Energy consumption in refiner mechanical pulping
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The efficiency of mechanical pulping has long been of interest due to the large energy consumed by the process. Previous estimates of theoretical efficiency have accounted for less than 20 % of the energy employed. In this study, we make new estimates based on fracture mechanics and abrasion as the mechanisms of new surface creation. We postulate that fracture mechanics comminutes wood into fibres and creates pores in fibre walls. This consumes around 100 kWh/t. Abrasion peels surface material from fibres in the form of morphologically different fines particles. Based on abrasion theory, we estimate this specific energy to be around 1,330 kWh/t. Together, fracture mechanics and abrasion, account for about 70 % of the specific energy (2,000 kWh/t) to produce TMP for printing paper grades. We postulate that the remaining energy is consumed as hysteresis losses from viscoelastic strains not linked to creation of new surface. The largest single source of energy consumption, abrasion, alone accounts for about 66 % of the energy of the process. Finally, we discuss how energy may be reduced by refining intensity and other means.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical and Thermal Properties Analysis · Belt Conveyor Systems Engineering · Lubricants and Their Additives
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , Canada
Holmen AB , Norrköping , Sweden
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. Atack, D. (1972). On the characterization of pressurized refiner mechanical pulps. Sven. Papperstidning 75: 89–94.10.1016/0014-4827(72)90523-X ↗
2. Atack, D. (1981). Fundamental differences in energy requirement between mechanical pulp processes. In: Proceedings of the int. mech. pulping conf., Oslo, Norway, Session VI.
3. Atack, D. and May, W.D. (1958). Frictional mechanisms in the grinding process. Pulp Pap. Can. Convention Issue: 265–271.10.1016/S0140-6736(58)90951-6 ↗
4. Atack, D. and Tabor, D. (1958). The friction of wood. In: Proceedings of the royal soc. (London), A., Vol. 246, pp. 539–555, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0163.10.1098/rspa.1958.0163 ↗
5. Atack, D., May, W.D., Morris, E.I., and Sproule, R.N. (1961). The energy of tensile and cleavage fracture of black spruce. Tappi J. 44: 555–567.
6. Berg, J.-E. (2008). Wood and fibre mechanics related to the thermomechanical pulping process, Ph.D. thesis. Mid-Sweden University, Sundsvall.
7. Campbell, W.B. (1934). Groundwood studies: theoretical efficiency. Pulp Pap. Can 35: 218–219.10.1021/ie50290a021 ↗
8. Esteban, L.S. and Carrasco, J.E. (2006). Evaluation of different strategies for pulverization of forest biomasses. Powder Technol. 166: 139–151, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2006.05.018.10.1016/j.powtec.2006.05.018 ↗
9. Fernandez, F.J., Martinez, D.M., and Olson, J.A. (2018). Investigation of low consistency reject refining of mechanical pulp for energy savings. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 33: 21–27, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-3006.10.1515/npprj-2018-3006 ↗
10. Heikkurinen, A. and Leskelä, L. (1999). The character and properties of mechanical pulps. In: Sundholm, Jan (Ed.). Mechanical Pulping, Papermaking Science and Technology Book 5. Fapet OY, Jyväskylä, Finland, p. 399.
11. Höglund, H., Bäck, R., Falk, B., and Jackson, M. (1997). Thermopulp – a new energy-efficient mechanical pulping process. Pulp Pap. Can 98: 82–89.
12. Karnis, A. (1994). The mechanism of fiber development in mechanical pulping. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 20: J280–J288.
13. Kerekes, R.J. (2010). Energy and forces in refining. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 36: 10–15.
14. Kerekes, R.J. (2015). Perspectives on high and low consistency refining in mechanical pulping. Bioresources 10: 8795–8811, https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.10.4.8795-8811.10.15376/biores.10.4.8795-8811 ↗
15. Kerekes, R. and Meltzer, F. (2018). The influence of bar width on bar forces and fibre shortening in low consistency pulp refining. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 33: 220–225, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-3028.10.1515/npprj-2018-3028 ↗
16. Kerekes, R.J., McDonald, J.D., and Meltzer, F.P. (2023). External fibrillation of wood pulp. Tappi J. 22: 363–371, https://doi.org/10.32964/tj22.6.363.10.32964/TJ22.6.363 ↗
17. Kure, K.-A., Sabourin, M.J., Dahlqvist, G., and Helle, T. (2000). Adjusting refining intensity by changing refiner plate design and rotational speed – effects on structural fibre properties. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 26: 346–352.
18. Lamb, G.E.R. (1960). The efficiency of mechanical pulping processes. Tappi J. 43: 989–944.
19. Lamb, G.E.R. (1962). Energy consumption in mechanical pulping. Tappi J. 45: 364–368.
20. Maloney, T.C. and Paulapuro, H. (1999). The formation of pores in the cell wall. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 25: 430–436.
21. Marton, R., Tsujimoto, N., and Eskelinen, E. (1981). Energy consumption in thermomechanical pulping. Tappi J. 64: 71–74.
22. Miles, K.B. (1991). A simplified method for calculating the residence time and refining intensity in a chip refiner. Paperi ja Puu 73: 852–856.
23. Miles, K.B. and May, W.D. (1990). The flow of pulp in chip refiners. J. Pulp Pap. Sci. 16: J63–J68.
24. Ottestam, C. and Salmen, L. (2001). Fracture energy of wood: relation to mechanical pulping. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 16: 140–142, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-2001-16-02-p140-142.10.3183/npprj-2001-16-02-p140-142 ↗
25. Rabinowicz, E. (1995). Friction and wear of materials, 2nd ed. J Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 169.
26. Ramalho, A. and Miranda, J.C. (2006). The relationship between wear and dissipated energy in sliding systems. Wear 260: 361–367, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.121.10.1016/j.wear.2005.02.121 ↗
27. Robertson, A.A. and Mason, S.G. (1949). Specific surface of cellulose fibres by the liquid permeability method. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can 50: 103–110.
28. Salmen, L. and Fellers, C. (1982). Fundamentals of energy consumption during viscoelastic and plastic deformation of wood. Trans. Tech. Sect., CPPA: TR93–TR99.
29. Sandberg, C., Nelsson, E., Engberg, B.A., Berg, J.-E., and Engstrand, P. (2018). Effects of chip pretreatment and feeding segments on specific energy and pulp quality in TMP production. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 33: 448–459, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2018-3052.10.1515/npprj-2018-3052 ↗
30. Sandberg, C., Ferritsius, O., and Ferritsius, R. (2021). Energy efficiency in mechanical pulping – definitions and considerations. Nord. Pup. Pap. Res. J. 36: 425–434, https://doi.org/10.1515/npprj-2021-0013.10.1515/npprj-2021-0013 ↗
31. Uhmeier, A. and Salmén, L. (1996). Repeated large radial compression of heated spruce. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 11: 171–176, https://doi.org/10.3183/npprj-1996-11-03-p171-176.10.3183/npprj-1996-11-03-p171-176 ↗