High-accuracy physical property prediction for pure organics via molecular representation learning: bridging data to discovery
Source abstract
Abstract
The escalating energy crisis has spurred extensive research into organic compounds for energy-efficient applications, taking advantage of their environmental friendliness, cost-effective synthesis, and adaptable molecular structures. Traditional trial-and-error methods for discovering highly functional organic compounds are expensive and time-consuming. We employed a 3D transformer-based molecular representation learning algorithm to create the Org-Mol pre-trained model, using 60 million semi-empirically optimized small organic molecule structures. After fine-tuning with public experimental data, the model can accurately predict various physical properties of pure organics, with test set R 2 values exceeding 0.92. These fine-tuned models are used in high-throughput screening among millions of ester molecules to identify novel immersion coolants, resulting in the experimental validation of two promising candidates. This work not only demonstrates the potential of Org-Mol in predicting bulk properties for pure organic compounds but also paves the way for the rational and efficient development of ideal candidates for energy-saving materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Various Chemistry Research Topics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Mirkin, C. A., Sargent, E. H. & Schrag, D. P. Energy transition needs new materials. Science 384, 713–713 (2024).10.1126/science.adq3799 ↗
2. Davidson, D. J. Exnovating for a renewable energy transition. Nat. Energy 4, 254–256 (2019).10.1038/s41560-019-0369-3 ↗
3. Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Xu, W. & Zhu, D. Organic thermoelectric materials: Emerging green energy materials converting heat to electricity directly and efficiently. Adv. Mater. 26, 6829–6851 (2014).10.1002/adma.201305371 ↗
4. Kandpal, V., Jaswal, A., Santibanez Gonzalez, E. D. R. & Agarwal, N. Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Technologies, 89–123 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52943-6_3 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024).10.1007/978-3-031-52943-6_3 ↗
5. Kuncoro, I. W. et al. Immersion cooling as the next technology for data center cooling: A review. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1402, 044057 (IOP Publishing, 2019).10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044057 ↗
6. Kanbur, B. B., Wu, C., Fan, S. & Duan, F. System-level experimental investigations of the direct immersion cooling data center units with thermodynamic and thermoeconomic assessments. Energy 217, 119373 (2021).10.1016/j.energy.2020.119373 ↗
7. Huang, Y. et al. Experimental study on the immersion liquid cooling performance of high-power data center servers. Energy 297, 131195 (2024).10.1016/j.energy.2024.131195 ↗
8. Sharma, R., Ganesan, P., Tyagi, V., Metselaar, H. & Sandaran, S. Developments in organic solid–liquid phase change materials and their applications in thermal energy storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 95, 193–228 (2015).10.1016/j.enconman.2015.01.084 ↗
9. Li, B. et al. Colossal barocaloric effects in plastic crystals. Nature 567, 506–510 (2019).10.1038/s41586-019-1042-5 ↗
10. Preuster, P., Papp, C. & Wasserscheid, P. Liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCS): Toward a hydrogen-free hydrogen economy. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 74–85 (2017).10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00474 ↗
11. Mah, A. X. Y. et al. Targeting and scheduling of standalone renewable energy system with liquid organic hydrogen carrier as energy storage. Energy 218, 119475 (2021).10.1016/j.energy.2020.119475 ↗
12. Tan, R., Ji, Q., Ling, Y. & Li, L. Advances in liquid organic hydrogen carriers: Developing efficient dehydrogenation strategies. Chem. Commun. 60, 8186–8203 (2024).10.1039/D4CC02057J ↗
13. Chhetri, A. et al. Numerical simulation of the single-phase immersion cooling process using a dielectric fluid in a data server. Mater. Today.: Proc. 51, 1532–1538 (2022).
