journal article·2019-03-01Open access

Adhesive behavior and detachment mechanisms of bacterial amyloid nanofibers

Ao Wang, Sinan Keten

npj Computational Materials· Volume 5· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Amyloid nanofibers, such as curli nanofibers, have proven capable of adhering strongly to abiotic surfaces. However, the adhesive performance of individual nanofibers and the dependence of this performance on physical properties remain to be characterized. We carried out coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to determine the detachment mechanisms of single amyloid fibers from surfaces. Taking a generic model inspired from the curli nanofiber subunit CsgA, we discover that the amyloid nanofibers can undergo three different peeling processes when pulled at a constant rate normal to the surface. Computational phase diagrams built from parametric studies indicate that strong nanofibers with high cohesive energy detach by peeling smoothly away from the substrate while weak fibers break prematurely. At intermediate ratios, hinge formation occurs and the work of peeling the nanofiber is twice the adhesive energy due to the additional energy required to bend the nanofiber during desorption. Varying the geometry of amyloid subunits revealed that the work of peeling decreases for thicker nanofibers, suggesting that the tape-like monomeric structure of amyloids may facilitate better adhesive performance. Our results demonstrate how the dimensions and adhesive and cohesive properties of the amyloid nanofibers can be optimized to resist mechanical peeling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials · Pickering emulsions and particle stabilization · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (67)

Show source-provided references
1. Larsen, P. et al. Amyloid adhesins are abundant in natural biofilms. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 3077–3090 (2007).10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01418.x ↗
2. Berne, C., Ellison, C. K., Ducret, A. & Brun, Y. V. Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 16, 616–627 (2018).10.1038/s41579-018-0057-5 ↗
3. Koli, P., Sudan, S., Fitzgerald, D., Adhya, S. & Kar, S. Conversion of commensal Escherichia coli K-12 to an invasive form via expression of a mutant histone-like protein. MBio 2, e00182–00111 (2011).10.1128/mBio.00263-11 ↗
4. Prigent-Combaret, C. et al. Complex regulatory network controls initial adhesion and biofilm formation in Escherichia coli via regulation of thecsgD gene. J. Bacteriol. 183, 7213–7223 (2001).10.1128/JB.183.24.7213-7223.2001 ↗
5. Nasr, A., Olsén, A., Sjöbring, U., Müller‐Esterl, W. & Björck, L. Assembly of human contact phase proteins and release of bradykinin at the surface of curli-expressing Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 20, 927–935 (1996).10.1111/j.1365-2958.1996.tb02534.x ↗
6. Herwald, H. et al. Activation of the contact-phase system on bacterial surfaces—a clue to serious complications in infectious diseases. Nat. Med. 4, 298 (1998).10.1038/nm0398-298 ↗
7. Olsén, A. et al. Identification of two protein-binding and functional regions of curli, a surface organelle and virulence determinant of Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 34568–34572 (2002).10.1074/jbc.M206353200 ↗
8. Austin, J. W., Sanders, G., Kay, W. W. & Collinson, S. K. Thin aggregative fimbriae enhance Salmonella enteritidis biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 162, 295–301 (1998).10.1111/j.1574-6968.1998.tb13012.x ↗
9. Pawar, D., Rossman, M. & Chen, J. Role of curli fimbriae in mediating the cells of enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli to attach to abiotic surfaces. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 418–425 (2005).10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02499.x ↗
10. Li, C., Adamcik, J. & Mezzenga, R. Biodegradable nanocomposites of amyloid fibrils and graphene with shape-memory and enzyme-sensing properties. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 421 (2012).10.1038/nnano.2012.62 ↗
11. Li, C., Bolisetty, S. & Mezzenga, R. Hybrid nanocomposites of gold single-crystal platelets and amyloid fibrils with tunable fluorescence, conductivity, and sensing properties. Adv. Mater. 25, 3694–3700 (2013).10.1002/adma.201300904 ↗
12. Li, C. et al. Amyloid-hydroxyapatite bone biomimetic composites. Adv. Mater. 26, 3207–3212 (2014).10.1002/adma.201306198 ↗
13. Nguyen, P. Q., Botyanszki, Z., Tay, P. K. R. & Joshi, N. S. Programmable biofilm-based materials from engineered curli nanofibres. Nat. Commun. 5, 4945 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5945 ↗
14. Zhong, C. et al. Strong underwater adhesives made by self-assembling multi-protein nanofibres. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 858 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2014.199 ↗
15. Zhang, T., Yuk, H., Lin, S., Parada, G. A. & Zhao, X. Tough and tunable adhesion of hydrogels: experiments and models. Acta Mech. Sin. 33, 543–554 (2017).10.1007/s10409-017-0661-z ↗
