bottom-up parallel-linking and strain: a molecular dynamics study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 122, 13140–13147 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b02001 ↗
20. Zhang, T. & Luo, T. Role of chain morphology and stiffness in thermal conductivity of amorphous. Polym. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 803–812 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b09955 ↗
21. Chen, H. et al. Thermal conductivity of polymer-based composites: fundamentals and applications. Polym. Sci. 59, 41–85 (2016).
22. Kim, S. et al. PubChem substance and compound databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1202–D1213 (2015).10.1093/nar/gkv951 ↗
23. Yang, J., Tao, L., He, J., McCutcheon, J. R. & Li, Y. Machine learning enables interpretable discovery of innovative polymers for gas separation membranes. Sci. Adv. 8, eabn9545 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abn9545 ↗
24. Chen, L. et al. Polymer informatics: current status and critical next steps. Mater. Sci. Eng. R. Rep. 144, 100595 (2021).10.1016/j.mser.2020.100595 ↗
25. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Comput. Mater. 3, 54 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
26. Wu, S., Yamada, H., Hayashi, Y., Zamengo, M. & Yoshida, R. Potentials and challenges of polymer informatics: exploiting machine learning for polymer design. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.07683 (2020).10.48550/arXiv.2010.07683 ↗
27. Audus, D. J. & de Pablo, J. J. Polymer informatics: opportunities and challenges. ACS Macro Lett. 6, 1078–1082 (2017).10.1021/acsmacrolett.7b00228 ↗
28. Huang, Y. et al. Structure–property correlation study for organic photovoltaic polymer materials using data science approach. J. Phys. Chem. C. 124, 12871–12882 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c00517 ↗
29. Nagasawa, S., Al-Naamani, E. & Saeki, A. Computer-aided screening of conjugated polymers for organic solar cell: classification by random forest. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 2639–2646 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00635 ↗
30. Afzal, M. A. F., Haghighatlari, M., Ganesh, S. P., Cheng, C. & Hachmann, J. Accelerated discovery of high-refractive-index polyimides via first-principles molecular modeling, virtual high-throughput screening, and data mining. J. Phys. Chem. C. 123, 14610–14618 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b01147 ↗
31. Wu, C. et al. Flexible temperature-invariant polymer dielectrics with large bandgap. Adv. Mater. 32, 2000499 (2020).10.1002/adma.202000499 ↗
32. Wu, K. et al. Prediction of polymer properties using infinite chain descriptors (ICD) and machine learning: toward optimized dielectric polymeric materials. J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys. 54, 2082–2091 (2016).10.1002/polb.24117 ↗
33. Sahu, H. et al. An informatics approach for designing conducting polymers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13, 53314–53322 (2021).10.1021/acsami.1c04017 ↗
34. Tao, L., Varshney, V. & Li, Y. Benchmarking machine learning models for polymer informatics: an example of glass transition temperature. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61, 5395–5413 (2021).10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01031 ↗
35. Bhowmik, R., Sihn, S., Pachter, R. & Vernon, J. P. Prediction of the specific heat of polymers from experimental data and machine learning methods. Polymer 220, 123558 (2021).10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123558 ↗
36. Zhu, M.-X., Song, H.-G., Yu, Q.-C., Chen, J.-M. & Zhang, H.-Y. Machine-learning-driven discovery of polymers molecular structures with high thermal conductivity. Int. J. Heat. Mass Transf. 162, 120381 (2020).10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.120381 ↗
37. Ma, R., Zhang, H. & Luo, T. Exploring high thermal conductivity amorphous polymers using reinforcement learning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 15587–15598 (2022).10.1021/acsami.1c23610 ↗
38. Wu, S. et al. Machine-learning-assisted discovery of polymers with high thermal conductivity using a molecular design algorithm. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 66 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0203-2 ↗
39. Zhou, T., Wu, Z., Chilukoti, H. K. & Müller-Plathe, F. Sequence-engineering polyethylene–polypropylene copolymers with high thermal conductivity using a molecular-dynamics-based genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 3772–3782 (2021).10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00134 ↗
40. Jaeger, S., Fulle, S. & Turk, S. Mol2vec: unsupervised machine learning approach with chemical intuition. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 58, 27–35 (2018).10.1021/acs.jcim.7b00616 ↗
41. Morgan, H. L. The generation of a unique machine description for chemical structures-a technique developed at chemical abstracts service. J. Chem. Doc. 5, 107–113 (1965).10.1021/c160017a018 ↗
42. Durant, J. L., Leland, B. A., Henry, D. R. & Nourse, J. G. Reoptimization of MDL keys for use in drug discovery. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 1273–1280 (2002).10.1021/ci010132r ↗
43. Capecchi, A., Probst, D. & Reymond, J.-L. One molecular fingerprint to rule them all: drugs, biomolecules, and the metabolome. J. Cheminform. 12, 43 (2020).10.1186/s13321-020-00445-4 ↗
44. D’Souza, S., Prema, K. V. & Balaji, S. Machine learning models for drug–target interactions: current knowledge and future directions. Drug Discov. Today 25, 748–756 (2020).10.1016/j.drudis.2020.03.003 ↗
