In VitroDegradation Effects on Strength, Stiffness, and Creep of PLLA/PBS: A Potential Stent Material
Source abstract
Abstract
Poly(L-lactic acid) is prominent in biodegradable stent material research but its brittleness is a disadvantage. Poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) addition enhances ductility but there is a void in knowledge of degradation effects on PLLA/PBS blends—vital for evaluation of a potential stent material. Neat PLLA and melt-blended PLLA/PBS specimens were subjected to tensile testing, before and after degradation in buffered saline (37°C, pH 7.4), for up to 24 weeks. Additional specimens were subjected to constant-load creep tests. Tensile test results indicate that PLLA/PBS blends exhibit gradual losses of strengths and Young's moduli as they degrade whilst neat PLLA shows little change over a 24-week degradation period. Neat PLLA exhibits increasing creep resistance during the first eight weeks of degradation whilst the 75/25 wt% PLLA/PBS blend exhibits decreasing creep resistance with increasing degradation time. PLLA/PBS blends are ductile but creep resistance during degradation needs improvement for their use as biodegradable stent materials.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Grech E. D. · 2004
2. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.04210.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.042 ↗
3. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.85917310.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.859173 ↗
4. 10.1163/15685620332147883810.1163/156856203321478838 ↗
5. 10.1002/pat.113110.1002/pat.1131 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.06510.1016/j.polymer.2006.03.065 ↗
7. 10.1002/app.2504910.1002/app.25049 ↗
8. Ferreira B. M. P. · J. Appl. Biomater. Biomech. · 2005 · 3 · 50
9. Liu X. · J. Polym. Environ. · 1997 · 5 · 225
10. 10.1002/app.2364610.1002/app.23646 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.82410.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.824 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10439-007-9376-910.1007/s10439-007-9376-9 ↗
13. 10.1115/1.235568310.1115/1.2355683 ↗
14. 10.1115/1.183534910.1115/1.1835349 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10856-009-3851-910.1007/s10856-009-3851-9 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10856-009-3921-z10.1007/s10856-009-3921-z ↗
17. 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182541f0e10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182541f0e ↗
18. Soares J. F. D. S. · 2008
19. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.01410.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.04.014 ↗
20. 10.1021/ma071274a10.1021/ma071274a ↗
21. 10.1002/jctb.228210.1002/jctb.2282 ↗
22. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.69373910.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.693739 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.acvd.2008.10.00610.1016/j.acvd.2008.10.006 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.1092310.1002/app.10923 ↗
25. Kimble L. D. · 2011
26. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.04.01710.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.04.017 ↗
27. Struik L. C. E. · 1978
28. 10.1002/mame.20100017410.1002/mame.201000174 ↗
29. 10.1002/mame.20090036910.1002/mame.200900369 ↗
30. 10.1016/0020-7683(94)00163-Q10.1016/0020-7683(94)00163-Q ↗
31. 10.1016/0032-3861(88)90107-310.1016/0032-3861(88)90107-3 ↗
32. 10.1007/BF0054037810.1007/BF00540378 ↗