Atomically resolved TEM imaging of covalently functionalised graphene
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Covalent functionalisation can be a powerful lever to tune the properties and processability of graphene. After overcoming the low chemical reactivity of graphene, covalent functionalisation led to the generation of new hybrid materials, applicable in a broad variation of fields. Although the process of functionalising graphene is nowadays firmly established, fundamental aspects of the produced hybrid materials remain to be clarified. Especially the atomically resolved imaging is only scarcely explored. Here we show aberration corrected in situ high resolution TEM imaging of dodecyl functionalised monolayer graphene at atomic resolution after an effective mechanical filtering approach. The mechanical filtering allows to separate adsorbed contamination from the covalently bound functional molecules and thus opens the possibility for the observation of this hybrid material. The obtained data is validated by DFT calculations and by a novel image simulation approach based on molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at room temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Graphene research and applications · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications · Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. Criado, A., Melchionna, M., Marchesan, S. & Prato, M. The covalent functionalization of graphene on substrates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 10734–10750 (2015).10.1002/anie.201501473 ↗
2. Tetsuka, H., Nagoya, A., Fukusumi, T. & Matsui, T. Molecularly designed, nitrogen-functionalized graphene quantum dots for optoelectronic devices. Adv. Mater. 28, 4632–4638 (2016).10.1002/adma.201600058 ↗
3. Tang, X., Mager, N., Vanhorenbeke, B., Hermans, S. & Raskin, J. P. Defect-free functionalized graphene sensor for formaldehyde detection. Nanotechnology 28, 055501 (2017).10.1088/1361-6528/28/5/055501 ↗
4. Bonaccorso, F. et al. 2D materials. Graphene, related two-dimensional crystals, and hybrid systems for energy conversion and storage. Science 347, 1246501 (2015).10.1126/science.1246501 ↗
5. Jorgensen, J. H. et al. Symmetry-driven band gap engineering in hydrogen functionalized graphene. ACS Nano 10, 10798–10807 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.6b04671 ↗
6. Gonzalez-Herrero, H. et al. Atomic-scale control of graphene magnetism by using hydrogen atoms. Science 352, 437–441 (2016).10.1126/science.aad8038 ↗
7. Sharma, R., Baik, J. H., Perera, C. J. & Strano, M. S. Anomalously large reactivity of single graphene layers and edges toward electron transfer chemistries. Nano Lett. 10, 398–405 (2010).10.1021/nl902741x ↗
8. Abellan, G. et al. Unifying principles of the reductive covalent graphene functionalization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 5175–5182 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b00704 ↗
9. Markevich, A. et al. Electron beam controlled covalent attachment of small organic molecules to graphene. Nanoscale 8, 2711–2719 (2016).10.1039/C5NR07539D ↗
10. He, Y. et al. Fusing tetrapyrroles to graphene edges by surface-assisted covalent coupling. Nat. Chem. 9, 33–38 (2017).10.1038/nchem.2600 ↗
11. Schweizer, P. et al. Mechanical cleaning of graphene using in situ electron microscopy. Nat. Commun. 11, 1743 (2020).10.1038/s41467-020-15255-3 ↗
12. Niyogi, S. et al. Spectroscopy of covalently functionalized graphene. Nano Lett. 10, 4061–4066 (2010).10.1021/nl1021128 ↗
13. Tyagi, A. et al. Modular functionalization of crystalline graphene by recombinant proteins: A nanoplatform for probing biomolecules. Nanoscale 10, 22572–22582 (2018).10.1039/C8NR06225K ↗
14. Lado, J. L. & Fernández-Rossier, J. Unconventional Yu–Shiba–Rusinov states in hydrogenated graphene. 2D Mater. 3, 025001 (2016).10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025001 ↗
15. Yang, H. et al. Preferential and reversible fluorination of monolayer graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C. 115, 16844–16848 (2011).10.1021/jp204573z ↗
16. Park, J. & Yan, M. Covalent functionalization of graphene with reactive intermediates. Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 181–189 (2013).10.1021/ar300172h ↗
17. Eckmann, A. et al. Probing the nature of defects in graphene by Raman spectroscopy. Nano Lett. 12, 3925–3930 (2012).10.1021/nl300901a ↗
18. Biswal, M. et al. Sodide and organic halides effect covalent functionalization of single-layer and bilayer graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139, 4202–4210 (2017).10.1021/jacs.7b00932 ↗
