Design of soft magnetic materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We present a strategy for the design of ferromagnetic materials with exceptionally low magnetic hysteresis, quantified by coercivity. In this strategy, we use a micromagnetic algorithm that we have developed in previous research and which has been validated by its success in solving the “Permalloy Problem”—the well-known difficulty of predicting the composition 78.5% Ni of the lowest coercivity in the Fe–Ni system—and by the insight it provides into the “Coercivity Paradox” of W. F. Brown. Unexpectedly, the design strategy predicts that cubic materials with large saturation magnetization ms and large magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant κ1 will have low coercivity on the order of that of Permalloy, as long as the magnetostriction constants λ100, λ111 are tuned to special values. The explicit prediction for a cubic material with low coercivity is the dimensionless number $$({c}11-{c}12){\lambda }1002/(2{\kappa }1)=81$$ for 〈100〉 easy axes. The results would seem to have broad potential application, especially to magnetic materials of interest in energy research.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic Properties and Applications · Magnetic properties of thin films · Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Steels
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Fert, A. Nobel Lecture: Origin, development, and future of spintronics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1517 (2008).10.1103/RevModPhys.80.1517 ↗
2. Silveyra, J. M., Ferrara, E., Huber, D. L., & Monson, T. C. Soft magnetic materials for a sustainable and electrified world. Science, 362, aao0195 (2018).10.1126/science.aao0195 ↗
3. Teter, J. P., Clark, A. E., Wun-Fogle, M. & McMasters, O. D. Magnetostriction and hysteresis for Mn substitutions in (TbxDy1−x)(MnyFe1−y)1.95. IEEE Trans. Magn. 26, 1748–1750 (1990).10.1109/20.104914 ↗
4. Clark, A. E., Teter, J. P. & McMasters, O. D. Magnetostriction “jumps” in twinned Tb0.3Dy0.7Fe1.9. J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3910–3912 (1988).10.1063/1.340602 ↗
5. Yang, S. et al. Large magnetostriction from morphotropic phase boundary in ferromagnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 197201 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.197201 ↗
6. Bergstrom, R.Jr. et al. Morphotropic phase boundaries in ferromagnets: Tb1−xDyxFe2 Alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 017203 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.017203 ↗
7. Hu, C. C. et al. Room-temperature ultrasensitive magnetoelastic responses near the magnetic-ordering tricritical region. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 063901 (2021).10.1063/5.0056712 ↗
8. Bozorth, R. M. The permalloy problem. Rev. Mod. Phys. 25, 42 (1953).10.1103/RevModPhys.25.42 ↗
9. Takahashi, M., Nishimaki, S. & Wakiyama, T. Magnetocrystalline anisotropy and magnetostriction of Fe-Si-Al (Sendust) single crystals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 66, 55–62 (1987).10.1016/0304-8853(87)90128-4 ↗
10. Tickle, R. & James, R. D. Magnetic and magnetomechanical properties of Ni2MnGa. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, 627–638 (1999).10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00292-9 ↗
11. Atulasimha, J. & Flatau, A. B. A review of magnetostrictive iron-gallium alloys. Smart Mater. Struct. 20, 043001, (2011).10.1088/0964-1726/20/4/043001 ↗
12. Clark, A. E., Wun-Fogle, M., Restorff, J. B. & Lograsso, T. A. Magnetostrictive properties of Galfenol alloys under compressive stress. Mater. Trans. 43, 881–886 (2002).10.2320/matertrans.43.881 ↗
13. Brown Jr, W. F. Micromagnetics 18 (Interscience Publishers, 1963).
14. Aharoni, A. & Shtrikman, S. Magnetization curve of the infinite cylinder. Phys. Rev. 109, 1522 (1958).10.1103/PhysRev.109.1522 ↗
15. Brown, W. F. Magnetostatic Principles in Ferromagnetism (North-Holland Publishing Company, 1962).
16. Renuka Balakrishna, A. & James, R. D. A tool to predict coercivity in magnetic materials. Acta Mater. 208, 116697 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.116697 ↗
17. Renuka Balakrishna, A. & James, R. D. A solution to the permalloy problem—A micromagnetic analysis with magnetostriction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 118, 212404 (2021).10.1063/5.0051360 ↗
18. Wang, X. P., Garcia-Cervera, C. J. & Weinan, E. A Gauss-Siedel projection method for micromagnetics simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 171, 357–372 (2001).10.1006/jcph.2001.6793 ↗
19. Zhang, J. X. & Chen, L. Q. Phase-field microelasticity theory and micromagnetic simulations of domain structures in giant magnetostrictive materials. Acta Mater. 53, 2845-2855, (2005).10.1016/j.actamat.2005.03.002 ↗
20. Wang, J. & Zhang, J. A real-space phase field model for the domain evolution of ferromagnetic materials. Int. J. Solids and Struct. 50, 3597-3609 (2013).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.07.001 ↗
21. Hubert, A., & Schäfer, R. Magnetic domains: the analysis of magnetic microstructures (Springer Science & Business Media, 2008).
