Molecular descriptors for high-throughput virtual screening of fluorescence emitters with inverted singlet-triplet energy gaps
Source abstract
Abstract
The discovery of fluorescence materials with an inverted singlet-triplet (IST) energy gap, where the singlet excited state (S1) lies below the triplet excited state (T1), mark a transformative advancement in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) technology. However, designing the potential IST emitters are greatly challenging, and their IST energy gap, arising from double electron excitation, can only be accurately described by time-consuming post-Hartree-Fock (HF) methods, which blocks large-scale high-throughput screening speed. Here, we develop a four-orbital model to elucidate detailly the roles of double excitations in the IST formation, and establish two molecular descriptors (KS and $${O}_{{\rm{D}}}$$ ) based on exchange integral and molecular orbital energy. By these descriptors, we rapidly identify 41 IST candidates out of 3,486 molecules. The descriptors-aided approach achieves a screening success rate of 90% and reduces computational costs by 13 times compared to full post-HF calculations. Importantly, we predicted a series of excellent non-traditional near-infrared IST emitters from a dataset of 1028 compounds with emission wavelengths ranging from 852.2 to 1002.3 nm, which open new avenues for designing highly efficient near-infrared OLED materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Luminescence and Fluorescent Materials · Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. Hong, G. et al. Brief history of OLEDs-Emitter development and industry milestones. Adv. Mater. 33, 2005630 (2021).10.1002/adma.202005630 ↗
2. Gu, G. et al. High-external-quantum-efficiency organic light-emitting devices. Opt. Lett. 22, 396–398 (1997).10.1364/OL.22.000396 ↗
3. Shuai, Z. & Peng, Q. Organic light-emitting diodes: theoretical understanding of highly efficient materials and development of computational methodology. Natl. Sci. Rev. 4, 224–239 (2017).10.1093/nsr/nww024 ↗
4. Uoyama, H. et al. Highly efficient organic light-emitting diodes from delayed fluorescence. Nature 492, 234–238 (2012).10.1038/nature11687 ↗
5. Li, P., Feng, L., Li, G. & Bai, Q. Effects of electron donating ability of substituents and molecular conjugation on the electronic structures of organic radicals. Chem. Res. Chin. Univ. 39, 202–207 (2023).10.1007/s40242-023-2364-2 ↗
6. Murawski, C., Leo, K. & Gather, M. C. Efficiency roll-off in organic light-emitting diodes. Adv. Mater. 25, 6801–6827 (2013).10.1002/adma.201301603 ↗
7. de Silva, P. Inverted singlet-triplet gaps and their relevance to thermally activated delayed fluorescence. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 10, 5674–5679 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b02333 ↗
8. Ehrmaier, J. et al. Singlet-triplet inversion in heptazine and in polymeric carbon nitrides. J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 8099–8108 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpca.9b06215 ↗
9. Pollice, R., Friederich, P., Lavigne, C., Gomes, G. D. P. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Organic molecules with inverted gaps between first excited singlet and triplet states and appreciable fluorescence rates. Matter 4, 1654–1682 (2021).10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.017 ↗
10. Omar, O. H., Xie, X., Troisi, A. & Padula, D. Identification of unknown inverted singlet-triplet cores by high-throughput virtual screening. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 19790–19799 (2023).10.1021/jacs.3c05452 ↗
11. Pollice, R., Ding, B. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Rational design of organic molecules with inverted gaps between the first excited singlet and triplet. Matter 7, 1161–1186 (2024).10.1016/j.matt.2024.01.002 ↗
12. Aizawa, N. et al. Delayed fluorescence from inverted singlet and triplet excited states. Nature 609, 502–506 (2022).10.1038/s41586-022-05132-y ↗
13. Sancho-García, J. C. et al. Violation of Hund’s rule in molecules: predicting the excited-state energy inversion by TD-DFT with double-hybrid methods. J. Chem. Phys. 156, 034105 (2022).10.1063/5.0076545 ↗
14. Drwal, D. et al. Role of spin polarization and dynamic correlation in singlet-triplet gap inversion of heptazine derivatives. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 7606–7616 (2023).10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00781 ↗
