journal article·2025-06-06Open access

Unveiling hydrogen chemical states in supersaturated amorphous alumina via machine learning-driven atomistic modeling

Simon Gramatte, Olivier Politano, Noel Jakse, Claudia Cancellieri, Ivo Utke, Lars P. H. Jeurgens, Vladyslav Turlo

npj Computational Materials· Volume 11· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Advancing hydrogen-based technologies requires detailed characterization of hydrogen chemical states in amorphous materials. As experimental probing of hydrogen is challenging, interpretation in amorphous systems demands accurate structural models. Guided by experiments on atomic layer deposited alumina, a fast atomistic simulation technique is introduced using an ab initio-based machine learning interatomic potential to generate amorphous structures with realistic hydrogen contents. As such, the annealing of highly defective crystalline hydroxide structures at atomic layer deposition temperatures reproduces experimental density and structure, enabling accurate prediction of Al Auger parameter chemical shifts. Our analysis shows that higher hydrogen content favors OH ligands, whereas lower hydrogen content leads to diverse chemical states and hydrogen bonding, consistent with charge density and partial Bader charge calculations. Our approach offers a robust route to link hydrogen content with experimentally accessible chemical shifts, aiding the design of next-generation hydrogen-related materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Semiconductor materials and devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Nemanič, V. Hydrogen permeation barriers: Basic requirements, materials selection, deposition methods, and quality evaluation. Nucl. Mater. Energy 19, 451–457 (2019).10.1016/j.nme.2019.04.001 ↗
2. Khosravanian, A. et al. Grand canonical Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations of the structural properties, diffusion and adsorption of hydrogen molecules through poly(benzimidazoles)/nanoparticle oxides composites. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 2803–2816 (2018).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.122 ↗
3. Hankoy, M. et al. Enhancing the hydrogen permeation of alumina composite porous membranes via graphene oxide addition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 48, 1380–1390 (2023).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.10.027 ↗
4. Wei, Y., Yang, W. & Yang, Z. An excellent universal catalyst support-mesoporous silica: Preparation, modification and applications in energy-related reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47, 9537–9565 (2022).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.048 ↗
5. He, G. et al. Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution of nanoporous CoFe2O4 and NiFe2O4 for water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 46, 5369–5377 (2021).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.11.107 ↗
6. Wang, Y. et al. Crystalline-to-amorphous transformation of tantalum-containing oxides for a superior performance in unassisted photocatalytic water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 21006–21015 (2017).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.064 ↗
7. Qin, M., Hu, Q. & Cheng, Y. F. Passivation of X80 pipeline steel in a carbonate/bicarbonate solution and the effect of oxide film on hydrogen atom permeation into the steel. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 70, 1–9 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.05.115 ↗
8. Huang, F. et al. Effect of sulfide films formed on X65 steel surface on hydrogen permeation in H2S environments. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 4561–4570 (2017).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.130 ↗
