Nitrogen embedding enhances stability and activity of single-atom motifs of MXenes under anodic polarization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract MXenes undergo water-mediated surface reconstruction under anodic polarization and spontaneously form single-atom centers, reminiscent of single-atom catalysts (SAC), which exhibit great potential for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Yet, the as-formed SAC-type MXene motifs still suffer from the conventional activity-stability trade-off under OER conditions. Here, we propose a nitrogen embedding strategy to modulate the local coordination environment of the single-atom centers, thereby enhancing both their stability under anodic polarization and OER activity. Based on density functional theory calculations, we systematically evaluate 53 N-doped SAC-type MXene motifs, covering M 2 X 1 O, M 3 X 2 O, and M 4 X 3 O MXenes, using a three-step screening approach, which identifies promising candidates that (i) allow nitrogen doping under anodic polarization, (ii) are thermodynamically stable under OER conditions, and (iii) exhibit high OER activity. We demonstrate that N-doped Ta 2 C 1 O and Ta 2 N 1 O SAC-like MXenes break the traditional activity-stability trade-off in OER and provide theoretical guidance for designing efficient and durable SAC-like MXene electrocatalysts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion · Ammonia Synthesis and Nitrogen Reduction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (80)
Show source-provided references
1. Li, S. et al. Recent advances in the development of single atom catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 82, 1081–1100 (2024).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.08.026 ↗
2. Zhao, C. X., Li, B. Q., Liu, J. N. & Zhang, Q. Intrinsic electrocatalytic activity regulation of M–N–C single-atom catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 4448–4463 (2021).10.1002/anie.202003917 ↗
3. Yang, M. Q. et al. Iridium single-atom catalyst coupled with lattice oxygen activated CoNiO2 for accelerating the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 25692–25700 (2022).10.1039/D2TA07292K ↗
4. Zhou, K. L. et al. Platinum single-atom catalyst coupled with transition metal/metal oxide heterostructure for accelerating alkaline hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Commun. 12, 3783 (2021).10.1038/s41467-021-24079-8 ↗
5. Qi, S., Li, C., Chen, G. & Zhao, M. Single-atom catalysts supported on graphene/electride heterostructures for the enhanced sulfur reduction reaction in lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Energy Chem. 97, 738–746 (2024).10.1016/j.jechem.2024.07.013 ↗
6. Georgakilas, V. et al. Decorating carbon nanotubes with metal or semiconductor nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. 17, 2679–2694 (2007).10.1039/b700857k ↗
7. Chai, H. et al. Single-atom anchored g-C3N4 monolayer as efficient catalysts for nitrogen reduction reaction. Nanomater 13, 1433 (2023).10.3390/nano13081433 ↗
8. Khan, K. et al. Recent developments in emerging two-dimensional materials and their applications. J. Mater. Chem. C 8, 387–440 (2020).10.1039/C9TC04187G ↗
9. Naguib, M. et al. Two-dimensional nanocrystals produced by exfoliation of Ti3AlC2. Adv. Mater. 23, 4248–4253 (2011).10.1002/adma.201102306 ↗
10. Jussambayev, M. et al. MXenes for sustainable energy: a comprehensive review on conservation and storage applications. Carbon Trends 19, 100471 (2025).10.1016/j.cartre.2025.100471 ↗
11. Singh, D., Razzaq, S., Tayyebi, E. & Exner, K. S. Selectivity control in the nitrogen reduction reaction over Mo2C MXene by a nitrogen-rich environment. ACS Catal 15, 5589–5600 (2025).10.1021/acscatal.4c04878 ↗
12. Singh, D., Bulatova, K. & Exner, K. S. Strain engineering of Mo2C MXene to steer the selectivity in the nitrogen reduction reaction toward ammonia. Chem. Eng. J. 518, 164451 (2025).10.1016/j.cej.2025.164451 ↗
13. Cao, S. et al. MXene-based single atom catalysts for efficient CO2RR towards CO: a novel strategy for high-throughput catalyst design and screening. Chem. Eng. J. 461, 141936 (2023).10.1016/j.cej.2023.141936 ↗
14. Yan, Y. et al. MXene-supported single-atom and nano catalysts for effective gas-phase hydrogenation reactions. Mater. Today Chem. 2, 100010 (2023).