19. Knirsch, K. C., Schafer, R. A., Hauke, F. & Hirsch, A. Mono- and ditopic bisfunctionalization of graphene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 5861–5864 (2016).10.1002/anie.201511807 ↗
20. Lin, Y. C. et al. Graphene annealing: how clean can it be? Nano Lett. 12, 414–419 (2012).10.1021/nl203733r ↗
21. Longchamp, J.-N., Escher, C. & Fink, H.-W. Ultraclean freestanding graphene by platinum-metal catalysis. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 31, 020605 (2013).10.1116/1.4793746 ↗
22. Cunge, G. et al. Dry efficient cleaning of poly-methyl-methacrylate residues from graphene with high-density H2 and H2-N2 plasmas. J. Appl. Phys. 118, 123302 (2015).10.1063/1.4931370 ↗
23. Tripathi, M. et al. Cleaning graphene: Comparing heat treatments in air and in vacuum. Phys. Status Solidi Rapid Res Lett. 11, 1700124 (2017).10.1002/pssr.201700124 ↗
24. Algara-Siller, G., Lehtinen, O., Turchanin, A. & Kaiser, U. Dry-cleaning of graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 153115 (2014).10.1063/1.4871997 ↗
25. Koren, E., Lortscher, E., Rawlings, C., Knoll, A. W. & Duerig, U. Surface science. Adhesion and friction in mesoscopic graphite contacts. Science 348, 679–683 (2015).10.1126/science.aaa4157 ↗
26. Kirkland, E. J. Computation in electron microscopy. Acta Crystallogr. A 72, 1–27 (2016).10.1107/S205327331501757X ↗
27. Englert, J. M. et al. Covalent bulk functionalization of graphene. Nat. Chem. 3, 279–286 (2011).10.1038/nchem.1010 ↗
28. Schafer, R. A. et al. Substrate-modulated reductive graphene functionalization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 14858–14862 (2016).10.1002/anie.201607427 ↗
29. Cancado, L. G. et al. Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett. 11, 3190–3196 (2011).10.1021/nl201432g ↗
30. Egerton, R. F. Radiation damage to organic and inorganic specimens in the TEM. Micron 119, 72–87 (2019).10.1016/j.micron.2019.01.005 ↗
31. Skowron, S. T. et al. Chemical reactions of molecules promoted and simultaneously imaged by the electron beam in transmission electron microscopy. Acc. Chem. Res. 50, 1797–1807 (2017).10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00078 ↗
32. Schaffel, F., Wilson, M. & Warner, J. H. Motion of light adatoms and molecules on the surface of few-layer graphene. ACS Nano 5, 9428–9441 (2011).10.1021/nn2036494 ↗
33. Susi, T., Meyer, J. C. & Kotakoski, J. Manipulating low-dimensional materials down to the level of single atoms with electron irradiation. Ultramicroscopy 180, 163–172 (2017).10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.03.005 ↗
34. Mittelberger, A., Kramberger, C. & Meyer, J. C. Insights into radiation damage from atomic resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy imaging of mono-layer CuPcCl16 films on graphene. Sci. Rep. 8, 4813 (2018).10.1038/s41598-018-23077-z ↗
35. Dyck, O. et al. Building structures atom by atom via electron beam manipulation. Small 14, e1801771 (2018).10.1002/smll.201801771 ↗
36. Mustonen, K. et al. Electron‐beam manipulation of silicon impurities in single‐walled carbon nanotubes. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1901327 (2019).10.1002/adfm.201901327 ↗
37. Su, C. et al. Engineering single-atom dynamics with electron irradiation. Sci. Adv. 5, eaav2252 (2019).10.1126/sciadv.aav2252 ↗
38. Holzwarth, J. et al. Highly regioselective alkylation of hexabenzocoronenes: fundamental insights into the covalent chemistry of graphene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 12184–12190 (2017).10.1002/anie.201706437 ↗
39. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
40. Wang, J., Wolf, R. M., Caldwell, J. W., Kollman, P. A. & Case, D. A. Development and testing of a general amber force field. J. Comput Chem. 25, 1157–1174 (2004).10.1002/jcc.20035 ↗
41. Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009).10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502 ↗
42. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
43. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
44. Grimme, S., Ehrlich, S. & Goerigk, L. Effect of the damping function in dispersion corrected density functional theory. J. Comput Chem. 32, 1456–1465 (2011).10.1002/jcc.21759 ↗
45. Vanderbilt, D. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue formalism. Phys. Rev., B Condens. Matter 41, 7892–7895 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892 ↗
46. Klöffel, T., Mathias, G. & Meyer, B. Integrating state of the art compute, communication, and autotuning strategies to multiply the performance of ab initio molecular dynamics on massively parallel multi-core supercomputers. Comput Phys. Commun. 260, 107745 (2021).10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107745 ↗