Active learning potentials for first-principles phase diagrams using replica-exchange nested sampling
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Accurate prediction of materials phase diagrams from first principles remains a central challenge in computational materials science. Machine-learning interatomic potentials can provide near-DFT accuracy at a fraction of the cost, but their reliability crucially depends on the availability of representative training data that span all relevant regions of the potential-energy surface. Here, we present a fully automated active-learning (AL) strategy based on replica-exchange nested sampling (RENS) for the generation of training data and the computation of complete pressure-temperature phase diagrams. In our framework, RENS acts as both the exploration engine and the acquisition mechanism: its intrinsic diversity and likelihood-constrained sampling ensure that the configurations selected for DFT labeling are both informative and thermodynamically representative. We apply the approach to silicon, germanium, and titanium using potentials trained at the r2SCAN level of theory. For all systems, the AL process converges within ~ 10–15 iterations, yielding transferable potentials that reproduce known phase transitions and thermodynamic trends. These results demonstrate that RENS-based AL provides a general and autonomous route to constructing machine-learning interatomic potentials and predicting first-principles phase diagrams across broad thermodynamic conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Model Reduction and Neural Networks
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Ciccotti, G., Dellago, C., Ferrario, M., Hernández, E. R. & Tuckerman, M. E. Molecular simulations: past, present, and future (a Topical Issue in EPJB). Eur. Phys. J. B 95, 3 (2022).10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00249-x ↗
2. Frenkel, D. & Ladd, A. J. C. New Monte Carlo method to compute the free energy of arbitrary solids. Application to the fcc and hcp phases of hard spheres. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3188–3193 (1984).10.1063/1.448024 ↗
3. Richard, P. et al. Ab initio phase diagram of gold in extreme conditions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 206101 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.206101 ↗
4. Laio, A. & Parrinello, M. Escaping free-energy minima. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 12562–12566 (2002).10.1073/pnas.202427399 ↗
5. Méndez, E. & Semino, R. Phase diagram of ZIF-4 from computer simulations. J. Mater. Chem. A 12, 31108–31115 (2024).10.1039/D4TA05026F ↗
6. Togo, A. First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023).10.7566/JPSJ.92.012001 ↗
7. Paul, R., Hu, S. X. & Karasiev, V. V. Anharmonic and anomalous trends in the high-pressure phase diagram of silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 125701 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.125701 ↗
8. Bichelmaier, S., Carrete, J., Wanzenböck, R., Buchner, F. & Madsen, G. K. H. Neural-network-backed effective harmonic potential study of the ambient pressure phases of hafnia. Phys. Rev. B 107, 184111 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.107.184111 ↗
9. Skilling, J. Nested sampling. AIP Conf. Proc. 735, 395–405 (2004).10.1063/1.1835238 ↗
10. Pártay, L. B., Csányi, G. & Bernstein, N. Nested sampling for materials. Eur. Phys. J. B 94, 159 (2021).10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00172-1 ↗
11. Deringer, V. L., Caro, M. A. & Csányi, G. Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials as Emerging Tools for Materials Science. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902765 (2019).10.1002/adma.201902765 ↗
12. Leimeroth, N., Erhard, L. C., Albe, K. & Rohrer, J. Machine-learning interatomic potentials from a users perspective: a comparison of accuracy, speed and data efficiency. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 33, 065012 (2025).10.1088/1361-651X/adf56d ↗
13. Erhard, L. C., Rohrer, J., Albe, K. & Deringer, V. L. Modelling atomic and nanoscale structure in the silicon–oxygen system through active machine learning. Nat. Commun. 15, 1927 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-45840-9 ↗
14. Shenoy, L. et al. Collinear-spin machine learned interatomic potential for Fe7Cr2Ni alloy. Phys. Rev. Mater. 8, 033804 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.033804 ↗
