journal article·2026-01-15Open access

Combining feature-based approaches with graph neural networks and symbolic regression for synergistic performance and interpretability

Rogério Almeida Gouvêa, Pierre-Paul De Breuck, Tatiane Pretto, Gian-Marco Rignanese, Marcos José Leite Santos

npj Computational Materials· Volume 12· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract This study introduces MatterVial, an innovative hybrid framework for feature-based machine learning in materials science. MatterVial expands the feature space by integrating latent representations from a diverse suite of pretrained graph-neural network (GNN) models—including structure-based (MEGNet), composition-based (ROOST), and equivariant (ORB) graph networks—with computationally efficient, GNN-approximated descriptors and novel features from symbolic regression. Our approach combines the chemical transparency of traditional feature-based models with the predictive power of deep learning architectures. When augmenting the feature-based model MODNet on Matbench tasks, this method yields significant error reductions and elevates its performance to be competitive with, and in several cases superior to, state-of-the-art end-to-end GNNs, with accuracy increases exceeding 40% for multiple tasks. An integrated interpretability module, employing surrogate models and symbolic regression, decodes the latent GNN-derived descriptors into explicit, physically meaningful formulas. This unified framework advances materials informatics by providing a high-performance, transparent tool that aligns with the principles of explainable AI, paving the way for more targeted and autonomous materials discovery.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Computational Drug Discovery Methods · Advanced Graph Neural Networks

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Rodrigues, J. F., Florea, L., De Oliveira, M. C. F., Diamond, D. & Oliveira, O. N. Big data and machine learning for materials science. Discov. Mater. 1, 12 (2021).10.1007/s43939-021-00012-0 ↗
2. Dey, A. et al. State of the art and prospects for halide perovskite nanocrystals. ACS Nano 15, 10775–10981 (2021).10.1021/acsnano.0c08903 ↗
3. Guo, K., Yang, Z., Yu, C.-H. & Buehler, M. J. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in design of mechanical materials. Mater. Horiz. 8, 1153–1172 (2021).10.1039/D0MH01451F ↗
4. De Breuck, P.-P., Hautier, G. & Rignanese, G. M. Materials property prediction for limited datasets enabled by feature selection and joint learning with MODNet. npj Comput. Mater. 7, 1–8 (2021).10.1038/s41524-021-00552-2 ↗
5. Zhang, B., Zhou, M., Wu, J. & Gao, F. Predicting the materials properties using a 3D graph neural network with invariant representation. IEEE Access 10, 62440–62449 (2022).10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3181750 ↗
6. Tawfik, S. A. & Russo, S. P. Naturally-meaningful and efficient descriptors: machine learning of material properties based on robust one-shot ab initio descriptors. J. Cheminform. 14, 78 (2022).10.1186/s13321-022-00658-9 ↗
7. Ward, L. et al. Matminer: an open source toolkit for materials data mining. Comput. Mater. Sci. 152, 60–69 (2018).10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.05.018 ↗
8. Pretto, T., Baum, F., Gouvêa, R. A., Brolo, A. G. & Santos, M. J. L. Optimizing the synthesis parameters of double perovskites with machine learning using a multioutput regression model. J. Phys. Chem. C. 128, 7041–7052 (2024).10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c06801 ↗
9. Liu, J. et al. Toward excellence of electrocatalyst design by emerging descriptor-oriented machine learning. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2110748 (2022).10.1002/adfm.202110748 ↗
10. Kim, G.-H., Lee, C., Kim, K. & Ko, D.-H. Novel structural feature-descriptor platform for machine learning to accelerate the development of organic photovoltaics. Nano Energy 106, 108108 (2023).10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108108 ↗
11. Li, S. et al. Encoding the atomic structure for machine learning in materials science. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 12, e1558 (2022).10.1002/wcms.1558 ↗
