A process-synergistic active learning framework for high-strength Al-Si alloys design
Source abstract
Abstract
High-strength Al-Si alloys are important lightweight materials, but their optimal design is hindered by scarce-imbalance data, and complex compositional-process-property relationships. Traditional trial-and-error experimentation fails to explore this multi-dimensional design space, where processing routes (PRs) and composition must be co-optimized to achieve superior strength. This study introduces a process-synergistic active learning (PSAL) framework leveraging a conditional Wasserstein autoencoder (c-WAE) to enable the data-efficient design. By encoding PRs as conditional variables, the PSAL framework reveals exceptional synergistic effects across diverse PRs, significantly outperforming single-process approaches. The process-aware latent representation facilitates the efficient exploration of potential compositions across multi-PRs simultaneously. Through iterative active learning cycles integrating machine learning predictions with experimental validations, ultimate tensile strength is greatly improved: 459.8 MPa for gravity casting with T6 heat treatment within three iterations and 220.5 MPa for gravity casting with hot extrusion in a single iteration. This framework handles sparse datasets effectively, capturing complex process-composition-property relationships and establishing a new paradigm for accelerated multi-objective material design.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Aluminum Alloy Microstructure Properties · Advanced Materials Characterization Techniques · Machine Learning in Materials Science
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (72)
Show source-provided references
1. Ejiofor, J. U. & Reddy, R. G. Developments in the processing and properties of particulate Al-Si composites. JOM 49, 31–37 (1997).10.1007/s11837-997-0008-5 ↗
2. Luo, Q. et al. Mechanism of Fe removal by Sn addition in Al-7Si-1Fe alloy. J. Alloy. Compd. 948, 169724 (2023).10.1016/j.jallcom.2023.169724 ↗
3. Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., Luo, Q., Peng, L. & Li, Q. Effectively refining Al-10Si alloy via Al-Ti-Nb-B refiner with Nb2O5. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 176, 204–210 (2024).10.1016/j.jmst.2023.08.029 ↗
4. Zhao, Z. et al. Insights into the dual effects of Ti on the grain refinement and mechanical properties of hypoeutectic Al–Si alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 189, 44–59 (2024).10.1016/j.jmst.2023.12.014 ↗
5. Tamuly, R., Behl, A. & Borkar, H. Effect of addition of grain refiner and modifier on microstructural and mechanical properties of squeeze cast A356 alloy. Trans. Indian Inst. Met. 75, 2395–2408 (2022).10.1007/s12666-022-02607-4 ↗
6. Shiga, K., Fujiwara, T., Murakami, Y. & Omura, N. In situ X-ray imaging of α-Al(FeMn)Si grain evolution during solidification of an Al-Si alloy with electromagnetic stirring. J. Alloy. Compd. 1004, 175866 (2024).10.1016/j.jallcom.2024.175866 ↗
7. Gao, J. & Li, Z. Current situation and prospect of computationally assisted design in high-performance additive manufactured Aluminum alloys: a review. Acta Metall. Sin. 59, 87–105 (2022).
