journal article·2026-01-13Open access

Physically interpretable interatomic potentials via symbolic regression and reinforcement learning

Bilvin Varughese, Troy D. Loeffler, Suvo Banik, Aditya Koneru, Sukriti Manna, Karthik Balasubramanian, Rohit Batra, Mathew J. Cherukara, Orcun Yildiz, Tom Peterka, Bobby G. Sumpter, Subramanian K.R.S. Sankaranarayanan

npj Computational Materials· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

The development of next-generation molecular simulation models requires moving beyond predefined functional forms toward machine learning (ML) techniques that directly capture multiscale physics. Here, we demonstrate such an approach using symbolic regression (SR) with equation learner networks and a reinforcement learning search engine to derive interpretable equations for interatomic interactions. Training data were generated through nested ensemble sampling with density functional theory (DFT) energetics, spanning crystalline to highly disordered states. The optimization of the learner network employed continuous-action Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) combined with gradient descent, enabling efficient exploration of function space. For copper as a representative transition metal, an unconstrained search produced models that outperformed fixed-form Sutton–Chen EAM potentials. The SR-derived models (SR1 and SR2) reproduced key material properties—lattice constants, cohesive energies, equations of state, elastic constants, phonon dispersion, defect formation energies, surface/bulk energetics, and phase transformation with significantly improved accuracy. Furthermore, stringent melting simulations using two-phase solid-amorphous interfaces confirmed that SR models accurately capture the interplay of vibrational entropy, cohesive energy, and structural dynamics, surpassing SC-EAM in both qualitative and quantitative predictions. This highlights the potential of SR to deliver fast, accurate, flexible, and physically meaningful potentials, advancing predictive modeling across scales.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Quantum many-body systems · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, J., Koneru, A., Sankaranarayanan, S. K. & Lilley, C. M. Graph neural network guided evolutionary search of grain boundaries in 2d materials. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 15, 20520–20530 (2023).10.1021/acsami.3c01161 ↗
2. Zhang, J., Koneru, A., Sankaranarayanan, S. K. & Lilley, C. M. Evolutionary search and theoretical study of silicene grain boundaries’ mechanical properties. J. Phys. Chem. C. 128, 6019–6030 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c07294 ↗
3. Chakrabarti, B. et al. Nanoporous dielectric resistive memories using sequential infiltration synthesis. ACS Nano 15, 4155–4164 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.0c03201 ↗
4. Gogoi, A., Koneru, A. & Reddy, K. A. Effect of graphene oxide (go) nanosheet sizes, pinhole defects and non-ideal lamellar stacking on the performance of layered go membranes: an atomistic investigation. Nanoscale Adv. 1, 3023–3035 (2019).10.1039/C9NA00235A ↗
5. Chu-Jon, C. et al. From nonclassical to classical: crystallization seeds reshape nucleation mechanisms. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 20456–20465 (2025).10.1021/jacs.5c02580 ↗
6. Stillinger, F. H. & Weber, T. A. Computer simulation of local order in condensed phases of silicon. Phys. Rev. B 31, 5262 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevB.31.5262 ↗
7. Vashishta, P., Kalia, R. K., Rino, J. P. & Ebbsjö, I. Interaction potential for sio 2: A molecular-dynamics study of structural correlations. Phys. Rev. B 41, 12197 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.41.12197 ↗
8. Sutton, A. & Chen, J. Long-range finnis–sinclair potentials. Philos. Mag. Lett. 61, 139–146 (1990).10.1080/09500839008206493 ↗
9. Backman, M., Juslin, N. & Nordlund, K. Bond order potential for gold. Eur. Phys. J. B 85, 317 (2012).10.1140/epjb/e2012-30429-y ↗
10. Manna, S. et al. Learning in continuous action space for developing high dimensional potential energy models. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–10 (2022).10.1038/s41467-021-27849-6 ↗
11. Koneru, A. et al. Multi-reward reinforcement learning based bond-order potential to study strain-assisted phase transitions in phosphorene. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13, 1886–1893 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03551 ↗
12. Koneru, A. et al. Development and assessment of hierarchical multi-reward reinforcement learning based potential for silicene with state-of-the-art models. Mater. Today Adv. 26, 100583 (2025).10.1016/j.mtadv.2025.100583 ↗
13. Apostol, F. & Mishin, Y. Interatomic potential for the Al-Cu system. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 83, 054116 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevB.83.054116 ↗
14. Keith, J. A., Fantauzzi, D., Jacob, T. & Van Duin, A. C. Reactive forcefield for simulating gold surfaces and nanoparticles. Phys. Rev. B 81, 235404 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.235404 ↗
15. Liang, T. et al. Classical atomistic simulations of surfaces and heterogeneous interfaces with the charge-optimized many body (comb) potentials. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 74, 255–279 (2013).10.1016/j.mser.2013.07.001 ↗
16. Yu, J., Sinnott, S. B. & Phillpot, S. R. Charge optimized many-body potential for the si/ sio 2 system. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 75, 085311 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.75.085311 ↗
17. Koza, J. Genetic programming. On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection (Bradford, 1992).
18. Brown, W. M., Thompson, A. P. & Schultz, P. A. Efficient hybrid evolutionary optimization of interatomic potential models. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 024108 (2010).10.1063/1.3294562 ↗
19. Slepoy, A., Peters, M. & Thompson, A. Searching for globally optimal functional forms for interatomic potentials using genetic programming with parallel tempering. J. Comput. Chem. 28, 2465–2471 (2007).10.1002/jcc.20710 ↗
20. Kenoufi, A. & Kholmurodov, K. Symbolic regression of interatomic potentials via genetic programming. Biol. Chem. Res 2, 1–10 (2015).
