Sample spinning to mitigate polarization artifact and interstitial-vacancy imbalance in ion-beam irradiation
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Accelerator-based ion-beam irradiation has been widely used to mimic the effects of neutron radiation damage in nuclear reactors. However, ion radiation is most often monodisperse in the incoming ions’ momentum direction, leading to excessive polarization in defect distribution, while the scattering under neutron irradiation is often more isotropic and has less radiation-induced polarization. Mitigation of the excess-polarization as well as the damage non-uniformity artifact might be crucial for making the simulation of neutron radiation by ion-beam radiation more realistic. In this work, a general radiation polarization theory in treating radiation as external polar stimuli is established to understand the natural material responses in different contexts, and the possibility to correct the defect polarization artifact in ion-beam irradiation. Inspired by Magic Angle Spinning in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, we present a precise sample spinning strategy to reduce the point-defect imbalance effect in ion-beam irradiation. It can be seen that with optimized surface inclination angle and the axis of sample rotation, the vacancy-interstitial population imbalance, as well as the damage profile non-uniformity in a designated region in the target are both reduced. It is estimated that sample spinning frequency on the order of kHz should be sufficient to scramble the ion momentum monodispersity for commonly taken ion fluxes and dose rates, which is experimentally feasible.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Nuclear Physics and Applications · Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. Was, G. S. Fundamentals of radiation materials science: metals and alloys. Second Edition (Springer, New York, 2017).
2. Zinkle, S. J. & Was, G. S. Materials challenges in nuclear energy. Acta Mater. 61, 735–758 (2013).10.1016/j.actamat.2012.11.004 ↗
3. Stoller, R. Standard practice for investigating the effects of neutron radiation damage using charged particle irradiation, ASTM standard. E521–96 (Reapproved 2009).
4. Was, G. S. et al. Emulation of reactor irradiation damage using ion beams. Scr. Mater. 88, 33–36 (2014).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2014.06.003 ↗
5. Garner, F. A. Impact of the injected interstitial on the correlation of charged particle and neutron-induced radiation damage. J. Nucl. Mater. 117, 177–197 (1983).10.1016/0022-3115(83)90023-5 ↗
6. Shao, L. et al. Effect of defect imbalance on void swelling distributions produced in pure iron irradiated with 3.5 MeV self-ions. J. Nucl. Mater. 453, 176–181 (2014).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.06.002 ↗
7. Han, W. Z. et al. Helium Nanobubbles Enhance Superelasticity and Retard Shear Localization in Small-Volume Shape Memory Alloy. Nano Lett. 17, 3725–3730 (2017).10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01015 ↗
8. Garner, F. A., Shao, L., Toloczko, M. B., Maloy, S. A. & Voyevodin, V. N. Use of self-ion bombardment to study void swelling in advanced radiation-resistant alloys. In 17th Int. Conf. Environmental Degradation of Materials in Nuclear Power Systems – Water Reactors. 1-19 (Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, 2015).
9. Was, G. S. Challenges to the use of ion irradiation for emulating reactor irradiation. J. Mater. Res. 30, 1158–1182 (2015).10.1557/jmr.2015.73 ↗
10. Short, M. P., Gaston, D. R., Jin, M., Shao, L. & Garner, F. A. Modeling injected interstitial effects on void swelling in self-ion irradiation experiments. J. Nucl. Mater. 471, 200–207 (2016).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.10.002 ↗
11. Hattar, K., Bufford, D. C. & Buller, D. L. Concurrent in situ ion irradiation transmission electron microscope. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 338, 56–65 (2014).10.1016/j.nimb.2014.08.002 ↗
12. Getto, E., Jiao, Z., Monterrosa, A. M., Sun, K. & Was, G. S. Effect of pre-implanted helium on void swelling evolution in self-ion irradiated HT9. J. Nucl. Mater. 462, 458–469 (2015).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.01.045 ↗
13. Getto, E., Jiao, Z., Monterrosa, A. M., Sun, K. & Was, G. S. Effect of irradiation mode on the microstructure of self-ion irradiated ferritic-martensitic alloys. J. Nucl. Mater. 465, 116–126 (2015).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.05.016 ↗
14. Balluffi, R. W., Allen, S. M. & Carter, W. C. Kinetics of Materials (J. Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, 2005).10.1002/0471749311 ↗
15. Li, Y. G. et al. IM3D: A parallel Monte Carlo code for efficient simulations of primary radiation displacements and damage in 3D geometry. Sci. Rep. 5, 18130 (2015).10.1038/srep18130 ↗
16. Nordlund, K. et al. Improving atomic displacement and replacement calculations with physically realistic damage models. Nat. Commun. 9, 1084 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-03415-5 ↗
17. Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D. & Biersack, J. P. SRIM – The stopping and range of ions in matter (2010). Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 268, 1818–1823 (2010).10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.091 ↗
18. Stoller, R. E. et al. On the use of SRIM for computing radiation damage exposure. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 310, 75–80 (2013).10.1016/j.nimb.2013.05.008 ↗
19. Li, J., Yang, Y. & Short, M. P. More Efficient and Accurate Simulations of Primary Radiation Damage in Materials with Nanosized Microstructural Features or Ion Beams. In Handbook of Materials Modeling. 1–33 (Springer, Cham, 2019).10.1007/978-3-319-50257-1_115-2 ↗
20. Bruemmer, S. M. et al. Radiation-induced material changes and susceptibility to intergranular failure of light-water-reactor core internals. J. Nucl. Mater. 274, 299–314 (1999).10.1016/S0022-3115(99)00075-6 ↗
21. Demkowicz, M. J. et al. The effect of excess atomic volume on He bubble formation at fcc–bcc interfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 161903 (2010).10.1063/1.3502594 ↗
22. Hennel, J. W. & Klinowski, J. Magic-Angle Spinning: a Historical Perspective. In New Techniques in Solid-State NMR. Topics in Current Chemistry. 246, 1–14 (Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005).10.1007/b98646 ↗
