Origin of the insulating phase and metal-insulator transition in the organic molecular solid κ-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Recent studies of organic molecular solids have focused on their complex phase diagram and on light-induced phenomena, including a Mott insulating state, a spin liquid phase, and light-enhanced superconductivity. However, discrepancies between experiments and first-principles calculations for the κ -(BEDT-TTF) 2 X family hinder a comprehensive understanding of their properties. Here, we revisit the electronic structure of κ -(BEDT-TTF) 2 Cu 2 (CN) 3 with a recently developed method for applying the Hubbard U potential on generalized orbital states, within the framework of density functional theory, to correct the orbital energy levels of the molecular solid. Our work focuses on the electronic structure of κ -(BEDT-TTF) 2 Cu 2 (CN) 3 , whose insulating state originates from an energy gap between the highest occupied and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital states of the BEDT-TTF dimers, which constitute the periodic unit of the molecular solid. Our calculations provide results in alignment with experiments for band gaps, optical conductivities, and evolution of the metal-insulator transition as a function of pressure. Especially, the observed superconducting dome of κ -(BEDT-TTF) 2 Cu 2 (CN) 3 , which derives from the flat band state at the Fermi level, is qualitatively reproduced. Additionally, we construct a new low-energy lattice model based on our first-principles computed band structure that can be exploited to address many-body physics, such as quantum spin liquid states and double-holon dynamics. Our work can be extended to achieve deeper insight into the complex phase diagram and light-induced phenomena in the κ -(BEDT-TTF) 2 X family and other complex organic molecular solids.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic and Molecular Conductors Research · Rare-earth and actinide compounds · Magnetism in coordination complexes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (71)
Show source-provided references
1. Kurosaki, Y., Shimizu, Y., Miyagawa, K., Kanoda, K. & Saito, G. Mott transition from a spin liquid to a fermi liquid in the spin-frustrated organic conductor kappa-(ET)2Cu2(CN)3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 177001 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.177001 ↗
2. Buzzi, M. et al. Phase diagram for light-induced superconductivity in kappa-(ET)2-X. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 197002 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.197002 ↗
3. Zadik, R. H. et al. Optimized unconventional superconductivity in a molecular Jahn-Teller metal. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500059 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500059 ↗
4. Buzzi, M. et al. Photomolecular high-temperature superconductivity. Phys. Rev. X 10, 031028 (2020).
5. Mitrano, M. et al. Possible light-induced superconductivity in K3C60 at high temperature. Nature 530, 461–464 (2016).10.1038/nature16522 ↗
6. Rowe, E. et al. Resonant enhancement of photo-induced superconductivity in K3C60. Nat. Phys. 19, 1821–1826 (2023).10.1038/s41567-023-02235-9 ↗
7. Isono, T., Terashima, T., Miyagawa, K., Kanoda, K. & Uji, S. Quantum criticality in an organic spin-liquid insulator k-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3. Nat. Commun. 7, 13494 (2016).10.1038/ncomms13494 ↗
8. Komatsu, T., Matsukawa, N., Inoue, T. & Saito, G. Realization of superconductivity at ambient pressure by band-filling control in k-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1340–1354 (1996).10.1143/JPSJ.65.1340 ↗
9. Lefebvre, S. Mott transition, antiferromagnetism, and unconventional superconductivity in layered organic superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 5420–5423 (2000).10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5420 ↗
10. Limelette, P. Mott transition and transport crossovers in the organic compound k-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu[N(CN2]Cl. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 016401 (2003).10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.016401 ↗
11. Warawa, K. et al. Ultrafast gap dynamics upon photodoping the Mott-insulating phase of a two-dimensional organic charge-transfer salt. arXiv arXiv:2310.18761 (2023).
12. Kawakami, Y. et al. Nonlinear charge oscillation driven by a single-cycle light field in an organic superconductor. Nat. Photonics 12, 474–478 (2018).10.1038/s41566-018-0194-4 ↗
13. Pratt, F. L. et al. Magnetic and non-magnetic phases of a quantum spin liquid. Nature 471, 612–616 (2011).10.1038/nature09910 ↗
14. Miksch, B. et al. Gapped magnetic ground state in quantum spin liquid candidate k-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3. Science 372, 276–279 (2021).10.1126/science.abc6363 ↗
15. Suzuki, Y. et al. Mott-driven bec-bcs crossover in a doped spin liquid candidate k-(BEDT-TTF)4hg2.89br8. Phys. Rev. X 12, 011016 (2022).
