Leveraging active learning-enhanced machine-learned interatomic potential for efficient infrared spectra prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Infrared (IR) spectroscopy is a pivotal analytical tool as it provides real-time molecular insight into material structures and enables the observation of reaction intermediates in situ. However, interpreting IR spectra often requires high-fidelity simulations, such as density functional theory based ab-initio molecular dynamics, which are computationally expensive and therefore limited in the tractable system size and complexity. In this work, we present a novel active learning-based framework, implemented in the open-source software package PALIRS, for efficiently predicting the IR spectra of small catalytically relevant organic molecules. PALIRS leverages active learning to train a machine-learned interatomic potential, which is then used for machine learning-assisted molecular dynamics simulations to calculate IR spectra. PALIRS reproduces IR spectra computed with ab-initio molecular dynamics accurately at a fraction of the computational cost. PALIRS further agrees well with available experimental data not only for IR peak positions but also for their amplitudes. This advancement with PALIRS enables high-throughput prediction of IR spectra, facilitating the exploration of larger and more intricate catalytic systems and aiding the identification of novel reaction pathways.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Zaera, F. New advances in the use of infrared absorption spectroscopy for the characterization of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 7624–7663 (2014).10.1039/C3CS60374A ↗
2. Khan, S. A. et al. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy: Fundamentals and Application in Functional Groups and Nanomaterials Characterization, 317–344 (Springer International Publishing, 2018).10.1007/978-3-319-92955-2_9 ↗
3. Rijs, A. M. & Oomens, J. IR Spectroscopic Techniques to Study Isolated Biomolecules, 1–42 (Springer International Publishing, 2015).10.1007/128_2014_621 ↗
4. Costa, D., Pradier, C.-M., Tielens, F. & Savio, L. Adsorption and self-assembly of bio-organic molecules at model surfaces: a route towards increased complexity. Surf. Sci. Rep. 70, 449–553 (2015).10.1016/j.surfrep.2015.10.002 ↗
5. Hamamoto, M., Katsura, M., Nishiyama, N., Tononue, R. & Nakashima, S. Transmission ir micro-spectroscopy of interfacial water between colloidal silica particles. e-J. Surf. Sci. Nanotechnol. 13, 301–306 (2015).10.1380/ejssnt.2015.301 ↗
6. Tang, M., Cziczo, D. J. & Grassian, V. H. Interactions of water with mineral dust aerosol: water adsorption, hygroscopicity, cloud condensation, and ice nucleation. Chem. Rev. 116, 4205–4259 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00529 ↗
7. Griffith, E. C., Guizado, T. R. C., Pimentel, A. S., Tyndall, G. S. & Vaida, V. Oxidized aromatic-aliphatic mixed films at the air-aqueous solution interface. J. Phys. Chem. C. 117, 22341–22350 (2013).10.1021/jp402737n ↗
8. Su, H. et al. In-situ spectroscopic observation of dynamic-coupling oxygen on atomically dispersed iridium electrocatalyst for acidic water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 12, 6118 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-26416-3 ↗
9. Lai, W. et al. Dynamic evolution of active sites in electrocatalytic co2 reduction reaction: fundamental understanding and recent progress. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2111193 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202111193 ↗
10. Deglmann, P., Schäfer, A. & Lennartz, C. Application of quantum calculations in the chemical industry-an overview. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 115, 107–136 (2015).10.1002/qua.24811 ↗
11. Lansford, J. L. & Vlachos, D. G. Infrared spectroscopy data- and physics-driven machine learning for characterizing surface microstructure of complex materials. Nat. Commun. 11, 1513 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15340-7 ↗
12. Puzzarini, C., Bloino, J., Tasinato, N. & Barone, V. Accuracy and interpretability: the devil and the holy grail. new routes across old boundaries in computational spectroscopy. Chem. Rev. 119, 8131–8191 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00007 ↗
13. Larkin, P. Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy; Principles and Spectral Interpretation (Elsevier, 2011).10.1016/B978-0-12-386984-5.10002-3 ↗