23. Ren, C. L. et al. POLARASE website. http://alum.mit.edu/www/liju99/Polarase.
24. Schmidhuber, J. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Netw. 61, 85–117 (2015).10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 ↗
25. LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. & Hinton, G. Deep learning. Nature 521, 436 (2015).10.1038/nature14539 ↗
26. Li, J., Kevrekidis, P. G., Gear, C. W. & Kevrekidis, I. G. Deciding the Nature of the Coarse Equation through Microscopic Simulations: The Baby-Bathwater Scheme. SIAM Rev. 49, 469–487 (2007).10.1137/070692303 ↗
27. Shi, Z. et al. Deep elastic strain engineering of bandgap through machine learning. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 116, 4117–4122 (2019).10.1073/pnas.1818555116 ↗
28. Zinkle, S. J. & Snead, L. L. Opportunities and limitations for ion beams in radiation effects studies: Bridging critical gaps between charged particle and neutron irradiations. Scr. Mater. 143, 154–160 (2018).10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.06.041 ↗
29. Lu, C. et al. Enhanced Radiation-tolerant Oxide Dispersion Strengthened Steel and its Microstructure Evolution under Helium-implantation and Heavy-ion Irradiation. Sci. Rep. 7, 40343 (2017).10.1038/srep40343 ↗
30. Norgett, M. J., Robinson, M. T. & Torrens, I. M. A proposed method of calculating displacement dose rates. Nucl. Eng. Des. 33, 50–54 (1975).10.1016/0029-5493(75)90035-7 ↗
31. Vogel, K. et al. Relationships between depth-resolved primary radiation damage, irradiation-induced nanostructure and nanoindentation response of ion-irradiated Fe-Cr and ODS Fe-Cr alloys. Nucl. Mater. Energy 24, 100759 (2020).10.1016/j.nme.2020.100759 ↗
32. Hardie, C. D., Williams, C. A., Xu, S. & Roberts, S. G. Effects of irradiation temperature and dose rate on the mechanical properties of self-ion implanted Fe and Fe–Cr alloys. J. Nucl. Mater. 439, 33–40 (2013).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.03.052 ↗
33. Su, C. et al. Engineering single-atom dynamics with electron irradiation. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2252 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aav2252 ↗
34. Berg, R. E. Rotating Wedge Cyclotron Beam Degrader. In 7th Int. Conf. Cyclotrons and their Applications. 315–316 (Birkhäuser, Basel, 1975).10.1007/978-3-0348-5520-4_65 ↗
35. Li, Y. et al. Ion radiation albedo effect: influence of surface roughness on ion implantation and sputtering of materials. Nucl. Fusion 57, 016038 (2017).10.1088/1741-4326/57/1/016038 ↗
36. Yang, Y. et al. Nano-beam and nano-target effects in ion radiation. Nanoscale 10, 1598–1606 (2018).10.1039/C7NR08116B ↗
37. Tissot, O., Pareige, C., Meslin, E., Décamps, B. & Henry, J. Influence of injected interstitials on α′ precipitation in Fe–Cr alloys under self-ion irradiation. Mater. Res. Lett. 5, 117–123 (2017).10.1080/21663831.2016.1230896 ↗
38. MathWorks website. https://www.mathworks.com/.
39. Vogl, T. P., Mangis, J. K., Rigler, A. K., Zink, W. T. & Alkon, D. L. Accelerating the convergence of the back-propagation method. Biol. Cybern. 59, 257–263 (1988).10.1007/BF00332914 ↗
40. MacKay, D. J. C. Bayesian Interpolation. Neural Comput. 4, 415–447 (1992).10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 ↗
41. Foresee, F. D. & Hagan, M. T. Gauss-Newton Approximation to Bayesian Learning. In Int. Conf. Neural Networks. 3, 1930–1935 (IEEE, Houston, 1997).10.1109/ICNN.1997.614194 ↗