8. Yamasaki, S. et al. Effect of Fe addition on heat-resistant aluminum alloys produced by selective laser melting. Metals 9, 468 (2019).10.3390/met9040468 ↗
9. Zhang, B. et al. Effect of heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Er-containing Al–7Si–0.6 Mg alloy by laser powder bed fusion. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 18, 3073–3084 (2022).10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.04.023 ↗
10. Wang, H. et al. Deformation-induced crystalline-to-amorphous phase transformation in a CrMnFeCoNi high-entropy alloy. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe3105 (2021).10.1126/sciadv.abe3105 ↗
11. Yi, W., Liu, G., Lu, Z., Gao, J. & Zhang, L. Efficient alloy design of Sr-modified A356 alloys driven by computational thermodynamics and machine learning. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 112, 277–290 (2022).10.1016/j.jmst.2021.09.061 ↗
12. Rao, Z. et al. Machine learning–enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science 378, 78–85 (2022).10.1126/science.abo4940 ↗
13. Gao, T., Gao, J., Zhang, J., Song, B. & Zhang, L. Development of an accurate “composition-process-properties” dataset for SLMed Al-Si-(Mg) alloys and its application in alloy design. J. Mater. Inf. 3, 6 (2023).10.20517/jmi.2023.03 ↗
14. Luo, A. A., Sachdev, A. K. & Apelian, D. Alloy development and process innovations for light metals casting. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 306, 117606 (2022).10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117606 ↗
15. Mao, H., Chen, H.-L. & Chen, Q. TCHEA1: a thermodynamic database not limited for “high entropy” alloys. J. Phase Equilibra Diffus. 38, 353–368 (2017).10.1007/s11669-017-0570-7 ↗
16. Körmann, F. et al. Treasure maps” for magnetic high-entropy-alloys from theory and experiment. Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 142404 (2015).10.1063/1.4932571 ↗
17. Rao, Z. et al. Invar effects in FeNiCo medium entropy alloys: from an Invar treasure map to alloy design. Intermetallics 111, 106520 (2019).10.1016/j.intermet.2019.106520 ↗
18. Liu, S. et al. A crystal glass–nanostructured Al-based electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd6421 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.add6421 ↗
19. Curtarolo, S. et al. The high-throughput highway to computational materials design. Nat. Mater. 12, 191–201 (2013).10.1038/nmat3568 ↗
20. Oganov, A. R., Pickard, C. J., Zhu, Q. & Needs, R. J. Structure prediction drives materials discovery. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 331–348 (2019).10.1038/s41578-019-0101-8 ↗
21. Ramprasad, R., Batra, R., Pilania, G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi, A. & Kim, C. Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Comput. Mater. 3, 54 (2017).10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5 ↗
22. Wang, C., Tan, X. P., Tor, S. B. & Lim, C. S. Machine learning in additive manufacturing: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Addit. Manuf. 36, 101538 (2020).
23. Tabor, D. P. et al. Accelerating the discovery of materials for clean energy in the era of smart automation. Nat. Rev. Mater. 3, 5–20 (2018).10.1038/s41578-018-0005-z ↗
24. Sasidhar, K. N. et al. Enhancing corrosion-resistant alloy design through natural language processing and deep learning. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg7992 (2023).10.1126/sciadv.adg7992 ↗
25. Jiang, L. et al. A rapid and effective method for alloy materials design via sample data transfer machine learning. npj Comput Mater. 9, 26 (2023).10.1038/s41524-023-00979-9 ↗
26. Chen, Y. et al. MatterGPT: A generative transformer for multi-property inverse design of solid-state materials. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.07608 (2024).10.48550/arXiv.2408.07608 ↗
27. Xiao, H. et al. An invertible, invariant crystal representation for inverse design of solid-state materials using generative deep learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 7027 (2023).10.1038/s41467-023-42870-7 ↗
28. Shen, C. et al. Physical metallurgy-guided machine learning and artificial intelligent design of ultrahigh-strength stainless steel. Acta Mater. 179, 201–214 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.08.033 ↗
29. Juan, Y. et al. Accelerated design of Al−Zn−Mg−Cu alloys via machine learning. T Noferr. Metal. Soc. 34, 709–723 (2024).10.1016/S1003-6326(23)66429-5 ↗
30. Huang, J., Ando, D. & Sutou, Y. Heat-resistant aluminum alloy design using explainable machine learning. Mater. Des. 243, 113057 (2024).10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113057 ↗
31. Chen, Z. Q., Shang, Y. H., Liu, X. D. & Yang, Y. Accelerated discovery of eutectic compositionally complex alloys by generative machine learning. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 204 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01385-5 ↗
32. Zhang, H., Fu, H., Zhu, S., Yong, W. & Xie, J. Machine learning assisted composition effective design for precipitation strengthened copper alloys. Acta Mater. 215, 117118 (2021).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117118 ↗
33. Wen, C. et al. Machine learning assisted design of high entropy alloys with desired property. Acta Mater. 170, 109–117 (2019).10.1016/j.actamat.2019.03.010 ↗
