journal article·2025-11-21Open access

Automated phase mapping of high-throughput X-ray diffraction data encoded with domain-specific materials science knowledge

Dongfang Yu, Sean Griesemer, Tzu-chen Liu, Chris Wolverton, Yizhou Zhu

npj Computational Materials· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Combinatorial synthesis and high-throughput characterization have become powerful tools to accelerate the discovery and design of novel materials. Correctly extracting information about the constituent phases and gaining materials insight from high-throughput X-ray diffraction data of combinatorial libraries is a crucial step in establishing the composition–structure–property relationship. Basic information includes the number, identity, and fraction of present phases in all the samples, while advanced information includes the lattice change, texture information, solid solution behavior, etc. Encoding domain-specific knowledge, such as crystallography, X-ray diffraction, thermodynamics, kinetics, and solid-state chemistry, into automated algorithms is crucial for the development of automated phase mapping algorithms. In this study, we present an unsupervised optimization-based solver to tackle the phase mapping challenge in high-throughput X-ray diffraction datasets. Besides leveraging robust fitting abilities of neural-network optimization algorithms, we integrated various material information, including first-principles calculated thermodynamic data, crystallography, X-ray diffraction, and texture into our automated solver. Our approach exhibits robust performance across multiple experimental datasets. We emphasize the importance of correctly integrating material information for automated solvers, contributing to the development of future automated characterization tools.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. Li, W., Liu, J. & Zhao, D. Mesoporous materials for energy conversion and storage devices. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16023 (2016).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.23 ↗
2. Wu, J., Lin, H., Moss, D. J., Loh, K. P. & Jia, B. Graphene oxide for photonics, electronics and optoelectronics. Nat. Rev. Chem. 7, 162–183 (2023).10.1038/s41570-022-00458-7 ↗
3. Ligon, S. C., Liska, R., Stampfl, J., Gurr, M. & Mülhaupt, R. Polymers for 3D printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem. Rev. 117, 10212–10290 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074 ↗
4. Yao, Y. et al. Carbothermal shock synthesis of high-entropy-alloy nanoparticles. Science 359, 1489–1494 (2018).10.1126/science.aan5412 ↗
5. Bruce, D. W., O’Hare, D. & Walton, R. I. Functional oxides (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).10.1002/9780470686072 ↗
6. Xiang, X.-D. et al. A combinatorial approach to materials discovery. Science 268, 1738–1740 (1995).10.1126/science.268.5218.1738 ↗
7. Ludwig, A. Discovery of new materials using combinatorial synthesis and high-throughput characterization of thin-film materials libraries combined with computational methods. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 70 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0205-0 ↗
8. John, M. & Gregoire, L. Z. J. A. H. Combinatorial synthesis for AI-driven materials discovery. Nat. Synth. 2, 493–504 (2023).10.1038/s44160-023-00251-4 ↗
9. Zhao, H. et al. A robotic platform for the synthesis of colloidal nanocrystals. Nat. Synth. 2, 505–514 (2023).10.1038/s44160-023-00250-5 ↗
10. Tabor, D. P. et al. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 5–20 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z ↗
11. Szymanski, N. J. et al. Adaptively driven X-ray diffraction guided by machine learning for autonomous phase identification. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 31 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-00984-y ↗
12. Potyrailo, R. A. & Takeuchi, I. Role of high-throughput characterization tools in combinatorial materials science. Measurement Sci. Technol. 16, 1 (2005).10.1088/0957-0233/16/1/001 ↗
13. Gregoire, J. M., Zhou, L. & Haber, J. A. Combinatorial synthesis for AI-driven materials discovery. Nat. Synth. 2, 493–504 (2023).10.1038/s44160-023-00251-4 ↗
14. Kusne, A. G. et al. On-the-fly closed-loop materials discovery via Bayesian active learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 5966 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-19597-w ↗
15. Holder, C. F. & Schaak, R. E. Tutorial on powder X-ray diffraction for characterizing nanoscale materials. ACS Nano 13, 7359–7365 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b05157 ↗
16. Waroquiers, D. et al. Statistical analysis of coordination environments in oxides. Chem. Mater. 29, 8346–8360 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02766 ↗
17. Toby, B. H. R factors in Rietveld analysis: how good is good enough? Powder Diffr 21, 67–70 (2006).10.1154/1.2179804 ↗
18. Choudhary, K. et al. Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 59 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00734-6 ↗
19. Gomes, C. P. et al. CRYSTAL: a multi-agent AI system for automated mapping of materials’ crystal structures. MRS Commun 9, 600–608 (2019).10.1557/mrc.2019.50 ↗
20. Stanev, V. et al. Unsupervised phase mapping of X-ray diffraction data by nonnegative matrix factorization integrated with custom clustering. npj Comput. Mater. 4, 43 (2018).10.1038/s41524-018-0099-2 ↗
