Identification of amino acids with sensitive nanoporous MoS2: towards machine learning-based prediction
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Protein detection plays a key role in determining the single point mutations which can cause a variety of diseases. Nanopore sequencing provides a label-free, single base, fast and long reading platform, which makes it amenable for personalized medicine. A challenge facing nanopore technology is the noise in ionic current. Here, we show that a nanoporous single-layer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) can detect individual amino acids in a polypeptide chain (16 units) with a high accuracy and distinguishability. Using extensive molecular dynamics simulations (with a total aggregate simulation time of 66 µs) and machine learning techniques, we featurize and cluster the ionic current and residence time of the 20 amino acids and identify the fingerprints of the signals. Using logistic regression, nearest neighbor, and random forest classifiers, the sensor reading is predicted with an accuracy of 72.45, 94.55, and 99.6%, respectively. In addition, using advanced ML classification techniques, we are able to theoretically predict over 2.8 million hypothetical sensor readings’ amino acid types.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies · Fuel Cells and Related Materials · Ion-surface interactions and analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Wei, R. S., Gatterdam, V., Wieneke, R., Tampe, R. & Rant, U. Stochastic sensing of proteins with receptor-modified solid-state nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 257–263 (2012).10.1038/nnano.2012.24 ↗
2. Yusko, E. C. et al. Controlling protein translocation through nanopores with bio-inspired fluid walls. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 253–260 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2011.12 ↗
3. Han, A. et al. Label-free detection of single protein molecules and protein-protein interactions using synthetic nanopores. Anal. Chem. 80, 4651–4658 (2008).10.1021/ac7025207 ↗
4. Han, A. P. et al. Sensing protein molecules using nanofabricated pores. Appl. Phys. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2180868 (2006).10.1063/1.2180868 ↗
5. Kowalczyk, S. W. et al. Single-molecule transport across an individual biomimetic nuclear pore complex. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 433–438 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2011.88 ↗
6. Majd, S. et al. Applications of biological pores in nanomedicine, sensing, and nanoelectronics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 21, 439–476 (2010).10.1016/j.copbio.2010.05.002 ↗
7. Aksimentiev, A., Heng, J. B., Timp, G. & Schulten, K. Microscopic kinetics of DNA translocation through synthetic nanopores. Biophys. J. 87, 2086–2097 (2004).10.1529/biophysj.104.042960 ↗
8. Steinbock, L. J. et al. Probing the size of proteins with glass nanopores. Nanoscale 6, 14380–14387 (2014).10.1039/C4NR05001K ↗
9. Farimani, A. B., Heiranian, M. & Aluru, N. R. Electromechanical signatures for dna sequencing through a mechanosensitive nanopore. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6, 650–657 (2015).10.1021/jz5025417 ↗
10. Farimani, A. B., Dibaeinia, P. & Aluru, N. R. DNA origami-graphene hybrid nanopore for dna detection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 92–100 (2017).10.1021/acsami.6b11001 ↗
11. Barati Farimani, A., Heiranian, M., Min, K. & Aluru, N. R. Antibody subclass detection using graphene nanopores. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 1670–1676 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00385 ↗
12. Branton, D. et al. The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1146–1153 (2008).10.1038/nbt.1495 ↗
13. Bayley, H. & Cremer, P. S. Stochastic sensors inspired by biology. Nature 413, 226–230 (2001).10.1038/35093038 ↗
14. Larkin, J., Henley, R. Y., Muthukumar, M., Rosenstein, J. K. & Wanunu, M. High-bandwidth protein analysis using solid-state nanopores. Biophys. J. 106, 696–704 (2014).10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.025 ↗
15. Venkatesan, B. M. & Bashir, R. Nanopore sensors for nucleic acid analysis. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 615–624 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2011.129 ↗
16. Radisavljevic, B., Radenovic, A., Brivio, J., Giacometti, V. & Kis, A. Single-layer MoS2 transistors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 147–150 (2011).10.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
17. Liu, K., Feng, J. D., Kis, A. & Radenovic, A. Atomically thin molybdenum disulfide nanopores with high sensitivity for DNA translocation. ACS Nano 8, 2504–2511 (2014).10.1021/nn406102h ↗
18. Feng, J. D. et al. Identification of single nucleotides in MoS2 nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 1070 (2015).10.1038/nnano.2015.219 ↗
19. Farimani, A. B., Min, K. & Aluru, N. R. DNA base detection using a single-layer MoS2. Acs Nano 8, 7914–7922 (2014).10.1021/nn5029295 ↗
20. Feng, J. et al. Electrochemical reaction in single layer MoS2: nanopores opened atom by atom. Nano. Lett. 15, 3431–3438 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b00768 ↗
21. Sulima, S. O. et al. Bypass of the pre-60S ribosomal quality control as a pathway to oncogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111, 5640–5645 (2014).10.1073/pnas.1400247111 ↗
22. Lee, T. I. & Young, R. A. Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease. Cell 152, 1237–1251 (2013).10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.014 ↗
23. Zhao, Y. et al. Single-molecule Spectroscopy of amino acids and peptides by recognition tunnelling. Nat. Nanotechnol. 9, 466–473 (2014).10.1038/nnano.2014.54 ↗
24. Wilson, J., Sloman, L., He, Z. & Aksimentiev, A. Graphene nanopores for protein sequencing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 4830–4838 (2016).10.1002/adfm.201601272 ↗
25. Kolmogorov, M., Kennedy, E., Dong, Z., Timp, G. & Pevzner, P. A. Single-molecule protein identification by sub-nanopore sensors. PLoS. Comput. Biol. 13, e1005356 (2017).10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005356 ↗
26. Feng, J. D. et al. Single-layer MoS2 nanopores as nanopower generators. Nature 536, 197-+ (2016).10.1038/nature18593 ↗
27. Wanunu, M. et al. Rapid electronic detection of probe-specific microRNAs using thin nanopore sensors. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 807–814 (2010).10.1038/nnano.2010.202 ↗
28. Darby, N. J. & Creighton, T. E. Protein Structure. (IRL Press at Oxford, 1993).
29. Pedregosa, F. et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011).
30. Plimpton, S. Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular-dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).10.1006/jcph.1995.1039 ↗
31. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 14, 33–38 (1996).10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5 ↗
32. Heiranian, M., Farimani, A. B. & Aluru, N. R. Water desalination with a single-layer MoS2 nanopore. Nat. Commun. 6, 6 (2015).10.1038/ncomms9616 ↗
33. MacKerell, A. D. & Banavali, N. K. All-atom empirical force field for nucleic acids: II. Application to molecular dynamics simulations of DNA and RNA in solution. J. Comput. Chem. 21, 105–120 (2000).10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(20000130)21:2<105::AID-JCC3>3.0.CO;2-P ↗
34. Liang, T., Phillpot, S. R. & Sinnott, S. B. Parametrization of a reactive many-body potential for Mo-S systems. Phys. Rev. B. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.245110 (2009).10.1103/PhysRevB.79.245110 ↗
35. Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald—an N-Log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 10089–10092 (1993).10.1063/1.464397 ↗
36. Nose, S. A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular-dynamics methods. J. Chem. Phys. 81, 511–519 (1984).10.1063/1.447334 ↗
37. Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics—equilibrium phase-space distributions. Phys. Rev. A. 31, 1695–1697 (1985).10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
38. Oliphant, T. E. Python for scientific computing. Comput. Sci. Eng. 9, 10–20 (2007).10.1109/MCSE.2007.58 ↗