34. Liu, S. et al. A comparative study of predicting high entropy alloy phase fractions with traditional machine learning and deep neural networks. npj Comput. Mater. 10, 172 (2024).10.1038/s41524-024-01335-1 ↗
35. Yang, C. et al. A machine learning-based alloy design system to facilitate the rational design of high entropy alloys with enhanced hardness. Acta Mater. 222, 117431 (2022).10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117431 ↗
36. He, J. et al. Machine learning-assisted design of high-entropy alloys with superior mechanical properties. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 33, 260–286 (2024).10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.09.014 ↗
37. Park, S. et al. High strength aluminum alloys design via explainable artificial intelligence. J. Alloy. Compd. 903, 163828 (2022).10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163828 ↗
38. Starke, E. A. & Staley, J. T. Application of modern aluminum alloys to aircraft. Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 32, 131–172 (1996).10.1016/0376-0421(95)00004-6 ↗
39. Noga, P., Skrzekut, T. & Wędrychowicz, M. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Si alloys produced by rapid solidification and hot extrusion. Materials 16, 5223 (2023).10.3390/ma16155223 ↗
40. Kaur, H., Pannu, H. S. & Malhi, A. K. A systematic review on imbalanced data challenges in machine learning: applications and solutions. ACM Comput. Surv. 52, 79:1–79:36 (2019).
41. Balachandran, P. V., Kowalski, B., Sehirlioglu, A. & Lookman, T. Experimental search for high-temperature ferroelectric perovskites guided by two-step machine learning. Nat. Commun. 9, 1668 (2018).10.1038/s41467-018-03821-9 ↗
42. Pei, X., Pei, J., Hou, H. & Zhao, Y. Optimizing casting process using a combination of small data machine learning and phase-field simulations. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 27 (2025).10.1038/s41524-025-01524-6 ↗
43. Gubernatis, J. E. & Lookman, T. Machine learning in materials design and discovery: examples from the present and suggestions for the future. Phys. Rev. Mater. 2, 120301 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.120301 ↗
44. Jung, J., Yoon, J. I., Park, H. K., Kim, J. Y. & Kim, H. S. Bayesian approach in predicting mechanical properties of materials: application to dual phase steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 743, 382–390 (2019).10.1016/j.msea.2018.11.106 ↗
45. Yamawaki, M., Ohnishi, M., Ju, S. & Shiomi, J. Multifunctional structural design of graphene thermoelectrics by Bayesian optimization. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4192 (2018).10.1126/sciadv.aar4192 ↗
46. Xue, D. et al. Accelerated search for materials with targeted properties by adaptive design. Nat. Commun. 7, 11241 (2016).10.1038/ncomms11241 ↗
47. Yuan, R. et al. Accelerated discovery of large electrostrains in BaTiO3 -based piezoelectrics using active learning. Adv. Mater. 30, 1702884 (2018).10.1002/adma.201702884 ↗
48. Zhao, T., Zhao, R. & Eskenazi, M. Learning discourse-level diversity for neural dialog models using conditional variational autoencoders. In: Proc. 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics 654–664 (ACL, 2017).10.18653/v1/P17-1061 ↗
49. Kriegeskorte, N. & Golan, T. Neural network models and deep learning. Curr. Biol. 29, R231–R236 (2019).10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.034 ↗
50. Binhao, F., Hong, H. & Ziyun, Z. Improve the application of XGBDT in network abnormal traffic detection. In: Proc. IEEE International Conference on Emergency Science and Information Technology (ICESIT) 193–200 (2021).10.1109/ICESIT53460.2021.9696640 ↗
51. Zhang, L., Zhang, J. & Nie, Q. DIRECT-NET: an efficient method to discover cis-regulatory elements and construct regulatory networks from single-cell multiomics data. Sci. Adv. 8, eabl7393 (2022).10.1126/sciadv.abl7393 ↗
52. Li, S. et al. Development and applications of aluminum alloys for aerospace industry. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 27, 944–983 (2023).10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.274 ↗
53. van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
54. Cabuk, K. S. et al. Chasing the objective upper eyelid symmetry formula; R2, RMSE, POC, MAE, and MSE. Int. Ophthalmol. 44, 303 (2024).10.1007/s10792-024-03157-y ↗
55. Mohammad, N. et al. Predicting the age of field Anopheles mosquitoes using mass spectrometry and deep learning. Sci. Adv. 10, eadj6990 (2024).10.1126/sciadv.adj6990 ↗
56. Mohanty, P. S. & Gruzleski, J. E. Grain refinement mechanisms of hypoeutectic Al-Si alloys. Acta Mater. 44, 3749–3760 (1996).10.1016/1359-6454(96)00021-3 ↗
57. Kang, N., Coddet, P., Liao, H., Baur, T. & Coddet, C. Wear behavior and microstructure of hypereutectic Al-Si alloys prepared by selective laser melting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 378, 142–149 (2016).10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.03.221 ↗
58. Liwen, X. et al. Progress in effects of squeeze casting process parameters and heat treatment on microstructure and properties of Al-Si alloy. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloy. 41, 842–848 (2023).