21. Suram, S. K. et al. Automated phase mapping with AgileFD and its application to light absorber discovery in the V–Mn–Nb oxide system. ACS Combin. Sci. 19, 37–46 (2017).
22. Maffettone, P. M. et al. Crystallography companion agent for high-throughput materials discovery. Nat. Comput. Sci. 1, 290–297 (2021).10.1038/s43588-021-00059-2 ↗
23. Chen, D. et al. Automating crystal-structure phase mapping by combining deep learning with constraint reasoning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3, 812–822 (2021).10.1038/s42256-021-00384-1 ↗
24. Szymanski, N. J., Bartel, C. J., Zeng, Y., Tu, Q. & Ceder, G. Probabilistic deep learning approach to automate the interpretation of multi-phase diffraction spectra. Chem. Mater. 33, 4204–4215 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c01071 ↗
25. Wang, H. et al. Rapid Identification of X-ray diffraction patterns based on very limited data by interpretable convolutional neural networks. J. Chem. Inf. Model 60, 2004–2011 (2020).10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00020 ↗
26. Massuyeau, F. et al. Perovskite or not perovskite? A deep-learning approach to automatically identify new hybrid perovskites from X-ray diffraction patterns. Adv. Mater. 34, 2203879 (2022).10.1002/adma.202203879 ↗
27. Long, C. J., Bunker, D., Li, X., Karen, V. L. & Takeuchi, I. Rapid identification of structural phases in combinatorial thin-film libraries using x-ray diffraction and non-negative matrix factorization. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 103902 (2009).10.1063/1.3216809 ↗
28. Kusne, A. G., Keller, D., Anderson, A., Zaban, A. & Takeuchi, I. High-throughput determination of structural phase diagram and constituent phases using GRENDEL. Nanotechnology 26, 444002 (2015).10.1088/0957-4484/26/44/444002 ↗
29. Lee, J.-W., Park, W. B., Lee, J. H., Singh, S. P. & Sohn, K.-S. A deep-learning technique for phase identification in multiphase inorganic compounds using synthetic XRD powder patterns. Nat. Commun. 11, 86 (2020).10.1038/s41467-019-13749-3 ↗
30. Zheng, Y., Speller, R. & Griffiths, J. A novel method to remove the background from X-Ray diffraction signal. Phys. Med. Biol. 63, 6 (2018).10.1088/1361-6560/aaac9e ↗
31. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
32. Birkholz, M. Thin Film Analysis by X-Ray Scattering (John Wiley & Sons, 2006).10.1002/3527607595 ↗
33. Harris, G. B. X. Quantitative measurement of preferred orientation in rolled uranium bars. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci 43, 113–123 (1952).10.1080/14786440108520972 ↗
34. Chung, S. K., Shin, S. J., Andriiko, A. A. & Rudenok, P. V. Equilibrium phases in Mn–V–O system under ambient atmosphere. J. Mater. Res. 14, 2929–2932 (1999).10.1557/JMR.1999.0391 ↗
35. Li, Z. et al. Thermodynamic properties of MnV2O6 and Mn2V2O7 at high temperatures. J. Alloy. Compd. 1005, 175937 (2024).10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175937 ↗
36. Yan, Q. et al. Mn2V2O7: an earth abundant light absorber for solar water splitting. Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1401840 (2015).10.1002/aenm.201401840 ↗
37. Waring, J. & Roth, R. Phase equilibria in the system vanadium oxide-niobium oxide. J. Res. Natl Bur. Stand. Sect. A Phys. Chem 69, 119–129 (1965).10.6028/jres.069A.014 ↗
38. Börrnert, C., Carrillo-Cabrera, W., Simon, P. & Langbein, H. V2.38Nb10.7O32.7: a V2O5–Nb2O5 mixed oxide tunnel structure related to the tetragonal tungsten bronzes. J. Solid State Chem. 183, 1038–1045 (2010).10.1016/j.jssc.2010.02.018 ↗
39. Wolff, N., Klimm, D., Habicht, K. & Fritsch, K. Crystal growth and thermodynamic investigation of Bi2M2+O4 (M = Pd, Cu). CrystEngComm. 23, 3230–3238 (2021).10.1039/D1CE00220A ↗
40. Keskar, M., Krishnan, K., Sali, S. K. & Kannan, S. Phase diagram study of BaOBi2O3V2O5 system. J. Alloy. Compd 720, 483–487 (2017).10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.279 ↗
41. Golovkin, B. G. & Pakhnutova, N. G. BaO—CuO—V2O5 phase diagram. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem 40, 1120–1123 (1999).
42. Deljoo, B., Tan, H., Suib, S. L. & Aindow, M. Thermally activated structural transformations in manganese oxide nanoparticles under air and argon atmospheres. J. Mater. Sci 55, 7247–7258 (2020).10.1007/s10853-020-04525-6 ↗
43. Liao, J. H., Leroux, F., Piffard, Y., Guyomard, D. & Payen, C. Synthesis, structures, magnetic properties, and phase transition of manganese(II) divanadate: Mn2V2O7. J. Solid State Chem 121, 214–224 (1996).10.1006/jssc.1996.0030 ↗
44. Ament, S. E. et al. Multi-component background learning automates signal detection for spectroscopic data. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 77 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0213-0 ↗
45. Gregoire, J. M. et al. High-throughput synchrotron X-ray diffraction for combinatorial phase mapping. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 21, 1262–1268 (2014).10.1107/S1600577514016488 ↗
46. Ong, S. P. et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source Python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
47. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
48. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
49. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