journal article·2024-07-14Open access

Exploring superionic conduction in lithium oxyhalide solid electrolytes considering composition and structural factors

Fiaz Hussain, Jinlong Zhu, Yusheng Zhao, Wei Xia

npj Computational Materials· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Lithium (Li) oxyhalides have emerged as promising solid electrolyte candidates for all-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) due to their superior ionic conductivity and excellent cathode capability. However, the mechanism of Li transport in oxyhalides has remained unclear due to the complex nature of these compounds, which often comprise multiple phases such as crystalline and amorphous structures. Herein, a first-principles study using density functional theory and ab initio molecular dynamic simulation is performed to gain a theoretical insight into the structural behavior and conduction pathway in oxyhalide electrolytes. Li2.5ZrCl5.5O0.5 electrolyte, as a case of study, is comprehensively investigated by considering various phases. It’s revealed that the $${\rm{P}}\bar{3}{\rm{m}}1$$ phase is energetically more stable and exhibits one order of magnitude higher Li conductivity compared to the C2/m phase among potential crystalline phases (1.63 mS cm−1 versus 0.24 mS cm−1 at room temperature). Interestingly, an amorphous phase with even higher ionic conductivity (~40 mS cm−1) can be generated by creating LiCl-deficient Li-Zr-O-Cl compounds. The remarkably high ionic conductivity suggests that the amorphous structure is likely the dominant conducting pathway, facilitating fast Li transport due the weak bonding between Li and other atoms. Cl anion mobility is also observed in the amorphous phase through mean square displacement (MSD) calculation, although further analyses revealed this to be localized vibration. This study sheds light on the nature of oxychloride structures and promotes a deeper understanding of the superionic conduction mechanism in oxychlorides, which will contribute to the development of advanced solid electrolytes and ASSBs.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies · Advancements in Battery Materials · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (74)

Show source-provided references
1. Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy 1, 16141–16144 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.141 ↗
2. Wang, X. et al. Toward high-energy-density lithium metal batteries: opportunities and challenges for solid organic electrolytes. Adv. Mater. 32, 1905219–1905240 (2020).10.1002/adma.201905219 ↗
3. Manthiram, A., Yu, X. & Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16103–16118 (2017).10.1038/natrevmats.2016.103 ↗
4. Banerjee, A., Wang, X., Fang, C., Wu, E. A. & Meng, Y. S. Interfaces and interphases in all-solid-state batteries with inorganic solid electrolytes. Chem. Rev. 120, 6878–6933 (2020).10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00101 ↗
5. Randau, S. et al. Benchmarking the performance of all-solid-state lithium batteries. Nat. Energy 5, 259–270 (2020).10.1038/s41560-020-0565-1 ↗
6. Hu, Y.-S. Batteries: getting solid. Nat. Energy 1, 16042 (2016).10.1038/nenergy.2016.42 ↗
7. Wang, C., Liang, J., Kim, J. T. & Sun, X. Prospects of halide-based all-solid-state batteries: from material design to practical application. Sci. Adv. 8, eadc9516 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.adc9516 ↗
8. Tuo, K., Sun, C. & Liu, S. Recent progress in and perspectives on emerging halide superionic conductors for all-solid-state batteries. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 6, 17 (2023).10.1007/s41918-023-00179-5 ↗
9. Yin, Y.-C. et al. A LaCl3-based lithium superionic conductor compatible with lithium metal. Nature 616, 77–83 (2023).10.1038/s41586-023-05899-8 ↗
10. Zhang, Z. et al. New horizons for inorganic solid state ion conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 1945–1976 (2018).10.1039/C8EE01053F ↗
11. Bachman, J. C. et al. Inorganic solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: mechanisms and properties governing ion conduction. Chem. Rev. 116, 140–162 (2016).10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00563 ↗
