Crystal structure prediction at finite temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Crystal structure prediction is a central problem of crystallography and materials science, which until mid-2000s was considered intractable. Several methods, based on either energy landscape exploration or, more commonly, global optimization, largely solved this problem and enabled fully non-empirical computational materials discovery. A major shortcoming is that, to avoid expensive calculations of the entropy, crystal structure prediction was done at zero Kelvin, reducing to the search for the global minimum of the enthalpy rather than the free energy. As a consequence, high-temperature phases (especially those which are not quenchable to zero temperature) could be missed. Here we develop an accurate and affordable solution, enabling crystal structure prediction at finite temperatures. Structure relaxation and fully anharmonic free energy calculations are done by molecular dynamics with a forcefield (which can be anything from a parametric forcefield for simpler cases to a trained on-the-fly machine learning interatomic potential), the errors of which are corrected using thermodynamic perturbation theory to yield accurate results with full ab initio accuracy. We illustrate this method by applications to metals (probing the P–T phase diagram of Al and Fe), a refractory covalent solid (WB), an Earth-forming silicate MgSiO3 (at pressures and temperatures of the Earth’s lower mantle), and ceramic oxide HfO2.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · High-pressure geophysics and materials · Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Glass, C. W., Oganov, A. R. & Hansen, N. USPEX—evolutionary crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 175, 713–720 (2006).10.1016/j.cpc.2006.07.020 ↗
2. Oganov, A. R., Lyakhov, A. O. & Valle, M. How evolutionary crystal structure prediction works—and why. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 227–237 (2011).10.1021/ar1001318 ↗
3. Lyakhov, A. O., Oganov, A. R., Stokes, H. T. & Zhu, Q. New developments in evolutionary structure prediction algorithm USPEX. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1172–1182 (2013).10.1016/j.cpc.2012.12.009 ↗
4. Pickard, C. J. & Needs, R. J. Ab initio random structure searching. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 23, 053201 (2011).10.1088/0953-8984/23/5/053201 ↗
5. Wang, Y., Lv, J., Zhu, L. & Ma, Y. CALYPSO: a method for crystal structure prediction. Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2063–2070 (2012).10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.008 ↗
6. Saxena, S. K. et al. Synchrotron x-ray study of iron at high pressure and temperature. Science 269, 1703–1704 (1995).10.1126/science.269.5231.1703 ↗
7. Belonoshko, A. B., Ahuja, R. & Johansson, B. Stability of the body-centred-cubic phase of iron in the Earth’s inner core. Nature 424, 1032–1034 (2003).10.1038/nature01954 ↗
8. Tateno, S., Hirose, K., Ohishi, Y. & Tatsumi, Y. The structure of iron in earth’s inner core. Science 330, 359–361 (2010).10.1126/science.1194662 ↗
9. Vočadlo, L. et al. Possible thermal and chemical stabilization of body-centered-cubic iron in the Earth’s core. Nature 424, 536–539 (2003).10.1038/nature01829 ↗
10. Hrubiak, R., Meng, Y. & Shen, G. Experimental evidence of a body centered cubic iron at the Earth’s core condition. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1804/1804.05109.pdf (2018).
11. Murakami, M., Hirose, K., Kawamura, K., Sata, N. & Ohishi, Y. Post-perovskite phase transition in MgSiO3. Science 304, 855–858 (2004).10.1126/science.1095932 ↗
12. Oganov, A. R. & Ono, S. Theoretical and experimental evidence for a post-perovskite phase of MgSiO3 in Earth’s D″ layer. Nature 430, 445–448 (2004).10.1038/nature02701 ↗
13. Tsuchiya, T., Tsuchiya, J., Umemoto, K. & Wentzcovitch, R. M. Phase transition in MgSiO3 perovskite in the earth’s lower mantle. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 224, 241–248 (2004).10.1016/j.epsl.2004.05.017 ↗
14. Ono, S. & Oganov, A. R. In situ observations of phase transition between perovskite and CaIrO3-type phase in MgSiO3 and pyrolitic mantle composition. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 236, 914–932 (2005).10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.001 ↗
15. Tateno, S., Hirose, K., Sata, N. & Ohishi, Y. Determination of post-perovskite phase transition boundary up to 4400 K and implications for thermal structure in D″ layer. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 277, 130–136 (2009).10.1016/j.epsl.2008.10.004 ↗
16. Francia, N. F., Price, L. S., Nyman, J., Price, S. L. & Salvalaglio, M. Systematic finite-temperature reduction of crystal energy landscapes. Cryst. Growth Des. 20, 6847–6862 (2020).10.1021/acs.cgd.0c00918 ↗
17. Oganov, A. R. Crystal structure prediction: reflections on present status and challenges. Faraday Discuss. 211, 643–660 (2018).10.1039/C8FD90033G ↗
