journal article·2025-06-26

The impact of cellulosic pulps on thermoforming process: effects on formation time and drainage efficiency

Caroline Lachance, Simon Barnabé, Dominic Deshaies, Benoit Bideau

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The growing environmental and health concerns associated with plastic pollution have driven the search for sustainable alternatives. This study investigated the impact of various types of cellulosic pulps and degree of refining on the production of thermoforming eco-friendly fiber-based materials as alternatives to plastics. By examining the influence pulp and fibers characteristics, the study aimed to correlate these factors with the two process parameters, formation time and drainage efficiency. Trays with a target dry weight of 31 g were produced using slurry consistency of 0.2 % and 0.8 % on an industrial molding machine. In this study, formation times required to achieve the target weight are varied from 0 to 42 s, influenced by pulp type, refining level, and slurry consistency showing that the longest time can affect the quality. Higher refining levels extended formation time, making it crucial to adjust slurry consistency to optimize production efficiency. Formation trials revealed that most pulps followed a logarithmic formation pattern at both consistencies. Dryness and drainage gain varied significantly across pulp types. Hardwood pulps exhibited the highest initial dryness, while alternative fibers like canola had the lowest, making them longer to dry. Recycled and mechanically pulped fibers retained more water due to fines content, further decreasing dewatering. Additionally, increased refining levels decreased both the initial dryness and the gain in dryness over equal drainage times. Since dryness directly influences drying time and energy consumption, optimizing pulp selection and refining strategies are essential for enhancing cost efficiency in thermoformed fiber production.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing · Microplastics and Plastic Pollution

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Innovations on Ecomaterials, Ecoproducts and Ecoenergies, University of Québec at Trois-Rivières , 3351 boul. des Forges , Trois-Rivières , QC , G9A 5H7 , Canada

Innofibre, Cégep de Trois-Rivières , 3351 boul. des Forges , Trois-Rivières , Québec , G9A 5H7 , Canada

