journal article·2026-04-08Open access

Flux-grown large Ti3AlC2 single crystals with well-defined structural and electronic properties toward millimetre-scale MXenes

Bing Wu, Fedor Lipilin, Xiaodong Liu, Jan Luxa, RuiZhi Yu, Martin Vesely, Kalyan Jyoti Sarkar, Aljoscha Söll, Filipa M. Oliveira, Lei Zheng, Yulong Ying, B. Layla Mehdi, Zdenek Sofer

npj 2D Materials and Applications· Volume 10· Issue 1

Abstract

Abstract Ti₃AlC₂, a typical MAX phase compound, serves as the parent structure of Ti₃C₂Tₓ MXenes, the most extensively studied members of the MXene family for diverse applications. Despite increasing interest, most studies of Ti₃AlC₂ rely on polycrystalline samples, limiting accurate determination of its intrinsic physical properties. The synthesis of large, high-quality single crystals therefore remains essential for probing fundamental electronic, optical, and transport behaviour. Here, we report the growth of large Ti₃AlC₂ single crystals using a TiAl₃ flux-assisted method. The crystals exhibit excellent structural quality, with individual flakes exceeding 1 cm in length and basal-plane areas up to ~36 mm². Hall measurements on individual flakes reveal a high carrier density of ~10²¹ cm⁻³, while polarisation-resolved Raman spectra show a nearly circular intensity pattern, indicating optical isotropy within the basal plane. Scanning tunnelling microscopy on freshly cleaved crystals reveals non-flat surface topography related to cleavage termination. First-principles calculations indicate that cleavage predominantly occurs between Ti–Al layers and predict distinct surface-dependent band structures and Fermi surfaces associated with Al- and Ti-terminated surfaces. Chemical etching of the MAX phase yields millimetre-scale Ti₃C₂Tₓ flakes that can be mechanically exfoliated onto chips. Raman spectra show a strong G band at ~1550 cm⁻¹ without a discernible D band, indicating ultralow-defect sp²-like carbon structures. Devices fabricated from these flakes exhibit symmetric I–V characteristics and negligible gate modulation, confirming metallic behaviour and good electrical contact. This work establishes a scalable route to large Ti₃AlC₂ single crystals and provides insight into their intrinsic properties, supporting future MXene-based device technologies.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · 2D Materials and Applications · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Li, X. et al. MXene chemistry, electrochemistry and energy storage applications. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6, 389–404 (2022).10.1038/s41570-022-00384-8 ↗
2. Wu, B. et al. In situ vanadium-deficient engineering of V2C MXene: a pathway to enhanced zinc-ion batteries. Small Methods 8, 2301461 (2024).10.1002/smtd.202301461 ↗
3. Oliveira, F. M. et al. Structure design and processing strategies of MXene-based materials for electromagnetic interference shielding. Small Methods 7, 2300112 (2023).10.1002/smtd.202300112 ↗
4. Shuck, C. E. et al. Scalable synthesis of Ti3C2Tx MXene. In MXenes 539–560 (Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2023).10.1201/9781003306511-26 ↗
5. Downes, M. et al. M5X4: a family of MXenes. ACS Nano 17, 17158–17168 (2023).10.1021/acsnano.3c04967 ↗
6. He, Z. et al. Pseudocapacitance of bimetallic solid-solution MXene for supercapacitors with enhanced electrochemical energy storage. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2305251 (2023).10.1002/adfm.202305251 ↗
7. Hongxiang, Z. et al. Tribophysical properties of polycrystalline bulk Ti3AlC2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88, 3270–3274 (2005).10.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00588.x ↗
8. Yang, L. et al. Identification of the role of grain boundaries in polycrystalline photovoltaics via advanced atomic force microscope. Small 20, 2304362 (2024).10.1002/smll.202304362 ↗
9. Ghasali, E. et al. Effects of 211 and 413 ordering on the corrosion behavior of V–Al–C MAX phases prepared by spark plasma sintering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 41, 4774–4787 (2021).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.03.001 ↗
10. Zhang, Q. et al. Ti3AlC2 single crystal growth via controlling horizontal temperature gradient. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 108, e20287 (2025).10.1111/jace.20287 ↗
11. Anayee, M. et al. Effect of oxygen substitution and oxycarbide formation on oxidation of Ti3AlC2 MAX phase. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 107, 6334–6341 (2024).10.1111/jace.19861 ↗
12. Ouisse, T. et al. High temperature solution growth and characterization of Cr2AlC single crystals. J. Cryst. Growth 384, 88–95 (2013).10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.09.021 ↗