9. Ohaeri, E., Eduok, U. & Szpunar, J. Hydrogen related degradation in pipeline steel: a review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 43, 14584–14617 (2018).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.064 ↗
10. Li, Y. et al. Mechanism and evaluation of hydrogen permeation barriers: a critical review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62, 15752–15773 (2023).10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02259 ↗
11. Plutnar, J. & Pumera, M. Applications of atomic layer deposition in design of systems for energy conversion. Small 17, 2102088 (2021).10.1002/smll.202102088 ↗
12. Karimzadeh, S., Safaei, B., Yuan, C. & Jen, T.-C. Emerging atomic layer deposition for the development of high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6, 24 (2023).10.1007/s41918-023-00192-8 ↗
13. Meng, X. Atomic and molecular layer deposition in pursuing better batteries. J. Mater. Res. 36, 2–25 (2021).10.1557/s43578-020-00054-9 ↗
14. Nilsen, O., Gandrud, K. B., Amund, R. & Helmer, F. Atomic layer deposition for thin-film lithium-ion batteries. In: Atomic layer deposition in energy conversion applications, 183–207, https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527694822.ch6 (Wiley, 2017).10.1002/9783527694822.ch6 ↗
15. Guerra-Nuñez, C., Park, H. G. & Utke, I. Atomic Layer Deposition for Surface and Interface Engineering in Nanostructured Photovoltaic Devices. In: Atomic Layer Deposition in Energy Conversion Applications, 119–148, https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527694822.ch4 (Wiley, 2017).10.1002/9783527694822.ch4 ↗
16. Gupta, B. et al. Recent advances in materials design using atomic layer deposition for energy applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2109105 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202109105 ↗
17. Xing, Z. et al. Atomic layer deposition of metal oxides in perovskite solar cells: present and future. Small Methods 4, 2000588 (2020).10.1002/smtd.202000588 ↗
18. Shen, C., Yin, Z., Collins, F. & Pinna, N. Atomic layer deposition of metal oxides and chalcogenides for high performance transistors. Adv. Sci. 9, 2104599 (2022).10.1002/advs.202104599 ↗
19. Choi, A. R. et al. Review of material properties of oxide semiconductor thin films grown by atomic layer deposition for next-generation 3D dynamic random-access memory devices. Chem. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02223 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02223 ↗
20. O’Neill, B. J. et al. Catalyst design with atomic layer deposition. ACS Catal. 5, 1804–1825 (2015).10.1021/cs501862h ↗
21. Singh, J. A., Yang, N. & Bent, S. F. Nanoengineering heterogeneous catalysts by atomic layer deposition. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 8, 41–62 (2017).10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101547 ↗
22. Marichy, C. & Pinna, N. Atomic layer deposition to materials for gas sensing applications. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1600335 (2016).10.1002/admi.201600335 ↗
23. Graniel, O., Weber, M., Balme, S., Miele, P. & Bechelany, M. Atomic layer deposition for biosensing applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 122, 147–159 (2018).10.1016/j.bios.2018.09.038 ↗
24. Weber, M., Julbe, A., Ayral, A., Miele, P. & Bechelany, M. Atomic layer deposition for membranes: basics, challenges, and opportunities. Chem. Mater. 30, 7368–7390 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02687 ↗
25. Behroozi, A. H., Vatanpour, V., Meunier, L., Mehrabi, M. & Koupaie, E. H. Membrane fabrication and modification by atomic layer deposition: processes and applications in water treatment and gas separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 13825–13843 (2023).