59. McLachlan, G. J. & Rathnayake, S. On the number of components in a Gaussian mixture model. Wires Data Min. Knowl. 4, 341–355 (2014).10.1002/widm.1135 ↗
60. Mira, A. Ordering and improving the performance of Monte Carlo Markov chains. Stat. Sci. 16, 340–350 (2001).10.1214/ss/1015346319 ↗
61. Wang, P., Sun, H., Zhang, Y., Zhang, J. & Li, Q. Influences of Al2.5Cu0.5Ti master alloy on micro-structure and mechanical properties of Al-7Si alloy. J. Mater. Eng. 51, 84–92 (2023).
62. Jiang, F., Zhang, G., Zhang, Z., Suo, Z. & Wang, Y. Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-12Si alloy under pressurized solidification. Spec. Cast. Nonferrous Alloy. 37, 1081–1083 (2017).
63. Fu, X. et al. Effect of Mn/Ag ratio on microstructure and mechanical properties of heat-resistant Al-Cu alloys. Materials 17, 1371 (2024).10.3390/ma17061371 ↗
64. Wu, Z. et al. A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 32, 4–24 (2021).10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386 ↗
65. Kitaev, N., Kaiser, L. & Levskaya, A. Reformer: the efficient transformer. In: Proc. 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) 1–12 (ICLR, 2020).
66. Jiang L. Research on next-generation advanced aluminum alloys with high strength and high toughness via data-driven methods. (University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2024).
67. Marcílio, W. E. & Eler, D. M. From explanations to feature selection: assessing SHAP values as feature selection mechanism. In: Proc. 33rd SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images (SIBGRAPI) 340–347 (SIBGRAPI, 2020).10.1109/SIBGRAPI51738.2020.00053 ↗
68. Rodríguez, P., Bautista, M. A., Gonzàlez, J. & Escalera, S. Beyond one-hot encoding: lower dimensional target embedding. Image Vis. Comput 75, 21–31 (2018).10.1016/j.imavis.2018.04.004 ↗
69. Petersen, P. & Voigtlaender, F. Optimal approximation of piecewise smooth functions using deep ReLU neural networks. Neural Netw. 108, 296–330 (2018).10.1016/j.neunet.2018.08.019 ↗
70. Zhang, Z. Improved Adam optimizer for deep neural networks. In: Proc. IEEE/ACM 26th International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS) 1–2 (IEEE, 2018).10.1109/IWQoS.2018.8624183 ↗
71. Borgwardt, K. M. et al. Integrating structured biological data by Kernel maximum mean discrepancy. Bioinformatics 22, e49–e57 (2006).10.1093/bioinformatics/btl242 ↗
72. Krause, A. & Guestrin, C. Nonmyopic active learning of Gaussian processes: an exploration-exploitation approach. In: Proc. 24th International Conference on Machine Learning 449–456 (ICML, 2007).10.1145/1273496.1273553 ↗