AIMATDESIGN: knowledge-augmented reinforcement learning for inverse materials design under data scarcity
Source abstract
Abstract
With the growing demand for novel materials, machine learning-driven inverse design methods face significant challenges in reconciling the high-dimensional materials composition space with limited experimental data. Existing approaches suffer from two major limitations: (I) machine learning models often lack reliability in high-dimensional spaces, leading to prediction biases during the design process; (II) these models fail to effectively incorporate domain expert knowledge, limiting their capacity to support knowledge-guided inverse design. To address these challenges, we present AIMATDESIGN, a reinforcement learning framework that augments experimental data via difference-based sampling to build a trusted experience pool. To enhance model reliability, an automated refinement strategy guided by large language models corrects prediction inconsistencies, ensuring better alignment between reward signals and value functions. Additionally, a knowledge-based reward further leverages expert rules to improve stability and efficiency. Experiments show that AIMATDESIGN outperforms conventional machine learning and reinforcement learning baselines in discovery efficiency, convergence speed, and success rates. From numerous candidates, experimental validation of Zr-based alloys yielded a bulk metallic glass with 1.7 GPa yield strength and 10.2% elongation, closely matching predictions. This framework demonstrates reliable performance in capturing property trends and provides a general pathway toward closed-loop, data-efficient materials discovery.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Block Copolymer Self-Assembly
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (68)
Show source-provided references
1. Field III, F., Clark, J. & Ashby, M. Market drivers for materials and process development in the 21st century. MRS Bull. 26, 716–725 (2001).10.1557/mrs2001.198 ↗
2. Capjon, J. Trial-and-Error-Based Innovation: Rapid materialisation as catalyser of perception and communication in design. In Futureground - DRS International Conference, Melbourne (eds Redmond, J., Durling, D. & de Bono, A.) (2004).10.21606/drs.2004.193 ↗
3. Kang, J., Zhang, X. & Wei, S.-H. Advances and challenges in DFT-based energy materials design. Chin. Phys. B 31, 107105 (2022).10.1088/1674-1056/ac89d7 ↗
4. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
5. Maier, W. F., Stoewe, K. & Sieg, S. Combinatorial and high-throughput materials science. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 46, 6016–6067 (2007).10.1002/anie.200603675 ↗
6. M. Dieb, T. et al. Mdts: automatic complex materials design using Monte Carlo tree search. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18, 498–503 (2017).10.1080/14686996.2017.1344083 ↗
7. Frazier, P.I. & Wang, J. Bayesian optimization for materials design. In Information Science for Materials Discovery and Design. Springer Series in Materials Science (eds Lookman, T., Alexander, F. & Rajan, K.) Vol 225, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5_3 (Springer, Cham, 2016).10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5_3 ↗
8. Chakraborti, N. Genetic algorithms in materials design and processing. Int. Mater. Rev. 49, 246–260 (2004).10.1179/095066004225021909 ↗
9. Liu, Y., Zhao, T., Ju, W. & Shi, S. Materials discovery and design using machine learning. J. Materiomics 3, 159–177 (2017).10.1016/j.jmat.2017.08.002 ↗
10. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Computational Mater. 3, 54 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
11. Menon, D. & Ranganathan, R. A generative approach to materials discovery, design, and optimization. ACS Omega 7, 25958–25973 (2022).10.1021/acsomega.2c03264 ↗
12. Dan, Y. et al. Generative adversarial networks (GAN) based efficient sampling of chemical composition space for inverse design of inorganic materials. npj Computational Mater. 6, 84 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-00352-0 ↗
13. Lew, A. J. & Buehler, M. J. Encoding and exploring latent design space of optimal material structures via a VAE-LSTM model. Forces Mech. 5, 100054 (2021).10.1016/j.finmec.2021.100054 ↗
14. El-Awady, K. VAE for modified 1-hot generative materials modeling, a step towards inverse material design. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06779 (2023).