18. Belonoshko, A. B. et al. High-pressure melting of MgSiO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 195701 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.195701 ↗
19. Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
20. Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
21. Shapeev, A. V. Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).10.1137/15M1054183 ↗
22. Li, Z., Kermode, J. R. & de Vita, A. Molecular dynamics with on-the-fly machine learning of quantum-mechanical forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096405 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.096405 ↗
23. Kruglov, I., Sergeev, O., Yanilkin, A. & Oganov, A. R. Energy-free machine learning force field for aluminum. Sci. Rep. 7, 8512 (2017).10.1038/s41598-017-08455-3 ↗
24. Byggmästar, J., Hamedani, A., Nordlund, K. & Djurabekova, F. Machine-learning interatomic potential for radiation damage and defects in tungsten. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144105 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144105 ↗
25. Dragoni, D., Daff, T. D., Csányi, G. & Marzari, N. Achieving DFT accuracy with a machine-learning interatomic potential: thermomechanics and defects in bcc ferromagnetic iron. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 013808 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.013808 ↗
26. Liu, Ybin et al. Machine learning interatomic potential developed for molecular simulations on thermal properties of β-Ga2O3. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 144501 (2020).10.1063/5.0027643 ↗
27. Liu, H., Qian, X., Bao, H., Zhao, C. Y. & Gu, X. High-temperature phonon transport properties of SnSe from machine-learning interatomic potential. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33, 405401 (2021).10.1088/1361-648X/ac13fd ↗
28. Pun, G. P. P., Yamakov, V., Hickman, J., Glaessgen, E. H. & Mishin, Y. Development of a general-purpose machine-learning interatomic potential for aluminum by the physically informed neural network method. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 113807 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.113807 ↗
29. Podryabinkin, E. V., Tikhonov, E. V., Shapeev, A. V. & Oganov, A. R. Accelerating crystal structure prediction by machine-learning interatomic potentials with active learning. Phys. Rev. B 99, 064114 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.064114 ↗
30. Artrith, N., Morawietz, T. & Behler, J. High-dimensional neural-network potentials for multicomponent systems: applications to zinc oxide. Phys. Rev. B 83, 153101 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.153101 ↗
31. Behler, J. Representing potential energy surfaces by high-dimensional neural network potentials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 26, 183001 (2014).10.1088/0953-8984/26/18/183001 ↗
32. Szlachta, W. J., Bartók, A. P. & Csányi, G. Accuracy and transferability of Gaussian approximation potential models for tungsten. Phys. Rev. B 90, 104108 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.104108 ↗
33. Dolgirev, P. E., Kruglov, I. A. & Oganov, A. R. Machine learning scheme for fast extraction of chemically interpretable interatomic potentials. AIP Adv. 6, 085318 (2016).10.1063/1.4961886 ↗
34. Kruglov, I. A., Yanilkin, A., Oganov, A. R. & Korotaev, P. Phase diagram of uranium from ab initio calculations and machine learning. Phys. Rev. B 100, 174104 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.174104 ↗
35. Podryabinkin, E. V. & Shapeev, A. V. Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 140, 171–180 (2017).10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.031 ↗
36. Zuo, Y. et al. A performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Phys. Chem. A https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 ↗
37. Korotaev, P., Novoselov, I., Yanilkin, A. & Shapeev, A. Accessing thermal conductivity of complex compounds by machine learning interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 100, 144308 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144308 ↗
38. Ladygin, V. V., Korotaev, P. Y., Yanilkin, A. V. & Shapeev, A. V. Lattice dynamics simulation using machine learning interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 172, 109333 (2020).10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109333 ↗
39. Novikov, I. S., Gubaev, K., Podryabinkin, E. V. & Shapeev, A. V. The MLIP package: moment tensor potentials with MPI and active learning. Machine Learn. Sci. Technol. 2, 025002 (2020).10.1088/2632-2153/abc9fe ↗
40. Straatsma, T. P. & Berendsen, H. J. C. Free energy of ionic hydration: analysis of a thermodynamic integration technique to evaluate free energy differences by molecular dynamics simulations. J. Chem. Phys. 89, 5876–5886 (1988).10.1063/1.455539 ↗
41. Freitas, R., Asta, M. & de Koning, M. Nonequilibrium free-energy calculation of solids using LAMMPS. Comput Mater. Sci. 112, 333–341 (2016).10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.10.050 ↗
42. Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz. E.M. Course of theoretical physics. Elsevier, 2013.
