Characterising pavement roughness at non-uniform speeds using connected vehicles
Source abstract
Abstract
Methods of pavement roughness characterisations using connected vehicles are poised to scale beyond the frequency, span and affordability of existing methods that require specially instrumented vehicles and skilled technicians. However, speed variability and differences in suspension behaviour require segmentation of the connected vehicle data to achieve some level of desired precision and accuracy with relatively few measurements. This study evaluates the reliability of a Road Impact Factor (RIF) transform under stop-and-go conditions. A RIF-transform converts inertial signals from on-board accelerometers and speed sensors to roughness indices (RIF-indices), in real-time. The case studies collected data from 18 different buses during their normal operation in a small urban city. Within 30 measurements, the RIF-indices distributed normally with an average margin-of-error below 6%. This result indicates that a large number of measurements will provide a reliable estimate of the average roughness experienced. Statistical t-tests distinguished the relatively small differences in average roughness levels among the roadway segments evaluated. In conclusion, when averaging roughness measurements from the same type of vehicle moving at non-uniform speeds, the RIF-transform will provide ever-increasing precision and accuracy as the traversal volume increases.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Traffic and Road Safety · Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Upper Great Plains Transportation Institute, North Dakota State University , Fargo, ND, USA
Funding
National Center for Transportation Research
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Agresti A. · 2009
2. 10.3390/s1702030510.3390/s17020305 ↗
3. 10.1080/10298436.2015.112178010.1080/10298436.2015.1121780 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000016710.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000167 ↗
5. Bridgelall R. · Journal of Infrastructure Systems · 2014 · 21 · 1
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000023410.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000234 ↗
7. 10.1080/10298436.2016.116230610.1080/10298436.2016.1162306 ↗
8. 10.1080/10298436.2016.116230710.1080/10298436.2016.1162307 ↗
9. 10.1080/10298436.2017.131664510.1080/10298436.2017.1316645 ↗
10. Cochran W. G. · 1957
11. Cruz J. F. · 2015
12. Dawkins J. · 2011
13. Dennis, E.P. , and Spulber, A. , 2016. Performance-based planning and programming for pavement management . Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) and Center for Automotive Research (CAR), 63.
14. 10.1155/2014/51248510.1155/2014/512485 ↗
15. Gillespie, T. D. , Sayers, M. W. , and Queiroz, C. A. V. , 1986. The international road roughness experiment: establishing correlation and calibration standard for measurement . Technical Report No. 45, Washington, DC: The World Bank, 464.
16. HPMS . 2016. Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) field manual . Office of highway policy information, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, 295.
17. Hughes W. J. · 2016
18. 10.3141/2457-0410.3141/2457-04 ↗
19. Karamihas S. M. · 2017
20. Nomura T. · International Journal of Informatics Society · 2015 · 7 · 29
21. 10.4271/97326710.4271/973267 ↗
22. Papoulis A. · 1991
23. Stribling J. W. · 2016
24. 10.5703/128828431361010.5703/1288284313610 ↗