journal article·2022-05-06Open access

High-throughput discovery of fluoride-ion conductors via a decoupled, dynamic, and iterative (DDI) framework

Jack D. Sundberg, Daniel L. Druffel, Lauren M. McRae, Matthew G. Lanetti, Jacob T. Pawlik, Scott C. Warren

npj Computational Materials· Volume 8· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Fluoride–ion batteries are a promising alternative to lithium–ion batteries with higher theoretical capacities and working voltages, but they have experienced limited success due to the poor ionic conductivities of known electrolytes and electrodes. Here, we report a high-throughput computational screening of 9747 fluoride-containing materials in search of fluoride-ion conductors. Via a combination of empirical, lightweight DFT, and nudged elastic band (NEB) calculations, we identified >10 crystal systems with high fluoride mobility. We applied a search strategy where calculations are performed in any order (decoupled), computational resources are reassigned based on need (dynamic), and predictive models are repeatedly updated (iterative). Unlike hierarchical searches, our decoupled, dynamic, and iterative framework (DDI) began by calculating high-quality barrier heights for fluoride-ion mobility in a large and diverse group of materials. This high-quality dataset provided a benchmark against which a rapid calculation method could be refined. This accurate method was then used to measure the barrier heights for 6797 fluoride–ion pathways. The final dataset has allowed us to discover many fascinating, high-performance conductors and to derive the design rules that govern their performance. These materials will accelerate experimental research into fluoride–ion batteries, while the design rules will provide an improved foundation for understanding ionic conduction.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds · Machine Learning in Materials Science · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (71)

Show source-provided references
1. Biemolt, J., Jungbacker, P., van Teijlingen, T., Yan, N. & Rothenberg, G. Beyond lithium-based batteries. Materials 13, 425 (2020).10.3390/ma13020425 ↗
2. Karkera, G., Reddy, M. A. & Fichtner, M. Recent developments and future perspectives of anionic batteries. J. Power Sources 481, 228877 (2021).10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228877 ↗
3. Druffel, D. L. et al. First-principles prediction of electrochemical electron-anion exchange: ion insertion without redox. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 9210–9214 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c02266 ↗
4. Nowroozi, M. A. et al. Fluoride ion batteries – past, present, and future. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 5980–6012 (2021).10.1039/D0TA11656D ↗
5. Zhao, X., Zhao-Karger, Z., Fichtner, M. & Shen, X. Halide-based materials and chemistry for rechargeable batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 5902–5949 (2020).10.1002/anie.201902842 ↗
6. Gschwind, F. et al. Fluoride ion batteries: theoretical performance, safety, toxicity, and a combinatorial screening of new electrodes. J. Fluor. Chem. 182, 76–90 (2016).10.1016/j.jfluchem.2015.12.002 ↗
7. Anji Reddy, M. & Fichtner, M. Batteries based on fluoride shuttle. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 17059 (2011).10.1039/c1jm13535j ↗
8. Dieudonné, B. et al. The key role of the composition and structural features in fluoride ion conductivity in tysonite Ce1−xSrxF3−x solid solutions. Dalton Trans. 46, 3761–3769 (2017).10.1039/C6DT04714A ↗
9. Dieudonné, B. et al. Exploring the Sm1−xCaxF3−x tysonite solid solution as a solid-state electrolyte: relationships between structural features and F– ionic conductivity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 119, 25170–25179 (2015).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b05016 ↗
10. Preishuber-Pflügl, F., Epp, V., Nakhal, S., Lerch, M. & Wilkening, M. Defect-enhanced F− ion conductivity in layer-structured nanocrystalline BaSnF4 prepared by high-energy ball milling combined with soft annealing. Phys. Status Solidi C. 12, 10–14 (2015).10.1002/pssc.201400193 ↗
11. Ahmad, M. M., Yamane, Y. & Yamada, K. Structure, ionic conduction, and giant dielectric properties of mechanochemically synthesized BaSnF4. J. Appl. Phys. 106, 074106 (2009).10.1063/1.3234393 ↗
12. Sorokin, N. I. SnF2 -Based Solid Electrolytes. Inorg. Mater. 40, 989–997 (2004).10.1023/B:INMA.0000041335.17098.d1 ↗
13. Mohammad, I., Witter, R., Fichtner, M. & Anji Reddy, M. Room-temperature, rechargeable solid-state fluoride-ion batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1, 4766–4775 (2018).10.1021/acsaem.8b00864 ↗
14. McRae, L. et al. Design of semiconducting electrides via electron-metal hybridization: the case of Sc2C. https://doi.org/10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-t1b6t (2021).10.33774/chemrxiv-2021-t1b6t ↗
15. Druffel, D. L. et al. Synthesis and electronic structure of a 3D crystalline stack of mxene-like sheets. Chem. Mater. 31, 9788–9796 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b03722 ↗
16. Warren, S. C. et al. Metal carbides and metal nitrides for a fluoride ion battery. US Patent App. US20210151755A1, 1–49 (2021).