26. Gong, N. et al. Atomic layer deposition of Al2O3 thin films for corrosion protections of additive manufactured and wrought stainless steels 316L. Mater. Lett. 331, 133434 (2023).10.1016/j.matlet.2022.133434 ↗
27. Santinacci, L. Atomic layer deposition: an efficient tool for corrosion protection. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 63, 101674 (2023).10.1016/j.cocis.2022.101674 ↗
28. Johnson, R. W., Hultqvist, A. & Bent, S. F. A brief review of atomic layer deposition: from fundamentals to applications. Mater. Today 17, 236–246 (2014).10.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.026 ↗
29. George, S., Pandit, P. & Gupta, A. B. Residual aluminium in water defluoridated using activated alumina adsorption - modeling and simulation studies. Water Res. 44, 3055–3064 (2010).10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.028 ↗
30. Detavernier, C., Dendooven, J., Pulinthanathu Sree, S., Ludwig, K. F. & Martens, J. A. Tailoring nanoporous materials by atomic layer deposition. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 5242–5253 (2011).10.1039/c1cs15091j ↗
31. Keuter, T. et al. Modeling precursor diffusion and reaction of atomic layer deposition in porous structures. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vacuum Surfaces Film. 33, 01A104 (2015).10.1116/1.4892385 ↗
32. Zhang, J., Li, Y., Cao, K. & Chen, R. Advances in atomic layer deposition. Nanomanufacturing Metrol. 5, 191–208 (2022).10.1007/s41871-022-00136-8 ↗
33. Lim, B. S., Rahtu, A. & Gordon, R. G. Atomic layer deposition of transition metals. Nat. Mater. 2, 749–754 (2003).10.1038/nmat1000 ↗
34. Kim, K. et al. Selective metal deposition at graphene line defects by atomic layer deposition. Nat. Commun. 5, 4781 (2014).10.1038/ncomms5781 ↗
35. Ritala, M. et al. Atomic layer deposition of oxide thin films with metal alkoxides as oxygen sources. Science 288, 319–321 (2000).10.1126/science.288.5464.319 ↗
36. Ponraj, J. S., Attolini, G. & Bosi, M. Review on atomic layer deposition and applications of oxide thin films. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 38, 203–233 (2013).10.1080/10408436.2012.736886 ↗
37. Macco, B. & Kessels, W. M. M. E. Atomic layer deposition of conductive and semiconductive oxides. Appl. Phys. Rev. 9, 41313 (2022).10.1063/5.0116732 ↗
38. Sønsteby, H. H., Fjellvåg, H. & Nilsen, O. Functional perovskites by atomic layer deposition - an overview. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 4, 1600903 (2017).10.1002/admi.201600903 ↗
39. Mackus, A. J. M., Schneider, J. R., MacIsaac, C., Baker, J. G. & Bent, S. F. Synthesis of doped, ternary, and quaternary materials by atomic layer deposition: a review. Chem. Mater. 31, 1142–1183 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02878 ↗
40. Hao, W., Marichy, C. & Journet, C. Atomic layer deposition of stable 2D materials. 2D Mater. 6, 12001 (2018).10.1088/2053-1583/aad94f ↗
41. Guerra-Nuñez, C., Döbeli, M., Michler, J. & Utke, I. Reaction and growth mechanisms in Al2O3 deposited via atomic layer deposition: elucidating the hydrogen source. Chem. Mater. 29, 8690–8703 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b02759 ↗
42. Cancellieri, C. et al. Effect of hydrogen on the chemical state, stoichiometry and density of amorphous Al2O3 films grown by thermal atomic layer deposition. Surf. Interface Anal. 56, 293–304 (2024).10.1002/sia.7282 ↗
43. Ruoho, M. et al. Thin-film engineering of mechanical fragmentation properties of atomic-layer-deposited metal oxide. Nanomaterials 10, 558 (2020).10.3390/nano10030558 ↗
44. Schneider, J. M., Larsson, K., Lu, J., Olsson, E. & Hjörvarsson, B. Role of hydrogen for the elastic properties of alumina thin films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1144–1146 (2002).10.1063/1.1448389 ↗