14. Wu, X. et al. Prediction models of saturated vapor pressure, saturated density, surface tension, viscosity and thermal conductivity of electronic fluoride liquids in two-phase liquid immersion cooling systems: A comprehensive review. Appl. Sci. 13, 4200 (2023).10.3390/app13074200 ↗
15. Nadkarni, R. & Nadkarni, R. Guide to ASTM Test Methods for the Analysis of Petroleum Products and Lubricants, vol. 44 (ASTM International West Conshohocken, 2007).10.1520/MNL44_2ND-EB ↗
16. Yamaguchi, T., Yamada, H., Fujiwara, T. & Hori, K. Simulations of dielectric constants and viscosities of organic electrolytes by quantum mechanics and molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Liq. 312, 113288 (2020).10.1016/j.molliq.2020.113288 ↗
17. Caleman, C. et al. Force field benchmark of organic liquids: Density, enthalpy of vaporization, heat capacities, surface tension, isothermal compressibility, volumetric expansion coefficient, and dielectric constant. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 8, 61–74 (2012).10.1021/ct200731v ↗
18. Ju, S.-P., Huang, S.-C., Lin, K.-H., Chen, H.-Y. & Shen, T.-K. Prediction of optical and dielectric properties of 4-cyano-4-pentylbiphenyl liquid crystals by molecular dynamics simulation, coarse-grained dynamics simulation, and density functional theory calculation. J. Phys. Chem. C. 120, 14277–14288 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b12222 ↗
19. Sild, S. & Karelson, M. A general qspr treatment for dielectric constants of organic compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 42, 360–367 (2002).10.1021/ci010335f ↗
20. Meng, X., Jia, M. & Wang, T. Neural network prediction of biodiesel kinematic viscosity at 313 k. Fuel 121, 133–140 (2014).10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.029 ↗
21. Deng, J. & Jia, G. Dielectric constant prediction of pure organic liquids and their mixtures with water based on interpretable machine learning. Fluid Phase Equilib. 561, 113545 (2022).10.1016/j.fluid.2022.113545 ↗
22. Luo, S., Deng, J. & Jia, G. Physical information neural network combined with the symbolic regression: A machine learning method for prediction of dielectric constants in organic liquids and water mixtures. J. Mol. Liq. 417, 126544 (2024).10.1016/j.molliq.2024.126544 ↗
23. Zheng, H., Lv, W., Wang, Y., Feng, Y. & Yang, H. Molecular kinematic viscosity prediction of natural ester insulating oil based on sparse machine learning models. J. Mol. Liq. 385, 122355 (2023).10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122355 ↗
24. Shan, Y., Wu, Q., Yuan, H. & Liu, W. Develop machine learning-based model and automated process for predicting liquid heat capacity of organics at different temperatures. Fluid Phase Equilib. 584, 114132 (2024).10.1016/j.fluid.2024.114132 ↗
25. Gereben, O. & Pusztai, L. On the accurate calculation of the dielectric constant from molecular dynamics simulations: The case of spc/e and swm4-dp water. Chem. Phys. Lett. 507, 80–83 (2011).10.1016/j.cplett.2011.02.064 ↗
26. Krishnamoorthy, A. et al. Dielectric constant of liquid water determined with neural network quantum molecular dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 216403 (2021).10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.216403 ↗
27. Comesana, A. E., Huntington, T. T., Scown, C. D., Niemeyer, K. E. & Rapp, V. H. A systematic method for selecting molecular descriptors as features when training models for predicting physiochemical properties. Fuel 321, 123836 (2022).10.1016/j.fuel.2022.123836 ↗
28. Amano, T., Yamazaki, T. & Tsuneyuki, S. Chemical bond based machine learning model for dipole moment: Application to dielectric properties of liquid methanol and ethanol. Phys. Rev. B 110, 165159 (2024).10.1103/PhysRevB.110.165159 ↗
29. Gao, N., Wang, X., Xuan, Y. & Chen, G. An artificial neural network for the residual isobaric heat capacity of liquid hfc and hfo refrigerants. Int. J. Refrig. 98, 381–387 (2019).10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2018.10.016 ↗
30. Walters, W. P. & Barzilay, R. Applications of deep learning in molecule generation and molecular property prediction. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 263–270 (2020).10.1021/acs.accounts.0c00699 ↗
31. Meftahi, N. et al. Machine learning property prediction for organic photovoltaic devices. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 166 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-00429-w ↗
32. Pang, C., Tong, H. H. & Wei, L. Advanced deep learning methods for molecular property prediction. Quant. Biol. 11, 395–404 (2023).10.1002/qub2.23 ↗
33. Zhou, G. et al. Uni-mol: A universal 3d molecular representation learning framework. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representationshttps://openreview.net/forum?id=6K2RM6wVqKu (2023).10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-jjm0j-v4 ↗