15. Ghosh, S. & Bhattacharyya, K. Origin of the failure of density functional theories in predicting inverted singlet-triplet gaps. J. Phys. Chem. A 126, 1378–1385 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpca.1c10492 ↗
16. Blaskovits, J. T., Corminboeuf, C. & Garner, M. H. Excited-state Hund’s rule violations in bridged [10]- and [14] annulene perimeters. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 10404–10412 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpca.4c06726 ↗
17. Bedogni, M., Giavazzi, D., Maiolo, F. D. & Painelli, A. Shining light on inverted singlet-triplet emitters. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 902–913 (2024).10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01112 ↗
18. Sobolewski, A. L. & Domcke, W. Are heptazine-based organic light-emitting diode chromophores thermally activated delayed fluorescence or inverted singlet-triplet systems?. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 6852–6860 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01926 ↗
19. Ricci, G., Sancho-García, J.-C. & Olivier, Y. Establishing design strategies for emissive materials with an inverted singlet-triplet energy gap (INVEST): a computational perspective on how symmetry rules the interplay between triplet harvesting and light emission. J. Mater. Chem. C. 10, 12680–12698 (2022).10.1039/D2TC02508F ↗
20. Blaskovits, J. T., Garner, M. H. & Corminboeuf, C. Symmetry-induced singlet-triplet inversions in non-alternant hydrocarbons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 135, e202218156 (2023).10.1002/ange.202218156 ↗
21. Jorner, K., Pollice, R., Lavigne, C. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Ultrafast computational screening of molecules with inverted singlet-triplet energy gaps using the Pariser-Parr-Pople semiempirical quantum chemistry method. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 2445–2456 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpca.3c06357 ↗
22. Loos, P. F., Lipparini, F. & Jacquemin, D. Heptazine, cyclazine, and related compounds: chemically-accurate estimates of the inverted singlet-triplet gap. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14, 11069–11075 (2023).10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c03042 ↗
23. Hatakeyama, T. et al. Ultrapure blue thermally activated delayed fluorescence molecules: efficient HOMO-LUMO separation by the multiple resonance effect. Adv. Mater. 28, 2777–2781 (2016).10.1002/adma.201505491 ↗
24. Suresh, S. M., Hall, D., Beljonne, D., Olivier, Y. & Zysman-Colman, E. Multiresonant thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitters based on heteroatom-doped nanographenes: recent advances and prospects for organic light-emitting diodes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1908677 (2020).10.1002/adfm.201908677 ↗
25. RDKit. https://github.com/rdkit/rdkit.
26. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 16 Rev. C.01 (Gaussian, Inc., 2016).
27. Shao, Y. et al. Advances in molecular quantum chemistry contained in the Q-Chem 4 program package. Mol. Phys. 113, 184–215 (2015).10.1080/00268976.2014.952696 ↗
28. Neese, F. Software update: the ORCA program system-version 5.0. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 12, e1606 (2022).10.1002/wcms.1606 ↗
29. Lu, T. & Chen, F. Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580–592 (2012).10.1002/jcc.22885 ↗
30. Peng, Q., Yi, Y., Shuai, Z. & Shao, J. Toward quantitative prediction of molecular fluorescence quantum efficiency: role of Duschinsky rotation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 9333–9339 (2007).10.1021/ja067946e ↗
31. Peng, Q. et al. Theoretical predictions of red and near-infrared strongly emitting X-annulated rylenes. J. Chem. Phys. 134, 074510 (2011).10.1063/1.3549143 ↗
32. Shuai, Z. Thermal vibration correlation function formalism for molecular excited state decay rates. Chin. J. Chem. 38, 1223–1232 (2020).10.1002/cjoc.202000226 ↗
33. Goushi, K., Yoshida, K., Sato, K. & Adachi, C. Organic light-emitting diodes employing efficient reverse intersystem crossing for triplet-to-singlet state conversion. Nat. Photonics 6, 253–258 (2012).10.1038/nphoton.2012.31 ↗
34. Hilborn, R. C. Einstein coefficients, cross sections, f values, dipole moments, and all that. Am. J. Phys. 50, 982–986 (1982).10.1119/1.12937 ↗