45. Landrum, G. RDKit: open-source cheminformatics software. https://www.rdkit.org/ (2020).
46. Karelson, M., Lobanov, V. S. & Katritzky, A. R. Quantum-chemical descriptors in QSAR/QSPR studies. Chem. Rev. 96, 1027–1044 (1996).10.1021/cr950202r ↗
47. Moriwaki, H., Tian, Y.-S., Kawashita, N. & Takagi, T. Mordred: a molecular descriptor calculator. J. Cheminform. 10, 4 (2018).10.1186/s13321-018-0258-y ↗
48. Haghighatlari, M. et al. ChemML: A machine learning and informatics program package for the analysis, mining, and modeling of chemical and materials data. WIREs Comput Mol. Sci. 10, e1458 (2020).10.1002/wcms.1458 ↗
49. Mauri, A., Consonni, V., Pavan, M. & Todeschini, R. Dragon software: an easy approach to molecular descriptor calculations. Match 56, 237–248 (2006).
50. Roy, K. & Das, R. N. QSTR with extended topochemical atom (ETA) indices. 16. Development of predictive classification and regression models for toxicity of ionic liquids towards Daphnia magna. J. Hazard. Mater. 254-255, 166–178 (2013).10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.03.023 ↗
51. Shields, B. J. et al. Bayesian reaction optimization as a tool for chemical synthesis. Nature 590, 89–96 (2021).10.1038/s41586-021-03213-y ↗
52. Tiihonen, A. et al. Predicting antimicrobial activity of conjugated oligoelectrolyte molecules via machine learning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 18917–18931 (2021).10.1021/jacs.1c05055 ↗
53. Domingos, P. A few useful things to know about machine learning. Commun. ACM 55, 78–87 (2012).10.1145/2347736.2347755 ↗
54. Marchetti, F., Moroni, E., Pandini, A. & Colombo, G. Machine learning prediction of allosteric drug activity from molecular dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 3724–3732 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00045 ↗
55. Schober, P., Boer, C. & Schwarte, L. A. Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth. Analg. 126, 1763–1768 (2018).10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 ↗
56. Chandrashekar, G. & Sahin, F. A survey on feature selection methods. Comput. Electr. Eng. 40, 16–28 (2014).10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024 ↗
57. Kuenneth, C. et al. Polymer informatics with multi-task learning. Patterns 2, 100238 (2021).10.1016/j.patter.2021.100238 ↗
58. Kamal, D. et al. Novel high voltage polymer insulators using computational and data-driven techniques. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 174906 (2021).10.1063/5.0044306 ↗
59. Otsuka, S., Kuwajima, I., Hosoya, J., Xu, Y. & Yamazaki, M. in Proc. International Conference on Emerging Intelligent Data and Web Technologies 22–29 (IEEE, 2011).10.1109/EIDWT.2011.13 ↗
60. Ma, R. & Luo, T. PI1M: a benchmark database for polymer informatics. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 4684–4690 (2020).10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00726 ↗
61. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).10.1002/jcc.20035 ↗
62. Lundberg, S. & Lee, S.-I. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 (2017).10.48550/arXiv.1705.07874 ↗
63. Hayashi, Y., Shiomi, J., Morikawa, J. & Yoshida, R. RadonPy: automated physical property calculation using all-atom classical molecular dynamics simulations for polymer informatics. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 222 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00906-4 ↗
64. McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 861 (2018).10.21105/joss.00861 ↗
65. Chen, L., Tran, H., Batra, R., Kim, C. & Ramprasad, R. Machine learning models for the lattice thermal conductivity prediction of inorganic materials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 170, 109155 (2019).10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109155 ↗
66. Kavzoglu, T. & Mather, P. M. The role of feature selection in artificial neural network applications. Int. J. Remote Sens. 23, 2919–2937 (2002).10.1080/01431160110107743 ↗
67. Ma, H. & Tian, Z. Chain rotation significantly reduces thermal conductivity of single-chain polymers. J. Mater. Res. 34, 126–133 (2019).10.1557/jmr.2018.362 ↗
68. Yang, K. et al. Analyzing learned molecular representations for property prediction. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 3370–3388 (2019).10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00237 ↗
69. Robbins, A. B. & Minnich, A. J. Crystalline polymers with exceptionally low thermal conductivity studied using molecular dynamics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 201908 (2015).10.1063/1.4936195 ↗
70. Liu, J. & Yang, R. Length-dependent thermal conductivity of single extended polymer chains. Phys. Rev. B 86, 104307 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.86.104307 ↗
71. Ertl, P. & Schuffenhauer, A. Estimation of synthetic accessibility score of drug-like molecules based on molecular complexity and fragment contributions. J. Cheminform. 1, 8 (2009).10.1186/1758-2946-1-8 ↗
72. Weng, B. et al. Simple descriptor derived from symbolic regression accelerating the discovery of new perovskite catalysts. Nat. Commun. 11, 3513 (2020).