17. Shang, S.-L. et al. A comprehensive first-principles study of pure elements: vacancy formation and migration energies and self-diffusion coefficients. Acta Mater. 109, 128–141 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2016.02.031 ↗
18. Zhou, B.-C., Shang, S.-L., Wang, Y. & Liu, Z.-K. Diffusion coefficients of alloying elements in dilute Mg alloys: A comprehensive first-principles study. Acta Mater. 103, 573–586 (2016).10.1016/j.actamat.2015.10.010 ↗
19. Angsten, T., Mayeshiba, T., Wu, H. & Morgan, D. Elemental vacancy diffusion database from high-throughput first-principles calculations for fcc and hcp structures. N. J. Phys. 16, 015018 (2014).10.1088/1367-2630/16/1/015018 ↗
20. Zeng, Y., Li, Q. & Bai, K. Prediction of interstitial diffusion activation energies of nitrogen, oxygen, boron and carbon in bcc, fcc, and hcp metals using machine learning. Comp. Mater. Sci. 144, 232–247 (2018).10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.12.030 ↗
21. Wu, M. et al. High-throughput screening of TMOCl cathode materials based on the full-cell system for chloride-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 23169–23177 (2021).10.1039/D1TA06779F ↗
22. Feng, Y. et al. High-throughput modeling of atomic diffusion migration energy barrier of fcc metals. Prog. Nat. Sci.: Mater. Int. 29, 341–348 (2019).10.1016/j.pnsc.2019.02.007 ↗
23. Wu, H., Mayeshiba, T. & Morgan, D. High-throughput ab-initio dilute solute diffusion database. Sci. Data 3, 160054 (2016).10.1038/sdata.2016.54 ↗
24. Kim, K. et al. Material Design Strategy for Halide Solid Electrolytes Li3MX6 (X = Cl, Br, and I) for All-Solid-State High-Voltage Li-Ion Batteries. Chem. Mater. 33, 3669–3677 (2021).10.1021/acs.chemmater.1c00555 ↗
25. Zhong, W. & Zhao, J.-C. A comprehensive diffusion mobility database comprising 23 elements for magnesium alloys. Acta Mater. 201, 191–208 (2020).10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.079 ↗
26. Agarwal, R. & Trinkle, D. R. Ab initio magnesium-solute transport database using exact diffusion theory. Acta Mater. 150, 339–350 (2018).10.1016/j.actamat.2018.03.025 ↗
27. He, B. et al. High-throughput screening platform for solid electrolytes combining hierarchical ion-transport prediction algorithms. Sci. Data 7, 151 (2020).10.1038/s41597-020-0474-y ↗
28. Kahle, L., Marcolongo, A. & Marzari, N. High-throughput computational screening for solid-state Li-ion conductors. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 928–948 (2020).10.1039/C9EE02457C ↗
29. Morkhova, Y. A. et al. Computational search for novel Zn-Ion conductors—a crystallochemical, bond valence, and density functional study. J. Phys. Chem. C. 125, 17590–17599 (2021).10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c02984 ↗
30. Sendek, A. D. et al. Holistic computational structure screening of more than 12000 candidates for solid lithium-ion conductor materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 10, 306–320 (2017).10.1039/C6EE02697D ↗
31. Pizzi, G., Cepellotti, A., Sabatini, R., Marzari, N. & Kozinsky, B. AiiDA: automated interactive infrastructure and database for computational science. Comp. Mater. Sci. 111, 218–230 (2016).10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.09.013 ↗
32. Mathew, K. et al. Atomate: a high-level interface to generate, execute, and analyze computational materials science workflows. Comp. Mater. Sci. 139, 140–152 (2017).10.1016/j.commatsci.2017.07.030 ↗
33. Jain, A. et al. FireWorks: a dynamic workflow system designed for high-throughput applications. Concurrency Computat.: Pract. Exp. 27, 5037–5059 (2015).10.1002/cpe.3505 ↗
34. Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOW: an automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Comp. Mater. Sci. 58, 218–226 (2012).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.005 ↗
35. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
36. Zapata, F. et al. Qmflows: A tool kit for interoperable parallel workflows in quantum chemistry. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 59, 3191–3197 (2019).10.1021/acs.jcim.9b00384 ↗
37. Adorf, C. S., Dodd, P. M., Ramasubramani, V. & Glotzer, S. C. Simple data and workflow management with the signac framework. Comp. Mater. Sci. 146, 220–229 (2018).10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.035 ↗
38. Mayeshiba, T. et al. The MAterials Simulation Toolkit (MAST) for atomistic modeling of defects and diffusion. Comp. Mater. Sci. 126, 90–102 (2017).10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.09.018 ↗
39. Sundberg, J. D. Online Github repository for Simmate. https://github.com/jacksund/simmate (2022).
40. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
41. Ong, S. P. et al. Python Materials Genomics (pymatgen): A robust, open-source python library for materials analysis. Comp. Mater. Sci. 68, 314–319 (2013).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.10.028 ↗
42. Smidstrup, S., Pedersen, A., Stokbro, K. & Jónsson, H. Improved initial guess for minimum energy path calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 140, 214106 (2014).10.1063/1.4878664 ↗
43. Trottier, R. M., Millican, S. L. & Musgrave, C. B. Modified single iteration synchronous-transit approach to bound diffusion barriers for solid-state reactions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 16, 5912–5922 (2020).10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00552 ↗
44. Henkelman, G., Uberuaga, B. P. & Jónsson, H. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901–9904 (2000).10.1063/1.1329672 ↗
45. Rong, Z., Kitchaev, D., Canepa, P., Huang, W. & Ceder, G. An efficient algorithm for finding the minimum energy path for cation migration in ionic materials. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 074112 (2016).10.1063/1.4960790 ↗
46. Garrido Torres, J. A., Jennings, P. C., Hansen, M. H., Boes, J. R. & Bligaard, T. Low-scaling algorithm for nudged elastic band calculations using a surrogate machine learning model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 156001 (2019).10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.156001 ↗
47. Sheppard, D., Terrell, R. & Henkelman, G. Optimization methods for finding minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 134106 (2008).10.1063/1.2841941 ↗
48. Peterson, A. A. Acceleration of saddle-point searches with machine learning. J. Chem. Phys. 145, 074106 (2016).10.1063/1.4960708 ↗
49. Li, H.-X., Zhou, X.-Y., Wang, Y.-C. & Jiang, H. Theoretical study of Na+ transport in the solid-state electrolyte Na3OBr based on deep potential molecular dynamics. Inorg. Chem. Front. 8, 425–432 (2021).10.1039/D0QI00921K ↗
50. Chen, H., Wong, L. L. & Adams, S. SoftBV - a software tool for screening the materials genome of inorganic fast ion conductors. Acta Crystallogr. B: Struct. Sci. Cryst. Eng. Mater. 75, 18–33 (2019).10.1107/S2052520618015718 ↗
51. Wang, Y. et al. Design principles for solid-state lithium superionic conductors. Nat. Mater. 14, 1026–1031 (2015).10.1038/nmat4369 ↗
52. Zhong, J., Chen, L. & Zhang, L. Automation of diffusion database development in multicomponent alloys from large number of experimental composition profiles. NPJ Comput. Mater. 7, 35 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00500-0 ↗
