Multiscale framework for simulation-guided growth of 2D materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is a powerful technique for synthesizing monolayer materials such as transition metal dichalcogenides. It has advantages over exfoliation techniques, including higher purity and the ability to control the chemistry of the products. However, controllable and reproducible synthesis of 2D materials using CVD is a challenge because of the complex growth process and its sensitivity to subtle changes in growth conditions, making it difficult to extend conclusions obtained in one CVD chamber to another. Here, we developed a multiscale model linking CVD control parameters to the morphology, size, and distribution of synthesized 2D materials. Its capabilities are experimentally validated via the systematic growth of MoS2. In particular, we coupled the reactor-scale governing heat and mass transport equations with the mesoscale phase-field equations for the growth morphology considering the variation of edge energies with the precursor concentration within the growth chamber. The predicted spatial distributions of 2D islands are statistically analyzed, and experiments are then performed to validate the predicted island morphology and distributions. It is shown that the model can be employed to predict and control the morphology and characteristics of synthesized 2D materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · MXene and MAX Phase Materials · Graphene research and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Liu, K.-K. et al. Growth of large-area and highly crystalline MoS2 thin layers on insulating substrates. Nano Lett. 12, 1538–1544 (2012).10.1021/nl2043612 ↗
2. Lee, Y.-H. et al. Synthesis of large‐area MoS2 atomic layers with chemical vapor deposition. Adv. Mater. 24, 2320–2325 (2012).10.1002/adma.201104798 ↗
3. Wang, S. et al. Shape evolution of monolayer MoS2 crystals grown by chemical vapor deposition. Chem. Mater. 26, 6371–6379 (2014).10.1021/cm5025662 ↗
4. Bosi, M. Growth and synthesis of mono and few-layers transition metal dichalcogenides by vapour techniques: a review. RSC Adv. 5, 75500–75518 (2015).10.1039/C5RA09356B ↗
5. Yu, W. J. et al. Highly efficient gate-tunable photocurrent generation in vertical heterostructures of layered materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 952–958 (2013).10.1038/nnano.2013.219 ↗
6. Zhang, W. et al. Ultrahigh-gain photodetectors based on atomically thin graphene–MoS2 heterostructures. Sci. Rep. 4, 192 (2014).
7. Zhang, F. et al. Controlled synthesis of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: from vertical to planar MoS2. 2D Mater. 4, 025029 (2017).10.1088/2053-1583/aa5b01 ↗
8. Govind Rajan, A., Warner, J. H., Blankschtein, D. & Strano, M. S. Generalized mechanistic model for the chemical vapor deposition of 2D transition metal dichalcogenide monolayers. ACS Nano 10, 4330–4344 (2016).10.1021/acsnano.5b07916 ↗
9. Zhang, F. et al. Controlled synthesis of 2D transition metal dichalcogenides: from vertical to planar MoS2. 2D Mater. 4, 025029 (2017).10.1088/2053-1583/aa5b01 ↗
10. Cao, D., Shen, T., Liang, P., Chen, X. & Shu, H. Role of chemical potential in flake shape and edge properties of monolayer MoS2. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 4294–4301 (2015).10.1021/jp5097713 ↗
11. Hess, P. Relationships between the elastic and fracture properties of boronitrene and molybdenum disulfide and those of graphene. Nanotechnology 28, 064002 (2017).10.1088/1361-6528/aa52e4 ↗
12. Senftle, T. P. et al. The ReaxFF reactive force-field: development, applications and future directions. npj Comput. Mater. 2, 9396 (2016).10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.11 ↗
13. Hong, S. et al. Computational synthesis of MoS2 layers by reactive molecular dynamics simulations: initial sulfidation of MoO3 surfaces. Nano Lett. 17, 4866–4872 (2017).10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01727 ↗
14. Mortazavi, B., Ostadhossein, A., Rabczuk, T. & van Duin, A. C. T. Mechanical response of all-MoS2 single-layer heterostructures: a ReaxFF investigation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 23695–23701 (2016).10.1039/C6CP03612K ↗
15. Ostadhossein, A. et al. ReaxFF reactive force-field study of molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8, 631–640 (2017).10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02902 ↗
16. Nie, Y. et al. A kinetic Monte Carlo simulation method of van der Waals epitaxy for atomistic nucleation-growth processes of transition metal dichalcogenides. Sci. Rep. 7, 10451 (2017).10.1038/s41598-017-10856-3 ↗
17. Nie, Y. et al. First principles kinetic Monte Carlo study on the growth patterns of WSe2 monolayer. 2D Mater. 3, 025029 (2016).10.1088/2053-1583/3/2/025029 ↗
18. Artyukhov, V. I., Liu, Y. & Yakobson, B. I. Equilibrium at the edge and atomistic mechanisms of graphene growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 15136–15140 (2012).10.1073/pnas.1207519109 ↗
19. Hu, Z., Lowengrub, J. S., Wise, S. M. & Voigt, A. Phase-field modeling of epitaxial growth: applications to step trains and island dynamics. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. 241, 77–94 (2012).10.1016/j.physd.2011.09.004 ↗
20. Meca, E., Shenoy, V. B. & Lowengrub, J. Phase-field modeling of two-dimensional crystal growth with anisotropic diffusion. Phys. Rev. E 88, 052409 (2013).10.1103/PhysRevE.88.052409 ↗
21. Seymour, M. & Provatas, N. Structural phase field crystal approach for modeling graphene and other two-dimensional structures. Phys. Rev. B 93, 035447 (2016).10.1103/PhysRevB.93.035447 ↗
22. Meca, E., Lowengrub, J., Kim, H., Mattevi, C. & Shenoy, V. B. Epitaxial graphene growth and shape dynamics on copper: phase-field modeling and experiments. Nano Lett. 13, 5692–5697 (2013).10.1021/nl4033928 ↗
23. Zhang, K. et al. Manganese doping of monolayer MoS2: the substrate is critical. Nano Lett. 15, 6586–6591 (2015).10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02315 ↗
24. Artyukhov, V. I., Hu, Z., Zhang, Z. & Yakobson, B. I. Topochemistry of bowtie- and star-shaped metal dichalcogenide nanoisland formation. Nano Lett. 16, 3696–3702 (2016).10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b00986 ↗
25. Vilá, R. A. et al. Bottom-up synthesis of vertically oriented two-dimensional materials. 2D Mater. 3, 041003 (2016).10.1088/2053-1583/3/4/041003 ↗
26. Mullins, W. W. & Sekerka, R. F. Stability of a planar interface during solidification of a dilute binary alloy. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 444–451 (2004).10.1063/1.1713333 ↗
27. Bales, G. S. & Zangwill, A. Morphological instability of a terrace edge during step-flow growth. Phys. Rev. B 41, 5500–5508 (1990).10.1103/PhysRevB.41.5500 ↗
28. Karma, A. & Rappel, W.-J. Phase-field method for computationally efficient modeling of solidification with arbitrary interface kinetics. Phys. Rev. E 53, R3017–R3020 (1996).10.1103/PhysRevE.53.R3017 ↗
29. Raudenský, M., Horský, J. & Krejsa, J. Usage of neural network for coupled parameter and function specification inverse heat conduction problem. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 22, 661–670 (1995).10.1016/0735-1933(95)00052-Z ↗
30. Smith, L. N., German, R. M. & Smith, M. L. A neural network approach for solution of the inverse problem for selection of powder metallurgy materials. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 120, 419–425 (2002).10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01198-0 ↗