Computational screening of sodium solid electrolytes through unsupervised learning
Source abstract
Abstract
All-solid-state Na-ion batteries have emerged as alternatives to all-solid-state Li-ion batteries owing to the global abundance of Na element. However, finding a commercially viable Na-ion solid-state electrolyte (SSE) remains challenging due to the relatively poor understanding of the structures effective for conduction compared to those for Li-ion SSE. In this study, we develop a screening framework based on an unsupervised machine learning technique to characterize Na-ion SSEs according to their lattice structures. Specifically, we evaluate feature vectors encoding 180 structural properties for 12,670 materials containing Na ions. Subsequently, the resulting feature vectors are clustered using hierarchical density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (HDBSCAN), leading to the discovery of 12 groups including those with experimentally proven Na-ion superionic conductors such as NASICONs and sodium chalcogenides. Post hoc analysis of these clusters reveals that the groups with high conductivity share similar characteristics, including the existence of ion channels for Na ions and the weak interactions between Na ions and the proximate atoms. Ab initio molecular dynamics simulations confirm that the promising groups exhibit exceptional ion diffusivity compared to other groups. By employing decision tree classifiers trained to screen promising groups, we demonstrate the rapid assessment of the potential of a given material. Finally, we offer perspectives and insights for the development of novel Na-ion SSEs for all-solid-state Na-ion batteries.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. Wu, J. F. et al. Inorganic solid electrolytes for all-solid-state sodium batteries: fundamentals and strategies for battery optimization. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31, 1–30 (2021).
2. Pereznieto, S., Jaafreh, R., Kim, J. & Hamad, K. Discovery of solid-state electrolytes for Na-ion batteries using machine learning. Mater. Lett. 349, 134848 (2023).10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134848 ↗
3. Lu, Y. et al. A high‐performance monolithic solid‐state sodium battery with Ca 2+ doped Na 3 Zr 2 Si 2 PO 12 electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater. 9, 1–9 (2019).10.1002/aenm.201901205 ↗
4. Ma, Q. et al. Scandium-substituted Na 3 Zr 2 (SiO 4) 2 (PO 4) prepared by a solution-assisted solid-state reaction method as sodium-ion conductors. Chem. Mater. 28, 4821–4828 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02059 ↗
5. Ma, Q. et al. Room temperature demonstration of a sodium superionic conductor with grain conductivity in excess of 0.01 S cm −1 and its primary applications in symmetric battery cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 7766–7776 (2019).10.1039/C9TA00048H ↗
6. Lu, X., Xia, G., Lemmon, J. P. & Yang, Z. Advanced materials for sodium-beta alumina batteries: status, challenges and perspectives. J. Power Sources 195, 2431–2442 (2010).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.120 ↗
7. Ramos, E. P. et al. Correlating ion mobility and single crystal structure in sodium-ion chalcogenide-based solid state fast ion conductors: Na 11 Sn 2 PnS 12 (Pn = Sb, P). Chem. Mater. 30, 7413–7417 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02077 ↗
8. Rao, R. P., Zhang, X., Phuah, K. C. & Adams, S. Mechanochemical synthesis of fast sodium ion conductor Na 11 Sn 2 PSe 12 enables first sodium–selenium all-solid-state battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 20790–20798 (2019).10.1039/C9TA06279C ↗
9. Duchardt, M. et al. Superion conductor Na 11.1 Sn 2.1 P 0.9 Se 12: lowering the activation barrier of Na+ conduction in quaternary 1–4–5–6 electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 30, 4134–4139 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01656 ↗
10. Duchardt, M., Ruschewitz, U., Adams, S., Dehnen, S. & Roling, B. Vacancy‐controlled Na+ superion conduction in Na 11 Sn 2 PS 12. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 1351–1355 (2018).10.1002/anie.201712769 ↗
11. Richards, W. D. et al. Design and synthesis of the superionic conductor Na10SnP2S12. Nat. Commun. 7, 11009 (2016).10.1038/ncomms11009 ↗
12. Wang, Y. et al. Structural manipulation approaches towards enhanced sodium ionic conductivity in Na-rich antiperovskites. J. Power Sources 293, 735–740 (2015).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.002 ↗
13. Sun, Y. et al. Rotational cluster anion enabling superionic conductivity in sodium-rich antiperovskite Na 3 OBH 4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 5640–5644 (2019).10.1021/jacs.9b01746 ↗