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. AFT (2016). Introduction to stock prep refining 2016 edition, Available at: https://aft-global.com/sites/default/files/resources/docs/files/2017-03/EB-050-ENA4_FineBar%20Training%20Manual%202016_A4.pdf (Accessed 21 Nov 2024).
2. Banavath, H.N., Sharma, N., Pandey, A.K., Gandhi, K.S., and Neogi, S. (2011). A comparative study of the effect of refining on charge of various pulps. Bioresour. Technol. 102: 4544–4551, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.109.10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.109 ↗
3. Biermann, C.J. (1996). Handbook of pulping and papermaking, 2nd ed. Academic Press, San Diego.
4. Chen, H., Park, A., Heitmann, J.A., and Hubbe, M.A. (2009). Importance of cellulosic fines relative to the dewatering rates of fiber suspensions. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48: 9106–9112, https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9006613.10.1021/ie9006613 ↗
5. Debnath, M., Ghosh, A., Sen, S., Kumar, B., and Singh, R. (2022). Molded pulp products for sustainable packaging: production rate challenges and product opportunities. BioResources 17: 3810–3870, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.17.2.debnath.10.15376/biores.17.2.Debnath ↗
6. Dey, A., Singh, R., Sen, S., and Mukhopadhyay, S. (2020). Paper and other pulp-based eco-friendly moulded materials for food packaging applications: a review. J. Postharvest Technol. 8: 01–21.
7. Didone, M., Saxena, P., Brilhuis-Meijer, E., Tosello, T., Bissacco, G., Mcaloone, T.C., Antelmi Pigosso, D.C., and Howard, T.J. (2017). Moulded pulp manufacturing: overview and prospects for the process technology. Packag. Technol. Sci. 30: 231–249, https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2289.10.1002/pts.2289 ↗
8. Didone, M. and Tosello, G. (2019). Moulded pulp products manufacturing with thermoforming. Packag. Technol. Sci. 32: 7–22, https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2412.10.1002/pts.2412 ↗
9. Dislaire, C., Déchelotte, S., Grand, A., and Gattin, R. (2021). Mechanical and hygroscopic properties of molded pulp products using different wood-based cellulose fibers. Polymers 13: 3225, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193225.10.3390/polym13193225 ↗
10. Environment and Climate Change Canada and Health Canada (2020). Science assessment of plastic pollution. Cat. No.: En14-424/2020E-PDF. ISBN 978-0-660-35897-0, Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/services/evaluating-existing-substances/science-assessment-plastic-pollution.html (Accessed 4 Dec 2024).
11. Gharehkhani, S., Sadeghinezhad, E., Nia, A.S., Kazi, S.N., Yarmand, H., Badarudin, A., and Safaei, M.R. (2015). Basic effects of pulp refining on fiber properties—a review. Carbohydr. Polym. 115: 785–803, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.047.10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.08.047 ↗
12. Government of Canada (2021). Government of Canada moving forward with banning harmful single-use plastics, Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate-change/news/2021/12/government-of-canada-moving-forward-with-banning-harmful-single-use-plastics0.html.
13. Hubbe, M.A. (2002). Fines management for increased paper machine productivity. In: Proc. Sci. Tech. Advan. Wet End Chem., pp. 22–23.
14. Hubbe, M.A., Heitmann, J.A., and Cole, C.A. (2008). Water release from fractionated stock suspensions. 2. Effects of consistency, flocculants, shear, and order of mixing. TAPPI J. 7: 14–19, https://doi.org/10.32964/tj7.8.14.10.32964/TJ7.8.14 ↗
15. Hubbe, M.A. and Pruszynski, P. (2020). Greaseproof paper products: a review emphasizing ecofriendly approaches. BioResources 15: 1978–2004, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.15.1.1978-2004.10.15376/biores.15.1.1978-2004 ↗
16. International Molded Fiber Association (2024). About molded fiber, Available at: https://www.imfa.org (Accessed 21 Nov 2024).
17. Lumiainen, J. (2000). Refining of chemical pulp. Papermaking 1: 86–122.
18. Napper, I.E. and Thompson, R.C. (2023). Plastics and the environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 48: 55–79, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112522-072642.10.1146/annurev-environ-112522-072642 ↗
19. Natural Resources Canada (2024). Current lumber, pulp, and panel prices, Available at: https://natural-resources.canada.ca/our-natural-resources/domestic-and-international-markets/current-lumber-pulp-panel-prices/13309 (Accessed 15 Nov 2024).
20. Oliaei, E., Seppänen, T., Koskinen, J., Haapala, A., and Rintala, L. (2021). Eco-friendly high-strength composites based on hot-pressed lignocellulose microfibrils or fibers. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9: 1899–1910.10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c08498 ↗
21. Pasquier, E., Skunde, R., Grand, A., and Gattin, R. (2023). Influence of temperature and pressure during thermoforming of softwood pulp. J. Bioresour. Bioprod. 8: 408–420.10.1016/j.jobab.2023.10.001 ↗
22. Pilapitiya, P.N.T. and Ratnayake, A.S. (2024). The world of plastic waste: a review. Clean. Mater. 11: 100220.10.1016/j.clema.2024.100220 ↗
23. Rattanawongkun, P., Wichai, J., and Nakapan, W. (2020). Improving agricultural waste pulps via self-blending concept with potential use in moulded pulp packaging. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8: 104320.10.1016/j.jece.2020.104320 ↗
24. Semple, K.E., Zhou, C., Rojas, O.J., Nkeuwa, W.N., and Dai, C. (2022). Moulded pulp fibers for disposable food packaging: a state-of-the-art review. Food Packag. Shelf Life 33: 100908.10.1016/j.fpsl.2022.100908 ↗
25. Vargas, F., Diez, C., Samper, M.D., Jiménez, L., and Rodríguez, A. (2012). Cellulosic pulps of cereal straws as raw material for the manufacture of ecological packaging. BioResources 7: 4161–4170, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.7.3.4161-4170.10.15376/biores.7.3.4161-4170 ↗
26. Wang, Q., Chen, J., Li, Y., and Zhou, J. (2018). Effect of light-delignification on mechanical, hydrophobic, and thermal properties of high-strength molded fiber materials. Sci. Rep. 8: 955, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19623-4.10.1038/s41598-018-19623-4 ↗
27. Zambrano, F., Rodriguez, R., and Gonzalez, P. (2021). Upcycling strategies for old corrugated containerboard to attain high-performance tissue paper: a viable answer to the packaging waste generation dilemma. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 175: 105854.10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105854 ↗