22. Otto, F. & Viehmann, T. Domain branching in uniaxial ferromagnets: asymptotic behavior of the energy. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 38, 135–181 (2010).10.1007/s00526-009-0281-y ↗
23. Otto, F. & Steiner, J. The concertina pattern. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. 39, 139–181 (2010).10.1007/s00526-009-0305-7 ↗
24. Döring, L., Ignat, R. & Otto, F. A reduced model for domain walls in soft ferromagnetic films at the cross-over from symmetric to asymmetric wall types. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 16, 1377–1422 (2014).10.4171/JEMS/464 ↗
25. Cinti, E. & Otto, F. Interpolation inequalities in pattern formation. J. Funct. Anal. 271, 3348–3392 (2016).10.1016/j.jfa.2016.05.007 ↗
26. Brown, W. F. Magnetoelastic interactions (Springer, 1966).10.1007/978-3-642-87396-6 ↗
27. Pilet, N.The relation between magnetic hysteresis and the micromagnetic state explored by quantitative magnetic force microscopy, Doctoral dissertation (University of Basel, 2006).
28. Knüpfer, H., Kohn, R. V. & Otto, F. Nucleation barriers for the cubic-to-tetragonal phase transformation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 66, 867–904 (2013).10.1002/cpa.21448 ↗
29. Zhang, Z., James, R. D. & Müller, S. Energy barriers and hysteresis in martensitic phase transformations. Acta Mater. 57, 4332–4352 (2009).10.1016/j.actamat.2009.05.034 ↗
30. Zwicknagl, B. Microstructures in low-hysteresis shape memory alloys: scaling regimes and optimal needle shapes. Arch. Ration. Mecha. Anal. 213, 355–421 (2014).10.1007/s00205-014-0736-y ↗
31. Cui, J. et al. Combinatorial search of thermoelastic shape-memory alloys with extremely small hysteresis width. Nat. Mater. 5, 286–290 (2006).10.1038/nmat1593 ↗
32. Thomas, S. V. Nanocrystallites via direct melt spinning of Fe77Ni5.5Co5.5Zr7B4Cu for enhanced magnetic softness. Phys. Status Solidi 217, 1900680 (2020).10.1002/pssa.201900680 ↗
33. McHenry, M. E., Willard, M. A. & Laughlin, D. E. Amorphous and nanocrystalline materials for applications as soft magnets. Prog. Materi. Sci. 44, 291–433 (1999).10.1016/S0079-6425(99)00002-X ↗
34. Soldatov, I., Andrei, P. & Schaefer, R. Inverted hysteresis, magnetic domains, and hysterons. IEEE Magn. Lett. 11, 1–5 (2020).10.1109/LMAG.2020.3035136 ↗
35. Ahani, N., Daware, A. & Renuka Balakrishna, A. In preparation (2021).
36. James, R. D. & Hane, K. F. Martensitic transformations and shape-memory materials. Acta Mater. 48, 197–222 (2000).10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00295-5 ↗
37. Ouazi, S. et al. Atomic-scale engineering of magnetic anisotropy of nanostructures through interfaces and interlines. Nat. Commun. 3, 1-9, (2012).10.1038/ncomms2316 ↗
38. Kablov, E. N. et al. Bifurcation of magnetic anisotropy caused by small addition of Sm in (Nd1−xSmxDy)(FeCo) B magnetic alloy. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 243903 (2015).10.1063/1.4922721 ↗
39. Osborn, J. A. Demagnetizing factors of the general ellipsoid. Phys. Rev. 67, 351 (1945).10.1103/PhysRev.67.351 ↗
40. Schäfer, R. & Schinnerling, S. Tomography of basic magnetic domain patterns in ironlike bulk material. Phys. Rev. B 101, 214430 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.101.214430 ↗