14. Fuchs, T., Culver, S. P., Till, P. & Zeier, W. G. Defect-mediated conductivity enhancements in Na 3– x Pn 1– x W x S 4 (Pn = P, Sb) using aliovalent substitutions. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 146–151 (2020).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02537 ↗
15. Varley, J. B. et al. Understanding ionic conductivity trends in polyborane solid electrolytes from Ab initio molecular dynamics. ACS Energy Lett. 2, 250–255 (2017).10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00620 ↗
16. Duchêne, L. et al. A highly stable sodium solid-state electrolyte based on a dodeca/deca-borate equimolar mixture. Chem. Commun. 53, 4195–4198 (2017).10.1039/C7CC00794A ↗
17. Zhu, Z., Chu, I.-H. & Ong, S. P. Li 3 Y(PS 4) 2 and Li 5 PS 4 Cl 2: new lithium superionic conductors predicted from silver thiophosphates using efficiently tiered ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. Chem. Mater. 29, 2474–2484 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04049 ↗
18. Wang, S. et al. Design principles for sodium superionic conductors. Nat. Commun. 14, 7615 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-43436-3 ↗
19. Hansen, K. et al. Machine learning predictions of molecular properties: accurate many-body potentials and nonlocality in chemical space. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 2326–2331 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00831 ↗
20. Kim, K., Kim, J., Kim, C., Lee, Y. & Lee, W. B. Robust design of multicomponent working fluid for organic Rankine cycle. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 58, 4154–4167 (2019).10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04825 ↗
21. Kim, K. et al. Data-driven pilot optimization for electrochemical CO mass production. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 16943–16950 (2020).10.1039/D0TA05607C ↗
22. Bejagam, K. K., Lalonde, J., Iverson, C. N., Marrone, B. L. & Pilania, G. Machine learning for melting temperature predictions and design in polyhydroxyalkanoate-based biopolymers. J. Phys. Chem. B 126, 934–945 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpcb.1c08354 ↗
23. Kuenneth, C. et al. Bioplastic design using multitask deep neural networks. Commun. Mater. 3, 96 (2022).10.1038/s43246-022-00319-2 ↗
24. Rupp, M., Tkatchenko, A., Müller, K.-R. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Fast and accurate modeling of molecular atomization energies with machine learning. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 058301 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.058301 ↗
25. Ong, S. P. et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source Python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
26. Faber, F., Lindmaa, A., von Lilienfeld, O. A. & Armiento, R. Crystal structure representations for machine learning models of formation energies. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 1094–1101 (2015).10.1002/qua.24917 ↗
27. Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A. & Wolverton, C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 16028 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
28. Lam Pham, T. et al. Machine learning reveals orbital interaction in materials. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18, 756–765 (2017).10.1080/14686996.2017.1378060 ↗
29. Laskowski, F. A. L., McHaffie, D. B. & See, K. A. Identification of potential solid-state Li-ion conductors with semi-supervised learning. Energy Environ. Sci. 16, 1264–1276 (2023).10.1039/D2EE03499A ↗
30. Zhang, Y. et al. Unsupervised discovery of solid-state lithium ion conductors. Nat. Commun. 10, 5260 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-13214-1 ↗
31. Kim, K., Lee, G., Park, K., Park, S. & Lee, W. B. Adaptive approach for estimation of pipeline corrosion defects via Bayesian inference. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 216, 107998 (2021).10.1016/j.ress.2021.107998 ↗
32. Sun, W. et al. The thermodynamic scale of inorganic crystalline metastability. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600225 (2016).10.1126/sciadv.1600225 ↗
33. Schlem, R., Banik, A., Eckardt, M., Zobel, M. & Zeier, W. G. Na 3– x Er 1– x Zr x Cl 6—a halide-based fast sodium-ion conductor with vacancy-driven ionic transport. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 10164–10173 (2020).10.1021/acsaem.0c01870 ↗
34. Hayashi, A., Noi, K., Sakuda, A. & Tatsumisago, M. Superionic glass-ceramic electrolytes for room-temperature rechargeable sodium batteries. Nat. Commun. 3, 856 (2012).10.1038/ncomms1843 ↗
35. Zhang, L. et al. Na3PSe4: a novel chalcogenide solid electrolyte with high ionic conductivity. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1501294 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201501294 ↗
36. Xiong, S. et al. Na3SbSe4−xS x as sodium superionic conductors. Sci. Rep. 8, 9146 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-27301-8 ↗