15. Menon, S. et al. From electrons to phase diagrams with machine learning potentials using pyiron based automated workflows. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 261 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01441-0 ↗
16. Erhard, L. C., Rohrer, J., Albe, K. & Deringer, V. L. A machine-learned interatomic potential for silica and its relation to empirical models. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 90 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00768-w ↗
17. Unglert, N., Carrete, J., Pártay, L. B. & Madsen, G. K. H. Neural-network force field backed nested sampling: Study of the silicon P − T phase diagram. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 123804 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.123804 ↗
18. Kloppenburg, J., Pártay, L. B., Jónsson, H. & Caro, M. A. A general-purpose machine learning Pt interatomic potential for an accurate description of bulk, surfaces, and nanoparticles. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 134704 (2023).10.1063/5.0143891 ↗
19. Bernstein, N., Csányi, G. & Deringer, V. L. De novo exploration and self-guided learning of potential-energy surfaces. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 99 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0236-6 ↗
20. Jinnouchi, R., Lahnsteiner, J., Karsai, F., Kresse, G. & Bokdam, M. Phase transitions of hybrid perovskites simulated by machine-learning force fields trained on the fly with Bayesian inference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 225701 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.225701 ↗
21. Zaverkin, V., Holzmüller, D., Steinwart, I. & Kästner, J. Exploring chemical and conformational spaces by batch mode deep active learning. Digit. Discov. 1, 605–620 (2022).10.1039/D2DD00034B ↗
22. Wanzenböck, R. et al. Exploring inhomogeneous surfaces: Ti-rich SrTiO3(110) reconstructions via active learning. Digit. Discov. 3, 2137–2145 (2024).10.1039/D4DD00231H ↗
23. Schäfer, M. R., Segreto, N., Zills, F., Holm, C. & Kästner, J. Apax: a flexible and performant framework for the development of machine-learned interatomic potentials. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 65, 8066–8078 (2025).10.1021/acs.jcim.5c01221 ↗
24. Castellano, A. et al. Machine learning assisted canonical sampling (Mlacs). Comput. Phys. Commun. 316, 109730 (2025).10.1016/j.cpc.2025.109730 ↗
25. Fletcher, V. G., Bartók, A. P. & Pártay, L. B. Optimal autonomous MLIP dataset building https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08864 (2025).
26. Montes-Campos, H., Carrete, J., Bichelmaier, S., Varela, L. M. & Madsen, G. K. H. A differentiable neural-network force field for ionic liquids. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 62, 88–101 (2022).10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01380 ↗
27. Furness, J. W., Kaplan, A. D., Ning, J., Perdew, J. P. & Sun, J. Accurate and numerically efficient r2SCAN meta-generalized gradient approximation. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 8208–8215 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02405 ↗
28. Unglert, N., Pártay, L. B. & Madsen, G. K. H. Replica Exchange Nested Sampling. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 7304–7319 (2025).10.1021/acs.jctc.5c00588 ↗
29. Bartók, A. P., Kermode, J., Bernstein, N. & Csányi, G. Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041048 (2018).
30. Heid, E., Schörghuber, J., Wanzenböck, R. & Madsen, G. K. H. Spatially resolved uncertainties for machine learning potentials. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 64, 6377–6387 (2024).10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00904 ↗
31. Widdowson, D., Mosca, M. M., Pulido, A., Kurlin, V. & Cooper, A. I. Average minimum distances of periodic point sets - foundational invariants for mapping periodic crystals. MATCH-Commun. Math. Co. 87, 529–559 (2022).
32. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
33. Horton, M. K. et al. Accelerated data-driven materials science with the Materials Project. Nat. Mater. 1–11 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41563-025-02272-0 (2025).
34. Steinhardt, P. J., Nelson, D. R. & Ronchetti, M. Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses. Phys. Rev. B 28, 784–805 (1983).10.1103/PhysRevB.28.784 ↗
35. Togo, A. & Tanaka, I.Spglib: a software library for crystal symmetry search http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01590 (2018).