45. Kim, S. et al. Influence of growth temperature on dielectric strength of Al2O3 thin films prepared via atomic layer deposition at low temperature. Sci. Rep. 12, 5124 (2022).10.1038/s41598-022-09054-7 ↗
46. Gorham, C. S., Gaskins, J. T., Parsons, G. N., Losego, M. D. & Hopkins, P. E. Density dependence of the room temperature thermal conductivity of atomic layer deposition-grown amorphous alumina (Al2O3). Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 253107 (2014).10.1063/1.4885415 ↗
47. Moretti, G. Auger parameter shifts in the case of the non-local screening mechanism: applications of the electrostatic model to molecules, solids and adsorbed species. Surf. Interface Anal. 17, 352–356 (1991).10.1002/sia.740170610 ↗
48. Jeurgens, L., Sloof, W., Tichelaar, F. & Mittemeijer, E. Thermodynamic stability of amorphous oxide films on metals: Application to aluminum oxide films on aluminum substrates. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 62, 4707–4719 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevB.62.4707 ↗
49. Snijders, P. C., Jeurgens, L. P. H. & Sloof, W. G. Structural ordering of ultra-thin, amorphous aluminium-oxide films. Surf. Sci. 589, 98–105 (2005).10.1016/j.susc.2005.05.051 ↗
50. Reichel, F., Jeurgens, L. P. H. H., Richter, G. & Mittemeijer, E. J. Amorphous versus crystalline state for ultrathin Al2O3 overgrowths on Al substrates. J. Appl. Phys. 103, 093515 (2008).10.1063/1.2913505 ↗
51. Wang, J., Yu, Y. H., Lee, S. C. & Chung, Y. W. Tribological and optical properties of crystalline and amorphous alumina thin films grown by low-temperature reactive magnetron sputter-deposition. Surf. Coatings Technol. 146-147, 189–194 (2001).10.1016/S0257-8972(01)01387-1 ↗
52. Angarita, G., Palacio, C., Trujillo, M. & Arroyave, M. Synthesis of Alumina Thin Films Using Reactive Magnetron Sputtering Method. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 850, 1–4 (2017).10.1088/1742-6596/850/1/012022 ↗
53. Hu, Z., Shi, J. & Heath Turner, C. Molecular dynamics simulation of the Al2O3 film structure during atomic layer deposition. Mol. Simul. 35, 270–279 (2009).10.1080/08927020802468372 ↗
54. Pugliese, A. et al. Atomic-layer-deposited aluminum oxide thin films probed with X-ray scattering and compared to molecular dynamics and density functional theory models. ACS Omega 7, 41033–41043 (2022).10.1021/acsomega.2c04402 ↗
55. Christie, J. K. Review: understanding the properties of amorphous materials with high-performance computing methods. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 381, 20220251 (2023).10.1098/rsta.2022.0251 ↗
56. Gramatte, S., Turlo, V. & Politano, O. Do we really need machine learning interatomic potentials for modeling amorphous metal oxides? Case study on amorphous alumina by recycling an existing ab initio database. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 32, 45010 (2024).10.1088/1361-651X/ad39ff ↗
57. Strand, J. & Shluger, A. L. On the structure of oxygen deficient amorphous oxide films. Adv. Sci. 2306243, 1–14 (2023).
58. Li, W., Ando, Y. & Watanabe, S. Effects of density and composition on the properties of amorphous alumina: A high-dimensional neural network potential study. J. Chem. Phys.153, 164119 (2020).10.1063/5.0026289 ↗
59. Takamoto, S. et al. Towards universal neural network potential for material discovery applicable to arbitrary combination of 45 elements. Nat. Commun. 13, 2991 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-30687-9 ↗
60. Wefers, K. & Misra, C. Oxides and hydroxides of aluminum. Alcoa Tech. Pap. 19, 1–100 (1987).
61. Dupree, R., Farnan, I., Forty, A. J., El-Mashri, S. & Bottyan, L. A mass NMR study of the structure of amorphous alumina films. Le J. Phys. Colloq. 46, C8–113–C8–117 (1985).