12. Kwak, H. et al. Emerging halide superionic conductors for all-solid-state batteries: design, synthesis, and practical applications. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 1776–1805 (2022).10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00438 ↗
13. Pawar, G. M. & Ewing, R. C. Recent advances in the global rare-earth supply chain. MRS Bull. 47, 244–249 (2022).10.1557/s43577-022-00305-6 ↗
14. Nikodimos, Y., Su, W. N. & Hwang, B. J. Halide solid‐state electrolytes: stability and application for high voltage all‐solid‐state Li batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 13, 2202854 (2023).10.1002/aenm.202202854 ↗
15. Asano, T. et al. Solid halide electrolytes with high lithium‐ion conductivity for application in 4 V class bulk‐type all‐solid‐state batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1803075–1803082 (2018).10.1002/adma.201803075 ↗
16. Li, X. et al. Origin of superionic Li3Y1–xInxCl6 halide solid electrolytes with high humidity tolerance. Nano Lett. 20, 4384–4392 (2020).10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c01156 ↗
17. Park, K.-H. et al. High-voltage superionic halide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state Li-Ion batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 533–539 (2020).10.1021/acsenergylett.9b02599 ↗
18. Kim, S. Y. et al. Lithium Ytterbium-based halide solid electrolytes for high voltage all-solid-state batteries. ACS Mater. Lett. 3, 930–938 (2021).10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00142 ↗
19. Li, X. et al. Air-stable Li3incl6 electrolyte with high voltage compatibility for all-solid-state batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 12, 2665–2671 (2019).10.1039/C9EE02311A ↗
20. Liang, J. et al. Site-occupation-tuned superionic LixScCl3+xhalide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7012–7022 (2020).10.1021/jacs.0c00134 ↗
21. Zhou, L. et al. A new halospinel superionic conductor for high-voltage all solid state lithium batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 2056–2063 (2020).10.1039/D0EE01017K ↗
22. Wang, S. et al. Lithium chlorides and bromides as promising solid-state chemistries for fast ion conductors with good electrochemical stability. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 8039–8043 (2019).10.1002/anie.201901938 ↗
23. Liang, J. et al. A series of ternary metal chloride superionic conductors for high-performance all-solid-state lithium batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2103921 (2022).10.1002/aenm.202103921 ↗
24. Wang, K. et al. A cost-effective and humidity-tolerant chloride solid electrolyte for lithium batteries. Nat. Commun. 12, 4410 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-24697-2 ↗
25. Kwak, H. et al. Li+ conduction in aliovalent-substituted monoclinic Li2ZrCl6 for all-solid-state batteries: Li2+XZr1-XMxCl6 (M = In, Sc). Chem. Eng. J. 437, 135413 (2022).10.1016/j.cej.2022.135413 ↗
26. Kwak, H. et al. New cost‐effective halide solid electrolytes for all‐solid‐state batteries: mechanochemically prepared Fe3+‐substituted Li2ZrCl6. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003190 (2021).10.1002/aenm.202003190 ↗
27. Fu, J. et al. Superionic conducting halide frameworks enabled by interface-bonded halides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 2183–2194 (2023).10.1021/jacs.2c09446 ↗
28. Ishiguro, Y., Ueno, K., Nishimura, S., Iida, G. & Igarashib, Y. TaCl5-glassified ultrafast lithium ion-conductive halide electrolytes for high-performance all-solid-state lithium batteries. Chem. Lett. 52, 237–241 (2023).10.1246/cl.220540 ↗
29. Tanaka, Y. et al. New oxyhalide solid electrolytes with high lithium ionic conductivity >10 mScm−1 for all‐solid‐state batteries. Angew. Chem. 135, e202217581 (2023).10.1002/ange.202217581 ↗
30. Wang, J., Chen, F., Hu, L. & Ma, C. Alternate crystal structure achieving ionic conductivity above 1 mS cm–1 in cost-effective Zr-based chloride solid electrolytes. Nano Lett. 23, 6081–6087 (2023).10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01468 ↗