12. Dunn, A. MatBench Leaderboard. https://matbench.materialsproject.org/ (2024).
13. Riebesell, J. et al. A framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions. Nat. Mach. Intell. 7, 836–847 (2025).10.1038/s42256-025-01055-1 ↗
14. Lam Pham, T. et al. Machine learning reveals orbital interaction in materials. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18, 756–765 (2017).10.1080/14686996.2017.1378060 ↗
15. Bartók, A. P., Kondor, R. & Csányi, G. On representing chemical environments. Phys. Rev. B 87, 184115 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.184115 ↗
16. Kanter, J. M. & Veeramachaneni, K. Deep feature synthesis: towards automating data science endeavors. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) 1–10 (IEEE, Campus des Cordeliers, Paris, France, 2015).10.1109/DSAA.2015.7344858 ↗
17. Arik, S. Ö. & Pfister, T. TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning. AAAI 35, 6679–6687 (2021).10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826 ↗
18. Ruff, R., Reiser, P., Stühmer, J. & Friederich, P. Connectivity optimized nested graph networks for crystal structures. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14102 (2023).
19. Ko, T. W. et al. Materials Graph Library (MatGL), an open-source graph deep learning library for materials science and chemistry. npj Comput. Mater. 11, 253 (2025).10.1038/s41524-025-01742-y ↗
20. Goodall, R. E. A. & Lee, A. A. Predicting materials properties without crystal structure: deep representation learning from stoichiometry. Nat. Commun. 11, 6280 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-19964-7 ↗
21. Rhodes, B. et al. Orb-v3: atomistic simulation at scale. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.06231 (2025).10.48550/arXiv.2504.06231 ↗
22. Shiota, T., Ishihara, K. & Mizukami, W. Universal neural network potentials as descriptors: towards scalable chemical property prediction using quantum and classical computers. Digit. Discov. 3, 1714–1728 (2024).10.1039/D4DD00098F ↗
23. El-Samman, A. M. et al. Global geometry of chemical graph neural network representations in terms of chemical moieties. Digit. Discov. 3, 544–557 (2024).10.1039/D3DD00200D ↗
24. El-Samman, A. M., De Castro, S., Morton, B. & De Baerdemacker, S. Transfer learning graph representations of molecules for pKa13, C-NMR, and solubility. Can. J. Chem. 102, 275–288 (2024).10.1139/cjc-2023-0152 ↗
25. Elijošius, R. et al. Zero shot molecular generation via similarity kernels. Nat. Commun. 16, 5991 (2025).10.1038/s41467-025-60963-3 ↗
26. Kim, S. Y., Park, Y. J. & Li, J. Leveraging neural network interatomic potentials for a foundation model of chemistry. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.18497 (2025).10.48550/arXiv.2506.18497 ↗
27. Oviedo, F., Ferres, J. L., Buonassisi, T. & Butler, K. T. Interpretable and explainable machine learning for materials science and chemistry. Acc. Mater. Res. 3, 597–607 (2022).10.1021/accountsmr.1c00244 ↗
28. Pilania, G. Machine learning in materials science: from explainable predictions to autonomous design. Comput. Mater. Sci. 193, 110360 (2021).10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110360 ↗
29. Abolhasani, M. & Kumacheva, E. The rise of self-driving labs in chemical and materials sciences. Nat. Synth. 2, 483–492 (2023).10.1038/s44160-022-00231-0 ↗
30. Dunn, A., Wang, Q., Ganose, A., Dopp, D. & Jain, A. Benchmarking materials property prediction methods: the Matbench test set and Automatminer reference algorithm. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 1–10 (2020).
31. De Breuck, P.-P., Evans, M. L. & Rignanese, G.-M. Robust model benchmarking and bias-imbalance in data-driven materials science: a case study on MODNet. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 33, 404002 (2021).
32. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 11002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
33. Shen, J. et al. Reflections on one million compounds in the open quantum materials database (OQMD). J. Phys. Mater. 5, 031001 (2022).10.1088/2515-7639/ac7ba9 ↗
34. Schmidt, J. et al. Machine-learning-assisted determination of the global zero-temperature phase diagram of materials. Adv. Mater. 35, 2210788 (2023).10.1002/adma.202210788 ↗
35. Choudhary, K. et al. The joint automated repository for various integrated simulations (JARVIS) for data-driven materials design. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 173 (2020).10.1038/s41524-020-00440-1 ↗
36. Barroso-Luque, L. et al. Open Materials 2024 (OMat24) Inorganic Materials Dataset and Models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.12771 (2024).10.48550/arXiv.2410.12771 ↗
37. matbench_v0.1: MegNet (kgcnn v2.1.0) - MatBench. Materialsproject.org https://matbench.materialsproject.org/Full%20Benchmark%20Data/matbench_v0.1_MegNet_kgcnn_v2.1.0/ (2020).
38. Xu, Y. & Qian, Q. i-SISSO: mutual information-based improved sure independent screening and sparsifying operator algorithm. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 116, 105442 (2022).10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105442 ↗
39. Jiang, X., Liu, G., Xie, J. & Hu, Z. Boosting SISSO performance on small sample datasets by using random forests prescreening for complex feature selection. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2409.19209 (2024).10.48550/ARXIV.2409.19209 ↗
40. Foppa, L., Purcell, T. A. R., Levchenko, S. V., Scheffler, M. & Ghiringhelli, L. M. Hierarchical symbolic regression for identifying key physical parameters correlated with bulk properties of perovskites. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 055301 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.055301 ↗
41. Chen, T. & Guestrin, C. XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In Proc. 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794 (ACM, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2016).10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
42. Chen, C., Ye, W., Zuo, Y., Zheng, C. & Ong, S. P. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem. Mater. 31, 3564–3572 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01294 ↗
43. Purcell, T. A. R., Scheffler, M. & Ghiringhelli, L. M. Recent advances in the SISSO method and their implementation in the SISSO++ code. J. Chem. Phys. 159, 114110 (2023).10.1063/5.0156620 ↗
44. Dunn, A. et al. Benchmarking materials property prediction methods: the Matbench test set and Automatminer reference algorithm. npj Comput. Mater. 6, 138 (2020). Data originally curated by Citrine Informatics (https://citrination.com/datasets/153092/).10.1038/s41524-020-00406-3 ↗
45. Choudhary, K., Kalish, I., Beams, R. & Tavazza, F. High-throughput identification and characterization of two-dimensional materials using density functional theory. Sci. Rep. 7, 5179 (2017).10.1038/s41598-017-05402-0 ↗
46. Petretto, G. et al. High-throughput density-functional perturbation theory phonons for inorganic materials. Sci. Data 5, 180065 (2018).10.1038/sdata.2018.65 ↗
47. Zhuo, Y., Mansouri Tehrani, A. & Brgoch, J. Predicting the band gaps of inorganic solids by machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 1668–1673 (2018).10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00124 ↗
48. Petousis, I. et al. High-throughput screening of inorganic compounds for the discovery of novel dielectric and optical materials. Sci. Data 4, 160134 (2017).10.1038/sdata.2016.134 ↗
49. Kawazoe, Y., Masumoto, T., Tsai, A.-P., Yu, J.-Z. & Aihara, T. Jr. 1 Introduction. In Nonequilibrium Phase Diagrams of Ternary Amorphous Alloys (eds Kawazoe, Y. et al.) 37A 1–32 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg, 1997).10.1007/10510374_2 ↗
50. Ward, L., Agrawal, A., Choudhary, A. & Wolverton, C. A general-purpose machine learning framework for predicting properties of inorganic materials. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 16028 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2016.28 ↗
51. De Jong, M. et al. Charting the complete elastic properties of inorganic crystalline compounds. Sci. Data 2, 150009 (2015).10.1038/sdata.2015.9 ↗
52. Castelli, I. E. et al. New cubic perovskites for one- and two-photon water splitting using the computational materials repository. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 9034 (2012).10.1039/c2ee22341d ↗