62. Poe, B. T., McMillan, P. F., Cote, B., Massiot, D. & Coutures, J. P. Silica-alumina liquids: in-situ study by high-temperature aluminum-27 NMR spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 8220–8224 (1992).10.1021/j100200a005 ↗
63. Ansell, S. et al. Structure of liquid aluminum oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 464–466 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.464 ↗
64. Cui, J. et al. Aluminum oxide thin films from aqueous solutions: insights from solid-state NMR and dielectric response. Chem. Mater. 30, 7456–7463 (2018).10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b05078 ↗
65. Gutiérrez, G., Belonoshko, A. B., Ahuja, R. & Johansson, B. Structural properties of liquid Al2O3 A molecular dynamics study. Phys. Rev. E Stat. Phys. Plasmas Fluids Relat. Interdiscip. Top. 61, 2723–2729 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevE.61.2723 ↗
66. Landron, C. et al. Liquid alumina: detailed atomic coordination determined from neutron diffraction data using empirical potential structure refinement. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4839–4842 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4839 ↗
67. Gramatte, S. et al. Atomistic simulations of the crystalline-to-amorphous transformation of gamma-Al2O3 nanoparticles: delicate interplay between lattice distortions, stresses, and space charges. Langmuir 39, 6301–6315 (2022).10.1021/acs.langmuir.2c03292 ↗
68. Snijders, P. C., Jeurgens, L. P. H. & Sloof, W. G. Structure of thin aluminium-oxide films determined from valence band spectra measured using XPS. Surf. Sci. 496, 97–109 (2002).10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01591-6 ↗
69. Yamaguchi, G., Yasui, I. & Chiu, W.-C. A new method of preparing theta-alumina and the interpretation of its X-Ray-powder diffraction pattern and electron diffraction pattern. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 43, 2487–2491 (1970).10.1246/bcsj.43.2487 ↗
70. Young, M. J. et al. Probing the atomic-scale structure of amorphous aluminum oxide grown by atomic layer deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 22804–22814 (2020).10.1021/acsami.0c01905 ↗
71. Guo, Z., Ambrosio, F. & Pasquarello, A. Extrinsic defects in amorphous oxides: hydrogen, carbon, and nitrogen impurities in alumina. Phys. Rev. Appl. 11, 1 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevApplied.11.024040 ↗
72. Sundar, A., Yu, J., Qi, L. & Nedim Cinbiz, M. High temperature stability and transport characteristics of hydrogen in alumina via multiscale computation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 47, 32345–32357 (2022).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.07.123 ↗
73. Tessman, J. R., Kahn, A. H. & Shockley, W. Electronic polarizabilities of ions in crystals. Phys. Rev. 92, 890–895 (1953).10.1103/PhysRev.92.890 ↗
74. Jeurgens, L. P. H., Reichel, F., Frank, S., Richter, G. & Mittemeijer, E. J. On the development of long-range order in ultra-thin amorphous Al2O3 films upon their transformation into crystalline gamma-Al2O3. Surf. Interface Anal. 40, 259–263 (2008).10.1002/sia.2688 ↗
75. Shannon, R. D. & Fischer, R. X. Empirical electronic polarizabilities in oxides, hydroxides, oxyfluorides, and oxychlorides. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 73, 1–28 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevB.73.235111 ↗
76. van Gog, H. First-principles study of dehydration interfaces between diaspore and corundum, gibbsite and boehmite, and boehmite and γ-Al2O3: Energetic stability, interface charge effects, and dehydration defects. Appl. Surf. Sci. 541, 148501 (2021).10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148501 ↗
77. Belonoshko, A. B., Rosengren, A., Dong, Q., Hultquist, G. & Leygraf, C. First-principles study of hydrogen diffusion in alpha - Al2O3 and liquid alumina. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 69, 1–6 (2004).10.1103/PhysRevB.69.024302 ↗
78. Niemelä, J.-P. et al. Mechanical properties of atomic-layer-deposited Al2O3/Y2O3 nanolaminate films on aluminum toward protective coatings. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5, 6285–6296 (2022).10.1021/acsanm.2c00378 ↗
79. Edwards, T. E. J. et al. On the thinnest Al2O3 interlayers in Al-based nanolaminates to enhance strength, and the role of constraint. Acta Mater. 240, 118345 (2022).10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118345 ↗