16. Menke, H. et al. Superconductivity and Mott physics in organic charge transfer materials. Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 136501 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.136501 ↗
17. Kandpal, H. C., Opahle, I., Zhang, Y.-Z., Jeschke, H. O. & Valentí, R. Revision of model parameters for k-type charge transfer salts: an Ab initio study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 067004 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.067004 ↗
18. Nomura, Y., Sakai, S., Capone, M. & Arita, R. Unified understanding of superconductivity and Mott transition in alkali-doped fullerides from first principles. Sci. Adv. 1, e1500568 (2015).10.1126/sciadv.1500568 ↗
19. Oshiyama, A. & Saito, S. Linear dependence of superconducting transition temperature on Fermi-level density-of-states in alkali-doped C60. Solid State Commun. 82, 41–45 (1992).10.1016/0038-1098(92)90403-V ↗
20. Anisimov, V. I., Zaanen, J. & Andersen, O. K. Band theory and mott insulators: Hubbard u instead of stoner i. Phys. Rev. B 44, 943–954 (1991).10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
21. Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003).10.1063/1.1564060 ↗
22. Onida, G., Reining, L. & Rubio, A. Electronic excitations: density-functional versus many-body Green’s-function approaches. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601–659 (2002).10.1103/RevModPhys.74.601 ↗
23. Beaulieu, S. et al. Ultrafast dynamical Lifshitz transition. Sci. Adv. 7, eabd9275 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abd9275 ↗
24. Jones, R. Density functional theory: Its origins, rise to prominence, and future. Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 897–923 (2015).10.1103/RevModPhys.87.897 ↗
25. Shin, D. et al. Identification of the mott insulating charge density wave state in 1t-tas2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 196406 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.196406 ↗
26. Cha, J., Lim, S., Choi, C. H., Cha, M.-H. & Park, N. Inaccuracy of density functional theory calculations for dihydrogen binding energetics onto ca cation centers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 216102 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.216102 ↗
27. Andrade, X. & Aspuru-Guzik, A. Prediction of the derivative discontinuity in density functional theory from an electrostatic description of the exchange and correlation potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 183002 (2011).10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.183002 ↗
28. Janak, J. F. Proof that de/dni=e in density-functional theory. Phys. Rev. B 18, 7165–7168 (1978).10.1103/PhysRevB.18.7165 ↗
29. Shin, D., Lee, G., Miyamoto, Y. & Park, N. Real-time propagation via time-dependent density functional theory plus the Hubbard U potential for electron-atom coupled dynamics involving charge transfer. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 201–208 (2016).10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00895 ↗
30. Mohan, N., Vijayalakshmi, K. P., Koga, N. & Suresh, C. H. Comparison of aromatic nh ⋯ π, OH ⋯ π, and CH ⋯ π interactions of alanine using MP2, CCSD, and DFT methods. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 2874–2882 (2010).10.1002/jcc.21582 ↗
31. Chen, Y., Zhang, L., E, W. & Car, R. Hybrid auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo for molecular systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19, 4484–4493 (2023).10.1021/acs.jctc.3c00038 ↗
32. Kronik, L., Stein, T., Refaely-Abramson, S. & Baer, R. Excitation gaps of finite-sized systems from optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functionals. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 1515–1531 (2012).10.1021/ct2009363 ↗
33. Cococcioni, M. & De Gironcoli, S. Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the lda+u method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035105 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105 ↗
34. Agapito, L. A., Curtarolo, S. & Nardelli, M. B. Reformulation of dft+u as a pseudohybrid Hubbard density functional for accelerated materials discovery. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011006 (2015).
35. Tancogne-Dejean, N. & Rubio, A. Parameter-free hybridlike functional based on an extended Hubbard model: Dft+u+v. Phys. Rev. B 102, 155117 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevB.102.155117 ↗
36. Campo, V. L. & Cococcioni, M. Extended DFT + U + V method with on-site and inter-site electronic interactions. J. Condens. Matter Phys. 22, 055602 (2010).10.1088/0953-8984/22/5/055602 ↗
37. Lee, S.-H. & Son, Y.-W. First-principles approach with a pseudohybrid density functional for extended Hubbard interactions. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043410 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043410 ↗
38. Tancogne-Dejean, N., Sentef, M. A. & Rubio, A. Ultrafast modification of Hubbard U in a strongly correlated material: Ab initio high-harmonic generation in nio. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 97402 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.097402 ↗
39. Dong, J. et al. Dynamics of electronic states in the insulating intermediate surface phase of 1T − tas2. Phys. Rev. B 108, 155145 (2023).10.1103/PhysRevB.108.155145 ↗
40. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
41. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
42. Mosey, N. J. & Carter, E. A. Ab initio evaluation of coulomb and exchange parameters for dft+u calculations. Phys. Rev. B 76, 155123 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevB.76.155123 ↗
43. Mosey, N. J., Liao, P. & Carter, E. A. Rotationally invariant ab initio evaluation of coulomb and exchange parameters for dft+u calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 129, 014103 (2008).10.1063/1.2943142 ↗
44. Shinaoka, H., Misawa, T., Nakamura, K. & Imada, M. Mott transition and phase diagram of κ-(BEDT-TTF)2 Cu(NCS)2 studied by two-dimensional model derived from Ab initio method. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 034701 (2012).10.1143/JPSJ.81.034701 ↗
45. Garza, A. J. & Scuseria, G. E. Predicting band gaps with hybrid density functionals. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 4165–4170 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01807 ↗
46. Elsässer, S., Wu, D., Dressel, M. & Schlueter, J. A. Power-law dependence of the optical conductivity observed in the quantum spin-liquid compound k-(BEDT-TTF)2Cu2(CN)3. Phys. Rev. B 86, 155150 (2012).10.1103/PhysRevB.86.155150 ↗
47. Yamamoto, H. M. et al. A strained organic field-effect transistor with a gate-tunable superconducting channel. Nat. Commun. 4, 2379 (2013).