31. Hu, L. et al. A cost-effective, ionically conductive and compressible oxychloride solid-state electrolyte for stable all-solid-state lithium-based batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 3807–3818 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-39522-1 ↗
32. He, B. et al. Halogen chemistry of solid electrolytes in all-solid-state batteries. Nat. Rev. Chem. 7 826–842 (2023).10.1038/s41570-023-00541-7 ↗
33. Zhang, S. et al. A family of oxychloride amorphous solid electrolytes for long-cycling all-solid-state lithium batteries. Nat. Commun. 14, 3780–3789 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-39197-8 ↗
34. Li, B. et al. Fast Li+-conducting Zr4+-based oxychloride electrolyte with good thermal and solvent stability. Sci. China Mater. 66, 3123–3128 (2023).10.1007/s40843-023-2434-4 ↗
35. Okhotnikov, K., Charpentier, T. & Cadars, S. Supercell program: a combinatorial structure-generation approach for the local-level modeling of atomic substitutions and partial occupancies in crystals. J. Cheminf. 8, 17 (2016).10.1186/s13321-016-0129-3 ↗
36. Haastrup, S. et al. The computational 2D materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 5, 042002 (2018).10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
37. Kappera, R. et al. Phase-engineered low-resistance contacts for ultrathin MoS2 tansistors. Nat. Mater. 13, 1128–1134 (2014).10.1038/nmat4080 ↗
38. Hussain, F. et al. Na2FeS2 cathode for sodium-ion batteries: a theoretical study. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 6, 7563–7570 (2023).10.1021/acsaem.3c00973 ↗
39. Han, F. et al. High electronic conductivity as the origin of lithium dendrite formation within solid electrolytes. Nat. Energy 4, 187–196 (2019).10.1038/s41560-018-0312-z ↗
40. Ong, S. P. et al. Phase stability, electrochemical stability and ionic conductivity of the Li10±1MP2X12 (M = Ge, Si, Sn, Al or P, and X = O, S or Se) family of superionic conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 6, 148–156 (2013).10.1039/C2EE23355J ↗
41. Wang, V., Xu, N., Liu, J.-C., Tang, G. & Geng, W.-T. VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using Vasp Code. Comput. Phys. Commun. 267, 108033–108052 (2021).10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
42. Yu, Y. et al. The ω3 scaling of the vibrational density of states in Quasi-2d nanoconfined solids. Nat. Commun. 13, 3649 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-31349-6 ↗
43. Xu, Z., Chen, X., Zhu, H. & Li, X. Anharmonic cation–anion coupling dynamics assisted lithium-ion diffusion in sulfide solid electrolytes. Adv. Mater. 34, 2207411 (2022).10.1002/adma.202207411 ↗
44. Shuichi, N. Constant temperature molecular dynamics methods. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 103, 1–46 (1991).10.1143/PTPS.103.1 ↗
45. Dai, T. et al. Inorganic glass electrolytes with polymer-like viscoelasticity. Nat. Energy 8, 1221–1228 (2023).10.1038/s41560-023-01356-y ↗
46. Lei, M., Li, B., Liu, H. & Jiang, D.-E. Dynamic monkey bar mechanism of superionic Li-ion transport in LiTaCl6. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202315628 (2024).10.1002/anie.202315628 ↗
47. Pham, T.-L. et al. Unveiling the Structure and ion dynamics of amorphous Na3-xOHxCl antiperovskite electrolytes by first-principles molecular dynamics. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 22922–22940 (2023).10.1039/D3TA01373A ↗
48. Murch, G. E. The haven ratio in fast ionic conductors. Solid State Ion. 7, 177–198 (1982).10.1016/0167-2738(82)90050-9 ↗
49. Van der Ven, A., Ceder, G., Asta, M. & Tepesch, P. D. First-principles theory of ionic diffusion with nondilute carriers. Phys. Rev. B 64, 184307 (2001).10.1103/PhysRevB.64.184307 ↗
50. Marcolongo, A. & Marzari, N. Ionic correlations and failure of Nernst-Einstein relation in solid-state electrolytes. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 025402 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.025402 ↗