15. Wan, P., Chen, Y. & Tang, Q. Electrochemical stability of MXenes in water based on constant potential AIMD simulations. ChemPhysChem 25, e202400325 (2024).10.1002/cphc.202400325 ↗
16. Razzaq, S. et al. MXenes spontaneously form active and selective single-atom centers under anodic polarization conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 161–168 (2025).10.1021/jacs.4c08518 ↗
17. Parker, T. et al. In situ raman and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy studies of MXene−electrolyte interfaces. ACS Nano https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5c03810 (2025).10.1021/acsnano.5c03810 ↗
18. Singh, D., Razzaq, S., Faridi, S. & Exner, K. S. Selective nitrogen reduction reaction on single-atom centers of molybdenum-based MXenes by pulsing the electrochemical potential. Mater. Today 86, 575–579 (2025).10.1016/j.mattod.2025.03.016 ↗
19. Faridi, S. et al. Trends in competing oxygen and chlorine evolution reactions over electrochemically formed single-atom centers of MXenes. J. Mater. Chem. A 13, 16481–16490 (2025).10.1039/D5TA02220G ↗
20. Di Liberto, G., Giordano, L. & Pacchioni, G. Predicting the stability of single-atom catalysts in electrochemical reactions. ACS Catal 14, 45–55 (2024).10.1021/acscatal.3c04801 ↗
21. Meng, L., Viñes, F., Illas, F. & Exner, K. S. Stability of single-atom centers of MXenes under anodic polarization conditions. J. Phys. Chem. C 129, 9589–9601 (2025).10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c01252 ↗
22. Zhang, Y. et al. The effect of coordination environment on the activity and selectivity of single-atom catalysts. Coord. Chem. Rev. 461, 214493 (2022).10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214493 ↗
23. Wang, L., Wang, H. & Lu, J. Local chemical environment effect in single-atom catalysis. Chem. Catal. 3, 100492 (2023).
24. Meng, L., Viñes, F. & Illas, F. Unveiling the synergy between surface terminations and boron configuration in boron-based Ti3C2 MXenes electrocatalysts for nitrogen reduction reaction. ACS Catal 14, 15429–15443 (2024).10.1021/acscatal.4c03415 ↗
25. Shi, Z., Yang, W., Gu, Y., Liao, T. & Sun, Z. Metal-nitrogen-doped carbon materials as highly efficient catalysts: progress and rational design. Adv. Sci. 7, 2001069 (2020).10.1002/advs.202001069 ↗
26. Ha, M. et al. Tuning metal single atoms embedded in NxCy moieties toward high-performance electrocatalysis. Energy Environ. Sci. 14, 3455–3468 (2021).10.1039/D1EE00154J ↗
27. Liu, X., Jiang, Z. & Guo, Y. Mechanistic understanding on effect of doping nitrogen with graphene supported single-atom Ir toward HER and OER: A computational consideration. Chem. Phys. Lett. 834, 140971 (2024).10.1016/j.cplett.2023.140971 ↗
28. Binninger, T., Moss, G. C., Rajan, Z. S. H. S., Mohamed, R. & Eikerling, M. H. How to break the activity-stability conundrum in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis: mechanistic insights. ChemCatChem 16, e202400567 (2024).10.1002/cctc.202400567 ↗
29. Zheng, X., Jiang, L., Pan, H. & Sun, W. Breaking the activity-durability trade-off of anode catalysts for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. ACS Energy Lett. 10, 3471–3484 (2025).10.1021/acsenergylett.5c01602 ↗
30. Gogotsi, Y. & Anasori, B. The rise of MXenes. ACS Nano 13, 8491–8494 (2019).10.1021/acsnano.9b06394 ↗
31. Wang, Y. et al. Controlled etching to immobilize highly dispersed Fe in MXene for electrochemical ammonia production. Carbon Neutraliz 1, 117–125 (2022).10.1002/cnl2.18 ↗
32. López, M., Exner, K. S., Viñes, F. & Illas, F. Computational pourbaix diagrams for MXenes: a key ingredient toward proper theoretical electrocatalytic studies. Adv. Theory Simul. 6, 2200217 (2023).10.1002/adts.202200217 ↗
33. Meng, L., Yan, L. K., Viñes, F. & Illas, F. Effect of terminations on the hydrogen evolution reaction mechanism on Ti3C2 MXene. J. Mater. Chem. A 11, 6886–6900 (2023).10.1039/D3TA00261F ↗
34. Peng, J., Chen, X., Ong, W. J., Zhao, X. & Li, N. Surface and heterointerface engineering of 2D MXenes and their nanocomposites: insights into electro- and photocatalysis. Chem 5, 18–50 (2019).10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.037 ↗
35. Tian, Y. et al. Theoretical insights on potential-dependent oxidation behaviors and antioxidant strategies of MXenes. Nat. Commun. 15, 10099 (2024).10.1038/s41467-024-54455-z ↗
36. Hou, P. et al. Unraveling the oxidation behaviors of MXenes in aqueous systems by active-learning-potential molecular-dynamics simulation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 62, e202304205 (2023).10.1002/anie.202304205 ↗
37. Ustavytska, O., Kurys, Y., Koshechko, V. & Pokhodenko, V. One-step electrochemical preparation of multilayer graphene functionalized with nitrogen. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 12, 175 (2017).10.1186/s11671-017-1957-4 ↗