37. Tsuji, F. et al. Preparation and characterization of sodium-ion conductive Na 3 BS 3 glass and glass–ceramic electrolytes. Mater. Adv. 2, 1676–1682 (2021).10.1039/D0MA00777C ↗
38. He, Y., Lu, F. & Kuang, X. Enhanced sodium ion conductivity in Na 3 VS 4 by P-doping. RSC Adv. 9, 39180–39186 (2019).10.1039/C9RA08900D ↗
39. Hayashi, A. et al. A sodium-ion sulfide solid electrolyte with unprecedented conductivity at room temperature. Nat. Commun. 10, 5266 (2019).10.1038/s41467-019-13178-2 ↗
40. Tang, W. S. et al. Liquid-like ionic conduction in solid lithium and sodium monocarba-closo-decaborates near or at room temperature. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1–6 (2016).10.1002/aenm.201502237 ↗
41. Tang, W. S. et al. Unparalleled lithium and sodium superionic conduction in solid electrolytes with large monovalent cage-like anions. Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 3637–3645 (2015).10.1039/C5EE02941D ↗
42. Udovic, T. J. et al. Exceptional superionic conductivity in disordered sodium decahydro‐closo‐decaborate. Adv. Mater. 26, 7622–7626 (2014).10.1002/adma.201403157 ↗
43. Udovic, T. J. et al. Sodium superionic conduction in Na 2 B 12 H 12. Chem. Commun. 50, 3750–3752 (2014).10.1039/C3CC49805K ↗
44. Zhang, Z. et al. A self‐forming composite electrolyte for solid‐state sodium battery with ultralong cycle life. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1–11 (2017).
45. Rettenwander, D. et al. Arrhenius behavior of the bulk Na-ion conductivity in Na 3 Sc 2 (PO 4) 3 single crystals observed by microcontact impedance spectroscopy. Chem. Mater. 30, 1776–1781 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00179 ↗
46. Tian, H., Liu, S., Deng, L., Wang, L. & Dai, L. New-type Hf-based NASICON electrolyte for solid-state Na-ion batteries with superior long-cycling stability and rate capability. Energy Storage Mater. 39, 232–238 (2021).10.1016/j.ensm.2021.04.026 ↗
47. Deng, Z. et al. Fundamental investigations on the sodium-ion transport properties of mixed polyanion solid-state battery electrolytes. Nat. Commun. 13, 4470 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-32190-7 ↗
48. Zhang, Z. et al. Na 11 Sn 2 PS 12: a new solid state sodium superionic conductor. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 87–93 (2018).10.1039/C7EE03083E ↗
49. Xiong, S. et al. Anion and cation co-doping of Na4SnS4 as sodium superionic conductors. Mater. Today Phys. 15, 100281 (2020).10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100281 ↗
50. Tang, W. S. et al. Stabilizing superionic-conducting structures via mixed-anion solid solutions of monocarba-closo-borate salts. ACS Energy Lett. 1, 659–664 (2016).10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00310 ↗
51. Deng, Y. et al. Enhancing the lithium ion conductivity in lithium superionic conductor (LISICON) solid electrolytes through a mixed polyanion effect. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 7050–7058 (2017).10.1021/acsami.6b14402 ↗
52. Kamaya, N. et al. A lithium superionic conductor. Nat. Mater. 10, 682–686 (2011).10.1038/nmat3066 ↗
53. Mizuno, F., Hayashi, A., Tadanaga, K. & Tatsumisago, M. High lithium ion conducting glass-ceramics in the system Li2S–P2S5. Solid State Ion. 177, 2721–2725 (2006).10.1016/j.ssi.2006.04.017 ↗
54. Rao, R. P. & Adams, S. Studies of lithium argyrodite solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. Phys. Status Solidi 208, 1804–1807 (2011).10.1002/pssa.201001117 ↗
55. Matsuo, M., Nakamori, Y., Orimo, S. I., Maekawa, H. & Takamura, H. Lithium superionic conduction in lithium borohydride accompanied by structural transition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 224103 (2007).10.1063/1.2817934 ↗
56. Li, W. et al. Li+ ion conductivity and diffusion mechanism in α-Li3N and β-Li3N. Energy Environ. Sci. 3, 1524 (2010).10.1039/c0ee00052c ↗
57. Tao, B. et al. Thio‐/LISICON and LGPS‐type solid electrolytes for all‐solid‐state lithium‐ion batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202203551 ↗
58. Merchant, A. et al. Scaling deep learning for materials discovery. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06735-9 ↗
59. Szymanski, N. J. et al. An autonomous laboratory for the accelerated synthesis of novel materials. Nature 624, 86–91 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-06734-w ↗
60. Campello, R. J. G. B., Moulavi, D., Zimek, A. & Sander, J. Hierarchical density estimates for data clustering, visualization, and outlier detection. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data 10, 1–51 (2015).10.1145/2733381 ↗
61. Wang, Y., Huang, H., Rudin, C. & Shaposhnik, Y. Understanding how dimension reduction tools work: an empirical approach to deciphering t-SNE, UMAP, TriMAP, and PaCMAP for data visualization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 22, 1–73 (2021).