16. Yuk, H., Zhang, T., Lin, S., Parada, G. A. & Zhao, X. Tough bonding of hydrogels to diverse non-porous surfaces. Nat. Mater. 15, 190 (2016).10.1038/nmat4463 ↗
17. Meredith, H. J., Jenkins, C. L. & Wilker, J. J. Enhancing the adhesion of a biomimetic polymer yields performance rivaling commercial glues. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 3259–3267 (2014).10.1002/adfm.201303536 ↗
18. North, M. A., Del Grosso, C. A. & Wilker, J. J. High strength underwater bonding with polymer mimics of mussel adhesive proteins. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 7866–7872 (2017).10.1021/acsami.7b00270 ↗
19. Dorval Courchesne, Nm-M., Duraj-Thatte, A., Tay, P. K. R., Nguyen, P. Q. & Joshi, N. S. Scalable production of genetically engineered nanofibrous macroscopic materials via filtration. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 733–741 (2016).10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00437 ↗
20. Knowles, T. P. & Buehler, M. J. Nanomechanics of functional and pathological amyloid materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 469 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2011.102 ↗
21. Jain, N. et al. Inhibition of curli assembly and Escherichia coli biofilm formation by the human systemic amyloid precursor transthyretin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 114, 12184–12189 (2017).10.1073/pnas.1708805114 ↗
22. Qi, Q., Zhao, T.-X., An, B.-L., Liu, X.-Y. & Zhong, C. Self-assembly and morphological characterization of two-component functional amyloid proteins. Chin. Chem. Lett. 28, 1062–1068 (2017).10.1016/j.cclet.2016.12.008 ↗
23. Kalyoncu, E., Ahan, R. E., Olmez, T. T. & Seker, U. O. S. Genetically encoded conductive protein nanofibers secreted by engineered cells. RSC Adv. 7, 32543–32551 (2017).10.1039/C7RA06289C ↗
24. Barnhart, M. M. & Chapman, M. R. Curli biogenesis and function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 60, 131–147 (2006).10.1146/annurev.micro.60.080805.142106 ↗
25. Evans, M. L. & Chapman, M. R. Curli biogenesis: order out of disorder. Biochim. Et. Biophys. Acta 1843, 1551–1558 (2014).10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.09.010 ↗
26. Sleutel, M. et al. Nucleation and growth of a bacterial functional amyloid at single-fiber resolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 13, 902 (2017).10.1038/nchembio.2413 ↗
27. Oh, Y. J. et al. Curli mediate bacterial adhesion to fibronectin via tensile multiple bonds. Sci. Rep. 6, 33909 (2016).10.1038/srep33909 ↗
28. Tian, P. et al. Structure of a functional amyloid protein subunit computed using sequence variation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 22–25 (2014).10.1021/ja5093634 ↗
29. DeBenedictis, E., Ma, D. & Keten, S. Structural predictions for curli amyloid fibril subunits CsgA and CsgB. RSC Adv. 7, 48102–48112 (2017).10.1039/C7RA08030A ↗
30. DeBenedictis, E. P., Liu, J. & Keten, S. Adhesion mechanisms of curli subunit CsgA to abiotic surfaces. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600998 (2016).10.1126/sciadv.1600998 ↗
31. Zhang, Y., Wang, A., DeBenedictis, E. P. & Keten, S. Bending energy penalty enhances the adhesive strength of functional amyloid curli to surfaces. Nanotechnology 28, 464002 (2017).10.1088/1361-6528/aa8f72 ↗
32. Chen, H., Feng, X., Huang, Y., Huang, Y. & Rogers, J. A. Experiments and viscoelastic analysis of peel test with patterned strips for applications to transfer printing. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 61, 1737–1752 (2013).10.1016/j.jmps.2013.04.001 ↗
33. Kim, K. S. & Aravas, N. Elastoplastic analysis of the peel test. Int. J. Solids Struct. 24, 417–435 (1988).10.1016/0020-7683(88)90071-6 ↗
34. Suo, Z. & Hutchinson, J. W. Interface crack between two elastic layers. Int. J. Fract. 43, 1–18 (1990).10.1007/BF00018123 ↗
35. Gao, E. et al. Mechanical exfoliation of two-dimensional materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 115, 248–262 (2018).10.1016/j.jmps.2018.03.014 ↗
36. He, L., Yan, S., Li, B. & Chu, J. Directional adhesion behavior of a single elastic fiber. J. Appl. Phys. 112, 013516 (2012).10.1063/1.4733331 ↗
37. Mojdehi, A. R., Holmes, D. P. & Dillard, D. A. Friction of extensible strips: an extended shear lag model with experimental evaluation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 124, 125–134 (2017).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2017.06.021 ↗
38. Peng, Z. & Chen, S. The effect of geometry on the adhesive behavior of bio-inspired fibrils. Soft Matter 8, 9864–9869 (2012).10.1039/c2sm26390d ↗
39. Peng, Z., Chen, S. & Soh, A. Peeling behavior of a bio-inspired nano-film on a substrate. Int. J. Solids Struct. 47, 1952–1960 (2010).10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.03.035 ↗
40. Ponce, S., Bico, J. & Roman, B. Effect of friction on the peeling test at zero-degrees. Soft Matter 11, 9281–9290 (2015).10.1039/C5SM01203A ↗
41. Pugno, N. M. The theory of multiple peeling. Int. J. Fract. 171, 185–193 (2011).10.1007/s10704-011-9638-2 ↗