43. Hirose, K., Sinmyo, R., Sata, N. & Ohishi, Y. Determination of post-perovskite phase transition boundary in MgSiO3 using Au and MgO pressure standards. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L01310 (2006).10.1029/2005GL024468 ↗
44. Kvashnin, A. G. & Samtsevich, A. I. Phase transitions in tungsten monoborides. JETP Lett. 111, 343–349 (2020).10.1134/S0021364020060041 ↗
45. Portnoi, K. I., Romashov, V. M., Levinskii, Y. V. & Romanovich, I. V. Phase diagram of the system tungsten-boron. Sov. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 6, 398–402 (1967).10.1007/BF00775398 ↗
46. Rudy, E. Experimental phase equilibria of selected binary, ternary, and higher order systems. Part 5. the Phase Diagram W-B-C. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA472013 (1970).10.21236/AD0713154 ↗
47. Sjostrom, T., Crockett, S. & Rudin, S. Multiphase aluminum equations of state via density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 94, 144101 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.94.144101 ↗
48. Tambe, M. J., Bonini, N. & Marzari, N. Bulk aluminum at high pressure: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B Condens Matter Mater. Phys. 77, 172102 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.77.172102 ↗
49. Kudasov, Y. B. et al. Lattice dynamics and phase diagram of aluminum at high temperatures. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. 117, 664–671 (2013).10.1134/S1063776113100038 ↗
50. Akahama, Y., Nishimura, M., Kinoshita, K., Kawamura, H. & Ohishi, Y. Evidence of a fcc-hcp transition in aluminum at multimegabar pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 045505 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.045505 ↗
51. Grigoriev, I. & Meilikhov, E. Handbook of Physical Quantities (November 25, 1996 ed.) (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1991
52. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, United States, 1996).
53. Boehler, R. & Ross, M. Melting curve of aluminum in a diamond cell to 0.8 Mbar: implications for iron. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 153, 223–227 (1997).10.1016/S0012-821X(97)00188-X ↗
54. Oganov, A. R., Brodholt, J. P. & Price, G. D. Comparative study of quasiharmonic lattice dynamics, molecular dynamics and Debye model applied to MgSiO3 perovskite. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 122, 277–288 (2000).10.1016/S0031-9201(00)00197-7 ↗
55. Böscke, T. S., Müller, J., Bräuhaus, D., Schröder, U. & Böttger, U. Ferroelectricity in hafnium oxide thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 102903 (2011).10.1063/1.3634052 ↗
56. Ohtaka, O. et al. Phase relations and volume changes of hafnia under high pressure and high temperature. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 84, 1369–1373 (2001).10.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00843.x ↗
57. Hyuk Park, M. et al. Ferroelectricity and antiferroelectricity of doped thin HfO2-based films. Adv. Mater. 27, 1811–1831 (2015).10.1002/adma.201404531 ↗
58. Huan, T. D., Sharma, V., Rossetti, G. A. & Ramprasad, R. Pathways towards ferroelectricity in hafnia. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 90, 064111 (2014).10.1103/PhysRevB.90.064111 ↗
59. Sang, X., Grimley, E. D., Schenk, T., Schroeder, U. & Lebeau, J. M. On the structural origins of ferroelectricity in HfO2 thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 162905 (2015).10.1063/1.4919135 ↗
60. Materlik, R., Kunneth, C. & Kersch, A. The origin of ferroelectricity in Hf1−xZrxO2: a computational investigation and a surface energy model. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 134109 (2015).10.1063/1.4916707 ↗
61. Batra, R., Huan, T. D., Jones, J. L., Rossetti, G. & Ramprasad, R. Factors favoring ferroelectricity in hafnia: a first-principles computational study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 121, 4139–4145 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11972 ↗
62. Sivaraman, G. et al. Machine-learned interatomic potentials by active learning: amorphous and liquid hafnium dioxide. NPJ Comput. Mater. 6, 1–8 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-00367-7 ↗
63. Verdi, C., Karsai, F., Liu, P., Jinnouchi, R. & Kresse, G. Thermal transport and phase transitions of zirconia by on-the-fly machine-learned interatomic potentials. NPJ Comput. Mater. 7, 1–9 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00630-5 ↗
64. Liu, P., Verdi, C., Karsai, F. & Kresse, G. Phase transitions of zirconia: machine-learned force fields beyond density functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 105, L060102 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L060102 ↗
65. Fan, S. et al. Vibrational fingerprints of ferroelectric HfO2. NPJ Quantum Mater. 7, 1–8 (2022).10.1038/s41535-021-00417-3 ↗
66. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).10.1103/PhysRevB.47.558 ↗
67. Kresse, G. & Hafner, J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251–14269 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251 ↗
68. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
69. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
70. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
71. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