Unveiling the complex structure-property correlation of defects in 2D materials based on high throughput datasets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Modification of physical properties of materials and design of materials with on-demand characteristics is at the heart of modern technology. Rare application relies on pure materials—most devices and technologies require careful design of materials properties through alloying, creating heterostructures of composites, or controllable introduction of defects. At the same time, such designer materials are notoriously difficult to model. Thus, it is very tempting to apply machine learning methods to such systems. Unfortunately, there is only a handful of machine learning-friendly material databases available these days. We develop a platform for easy implementation of machine learning techniques to materials design and populate it with datasets on pristine and defected materials. Here we introduce the 2D Material Defect (2DMD) datasets that include defect properties of represented 2D materials such as MoS2, WSe2, hBN, GaSe, InSe, and black phosphorous, calculated using DFT. Our study provides a data-driven physical understanding of complex behaviors of defect properties in 2D materials, holding promise for a guide to the development of efficient machine learning models. In addition, with the increasing enrollment of datasets, our database could provide a platform for designing materials with predetermined properties.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · 2D Materials and Applications · Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Wolfowicz, G. et al. Quantum guidelines for solid-state spin defects. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 906–925 (2021).10.1038/s41578-021-00306-y ↗
2. Novoselov, K. S. et al. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306, 666–669 (2004).10.1126/science.1102896 ↗
3. Koperski, M. et al. Single photon emitters in exfoliated WSe2 structures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 503–506 (2015).10.1038/nnano.2015.67 ↗
4. He, Y.-M. et al. Single quantum emitters in monolayer semiconductors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 497–502 (2015).10.1038/nnano.2015.75 ↗
5. Tran, T. T., Bray, K., Ford, M. J., Toth, M. & Aharonovich, I. Quantum emission from hexagonal boron nitride monolayers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 11, 37–41 (2016).10.1038/nnano.2015.242 ↗
6. Jain, A. et al. Commentary: The Materials Project: a materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation. APL Mater. 1, 011002 (2013).10.1063/1.4812323 ↗
7. Kirklin, S. et al. The open quantum materials database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies. npj Comput. Mater. 1, 1–15 (2015).10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 ↗
8. Saal, J. E., Kirklin, S., Aykol, M., Meredig, B. & Wolverton, C. Materials design and discovery with high-throughput density functional theory: the open quantum materials database (OQMD). JOM 65, 1501–1509 (2013).10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 ↗
9. Curtarolo, S. et al. AFLOW: An automatic framework for high-throughput materials discovery. Comput. Mater. Sci. 58, 218–226 (2012).10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.005 ↗
10. Chen, C., Ye, W., Zuo, Y., Zheng, C. & Ong, S. P. Graph networks as a universal machine learning framework for molecules and crystals. Chem. Mater. 31, 3564–3572 (2019).10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01294 ↗
11. Xie, T. & Grossman, J. C. Crystal graph convolutional neural networks for an accurate and interpretable prediction of material properties. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 145301 (2018).10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.145301 ↗
12. Schütt, K. T., Sauceda, H. E., Kindermans, P.-J., Tkatchenko, A. & Müller, K.-R. SchNet – A deep learning architecture for molecules and materials. J. Chem. Phys. 148, 241722 (2018).10.1063/1.5019779 ↗
13. Gasteiger, J., Becker, F. & Günnemann, S. GemNet: universal directional graph neural networks for molecules. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6790–6802 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2021).
14. Zitnick, C. L. et al. An introduction to electrocatalyst design using machine learning for renewable energy storage. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.09435 (2020).10.48550/arXiv.2010.09435 ↗
15. Mounet, N. et al. Two-dimensional materials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 246–252 (2018).10.1038/s41565-017-0035-5 ↗
16. Zhou, J. et al. 2DMatPedia, an open computational database of two-dimensional materials from top-down and bottom-up approaches. Sci. Data 6, 86 (2019).10.1038/s41597-019-0097-3 ↗
17. Sun, W. et al. Machine learning–assisted molecular design and efficiency prediction for high-performance organic photovoltaic materials. Sci. Adv. 5, eaay4275 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aay4275 ↗
18. Zhang, Y. et al. Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning. Nat. Commun. 11, 1706 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15235-7 ↗
19. Frey, N. C., Akinwande, D., Jariwala, D. & Shenoy, V. B. Machine learning-enabled design of point defects in 2D materials for quantum and neuromorphic information processing. ACS Nano 14, 13406–13417 (2020).10.1021/acsnano.0c05267 ↗
20. Manzoor, A. et al. Machine learning based methodology to predict point defect energies in multi-principal element alloys. Front. Mater. 8, 129 (2021).10.3389/fmats.2021.673574 ↗
21. Patra, T. K. et al. Defect dynamics in 2-D MoS2 probed by using machine learning, atomistic simulations, and high-resolution microscopy. ACS Nano 12, 8006–8016 (2018).10.1021/acsnano.8b02844 ↗
22. Haastrup, S. et al. The computational 2D materials database: high-throughput modeling and discovery of atomically thin crystals. 2D Mater. 5, 042002 (2018).10.1088/2053-1583/aacfc1 ↗
23. Bertoldo, F., Ali, S., Manti, S. & Thygesen, K. S. Quantum point defects in 2D materials - the QPOD database. npj Comput. Mater. 8, 1–16 (2022).10.1038/s41524-022-00730-w ↗
24. Murray, C. et al. Addressing bias in active learning with depth uncertainty networks... or not. Workshop at NeurIPS PMLR163 59–63 (2022).
25. Rolos. https://rolos.com/open/2d-materials-point-defects/ (2022).
26. Lieb, E. H. Two theorems on the Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1201–1204 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.1201 ↗
27. Huang, P. et al. Carbon and vacancy centers in hexagonal boron nitride. Phys. Rev. B 106, 014107 (2022).10.1103/PhysRevB.106.014107 ↗
28. Koperski, M. et al. Midgap radiative centers in carbon-enriched hexagonal boron nitride. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 13214–13219 (2020).10.1073/pnas.2003895117 ↗
29. Friedel, J. The distribution of electrons round impurities in monovalent metals. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 43, 153–189 (1952).10.1080/14786440208561086 ↗
30. Lau, K. H. & Kohn, W. Indirect long-range oscillatory interaction between adsorbed atoms. Surf. Sci. 75, 69–85 (1978).10.1016/0039-6028(78)90053-5 ↗
31. Cheianov, V. V. & Fal’ko, V. I. Friedel oscillations, impurity scattering, and temperature dependence of resistivity in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 226801 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.226801 ↗
32. Pereira, V. M., Guinea, F., Lopes dos Santos, J. M. B., Peres, N. M. R. & Castro Neto, A. H. Disorder induced localized states in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 036801 (2006).10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.036801 ↗
33. Pereira, V. M., Lopes dos Santos, J. M. B. & Castro Neto, A. H. Modeling disorder in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 115109 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.77.115109 ↗
34. Shytov, A. V., Abanin, D. A. & Levitov, L. S. Long-range interaction between adatoms in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 016806 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.016806 ↗
35. González-Herrero, H. et al. Atomic-scale control of graphene magnetism by using hydrogen atoms. Science 352, 437–441 (2016).10.1126/science.aad8038 ↗
36. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
37. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
38. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
39. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
40. Sohier, T., Calandra, M. & Mauri, F. Density functional perturbation theory for gated two-dimensional heterostructures: theoretical developments and application to flexural phonons in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 96, 075448 (2017).10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075448 ↗