42. Putignano, C., Afferrante, L., Mangialardi, L. & Carbone, G. Equilibrium states and stability of pre-tensioned adhesive tapes. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 5, 1725 (2014).10.3762/bjnano.5.182 ↗
43. Qian, J., Lin, J., Xu, G.-K., Lin, Y. & Gao, H. Thermally assisted peeling of an elastic strip in adhesion with a substrate via molecular bonds. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 101, 197–208 (2017).10.1016/j.jmps.2017.01.007 ↗
44. Kierfeld, J. Force-induced desorption and unzipping of semiflexible polymers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 058302 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.058302 ↗
45. Seifert, U. & Lipowsky, R. Adhesion of vesicles. Phys. Rev. A 42, 4768 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevA.42.4768 ↗
46. Paul, T. J. et al. Structural and mechanical properties of amyloid beta fibrils: a combined experimental and theoretical approach. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 2758–2764 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01066 ↗
47. Adamcik, J. et al. Understanding amyloid aggregation by statistical analysis of atomic force microscopy images. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 423 (2010).10.1038/nnano.2010.59 ↗
48. Jordens, S., Isa, L., Usov, I. & Mezzenga, R. Non-equilibrium nature of two-dimensional isotropic and nematic coexistence in amyloid fibrils at liquid interfaces. Nat. Commun. 4, 1917 (2013).10.1038/ncomms2911 ↗
49. Choi, B., Yoon, G., Lee, S. W. & Eom, K. Mechanical deformation mechanisms and properties of amyloid fibrils. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 1379–1389 (2015).10.1039/C4CP03804E ↗
50. Choi, H., Lee, M., Park, H. S. & Na, S. The effect of structural heterogeneity on the conformation and stability of Aβ–tau mixtures. RSC Adv. 6, 52236–52247 (2016).10.1039/C6RA09467H ↗
51. Kim, J., Lee, M., Baek, I., Yoon, G. & Na, S. The mechanical response of hIAPP nanowires based on different bending direction simulations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 18493–18500 (2014).10.1039/C4CP02494J ↗
52. Tran, T.-T., Nguyen, P. H. & Derreumaux, P. Alzheimer’s disease: insights into amyloid fibril formation from lattice monte carlo simulations. Biophys. J. 110, 219a (2016).10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.1213 ↗
53. Xiao, Y. et al. Aβ (1–42) fibril structure illuminates self-recognition and replication of amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 499 (2015).10.1038/nsmb.2991 ↗
54. Gazit, E. A possible role for π-stacking in the self-assembly of amyloid fibrils. FASEB J. 16, 77–83 (2002).10.1096/fj.01-0442hyp ↗
55. Röder, K. & Wales, D. J. Energy landscapes for the aggregation of Aβ17–42. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 4018–4027 (2018).10.1021/jacs.7b12896 ↗
56. Yoon, G., Kwak, J., Kim, J. I., Na, S. & Eom, K. Mechanical characterization of amyloid fibrils using coarse-grained normal mode analysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 21, 3454–3463 (2011).10.1002/adfm.201002493 ↗
57. Yoon, G., Lee, M., Kim, J. I., Na, S. & Eom, K. Role of sequence and structural polymorphism on the mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils. PLoS ONE 9, e88502 (2014).10.1371/journal.pone.0088502 ↗
58. Knowles, T. P. et al. Role of intermolecular forces in defining material properties of protein nanofibrils. Science 318, 1900–1903 (2007).10.1126/science.1150057 ↗
59. Hu, B. et al. Polyphenol-binding amyloid fibrils self-assemble into reversible hydrogels with antibacterial activity. ACS nano 12, 3385–3396 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.7b08969 ↗
60. Jenkins, C. L., Meredith, H. J. & Wilker, J. J. Molecular weight effects upon the adhesive bonding of a mussel mimetic polymer. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 5091–5096 (2013).10.1021/am4009538 ↗
61. Matos-Pérez, C. R., White, J. D. & Wilker, J. J. Polymer composition and substrate influences on the adhesive bonding of a biomimetic, cross-linking polymer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9498–9505 (2012).10.1021/ja303369p ↗
62. Xuan, W. et al. Site-specific incorporation of a thioester containing amino acid into proteins. ACS Chem. Biol. 13, 578–581 (2018).10.1021/acschembio.7b00998 ↗
63. Heinzmann, C., Weder, C. & de Espinosa, L. M. Supramolecular polymer adhesives: advanced materials inspired by nature. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 342–358 (2016).10.1039/C5CS00477B ↗
64. Pfeifer, W., Lill, P., Gatsogiannis, C. & Saccà, B. Hierarchical assembly of DNA filaments with designer elastic properties. ACS nano 12, 44–45 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b06012 ↗
65. Marshall, K. E. et al. Hydrophobic, aromatic, and electrostatic interactions play a central role in amyloid fibril formation and stability. Biochemistry 50, 2061–2071 (2011).10.1021/bi101936c ↗
66. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33–38 (1996).10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
67. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