48. Norman, M. R. The challenge of unconventional superconductivity. Science 332, 196–200 (2011).10.1126/science.1200181 ↗
49. Schmalian, J. Pairing due to spin fluctuations in layered organic superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 4232–4235 (1998).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4232 ↗
50. Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N. & Schrieffer, J. R. Theory of superconductivity. Phys. Rev. 108, 1175–1204 (1957).10.1103/PhysRev.108.1175 ↗
51. Cantaluppi, A. et al. Pressure tuning of light-induced superconductivity in K3C60. Nat. Phys. 14, 837–841 (2018).10.1038/s41567-018-0134-8 ↗
52. Ghazaryan, A., Holder, T., Serbyn, M. & Berg, E. Unconventional superconductivity in systems with annular Fermi surfaces: application to rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 247001 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.247001 ↗
53. You, Y.-Z. & Vishwanath, A. Kohn-Luttinger superconductivity and intervalley coherence in rhombohedral trilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 105, 134524 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.105.134524 ↗
54. Chang, B. K. & Bernardi, M. Bandlike charge transport and electron-phonon coupling in organic molecular crystals. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 37, 095704 (2025).10.1088/1361-648X/ad9da6 ↗
55. Chang, B. K. et al. First-principles electron-phonon interactions and polarons in the parent cuprate La 2 CuO 4. Phys. Rev. Res. 7, L012073 (2025).10.1103/PhysRevResearch.7.L012073 ↗
56. Zhou, J.-J. et al. Ab initio electron-phonon interactions in correlated electron systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 126404 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.126404 ↗
57. Riedl, K., Gati, E. & Valentí, R. Ingredients for generalized models of k-phase organic charge-transfer salts: a review. Crystals 12, 1689 (2022).10.3390/cryst12121689 ↗
58. Kyung, B. & Tremblay, A.-M. S. Mott transition, antiferromagnetism, and d -wave superconductivity in two-dimensional organic conductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 046402 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.046402 ↗
59. Hébert, C.-D., Sémon, P. & Tremblay, A.-M. S. Superconducting dome in doped quasi-two-dimensional organic Mott insulators: A paradigm for strongly correlated superconductivity. Phys. Rev. B 92, 195112 (2015).10.1103/PhysRevB.92.195112 ↗
60. Coh, S. & Vanderbilt, D. Python Tight Binding (PythTB) https://zenodo.org/records/12721316 (2022).
61. Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum Espresso. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 ↗
62. Dal Corso, A. Pseudopotentials periodic table: from H to Pu. Comput. Mater. Sci. 95, 337–350 (2014).10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.07.043 ↗
63. Tancogne-Dejean, N. et al. Octopus, a computational framework for exploring light-driven phenomena and quantum dynamics in extended and finite systems. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 124119 (2020).10.1063/1.5142502 ↗
64. Tancogne-Dejean, N., Oliveira, M. J. T. & Rubio, A. Self-consistent DFT+U method for real-space time-dependent density functional theory calculations. Phys. Rev. B 96, 245133 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.245133 ↗
65. Van Setten, M. J. et al. The pseudodojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table. Comput. Phys. Commun. 226, 39–54 (2018).10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.012 ↗
66. Neese, F., Wennmohs, F., Becker, U. & Riplinger, C. The ORCA quantum chemistry program package. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 224108 (2020).10.1063/5.0004608 ↗
67. Zhao, Y. & Truhlar, D. G. Design of density functionals that are broadly accurate for thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, and nonbonded interactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 5656–5667 (2005).10.1021/jp050536c ↗
68. Weigend, F. & Ahlrichs, R. Balanced basis sets of split valence, triple zeta valence and quadruple zeta valence quality for H to Rn: Design and assessment of accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7, 3297–3305 (2005).10.1039/b508541a ↗
69. Dunning Jr, T. H. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. I. The atoms boron through neon and hydrogen. J. Chem. Phys. 90, 1007–1023 (1989).10.1063/1.456153 ↗
70. Weigend, F., Furche, F. & Ahlrichs, R. Gaussian basis sets of quadruple zeta valence quality for atoms h-kr. J. Chem. Phys. 119, 12753–12762 (2003).10.1063/1.1627293 ↗
71. Caldeweyher, E. et al. A generally applicable atomic-charge dependent London dispersion correction. J. Chem. Phys. 150, 154122 (2019).10.1063/1.5090222 ↗