36. Marchant, G. A., Caro, M. A., Karasulu, B. & Pártay, L. B. Exploring the configuration space of elemental carbon with empirical and machine learned interatomic potentials. NPJ Comput. Mater. 9, 1–12 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-01081-w ↗
37. Voronin, G. A., Pantea, C., Zerda, T. W., Wang, L. & Zhao, Y. In situ x-ray diffraction study of silicon at pressures up to 15.5 GPa and temperatures up to 1073 K. Phys. Rev. B 68, 020102 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevB.68.020102 ↗
38. Kubo, A. et al. Melting curve of silicon to 15 GPa determined by two-dimensional angle-dispersive diffraction using a Kawai-type apparatus with X-ray transparent sintered diamond anvils. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69, 2255–2260 (2008).10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.04.025 ↗
39. Yang, C. C. & Jiang, Q. Temperature–pressure phase diagram of germanium determined by Clapeyron equation. Scr. Mater. 51, 1081–1085 (2004).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.001 ↗
40. Cannon, J. F. Behavior of the elements at high pressures. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 3, 781–824 (1974).10.1063/1.3253148 ↗
41. Jayaraman, A., Klement, W. & Kennedy, G. C. Melting and polymorphism at high pressures in some group IV elements and III-V compounds with the diamond/zincblende structure. Phys. Rev. 130, 540–547 (1963).10.1103/PhysRev.130.540 ↗
42. Bundy, F. P. Phase diagrams of silicon and germanium to 200 kbar, 1000∘C. J. Chem. Phys. 41, 3809–3814 (2004).10.1063/1.1725818 ↗
43. Tonkov, E. Y. & Ponyatovsky, E. G.Phase Transformations of Elements Under High Pressure (CRC Press, 2004).10.1201/9781420037609.ch1 ↗
44. Zhang, J. et al. Experimental constraints on the phase diagram of titanium metal. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 69, 2559–2563 (2008).10.1016/j.jpcs.2008.05.016 ↗
45. Dewaele, A. et al. High pressure-temperature phase diagram and equation of state of titanium. Phys. Rev. B 91, 134108 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.91.134108 ↗
46. Mei, Z.-G., Shang, S.-L., Wang, Y. & Liu, Z.-K. Density-functional study of the thermodynamic properties and the pressure–temperature phase diagram of Ti. Phys. Rev. B 80, 104116 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.80.104116 ↗
47. Radova, M., Stark, W. G., Allen, C. S., Maurer, R. J. & Bartók, A. P. Fine-tuning foundation models of materials interatomic potentials with frozen transfer learning. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 237 (2025).10.1038/s41524-025-01727-x ↗
48. Baldock, R. J. N., Pártay, L. B., Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C. & Csányi, G. Determining pressure-temperature phase diagrams of materials. Phys. Rev. B 93, 174108 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174108 ↗
49. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
50. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
51. Carrete, J., Montes-Campos, H., Wanzenböck, R., Heid, E. & Madsen, G. K. H. Deep ensembles vs committees for uncertainty estimation in neural-network force fields: Comparison and application to active learning. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 204801 (2023).10.1063/5.0146905 ↗
52. Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
53. Kocer, E., Mason, J. K. & Erturk, H. Continuous and optimally complete description of chemical environments using Spherical Bessel descriptors. AIP Adv. 10, 015021 (2020).10.1063/1.5111045 ↗
54. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 770–778 (2016).10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 ↗
55. Ramachandran, P., Zoph, B. & Le, Q. V. Searching for Activation Functions http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05941 (2017).
56. Bradbury, J. et al. JAX: composable transformations of Python+NumPy programs http://github.com/google/jax (2018).
57. Heek, J. et al. Flax: A neural network library and ecosystem for JAX http://github.com/google/flax (2020).
58. Metz, L. et al. VeLO: Training Versatile Learned Optimizers by Scaling Up http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.09760 (2022). ArXiv:2211.09760 [cs].
59. Larsen, A. H. et al. The atomic simulation environment—a Python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
60. Unglert, M., Nico Ketter & Madsen, G. K. H. Active learning potentials for first-principles phase diagrams using replica-exchange nested sampling. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17662936, https://zenodo.org/records/17662936 (2025).10.5281/zenodo.17662936 ↗
61. Montes-Campos, H., Carrete, J., Bichelmaier, S., Varela, L. M. & Madsen, G. K. H. NeuralIL. https://github.com/Madsen-s-research-group/neuralil-public-releases (2022).
62. Errandonea, D. et al. Systematics of transition-metal melting. Phys. Rev. B 63, 132104 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.63.132104 ↗
63. Stutzmann, V., Dewaele, A., Bouchet, J., Bottin, F. & Mezouar, M. High-pressure melting curve of titanium. Phys. Rev. B 92, 224110 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.224110 ↗