15. Guo, K. & Buehler, M. J. A semi-supervised approach to architected materials design using graph neural networks. Extrem. Mech. Lett. 41, 101029 (2020).10.1016/j.eml.2020.101029 ↗
16. Wang, Q. & Zhang, L. Inverse design of glass structure with deep graph neural networks. Nat. Commun. 12, 5359 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-25490-x ↗
17. Zeni, C. et al. A generative model for inorganic materials design. Nature 639, 624–632 (2025).10.1038/s41586-025-08628-5 ↗
18. Yu, Y., Xiong, J., Wu, X. & Qian, Q. From small data modeling to large language model screening: a dual-strategy framework for materials intelligent design. Adv. Sci. 11, 2403548 (2024).10.1002/advs.202403548 ↗
19. Zhang, P., Qian, Y. & Qian, Q. Multi-objective optimization for materials design with improved NSGA-II. Mater. Today Commun. 28, 102709 (2021).10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102709 ↗
20. Ma, H., Zhang, Y., Sun, S., Liu, T. & Shan, Y. A comprehensive survey on NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization and applications. Artif. Intell. Rev. 56, 15217–15270 (2023).10.1007/s10462-023-10526-z ↗
21. Li, Z. & Birbilis, N. NSGAN: a non-dominant sorting optimisation-based generative adversarial design framework for alloy discovery. npj Computational Mater. 10, 112 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01294-7 ↗
22. Rao, Z. et al. Machine learning–enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science 378, 78–85 (2022).10.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
23. Suvarna, M. et al. Active learning streamlines development of high performance catalysts for higher alcohol synthesis. Nat. Commun. 15, 5844 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-50215-1 ↗
24. Cai, J. et al. A process-synergistic active learning framework for high-strength Al-Si alloys design. npj Computational Mater. 11, 228 (2025).10.1038/s41524-025-01721-3 ↗
25. Mousavi, S.S., Schukat, M. & Howley, E. Deep reinforcement learning: An Overview. In Proceedings of SAI Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys) 2016. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems (eds Bi, Y., Kapoor, S. & Bhatia, R) Vol. 16, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56991-8_32 (Springer, Cham, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-56991-8_32 ↗
26. Sui, F., Guo, R., Zhang, Z., Gu, G. X. & Lin, L. Deep reinforcement learning for digital materials design. ACS Mater. Lett. 3, 1433–1439 (2021).10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00390 ↗
27. Brown, N. K., Garland, A. P., Fadel, G. M. & Li, G. Deep reinforcement learning for engineering design through topology optimization of elementally discretized design domains. Mater. Des. 218, 110672 (2022).10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110672 ↗
28. Shah, T. et al. Reinforcement learning applied to metamaterial design. J. Acoustical Soc. Am. 150, 321–338 (2021).10.1121/10.0005545 ↗
29. Karpovich, C., Pan, E. & Olivetti, E. A. Deep reinforcement learning for inverse inorganic materials design. npj Computational Mater. 10, 287 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01474-5 ↗
30. Jia, S., Zhang, C. & Fung, V. LLMatdesign: autonomous materials discovery with large language models. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13163 (2024).
31. Liu, Q. et al. Beyond designer’s knowledge: Generating materials design hypotheses via a large language model. Acta Mater. 297, 121307 (2025).10.1016/j.actamat.2025.121307 ↗
32. LaValley, M. P. Logistic regression. Circulation 117, 2395–2399 (2008).10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.682658 ↗
33. Zhao, S. et al. Linear discriminant analysis. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 4, 70 (2024).10.1038/s43586-024-00346-y ↗
34. Lau, K. & Wu, Q. Online training of support vector classifier. Pattern Recognit. 36, 1913–1920 (2003).10.1016/S0031-3203(03)00038-4 ↗
35. Ying, L. et al. Decision tree methods: applications for classification and prediction. Shanghai Arch. Psychiatry 27, 130 (2015).
36. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).10.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
37. Natekin, A. & Knoll, A. Gradient boosting machines, a tutorial. Front. Neurorobotics 7, 21 (2013).10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021 ↗
38. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 785–794 (ACM, 2016).10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
39. Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A. V. & Gulin, A. Catboost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NIPS, 2018).
40. Zhu, J. et al. Multi-class adaboost. Stat. Interface 2, 349–360 (2009).10.4310/SII.2009.v2.n3.a8 ↗
41. Kramer, O. K-Nearest Neighbors. In Dimensionality reduction with unsupervised nearest neighbors. Intelligent Systems Reference Library. Vol. 51, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38652-7_2 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 2013).10.1007/978-3-642-38652-7_2 ↗
42. Ontivero-Ortega, M., Lage-Castellanos, A., Valente, G., Goebel, R. & Valdes-Sosa, M. Fast Gaussian naíve Bayes for searchlight classification analysis. Neuroimage 163, 471–479 (2017).10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.001 ↗
43. Abbas, M., Memon, K. A., Jamali, A. A., Memon, S. & Ahmed, A. Multinomial naive bayes classification model for sentiment analysis. IJCSNS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Netw. Secur 19, 62 (2019).