14. Gaigeot, M.-P. & Sprik, M. Ab initio molecular dynamics computation of the infrared spectrum of aqueous uracil. J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 10344–10358 (2003).10.1021/jp034788u ↗
15. Rodriguez-Betancourtt, V.-M., Quezada-Navarro, V.-M., Neff, M. & Rauhut, G. Anharmonic frequencies of [f,c,n,x] isomers (x=o,s) obtained from explicitly correlated coupled-cluster calculations. Chem. Phys. 387, 1–4 (2011).10.1016/j.chemphys.2011.06.015 ↗
16. Weymuth, T. et al. Movipac: vibrational spectroscopy with a robust meta-program for massively parallel standard and inverse calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 33, 2186–2198 (2012).10.1002/jcc.23036 ↗
17. Thomas, M., Brehm, M., Fligg, R., Vöhringer, P. & Kirchner, B. Computing vibrational spectra from ab initio molecular dynamics. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 6608–6622 (2013).10.1039/c3cp44302g ↗
18. Gaigeot, M.-P. & Spezia, R.Theoretical Methods for Vibrational Spectroscopy and Collision Induced Dissociation in the Gas Phase, 99–151 (Springer International Publishing, 2015).10.1007/128_2014_620 ↗
19. Miotto, M. & Monacelli, L. Fast prediction of anharmonic vibrational spectra for complex organic molecules. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 1–9 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01400-9 ↗
20. Bastonero, L. & Marzari, N. Automated all-functionals infrared and Raman spectra. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 1–12 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01236-3 ↗
21. Conte, R. et al. Anharmonicity and quantum nuclear effects in theoretical vibrational spectroscopy: a molecular tale of two cities. Theor. Chem. Acc. 142, 53 (2023).10.1007/s00214-023-02993-y ↗
22. Sagiv, L., Hirshberg, B. & Gerber, R. B. Anharmonic vibrational spectroscopy calculations using the ab initio CSP method: applications to H2CO3, (H2CO3)2, H2CO3-H2O and isotopologues. Chem. Phys. 514, 44–54 (2018).10.1016/j.chemphys.2017.12.015 ↗
23. Miller, W. H. The semiclassical initial value representation: a potentially practical way for adding quantum effects to classical molecular dynamics simulations. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 2942–2955 (2001).10.1021/jp003712k ↗
24. Heller, E. J. Time-dependent approach to semiclassical dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 62, 1544–1555 (1975).10.1063/1.430620 ↗
25. Cao, J. & Voth, G. A. The formulation of quantum statistical mechanics based on the feynman path centroid density. ii. dynamical properties. J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5106–5117 (1994).10.1063/1.467176 ↗
26. Craig, I. R. & Manolopoulos, D. E. Quantum statistics and classical mechanics: real time correlation functions from ring polymer molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 121, 3368–3373 (2004).10.1063/1.1777575 ↗
27. Musil, F., Zaporozhets, I., Noé, F., Clementi, C. & Kapil, V. Quantum dynamics using path integral coarse-graining. J. Chem. Phys. 157, 181102 (2022).10.1063/5.0120386 ↗
28. Kapil, V., Wilkins, D. M., Lan, J. & Ceriotti, M. Inexpensive modeling of quantum dynamics using path integral generalized langevin equation thermostats. J. Chem. Phys. 152, 124104 (2020).10.1063/1.5141950 ↗
29. Behler, J. & Parrinello, M. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 146401 (2007).10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401 ↗
30. Bartók, A. P. Gaussian approximation potentials: the accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 136403 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.136403 ↗
31. Smith, J. S., Isayev, O. & Roitberg, A. E. ANI-1: an extensible neural network potential with DFT accuracy at force field computational cost. Chem. Sci. 8, 3192–3203 (2017).10.1039/C6SC05720A ↗
32. Gastegger, M., Behler, J. & Marquetand, P. Machine learning molecular dynamics for the simulation of infrared spectra. Chem. Sci. 8, 6924–6935 (2017).10.1039/C7SC02267K ↗
33. Schütt, K. T., Sauceda, H. E., Kindermans, P.-J., Tkatchenko, A. & Müller, K.-R. SchNet - A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241722 (2018).10.1063/1.5019779 ↗
34. Zaverkin, V. & Kästner, J. Gaussian moments as physically inspired molecular descriptors for accurate and scalable machine learning potentials. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 5410–5421 (2020).10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00347 ↗