38. Nørskov, J. K. et al. Origin of the overpotential for oxygen reduction at a fuel-cell cathode. Phys. Chem. B. 108, 17886–17892 (2004).10.1021/jp047349j ↗
39. Yang, T. et al. High-throughput identification of exfoliable two-dimensional materials with active basal planes for hydrogen evolution. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 2313–2321 (2020).10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00957 ↗
40. McCrory, C. C. L., Jung, S., Peters, J. C. & Jaramillo, T. F. Benchmarking heterogeneous electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 16977–16987 (2013).10.1021/ja407115p ↗
41. McCrory, C. C. L. et al. Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 4347–4357 (2015).10.1021/ja510442p ↗
42. Exner, K. S. Importance of the walden inversion for the activity volcano plot of oxygen evolution. Adv. Sci 10, 2305505 (2023).10.1002/advs.202305505 ↗
43. Razzaq, S. & Exner, K. S. Materials screening by the descriptor Gmax(η): the free-energy span model in electrocatalysis. ACS Catal 13, 1740–1758 (2023).10.1021/acscatal.2c03997 ↗
44. Exner, K. S. A universal descriptor for the screening of electrode materials for multiple-electron processes: beyond the thermodynamic overpotential. ACS Catal 10, 12607–12617 (2020).10.1021/acscatal.0c03865 ↗
45. Yu, S., Levell, Z., Jiang, Z., Zhao, X. & Liu, Y. What is the rate-limiting step of oxygen reduction reaction on Fe–N–C catalysts? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 25352–25356 (2023).10.1021/jacs.3c09193 ↗
46. Tang, Y. et al. Breaking the activity-stability trade-off of Au catalysts by depth-controlled TiO2 nanotraps. J. Catal. 423, 145–153 (2023).10.1016/j.jcat.2023.05.002 ↗
47. Peera, S. G. et al. Effect of N-doped carbon on the morphology and oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity of a xerogel-derived Mn(II)O Electrocatalyst. Catalysts 14, 792 (2024).10.3390/catal14110792 ↗
48. Li, Y. et al. Carbon corrosion mechanism on nitrogen-doped carbon support—a density functional theory study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 46, 13273–13282 (2021).10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.01.148 ↗
49. Shim, J. et al. Atomically dispersed high-valent d0-metal breaks the activity–stability trade-off in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 147, 16179–16188 (2025).10.1021/jacs.5c00936 ↗
50. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
51. Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
52. Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 ↗
53. López, M., Exner, K. S., Viñes, F. & Illas, F. Theoretical study of the mechanism of the hydrogen evolution reaction on the V2C MXene: Thermodynamic and kinetic aspects. J. Catal. 421, 252–263 (2023).10.1016/j.jcat.2023.03.027 ↗
54. Huang, K. et al. Mechanistic insights for the electrocatalytic CO2 reduction on M2C-type MXenes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 62, 20716–20726 (2023).10.1021/acs.iecr.3c02962 ↗
55. Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).10.1063/1.3382344 ↗
56. Ventura-Macias, E., Martinez, P. M., Pérez, R. & Vilhena, J. G. Quantum mechanical derived (VdW-DFT) transferable Lennard–Jones and morse potentials to model cysteine and alkanethiol adsorption on Au(111). Adv. Mater. Interfaces 11, 2400369 (2024).10.1002/admi.202400369 ↗
57. Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).10.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
58. Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
59. Islam, M. A comprehensive investigation on the physical properties of SiC polymorphs for high-temperature applications: a DFT study based on GGA and hybrid HSE06 exchange correlation functionals. Nucl. Mater. Energy. 38, 101631 (2024).10.1016/j.nme.2024.101631 ↗
60. Ontiveros, D., Vela, S., Viñes, F. & Sousa, C. Tuning MXenes towards their use in photocatalytic water splitting. Energy Environ. Mater. 7, e12774 (2024).10.1002/eem2.12774 ↗
61. Deák, P., Aradi, B., Frauenheim, T., Janzén, E. & Gali, A. Accurate defect levels obtained from the HSE06 range-separated hybrid functional. Phys. Rev. B 81, 153203 (2010).10.1103/PhysRevB.81.153203 ↗
62. Urrego-Ortiz, R., Builes, S., Illas, F. & Calle-Vallejo, F. Gas-phase errors in computational electrocatalysis: a review. EES Catal 2, 157–179 (2024).10.1039/D3EY00126A ↗
63. NIST Standard Reference Database. SRD Number 69, https://doi.org/10.18434/T4D303 (2025).10.18434/T4D303 ↗
64. Kaxiras, E. Atomic and Electronic Structure of Solids (Cambridge University Press, 2003).10.1017/CBO9780511755545 ↗
65. Kittel, C. Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th edn (John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2005).