21. Makarov, D. E. & Metiu, H. Fitting potential-energy surfaces: a search in the function space by directed genetic programming. J. Chem. Phys. 108, 590–598 (1998).10.1063/1.475421 ↗
22. Liu, P., Shi, Q., Daumé, H. & Voth, G. A. A bayesian statistics approach to multiscale coarse graining. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 214114 (2008).10.1063/1.3033218 ↗
23. Dequidt, A. & Solano Canchaya, J. G. Bayesian parametrization of coarse-grain dissipative dynamics models. J. Chem. Phys. 143, 084122 (2015).10.1063/1.4929557 ↗
24. McDonagh, J. L., Shkurti, A., Bray, D. J., Anderson, R. L. & Pyzer-Knapp, E. O. Utilizing machine learning for efficient parameterization of coarse grained molecular force fields. J. Chem. Inf. Modeling 59, 4278–4288 (2019).10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00646 ↗
25. Iype, E., Hütter, M., Jansen, A., Nedea, S. V. & Rindt, C. Parameterization of a reactive force field using a Monte Carlo algorithm. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 1143–1154 (2013).10.1002/jcc.23246 ↗
26. Cosseddu, S. & Infante, I. Force field parametrization of colloidal cdse nanocrystals using an adaptive rate Monte Carlo optimization algorithm. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 297–308 (2017).10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01089 ↗
27. Cawley, G. C. & Talbot, N. L. Preventing over-fitting during model selection via bayesian regularisation of the hyper-parameters. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 8, 841–861 (2007).
28. Wagner, N. & Rondinelli, J. M. Theory-guided machine learning in materials science. Front. Mater. 3, 28 (2016).10.3389/fmats.2016.00028 ↗
29. Koneru, A. et al. Ab initio-based bond order potential for arsenene polymorphs developed via hierarchical reinforcement learning. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 5752–5761 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpca.4c01040 ↗
30. Koneru, A. et al. Multi-reward reinforcement learning based development of inter-atomic potential models for silica. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 125 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-01074-9 ↗
31. Koneru, A. et al. Machine learning a simple interpretable short-range potential for silica. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 8665–8674 (2024).10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00639 ↗
32. Chan, H. et al. Machine learning coarse grained models for water. Nat. Commun. 10, 379 (2019).10.1038/s41467-018-08222-6 ↗
33. Zhang, X. et al. Multi-objective parametrization of interatomic potentials for large deformation pathways and fracture of two-dimensional materials. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 113 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00573-x ↗
34. Zuo, Y. et al. Performance and cost assessment of machine learning interatomic potentials. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 731–745 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpca.9b08723 ↗
35. Nyshadham, C. et al. Machine-learned multi-system surrogate models for materials prediction. npj Comput. Mater. 5, 51 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0189-9 ↗
36. Artrith, N., Urban, A. & Ceder, G. Efficient and accurate machine-learning interpolation of atomic energies in compositions with many species. Phys. Rev. B 96, 014112 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.014112 ↗
37. Shapeev, A. V. Moment tensor potentials: a class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul. 14, 1153–1173 (2016).10.1137/15M1054183 ↗
38. Huan, T. D. et al. A universal strategy for the creation of machine learning-based atomistic force fields. NPJ Comput. Mater. 3, 37 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0042-y ↗
39. Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
40. Varughese, B. et al. Active and transfer learning of high-dimensional neural network potentials for transition metals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 16, 20681–20692 (2024).
41. Bartók, A. P., Payne, M. C., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
42. Banik, S., Dutta, P. S., Manna, S. & Sankaranarayanan, S. K. Development of a machine learning potential to study the structure and thermodynamics of nickel nanoclusters. J. Phys. Chem. A 128, 10259–10271 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpca.4c04048 ↗
43. Thompson, A. P., Swiler, L. P., Trott, C. R., Foiles, S. M. & Tucker, G. J. Spectral neighbor analysis method for automated generation of quantum-accurate interatomic potentials. J. Comput. Phys. 285, 316–330 (2015).10.1016/j.jcp.2014.12.018 ↗
44. Drautz, R. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B 99, 014104 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevB.99.014104 ↗