51. Habasaki, J. Molecular Dynamics of Nanostructures and Nanoionics, Simulations in Complex Systems. (Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003044901.10.1201/9781003044901 ↗
52. Habasaki, J. A molecular dynamics study of enhanced dynamics and self-healing processes in nano-porous lithium metasilicate systems. Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 11, 421–431 (2020).10.1111/ijag.15511 ↗
53. Haarmann, L. & Albe, K. From ionic to superionic conductivity: the influence of cation order on sodium diffusion in Na3Zr2Si2PO12. Solid State Ion. 363, 115604 (2021).10.1016/j.ssi.2021.115604 ↗
54. Bron, P. et al. Li10SnP2S12: an affordable lithium superionic conductor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 15694–15697 (2013).10.1021/ja407393y ↗
55. Vargas-Barbosa, N. M. & Roling, B. Dynamic ion correlations in solid and liquid electrolytes: how do they affect charge and mass transport? ChemElectroChem 7, 367–385 (2020).10.1002/celc.201901627 ↗
56. Gheribi, A. E. et al. On the determination of ion transport numbers in molten salts using molecular dynamics. Electrochim. Acta 274, 266–273 (2018).10.1016/j.electacta.2018.04.094 ↗
57. Wang, Y. et al. Design principles for solid-state lithium superionic conductors. Nat. Mater. 14, 1026–1031 (2015).10.1038/nmat4369 ↗
58. Zhu, Z., Chu, I.-H., Deng, Z. & Ong, S. P. Role of Na+ interstitials and dopants in enhancing the Na+ conductivity of the cubic Na3PS4 superionic conductor. Chem. Mater. 27, 8318–8325 (2015).10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b03656 ↗
59. Deng, Z., Zhu, Z., Chu, I.-H. & Ong, S. P. Data-driven first-principles methods for the study and design of alkali superionic conductors. Chem. Mater. 29, 281–288 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02648 ↗
60. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
61. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
62. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
63. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
64. Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976).10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
65. Heyd, J., Scuseria, G. E. & Ernzerhof, M. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb Potential. J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207–8215 (2003).10.1063/1.1564060 ↗
66. Barber, C. B., Dobkin, D. P. & Huhdanpaa, H. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 22, 469–483 (1996).10.1145/235815.235821 ↗
67. Ong, S. P., Wang, L., Kang, B. & Ceder, G. Li-Fe-P-O2 phase diagram from first principles calculations. Chem. Mater. 20, 1798–1807 (2008).10.1021/cm702327g ↗
68. Ong, S. P. et al. Python materials genomics (pymatgen): a robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comput. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
69. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: the materials project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
70. Aydinol, M. K., Kohan, A. F., Ceder, G., Cho, K. & Joannopoulos, J. Ab initio study of lithium intercalation in metal oxides and metal dichalcogenides. Phys. Rev. B 56, 1354–1365 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevB.56.1354 ↗
71. Ong, S. P., Jain, A., Hautier, G., Kang, B. & Ceder, G. Thermal stabilities of Delithiated Olivine MPO4 (M = Fe, Mn) cathodes investigated using first principles calculations. Electrochem. Commun. 12, 427–430 (2010).10.1016/j.elecom.2010.01.010 ↗
72. Hussain, F., Li, P. & Li, Z. Theoretical insights into Li-Ion transport in LiTa2PO8. J. Phys. Chem. C. 123, 19282–19287 (2019).10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b03313 ↗
73. Hussain, F., Zhu, J., Xia, H., Zhao, Y. & Xia, W. Theoretical insights on the comparison of Li-Ion conductivity in halide superionic conductors Li3MCl6, Li2M2/3Cl4, and LiMCl4 (M = Y, Sc, Al, and Sm). J. Phys. Chem. C. 126, 13105–13113 (2022).10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c02511 ↗
74. Bockris, J. & Reddy, A. Modern Electrochemistry. in Ion Transport in Solutions Vol. 1, Ch. 4 (Plenum Publishing Corporation, New York, 1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-7467-5.10.1007/978-1-4615-7467-5 ↗