35. Zaverkin, V., Holzmüller, D., Steinwart, I. & Kästner, J. Fast and sample-efficient interatomic neural network potentials for molecules and materials based on Gaussian moments. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 6658–6670 (2021).10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00527 ↗
36. Deringer, V. L. et al. Gaussian process regression for materials and molecules. Chem. Rev. 121, 10073–10141 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00022 ↗
37. Batzner, S. et al. E(3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
38. Musaelian, A. et al. Learning local equivariant representations for large-scale atomistic dynamics. Nat. Commun. 14, 579 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-36329-y ↗
39. Grisafi, A., Wilkins, D. M., Csányi, G. & Ceriotti, M. Symmetry-adapted machine learning for tensorial properties of atomistic systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 036002 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.036002 ↗
40. Unke, O. T. & Meuwly, M. Physnet: a neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 3678–3693 (2019).10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00181 ↗
41. Gastegger, M., Schütt, K. T. & Müller, K.-R. Machine learning of solvent effects on molecular spectra and reactions. Chem. Sci. 12, 11473–11483 (2021).10.1039/D1SC02742E ↗
42. Schütt, K., Unke, O. & Gastegger, M. Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research (eds Meila, M. & Zhang, T) 9377–9388 (PMLR, 2021).
43. Beckmann, R., Brieuc, F., Schran, C. & Marx, D. Infrared spectra at coupled cluster accuracy from neural network representations. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 5492–5501 (2022).10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00511 ↗
44. Batatia, I. et al. The design space of e(3)-equivariant atom-centered interatomic potentials. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 56–67 (2025).10.1038/s42256-024-00956-x ↗
45. Batatia, I., Kovacs, D. P., Simm, G., Ortner, C. & Csányi, G. Mace: higher order equivariant message passing neural networks for fast and accurate force fields. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 35, 11423–11436 (2022).
46. Sommers, G. M., Calegari Andrade, M. F., Zhang, L., Wang, H. & Car, R. Raman spectrum and polarizability of liquid water from deep neural networks. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 10592–10602 (2020).10.1039/D0CP01893G ↗
47. Kapil, V., Kovács, D. P., Csányi, G. & Michaelides, A. First-principles spectroscopy of aqueous interfaces using machine-learned electronic and quantum nuclear effects. Faraday Discuss. 249, 50–68 (2024).10.1039/D3FD00113J ↗
48. Pracht, P. et al. Efficient composite infrared spectroscopy: combining the double-harmonic approximation with machine learning potentials. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 20, 10986–11004 (2024).10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01157 ↗
49. Kovács, D. P. et al. Mace-off: short-range transferable machine learning force fields for organic molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 17598–17611 (2025).10.1021/jacs.4c07099 ↗
50. Tang, Z., Bromley, S. T. & Hammer, B. A machine learning potential for simulating infrared spectra of nanosilicate clusters. J. Chem. Phys. 158, 224108 (2023).10.1063/5.0150379 ↗
51. Zou, Z. et al. A deep learning model for predicting selected organic molecular spectra. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 957–964 (2023).10.1038/s43588-023-00550-y ↗
52. Stienstra, C. M. K. et al. Graphormer-IR: graph transformers predict experimental IR spectra using highly specialized attention. J. Chem. Inf. Modeling 64, 4613–4629 (2024).10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00378 ↗
53. Krzyżanowski, M. & Matyszczak, G. Machine learning prediction of organic moieties from the IR spectra, enhanced by additionally using the derivative IR data. Chem. Pap. 78, 3149–3173 (2024).10.1007/s11696-024-03301-z ↗
54. Yuan, M., Zou, Z. & Hu, W. Qme14s, a comprehensive and efficient spectral dataset for small organic molecules. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 16, 3972–3979 (2025).10.1021/acs.jpclett.5c00839 ↗
55. Rowe, P., Deringer, V. L., Gasparotto, P., Csányi, G. & Michaelides, A. An accurate and transferable machine learning potential for carbon. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 034702 (2020).10.1063/5.0005084 ↗
56. Bartók, A. P., Kermode, J., Bernstein, N. & Csányi, G. Machine learning a general-purpose interatomic potential for silicon. Phys. Rev. X 8, 041048 (2018).