34. Cheng, Z. et al. Automatic screen-out of ir (iii) complex emitters by combined machine learning and computational analysis. Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2301093 (2023).10.1002/adom.202301093 ↗
35. Wang, J. et al. A comprehensive transformer-based approach for high-accuracy gas adsorption predictions in metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 15, 1904 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-46276-x ↗
36. van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-sne. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
37. Zhang, C., Wang, H., Huang, Y., Zhang, L. & Chen, Y. Immersion liquid cooling for electronics: Materials, systems, applications and prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 208, 114989 (2025).10.1016/j.rser.2024.114989 ↗
38. Maji, D., Indra, S. & Biswas, R. Dielectric relaxations of molten acetamide: Dependence on the model interaction potentials and the effects of system size. J. Chem. Sci. 133, 1–12 (2021).10.1007/s12039-021-01973-8 ↗
39. Neumann, M. Dipole moment fluctuation formulas in computer simulations of polar systems. Mol. Phys. 50, 841–858 (1983).10.1080/00268978300102721 ↗
40. Neumann, M., Steinhauser, O. & Pawley, G. S. Consistent calculation of the static and frequency-dependent dielectric constant in computer simulations. Mol. Phys. 52, 97–113 (1984).10.1080/00268978400101081 ↗
41. Zhang, C., Hutter, J. & Sprik, M. Computing the Kirkwood g-factor by combining constant Maxwell electric field and electric displacement simulations: Application to the dielectric constant of liquid water. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7, 2696–2701 (2016).10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01127 ↗
42. Alam, M. S., Ashokkumar, B. & Siddiq, A. M. The density, dynamic viscosity and kinematic viscosity of protic polar solvents (pure and mixed systems) studies: A theoretical insight of thermophysical properties. J. Mol. Liq. 251, 458–469 (2018).10.1016/j.molliq.2017.12.089 ↗
43. Afzal, M. A. F. et al. High-throughput molecular dynamics simulations and validation of thermophysical properties of polymers for various applications. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 3, 620–630 (2021).10.1021/acsapm.0c00524 ↗
44. Wang, F. et al. Mmpolymer: A multimodal multitask pretraining framework for polymer property prediction. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, CIKM ’24, 2336-2346 https://doi.org/10.1145/3627673.3679684 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2024).10.1145/3627673.3679684 ↗
45. Kuenneth, C. & Ramprasad, R. polybert: A chemical language model to enable fully machine-driven ultrafast polymer informatics. Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).
46. Satorras, V. G., Hoogeboom, E. & Welling, M. E (n) equivariant graph neural networks. In International conference on machine learning, 9323–9332 (PMLR, 2021).
47. Batzner, S. et al. E (3)-equivariant graph neural networks for data-efficient and accurate interatomic potentials. Nat. Commun. 13, 2453 (2022).10.1038/s41467-022-29939-5 ↗
48. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ’16, 785-794 https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2016).10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
49. Khajeh, A. & Modarress, H. Quantitative structure–property relationship prediction of liquid heat capacity at 298.15k for organic compounds. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51, 6251–6255 (2012).10.1021/ie202153e ↗
50. Kim, S. et al. PubChem 2025 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 53, D1516–D1525 (2024).10.1093/nar/gkae1059 ↗
51. Nakata, M., Shimazaki, T., Hashimoto, M. & Maeda, T. Pubchemqc pm6: Data sets of 221 million molecules with optimized molecular geometries and electronic properties. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60, 5891–5899 (2020).10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00740 ↗
52. Stewart, J. J. Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods v: Modification of nddo approximations and application to 70 elements. J. Mol. Model. 13, 1173–1213 (2007).10.1007/s00894-007-0233-4 ↗
53. Haynes, W. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=bNDMBQAAQBAJ (CRC Press, 2014).10.1201/b17118 ↗
54. Wohlfahrt, C. 2 pure liquids: Data. https://materials.springer.com/lb/docs/sm_lbs_978-3-540-47619-1_2. Copyright 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
55. Yaws, C. Chemical Properties Handbook: Physical, Thermodynamics, Environmental Transport, Safety & Health Related Properties for Organic &. Chemical Engineering Books https://books.google.com.sg/books?id=PH2KG4cbtzYC (McGraw-Hill Education, 1999).
56. Wohlfarth, C. Viscosity of methyl decanoate. https://materials.springer.com/lb/docs/sm_lbs_978-3-662-49218-5_364. Copyright 2017 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
57. Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian1̃6 Revision C.01 Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT (2016).