44. Murphy, K. P. et al. Naive Bayes classifiers. Univ. Br. Columbia 18, 1–8 (2006).
45. Tharwat, A. Linear vs. quadratic discriminant analysis classifier: a tutorial. Int. J. Appl. Pattern Recognit. 3, 145–180 (2016).10.1504/IJAPR.2016.079050 ↗
46. McDonald, G. C. Ridge regression. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. 1, 93–100 (2009).10.1002/wics.14 ↗
47. Ranstam, J. & Cook, J. A. Lasso regression. J. Br. Surg. 105, 1348–1348 (2018).10.1002/bjs.10895 ↗
48. Zou, H. & Hastie, T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 67, 301–320 (2005).10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x ↗
49. Awad, M. & Khanna, R. Support vector regression. In Efficient Learning Machines. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_4 (Apress, Berkeley, CA, 2015).10.1007/978-1-4302-5990-9_4 ↗
50. Solomatine, D. P. & Shrestha, D. L. Adaboost. rt: a boosting algorithm for regression problems. In 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37541), 2, 1163–1168 (IEEE, 2004).10.1109/IJCNN.2004.1380102 ↗
51. Hu, M., Chion, J. H., Suganthan, P. N. & Katuwal, R. K. Ensemble deep random vector functional link neural network for regression. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 53, 2604–2615 (2022).10.1109/TSMC.2022.3213628 ↗
52. Hurst, A. et al. GPT-4o system card. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21276 (2024).
53. Mnih, V. et al. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. Nature 518, 529–533 (2015).10.1038/nature14236 ↗
54. Lillicrap, T. P. et al. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02971 (2015).
55. Fujimoto, S., Hoof, H. & Meger, D. Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods. In International conference on machine learning, 1587–1596 (PMLR, 2018).
56. Haarnoja, T. et al. Soft actor-critic algorithms and applications. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05905 (2018).
57. Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A. & Klimov, O. Proximal policy optimization algorithms. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347 (2017).
58. Xiong, J., Shi, S.-Q. & Zhang, T.-Y. A machine-learning approach to predicting and understanding the properties of amorphous metallic alloys. Mater. Des. 187, 108378 (2020).10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108378 ↗
59. Hartigan, J. A. & Wong, M. A. Algorithm as 136: a k-means clustering algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C. Appl. Stat. 28, 100–108 (1979).
60. Liashchynskyi, P. & Liashchynskyi, P. Grid search, random search, genetic algorithm: a big comparison for NAS. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06059 (2019).
61. Shahriari, B., Swersky, K., Wang, Z., Adams, R. P. & De Freitas, N. Taking the human out of the loop: a review of Bayesian optimization. Proc. IEEE 104, 148–175 (2015).10.1109/JPROC.2015.2494218 ↗
62. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S. & Meyarivan, T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evolut. Comput. 6, 182–197 (2002).10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
63. Tian, Z. et al. High-dimensional Bayesian optimization for metamaterial design. Mater. Genome Eng. Adv. 2, e79 (2024).10.1002/mgea.79 ↗
64. Gao, J., Xue, H., Gao, L. & Luo, Z. Topology optimization for auxetic metamaterials based on isogeometric analysis. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 352, 211–236 (2019).10.1016/j.cma.2019.04.021 ↗
65. Liao, L., Yao, S. & Li, Y. Topological optimization design of multi-material phononic crystals with floating projection constraints to achieve ultra-wide band gap. Composite Struct. 346, 118387 (2024).10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118387 ↗
66. Muc, A. Introduction to macroscopic optimal design in the mechanics of composite materials and structures. J. Compos. Sci. 5, 36 (2021).10.3390/jcs5020036 ↗
67. Drugan, M. M. & Nowe, A. Designing multi-objective multi-armed bandits algorithms: A study. In The 2013 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), 1–8 (IEEE, 2013).10.1109/IJCNN.2013.6707036 ↗
68. Sun, L. et al. Machine learning-assisted composition design of w-free co-based superalloys with high γ’-solvus temperature and low density. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 29, 656–667 (2024).10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.01.040 ↗