66. IUPAC. Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 2nd edn (the “Gold Book”). Online corrected version, 2006, “Standard electrode potential, E. https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.S05912 (1997).10.1351/goldbook.S05912 ↗
67. IUPAC. Compendium of Chemical Terminology, 3rd edn. International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. Online version 3.0.1, 2019, “electrode potential”. https://doi.org/10.1351/goldbook.E01956 (2006).10.1351/goldbook.E01956 ↗
68. Man, I. C. et al. Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces. ChemCatChem 3, 1159–1165 (2011).10.1002/cctc.201000397 ↗
69. Rossmeisl, J., Logadottir, A. & Nørskov, J. K. Electrolysis of water on (oxidized) metal surfaces. Chem. Phys. 319, 178–184 (2005).10.1016/j.chemphys.2005.05.038 ↗
70. Usama, M., Razzaq, S., Hättig, C., Steinmann, S. N. & Exner, K. S. Oxygen evolution reaction on IrO2(110) is governed by Walden-type mechanisms. Nat. Commun. 16, 6137 (2025).10.1038/s41467-025-61367-z ↗
71. Yu, M., Li, A., Kan, E. & Zhan, C. Substantial impact of spin state evolution in OER/ORR catalyzed by Fe–N–C. ACS Catal 14, 6816–6826 (2024).10.1021/acscatal.3c06122 ↗
72. Grindy, S., Meredig, B., Kirklin, S., Saal, J. E. & Wolverton, C. Approaching chemical accuracy with density functional calculations: diatomic energy corrections. Phys. Rev. B 87, 075150 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevB.87.075150 ↗
73. Urrego-Ortiz, R., Builes, S. & Calle-Vallejo, F. Fast correction of errors in the DFT-calculated energies of gaseous nitrogen-containing species. ChemCatChem 13, 2508–2516 (2021).10.1002/cctc.202100125 ↗
74. Linstrom, P. J. & Mallard, W. G. (eds). NIST Chemistry WebBook, NIST Standard Reference Database 69 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1997).
75. Kozuch, S. & Shaik, S. How to conceptualize catalytic cycles? The energetic span model. Acc. Chem. Res. 44, 101–110 (2011).10.1021/ar1000956 ↗
76. Li, N. et al. Understanding of electrochemical mechanisms for CO2 capture and conversion into hydrocarbon fuels in transition-metal carbides (MXenes). ACS Nano 11, 10825–10833 (2017).10.1021/acsnano.7b03738 ↗
77. Guo, Z. et al. M2C-type MXenes: promising catalysts for CO2 capture and reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 521, 146436 (2020).10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146436 ↗
78. Melander, M. M., Wu, T., Weckman, T. & Honkala, K. Constant inner potential DFT for modelling electrochemical systems under constant potential and bias. NPJ Comput. Mater. 10, 5 (2024).10.1038/s41524-023-01184-4 ↗
79. Razzaq, S. & Exner, K. S. Method to determine the bifunctional index for the oxygen electrocatalysis from theory. ChemElectroChem 9, e202101603 (2022).10.1002/celc.202101603 ↗
80. Exner, K. S. Beyond the thermodynamic volcano picture in the nitrogen reduction reaction over transition-metal oxides: implications for materials screening. Chin. J. Catal. 43, 2871–2880 (2022).10.1016/S1872-2067(21)64025-1 ↗