53. Zhang, L. et al. A database of ionic transport characteristics for over 29000 inorganic compounds. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 2003087 (2020).10.1002/adfm.202003087 ↗
54. Elbaz, Y. & Furman, D. & Caspary Toroker, M. Modeling diffusion in functional materials: from density functional theory to artificial intelligence. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30, 1900778 (2020).10.1002/adfm.201900778 ↗
55. Danto, Y., Poujade, G., Pistré, J. D., Lucat, C. & Salardenne, J. A Pb|PbF2 | BiF3|Bi thin solid film reversible galvanic cell. Thin Solid Films 55, 347–354 (1978).10.1016/0040-6090(78)90151-7 ↗
56. Mohammad, I., Witter, R., Fichtner, M. & Reddy, M. A. Introducing interlayer electrolytes: toward room-temperature high-potential solid-state rechargeable fluoride ion batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 1553–1562 (2019).10.1021/acsaem.8b02166 ↗
57. Berastegui, P. Structure and conductivity of some fluoride ion conductors. Solid State Ion. 154–155, 605–608 (2002).10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00504-0 ↗
58. Wapenaar, K. E. D. The ionic conductivity of fluorite-structured solid solutions of composition: MF2:UF4:CeF3 (M = Ca, Sr, Ba). J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 667 (1979).10.1149/1.2129107 ↗
59. Kennedy, J. H. Ionic conductivity of doped beta-lead fluoride. J. Electrochem. Soc. 123, 47 (1976).10.1149/1.2132763 ↗
60. Anji Reddy, M. & Fichtner, M. Fluoride-ion conductors. Handb. Sol. State Batteries 6, 277–306 (2015).10.1142/9789814651905_0008 ↗
61. Nowroozi, M. A., Wissel, K., Rohrer, J., Munnangi, A. R. & Clemens, O. LaSrMnO4: reversible electrochemical intercalation of fluoride ions in the context of fluoride ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 29, 3441–3453 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05075 ↗
62. Nowroozi, M. A., de Laune, B. & Clemens, O. Reversible electrochemical intercalation and deintercalation of fluoride ions into host lattices with schafarzikite-type structure. Chem. Open 7, 617–623 (2018).
63. Clemens, O. et al. Electrochemical fluorination of perovskite type BaFeO2.5. Dalton Trans. 43, 15771–15778 (2014).10.1039/C4DT02485K ↗
64. Deng, Z., Zhu, Z., Chu, I.-H. & Ong, S. P. Data-driven first-principles methods for the study and design of alkali superionic conductors. Chem. Mater. 29, 281–288 (2017).10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02648 ↗
65. Ward, L. et al. Matminer: An open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comp. Mater. Sci. 152, 60–69 (2018).10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018 ↗
66. Gražulis, S. et al. Crystallography open database - an open-access collection of crystal structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 42, 726–729 (2009).10.1107/S0021889809016690 ↗
67. Yuliia, P., Anatoliy, O. & Anton, N. Synthesis and electrical conductivity of solid solutions of the system PbF2-NdF3-SnF2. Ukr. Chem. J. 86, 24–37 (2020).10.33609/2708-129X.86.5.2020.24-37 ↗
68. Sorokin, N. I. Anion-conducting fluoride and oxyfluoride glasses. Russ. Chem. Rev. 70, 801–807 (2001).10.1070/RC2001v070n09ABEH000674 ↗
69. Choudhury, P., Mandal, P., Das, A. N. & Ghosh, B. Dielectric behaviour and thermal expansions of ZnTiF6 6H2O/6D2O and MnTiF6 6H2O/6D2O crystals. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 19, 3961–3970 (1986).10.1088/0022-3719/19/21/003 ↗
70. Rubins, R. S. & Yung, Y. H. Pair and isolated ion spectra of Ni2+ in MgTiF6 6H2O. J. Chem. Phys. 75, 4285–4288 (1981).10.1063/1.442632 ↗
71. Kawamoto, Y. Ionic conductivities of ZrF4-BaF2-CsF glasses. Solid State Ion. 22, 207–212 (1987).10.1016/0167-2738(87)90034-8 ↗