13. Shi, L. et al. Synthesis of single crystals of V2AlC phase by high-temperature solution growth and slow cooling technique. Acta Mater. 83, 304–309 (2015).10.1016/j.actamat.2014.10.018 ↗
14. Badr, H. O. et al. Elastic properties and hardness values of V2AlC and Cr2AlC single crystals. Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 083605 (2020).10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.083605 ↗
15. Ade, M. & Hillebrecht, H. Ternary borides Cr2AlB2, Cr3AlB4, and Cr4AlB6: the first members of the series (CrB2)nCrAl with n = 1, 2, 3 and a unifying concept for ternary borides as MAB phases. Inorg. Chem. 54, 6122–6135 (2015).10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b00049 ↗
16. Presser, V. et al. First-order Raman scattering of the MAX phases: Ti2AlN, Ti2AlC0.5N0.5, Ti2AlC, (Ti0.5V0.5)2AlC, V2AlC, Ti3AlC2, and Ti3GeC2. J. Raman Spectrosc. 43, 168–172 (2012).10.1002/jrs.3036 ↗
17. Shi, Y. et al. The polarization properties of the reflection spectra of single-layer MoS2 and ReS2 on SiO2/Si and quartz substrates. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 15, 1–6 (2020).10.1186/s11671-020-3280-8 ↗
18. Natu, V. et al. A critical analysis of the X-ray photoelectron spectra of Ti3C2Tz MXenes. Matter 4, 1224–1251 (2021).10.1016/j.matt.2021.01.015 ↗
19. Näslund, L. -Å, Persson, P. O. & Rosen, J. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy of Ti3AlC2, Ti3C2Tz, and TiC provides evidence for the electrostatic interaction between laminated layers in MAX-phase materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 27732–27742 (2020).10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07413 ↗
20. Xu, X. et al. High-yield Ti3C2Tx MXene-MoS2 integrated circuits. Adv. Mater. 34, 2107370 (2022).10.1002/adma.202107370 ↗
21. Sondheimer, E. H. & Wilson, A. H. The theory of the magnetoresistance effects in metals. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 190, 435–455 (1947).10.1098/rspa.1947.0087 ↗
22. Gonzalez-Julian, J. Processing of MAX phases: from synthesis to applications. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 104, 659–690 (2021).10.1111/jace.17544 ↗
23. Tang, M. et al. Surface terminations of MXene: synthesis, characterization, and properties. Symmetry 14, 2232 (2022).10.3390/sym14112232 ↗
24. Sarycheva, A. & Gogotsi, Y. Raman spectroscopy analysis of the structure and surface chemistry of Ti3C2Tx MXene. In MXenes 333–355 (Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2023).10.1201/9781003306511-16 ↗
25. Xu, X. et al. Wafer-scale transfer of MXene films with enhanced device performance via 2D liquid intercalation. Adv. Mater. 36, 2405214 (2024).10.1002/adma.202405214 ↗
26. Lipatov, A. et al. High electrical conductivity and breakdown current density of individual monolayer Ti3C2Tx MXene flakes. Matter 4, 1413–1427 (2021).10.1016/j.matt.2021.01.021 ↗
27. Iqbal, M. Z. & Faisal, M. M. Fowler–Nordheim tunneling characteristics of graphene/hBN/metal heterojunctions. J. Appl. Phys. 125, 083705 (2019).10.1063/1.5066077 ↗
28. Pandey, S. et al. Transition from direct to Fowler–Nordheim tunneling in chemically reduced graphene oxide film. Nanoscale 6, 3410–3417 (2014).10.1039/C3NR05675A ↗
29. Varade, V. et al. Efficient charge transfer and field-induced tunneling transport in hybrid composite devices of organic semiconductors and cadmium telluride quantum dots. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 215503 (2015).10.1063/1.4922128 ↗
30. Xu, C. et al. Large-area high-quality 2D ultrathin Mo2C superconducting crystals. Nat. Mater. 14, 1135–1141 (2015).10.1038/nmat4374 ↗
31. Geng, D. et al. Direct synthesis of large-area 2D Mo2C on in situ grown graphene. Adv. Mater. 29, 1700072 (2017).10.1002/adma.201700072 ↗
32. Wang, D. et al. Direct synthesis and chemical vapor deposition of 2D carbide and nitride MXenes. Science 379, 1242–1247 (2023).10.1126/science.add9204 ↗
33. Xu, X. et al. Status and prospects of MXene-based nanoelectronic devices. Matter 6, 800–837 (2023).10.1016/j.matt.2023.01.019 ↗
34. Mortensen, J. J., Hansen, L. B. & Jacobsen, K. W. Real-space grid implementation of the projector augmented wave method. Phys. Rev. B 71, 035109 (2005).10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035109 ↗
35. Enkovaara, J. et al. Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22, 253202 (2010).10.1088/0953-8984/22/25/253202 ↗
36. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
37. Grimme, S. et al. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H–Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