45. Ortner, C. On the atomic cluster expansion: interatomic potentials and beyond. Preprint at arXiv:2308.06462 (2023).
46. Wang, G., Wang, E., Li, Z., Zhou, J. & Sun, Z. Exploring the mathematic equations behind the materials science data using interpretable symbolic regression. Interdiscip. Mater. 3, 637–657 (2024).10.1002/idm2.12180 ↗
47. Schmidt, M. & Lipson, H. Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data. Science 324, 81–85 (2009).10.1126/science.1165893 ↗
48. Udrescu, S.-M. & Tegmark, M. Ai feynman: a physics-inspired method for symbolic regression. Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2631 (2020).10.1126/sciadv.aay2631 ↗
49. Guo, Z., Hu, S., Han, Z.-K. & Ouyang, R. Improving symbolic regression for predicting materials properties with iterative variable selection. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 4945–4951 (2022).10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00281 ↗
50. Zhang, L., Hu, W., He, M. & Li, S. Optimizing photoelectrochemical photovoltage and stability of molecular interlayer-modified halide perovskite in water: insights from interpretable machine learning and symbolic regression. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 6, 5177–5187 (2023).10.1021/acsaem.2c04066 ↗
51. Tan, B., Liang, Y.-C., Chen, Q., Zhang, L. & Ma, J.-J. Discovery of a new criterion for predicting glass-forming ability based on symbolic regression and artificial neural network. J. Appl. Phys. 132, 125104 (2022).10.1063/5.0105445 ↗
52. Hernandez, A., Balasubramanian, A., Yuan, F., Mason, S. A. & Mueller, T. Fast, accurate, and transferable many-body interatomic potentials by symbolic regression. npj Comput.l Mater. 5, 112 (2019).10.1038/s41524-019-0249-1 ↗
53. Hernandez, A. & Mueller, T. Generalizability of functional forms for interatomic potential models discovered by symbolic regression. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 053804 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.053804 ↗
54. Parlinski, K., Li, Z. & Kawazoe, Y. First-principles determination of the soft mode in cubic zro 2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4063 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.4063 ↗
55. Togo, A., Chaput, L., Tadano, T. & Tanaka, I. Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 35, 353001 (2023).10.1088/1361-648X/acd831 ↗
56. Togo, A. First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023).10.7566/JPSJ.92.012001 ↗
57. Bernstein, N. From gap to ace to mace. Preprint at arXiv:2410.06354 (2024).
58. Jacobs, R. et al. A practical guide to machine learning interatomic potentials–status and future. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 35, 101214 (2025).10.1016/j.cossms.2025.101214 ↗
59. Martius, G. & Lampert, C. H. Extrapolation and learning equations. Preprint at arXiv:1610.02995 (2016).
60. Sahoo, S., Lampert, C. & Martius, G. Learning equations for extrapolation and control. In International Conference on Machine Learning 4442–4450 (PMLR, 2018).
61. Werner, M., Junginger, A., Hennig, P. & Martius, G. Informed equation learning. Preprint at arXiv:2105.06331 (2021).
62. Chen, G. Learning symbolic expressions via gumbel-max equation learner networks. Preprint at arXiv:2012.06921 (2020).
63. Loeffler, T. D., Patra, T. K., Chan, H., Cherukara, M. & Sankaranarayanan, S. K. Active learning the potential energy landscape for water clusters from sparse training data. J. Phys. Chem. C. 124, 4907–4916 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c00047 ↗
64. Loeffler, T. D. et al. Active learning a neural network model for gold clusters & bulk from sparse first principles training data. ChemCatChem 12, 4796–4806 (2020).10.1002/cctc.202000774 ↗
65. Nielsen, S. O. Nested sampling in the canonical ensemble: Direct calculation of the partition function from NVT trajectories. J. Chem. Phys.139, 124104 (2013).10.1063/1.4821761 ↗
66. Abdi, H. & Williams, L. J. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2, 433–459 (2010).10.1002/wics.101 ↗
67. Patra, T. K., Loeffler, T. D. & Sankaranarayanan, S. K. Accelerating copolymer inverse design using monte carlo tree search. Nanoscale 12, 23653–23662 (2020).10.1039/D0NR06091G ↗
68. Gilbert, J. C. & Nocedal, J. Global convergence properties of conjugate gradient methods for optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 2, 21–42 (1992).10.1137/0802003 ↗
69. Hohenberg, P. & Kohn, W. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
70. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
71. Simmons, G. & Wang, H. A Handbook of Single Crystal Elastic Constants and Calculated Aggregate Properties (MIT Press, 1971).
72. Branicio, P., Zhang, J. & Srolovitz, D. Effect of strain on the stacking fault energy of copper: a first-principles study. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 88, 064104 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.88.064104 ↗
73. Triftshäuser, W. & McGervey, J. Monovacancy formation energy in copper, silver, and gold by positron annihilation. Appl. Phys. 6, 177–180 (1975).10.1007/BF00883748 ↗
74. Chaturvedi, S., Verma, A., Sethi, S. K. & Ogata, S. in Forcefields for Atomistic-Scale Simulations:Materials and Applications (eds Verma, A., Rangappa, S. M., Ogata, S. & Siengchin, S.) Ch. 8 (Springer, 2022).