57. Deringer, V. L., Caro, M. A. & Csányi, G. A general-purpose machine-learning force field for bulk and nanostructured phosphorus. Nat. Commun. 11, 5461 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-19168-z ↗
58. Podryabinkin, E. V. & Shapeev, A. V. Active learning of linearly parametrized interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 140, 171–180 (2017).10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.08.031 ↗
59. Gubaev, K., Podryabinkin, E. V., Hart, G. L. & Shapeev, A. V. Accelerating high-throughput searches for new alloys with active learning of interatomic potentials. Comput. Mater. Sci. 156, 148–156 (2019).10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.09.031 ↗
60. Vandermause, J. et al. On-the-fly active learning of interpretable Bayesian force fields for atomistic rare events. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 1–11 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-0283-z ↗
61. van der Oord, C., Sachs, M., Kovács, D. P., Ortner, C. & Csányi, G. Hyperactive learning for data-driven interatomic potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 1–14 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-01104-6 ↗
62. Kulichenko, M. et al. Uncertainty-driven dynamics for active learning of interatomic potentials. Nat. Comput. Sci. 3, 230–239 (2023).10.1038/s43588-023-00406-5 ↗
63. Tan, A. R., Urata, S., Goldman, S., Dietschreit, J. C. B. & Gómez-Bombarelli, R. Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensembles. npj Comput. Mater. 9, 1–11 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-01180-8 ↗
64. Zaverkin, V. et al. Uncertainty-biased molecular dynamics for learning uniformly accurate interatomic potentials. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 1–18 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01254-1 ↗
65. Ghosh, K., Todorović, M., Vehtari, A. & Rinke, P. Active learning of molecular data for task-specific objectives. J. Chem. Phys. 162, 014103 (2025).10.1063/5.0229834 ↗
66. Homm, H., Laakso, J. & Rinke, P. Efficient dataset generation for machine learning halide perovskite alloys. Phys. Rev. Mater. 9, 053802 (2025).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.9.053802 ↗
67. Bhatia, N., Krejčí, O. & Rinke, P. Palirs. https://gitlab.com/cest-group/PALIRS (2024).
68. Schran, C., Brezina, K. & Marsalek, O. Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learning. J. Chem. Phys. 153, 104105 (2020).10.1063/5.0016004 ↗
69. Smith, J. S., Nebgen, B., Lubbers, N., Isayev, O. & Roitberg, A. E. Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learning. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241733 (2018).10.1063/1.5023802 ↗
70. Qu, C., Yu, Q. & Bowman, J. M. Permutationally invariant potential energy surfaces. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 69, 151–175 (2018).10.1146/annurev-physchem-050317-021139 ↗
71. Blum, V. et al. Ab initio molecular simulations with numeric atom-centered orbitals. Comput. Phys. Commun. 180, 2175–2196 (2009).10.1016/j.cpc.2009.06.022 ↗
72. Havu, V., Blum, V., Havu, P. & Scheffler, M. Efficient O(N) integration for all-electron electronic structure calculation using numeric basis functions. J. Comput.Phys. 228, 8367–8379 (2009).10.1016/j.jcp.2009.08.008 ↗
73. Levchenko, S. V. et al. Hybrid functionals for large periodic systems in an all-electron, numeric atom-centered basis framework. Comput. Phys. Commun. 192, 60–69 (2015).10.1016/j.cpc.2015.02.021 ↗
74. Ren, X. et al. Resolution-of-identity approach to Hartree-Fock, hybrid density functionals, RPA, MP2, and GW with numeric atom-centered orbital basis functions. N. J. Phys. 14, 053020 (2012).10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/053020 ↗
75. Huo, H. & Rupp, M. Unified representation of molecules and crystals for machine learning. Mach. Learn. Sci. Technol. 3, 045017 (2022).10.1088/2632-2153/aca005 ↗
76. Himanen, L. et al. Dscribe: Library of descriptors for machine learning in materials science. Comput. Phys. Commun. 247, 106949 (2020).10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106949 ↗
77. Esch, Bvd, Peters, L. D. M., Sauerland, L. & Ochsenfeld, C. Quantitative comparison of experimental and computed IR-spectra extracted from ab initio molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 17, 985–995 (2021).10.1021/acs.jctc.0c01279 ↗
78. Wallace, W. E. NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database Number 69. Vol. 20899, (retrieved September 12, 2024); Chapter “Infrared Spectra” by NIST Mass Spectrometry Data Center.