62. McInnes, L., Healy, J. & Melville, J. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 861 (2018).10.21105/joss.00861 ↗
63. Zu, X. & Tao, Q. SpaceMAP: visualizing high-dimensional data by space expansion. Proc. 39th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. 162, 27707–27723 (2022).
64. Park, D., Na, J. & Lee, J. M. Clustered manifold approximation and projection for semisupervised fault diagnosis and process monitoring. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 60, 9521–9531 (2021).10.1021/acs.iecr.1c01271 ↗
65. Marsden, P. V. Network Analysis. in Encyclopedia of Social Measurement vol. 73 819–825 (Elsevier, 2005).10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00409-6 ↗
66. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
67. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
68. Kresse, G., & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
69. Jalem, R., Hayashi, A., Tsuji, F., Sakuda, A. & Tateyama, Y. First-principles calculation study of Na+superionic conduction mechanism in W- and Mo-doped Na3SbS4 solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 32, 8373–8381 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c02318 ↗
70. Laws, K. J., Miracle, D. B. & Ferry, M. A predictive structural model for bulk metallic glasses. Nat. Commun. 6, 8123 (2015).10.1038/ncomms9123 ↗
71. Butler, M. A. & Ginley, D. S. Prediction of flatband potentials at semiconductor‐electrolyte interfaces from atomic electronegativities. J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 228–232 (1978).10.1149/1.2131419 ↗
72. Ward, L. et al. Including crystal structure attributes in machine learning models of formation energies via Voronoi tessellations. Phys. Rev. B 96, 024104 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.024104 ↗
73. Deml, A. M., O’Hayre, R., Wolverton, C. & Stevanovic, V. ChemInform abstract: predicting density functional theory total energies and enthalpies of formation of metal-nonmetal compounds by linear regression. ChemInform 47, 85142 (2016).10.1002/chin.201644254 ↗
74. Ewald, P. P. Die Berechnung optischer und elektrostatischer Gitterpotentiale. Ann. Phys. 369, 253–287 (1921).10.1002/andp.19213690304 ↗
75. Salinas-Sanchez, A., Garcia-Muñoz, J. L., Rodriguez-Carvajal, J., Saez-Puche, R. & Martinez, J. L. Structural characterization of R2BaCuO5 (R = Y, Lu, Yb, Tm, Er, Ho, Dy, Gd, Eu and Sm) oxides by X-ray and neutron diffraction. J. Solid State Chem. 100, 201–211 (1992).10.1016/0022-4596(92)90094-C ↗
76. Choudhary, K., DeCost, B. & Tavazza, F. Machine learning with force-field-inspired descriptors for materials: fast screening and mapping energy landscape. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 083801 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.083801 ↗
77. Meredig, B. et al. Combinatorial screening for new materials in unconstrained composition space with machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 89, 094104 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.89.094104 ↗
78. Himanen, L. et al. DScribe: Library of descriptors for machine learning in materials science. Comput. Phys. Commun. 247, 106949 (2020).10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106949 ↗
79. Krivovichev, S. V. Structural complexity of minerals: information storage and processing in the mineral world. Mineral. Mag. 77, 275–326 (2013).10.1180/minmag.2013.077.3.05 ↗
80. Yang, X. & Zhang, Y. Prediction of high-entropy stabilized solid-solution in multi-component alloys. Mater. Chem. Phys. 132, 233–238 (2012).10.1016/j.matchemphys.2011.11.021 ↗