73. Wang, Y., Wagner, N. & Rondinelli, J. M. Symbolic regression in materials science. MRS Commun. 9, 793–805 (2019).10.1557/mrc.2019.85 ↗
74. Stephens, T. Genetic programming in Python, with a scikit-learn inspired API: gplearn. https://gplearn.readthedocs.io/en/stable/.
75. Zhou, Y., Rao, Y., Zhang, L., Ju, S. & Wang, H. Machine-learning prediction of Vegard’s law factor and volume size factor for binary substitutional metallic solid solutions. Acta Mater. 237, 118166 (2022).10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118166 ↗
76. Paulson, N. H., Libera, J. A. & Stan, M. Flame spray pyrolysis optimization via statistics and machine learning. Mater. Des. 196, 108972 (2020).10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108972 ↗
77. Agarwal, G., Doan, H. A., Robertson, L. A., Zhang, L. & Assary, R. S. Discovery of energy storage molecular materials using quantum chemistry-guided multiobjective bayesian optimization. Chem. Mater. 33, 8133–8144 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c02040 ↗
78. Thomas, J. A., Turney, J. E., Iutzi, R. M., Amon, C. H. & McGaughey, A. J. H. Predicting phonon dispersion relations and lifetimes from the spectral energy density. Phys. Rev. B 81, 081411 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.081411 ↗
79. Müller-Plathe, F. A simple nonequilibrium molecular dynamics method for calculating the thermal conductivity. J. Chem. Phys. 106, 6082–6085 (1997).10.1063/1.473271 ↗
80. Pawlak, A. The entanglements of macromolecules and their influence on the properties of polymers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 220, 1900043 (2019).10.1002/macp.201900043 ↗
81. Di Benedetto, F. et al. Patterning of light-emitting conjugated polymer nanofibres. Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 614–619 (2008).10.1038/nnano.2008.232 ↗
82. Hagaman, D. et al. Block copolymer supramolecular assembly using a precursor to a novel conjugated polymer. Polym. Chem. 4, 1482–1490 (2013).10.1039/C2PY20680C ↗
83. Turcani, L., Berardo, E. & Jelfs, K. E. stk: a python toolkit for supramolecular assembly. J. Comput. Chem. 39, 1931–1942 (2018).10.1002/jcc.25377 ↗
84. Tosco, P., Stiefl, N. & Landrum, G. Bringing the MMFF force field to the RDKit: implementation and validation. J. Cheminform. 6, 37 (2014).10.1186/s13321-014-0037-3 ↗
85. Fortunato, M. E. & Colina, C. M. pysimm: a python package for simulation of molecular systems. SoftwareX 6, 7–12 (2017).10.1016/j.softx.2016.12.002 ↗
86. Zhao, Y. H., Abraham, M. H. & Zissimos, A. M. Fast calculation of van der waals volume as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its application to drug compounds. J. Org. Chem. 68, 7368–7373 (2003).10.1021/jo034808o ↗
87. Hu, Y. et al. Unification of nonequilibrium molecular dynamics and the mode-resolved phonon Boltzmann equation for thermal transport simulations. Phys. Rev. B 101, 155308 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.101.155308 ↗
88. Das, S. & Muthukumar, M. Thermal conduction and phonon transport in folded polyethylene chains. Macromolecules 56, 393–403 (2023).10.1021/acs.macromol.2c01954 ↗
89. Yang, N., Zhang, G. & Li, B. Violation of Fourier’s law and anomalous heat diffusion in silicon nanowires. Nano Today 5, 85–90 (2010).10.1016/j.nantod.2010.02.002 ↗
90. Zhang, T. & Luo, T. Morphology-influenced thermal conductivity of polyethylene single chains and crystalline fibers. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 094304 (2012).10.1063/1.4759293 ↗
91. Shrestha, R. et al. Crystalline polymer nanofibers with ultra-high strength and thermal conductivity. Nat. Commun. 9, 1664 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-03978-3 ↗
92. Wirnsberger, P., Frenkel, D. & Dellago, C. An enhanced version of the heat exchange algorithm with excellent energy conservation properties. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 124104 (2015).10.1063/1.4931597 ↗
93. Ju, S., Palpant, B. & Chalopin, Y. Adverse effects of polymer coating on heat transport at the solid–liquid. Interface J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 13474–13480 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b02123 ↗
94. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
95. Nogueira, F. Bayesian optimization: open source constrained global optimization tool for Python. https://github.com/fmfn/BayesianOptimization (2014).