80. Frankberg, E. J. et al. Highly ductile amorphous oxide at room temperature and high strain rate. Sci. (80-.). 366, 864–869 (2019).10.1126/science.aav1254 ↗
81. Lee, J.-S., Ji, J., Jeong, U. & Lee, B.-J. An atomistic simulation study on ductility of amorphous aluminum oxide. Acta Mater. 274, 119985 (2024).10.1016/j.actamat.2024.119985 ↗
82. Koo, J. et al. Evaluating mechanical properties of 100 nm-thick atomic layer deposited Al2O3 as a free-standing film. Scr. Mater. 187, 256–261 (2020).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.028 ↗
83. Li, X. et al. Review of hydrogen embrittlement in metals: hydrogen diffusion, hydrogen characterization, hydrogen embrittlement mechanism and prevention. Acta Metall. Sin. 33, 759–773 (2020).10.1007/s40195-020-01039-7 ↗
84. Yu, H. et al. Hydrogen embrittlement as a conspicuous material challenge –comprehensive review and future directions. Chem. Rev. 124, 6271–6392 (2024).10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00624 ↗
85. Roberts, R. M., Elleman, T. S., Hayne, P. & Verghese, K. Hydrogen permeability of sintered aluminum oxide. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 62, 495–499 (1979).10.1111/j.1151-2916.1979.tb19114.x ↗
86. Somjit, V. & Yildiz, B. Doping α-Al2O3 to reduce its hydrogen permeability: thermodynamic assessment of hydrogen defects and solubility from first principles. Acta Mater. 169, 172–183 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.02.031 ↗
87. Kronenberg, A., Castaing, J., Mitchell, T. & Kirby, S. Hydrogen defects in α-Al2O3 and water weakening of sapphire and alumina ceramics between 600 and 1000 °C I. Infrared characterization of defects. Acta Mater. 48, 1481–1494 (2000).10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00448-6 ↗
88. Zhao, H. et al. How solute atoms control aqueous corrosion of Al-alloys. Nat. Commun. 15, 561 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-44802-5 ↗
89. Gopalan, H. et al. Influence of electrochemical hydrogen charging on the mechanical, diffusional, and interfacial properties of an amorphous alumina coating on Fe-8 wt% Cr alloy. J. Mater. Res. 39, 1812–1821 (2024).10.1557/s43578-024-01348-y ↗
90. Ylivaara, O. M. et al. Aluminum oxide from trimethylaluminum and water by atomic layer deposition: The temperature dependence of residual stress, elastic modulus, hardness and adhesion. Thin Solid Films 552, 124–135 (2014).10.1016/j.tsf.2013.11.112 ↗
91. Liu, X. & He, D. Atomic layer deposited aluminium oxide membranes for selective hydrogen separation through molecular sieving. J. Memb. Sci. 662, 121011 (2022).10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121011 ↗
92. Aireddy, D. R., Yu, H., Cullen, D. A. & Ding, K. Elucidating the Roles of Amorphous Alumina Overcoat in Palladium-Catalyzed Selective Hydrogenation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 24290–24298 (2022).10.1021/acsami.2c02132 ↗
93. Thompson, A. P. et al. LAMMPS - a flexible simulation tool for particle-based materials modeling at the atomic, meso, and continuum scales. Comput. Phys. Commun. 271, 108171 (2022).10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108171 ↗
94. Asthagiri, D. N. & Beck, T. L. MD simulation of water using a rigid body description requires a small time step to ensure equipartition. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 368–374 (2024).10.1021/acs.jctc.3c01153 ↗
95. Jain, A. et al. A high-throughput infrastructure for density functional theory calculations. Comput. Mater. Sci. 50, 2295–2310 (2011).10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.02.023 ↗
96. Larsen, A. H. The atomic simulation environment - a python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2012).10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
97. Stukowski, A. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO-the Open Visualization Tool. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 18, 1–7 (2010).10.1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012 ↗
98. Takamoto, S. et al. Matlantis, software as a service style material discovery tool. https://matlantis.com.
99. Gramatte, S. et al. Effect of hydrogen on the local chemical bonding states and structure of amorphous alumina by atomistic and electrostatic modeling of auger parameter shifts, https://doi.org/10.24435/materialscloud:9v-61 (2024).10.24435/materialscloud:9v-61 ↗
100. Seeger, M. Gaussian processes for machine learning University of California at Berkeley. Int. J. Neural Syst. 14, 69–109 (2004).10.1142/S0129065704001899 ↗