79. Asmis, K. R. et al. Gas-phase infrared spectrum of the protonated water dimer. Science 299, 1375–1377 (2003).10.1126/science.1081634 ↗
80. Eastman, P. et al. Spice, a dataset of drug-like molecules and peptides for training machine learning potentials. Sci. Data 10, 11 (2023).10.1038/s41597-022-01882-6 ↗
81. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple.Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1396–1396 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1396 ↗
82. Tkatchenko, A. & Scheffler, M. Accurate molecular Van Der Waals interactions from ground-state electron density and free-atom reference data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 073005 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.073005 ↗
83. Fu, B. et al. Highly selective and stable isolated non-noble metal atom catalysts for selective hydrogenation of acetylene. ACS Catal. 12, 607–615 (2022).10.1021/acscatal.1c04758 ↗
84. Parker, T. et al. In situ Raman and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies of MXene-Electrolyte interfaces. ACS Nano 19, 22228–22239 (2025).10.1021/acsnano.5c03810 ↗
85. Zhang, L. et al. Elucidating the structure-stability relationship of cu single-atom catalysts using operando surface-enhanced infrared absorption spectroscopy. Nat. Commun. 14, 8311 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-44078-1 ↗
86. Lenthe, E. V., Baerends, E. J. & Snijders, J. G. Relativistic regular two-component hamiltonians. J. Chem. Phys. 99, 4597–4610 (1993).10.1063/1.466059 ↗
87. Nocedal, J. & Wright, S. J. Numerical Optimization (Springer New York, 2006).
88. Larsen, A. H. et al. The atomic simulation environment-a python library for working with atoms. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 273002 (2017).10.1088/1361-648X/aa680e ↗
89. Ramakrishnan, R., Dral, P. O., Rupp, M. & von Lilienfeld, O. A. Quantum chemistry structures and properties of 134 kilo molecules. Sci. Data 1, 140022 (2014).10.1038/sdata.2014.22 ↗
90. Bennett, K., Bradley, P. & Demiriz, A. Constrained k-means clustering. Microsoft Research, Redmond 20, 0 (2000).
91. Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 3684–3690 (1984).10.1063/1.448118 ↗
92. Nosé, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).10.1063/1.447334 ↗
93. Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
94. Ceriotti, M., Bussi, G. & Parrinello, M. Langevin equation with colored noise for constant-temperature molecular dynamics simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 020601 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.020601 ↗
95. Wiener, N. Generalized harmonic analysis. Acta Mathematica 55, 117–258 (1930).10.1007/BF02546511 ↗
96. Blackman, R. B. & Tukey, J. W. The measurement of power spectra from the point of view of communications engineering - Part I. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 37, 185–282 (1958).10.1002/j.1538-7305.1958.tb03874.x ↗
97. Schütt, K. T. et al. SchNetPack: a deep learning toolbox for atomistic systems. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15, 448–455 (2019).10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00908 ↗
98. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
99. Henschel, H., Andersson, A. T., Jespers, W., Mehdi Ghahremanpour, M. & van der Spoel, D. Theoretical infrared spectra: quantitative similarity measures and force fields. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 3307–3315 (2020).10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00126 ↗
100. Pracht, P., Grant, D. F. & Grimme, S. Comprehensive assessment of GFN tight-binding and composite density functional theory methods for calculating gas-phase infrared spectra. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 7044–7060 (2020).10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00877 ↗