journal article·2020-06-25Open access

Modeling of tensile index using uncertain data sets

Fredrik Bengtsson, Anders Karlström, Torsten Wik

Abstract

Abstract The objective of this investigation is to analyze and model tensile index. Two approaches are used, one based on training and validation data, while the other novel approach tests models using all possible combinations of data points. This approach is focused on small data sets which have here been obtained from nineteen pulp samples at different refining conditions in a full-scale TMP production line with a CD-76 refiner as a primary stage. From each pulp sample twenty handsheet strips for tensile index measurements were performed. Initially, specific energy and the external variables (dilution water feed rates and plate gaps) are used as predictors in a modeling approach based on an adjusted {R2} approach. Thereafter, the resulting models are compared with a combination of specific energy and internal variables (primarily consistencies) obtained from temperature measurements inside the refining zones using a soft sensor concept. It is found that specific energy and internal variables as predictors outperform the external variables when estimating tensile index.
Source: crossref · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mineral Processing and Grinding · Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses · Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering , Chalmers University of Technology , Göteborg , Sweden

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Bajpai, P. Biotechnology for Pulp and Paper Processing. Springer, New York, USA, 2012.10.1007/978-1-4614-1409-4 ↗
2. Barnett, V., Lewis, T. Outliers in Statistical Data. 3rd edition. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1994. .
3. Belsley, D.A., Kuh, E., Welsch, R.E. Regression Diagnostics. Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, USA, 1980.10.1002/0471725153 ↗
4. Bengtsson, F., Karlström, A., Hill, J., Johansson, L. (2019) Raw data for tensile index estimations from a CD72-refiner. Technical report. Chalmers University of Technology. Available at https://research.chalmers.se/publication/510615.
5. Draper, N.R., Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis. vol. 326. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1998.10.1002/9781118625590 ↗
6. Fernando, D., Gorski, D., Sabourin, M., Daniel, G. (2013) Characterization of fiber development in high-and low-consistency refining of primary mechanical pulp. Holzforschung 67:735–745.10.1515/hf-2012-0135 ↗
7. Forgacs, O. (1963) The characterization of mechanical pulps. Pulp Pap. Mag. Can. 64:89–118.
8. Freedman, L.S., Pee, D. (1989) Return to a note on screening regression equations. Am. Stat. 43:279–282.10.1080/00031305.1989.10475675 ↗
9. Gilbert, R.O. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA, 1987.
10. Härkönen, E., Huusari, E., Ravila, P. (2000) Residence time of fibre in a single disc refiner. Pulp Pap. Can. 101:330–335.
11. Härkönen, E., Kortelainen, J., Virtanen, J., Vuorio, P. (2003) Fiber development in TMP main line. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Quebec, Canada. pp. 171–178.
12. Harrell, J.F., Lee, K.L., Matchar, D.B., Reichert, T.A. (1985) Regression models for prognostic prediction: advantages, problems, and suggested solutions. Cancer Treat. Rep. 69:1071–1077.
13. Hill, J., Westin, H., Bergström, R. (1979) Monitoring pulp quality for process control. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Toronto, Canada. pp. 111–125.
14. Johansson, B.L., Karlsson, H., Jung, E. (1980) Experiences with computer control, based on optical sensors for pulp quality, of a two-stage TMP-plant. In: Process Control Conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia. pp. 145–152.
15. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014a) Fiber energy efficiency Part I: Extended entropy model. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29:322–331.10.3183/npprj-2014-29-02-p322-331 ↗
16. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014b) Fiber energy efficiency Part II: Forces acting on the refiner bars. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29:332–343.10.3183/npprj-2014-29-02-p332-343 ↗
17. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014c) Fiber energy efficiency Part III: Modeling of bar-to-fiber interaction. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29:401–408.10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p401-408 ↗
18. Karlström, A., Eriksson, K. (2014d) Fiber energy efficiency Part IV: Multi-scale modeling of refining processes. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 29:409–417.10.3183/npprj-2014-29-03-p409-417 ↗
19. Karlström, A., Hill, J. (2017a) CTMP process optimization Part I: Internal and external variables impact on refiner conditions. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32:35–44.10.3183/npprj-2017-32-01-p035-044 ↗
20. Karlström, A., Hill, J. (2017b) CTMP process optimization Part II: Reliability in pulp and handsheet Measurements. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32:253–265.10.3183/npprj-2017-32-02-p253-265 ↗
21. Karlström, A., Hill, J. (2017c) CTMP process optimization Part III: On the prediction of Scott-bond, z-strength and tensile index. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 32:266–279.10.3183/npprj-2017-32-02-p266-279 ↗
22. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Ferritsius, O., Ferritsius, R. (2016a) Pulp property development Part III: Fiber residence time and consistency profile impact on specific energy and pulp properties. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 31:300–307.10.3183/npprj-2016-31-02-p300-307 ↗
23. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Ferritsius, R., Ferritsius, O. (2015) Pulp property development Part I: Interlacing undersampled pulp properties and TMP process data using piece-wise linear functions. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 30:599–608.10.3183/npprj-2015-30-04-p599-608 ↗
24. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Ferritsius, R., Ferritsius, O. (2016b) Pulp property development Part II: Process nonlinearities and their influence on pulp property development. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 31:287–299.10.3183/npprj-2016-31-02-p287-299 ↗
25. Karlström, A., Hill, J., Johansson, L. (2018) An overview of some efforts to understand CD-refiners. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Trondheim, Norway.
26. Karlström, A., Johansson, L., Hill, J. (2019) On the modeling of tensile index from larger data sets. Nord. Pulp Pap. Res. J. 34:289–303.10.1515/npprj-2018-0019 ↗
27. Nelsson, E. (2016) Improved energy efficiency in mill scale production of mechanical pulp by increased wood softening and refining intensity. Ph.D. thesis, Mid Sweden University.
28. Peduzzi, P., Concato, J., Kemper, E., Holford, T.R., Feinstein, A.R. (1996) A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 49:1373–1379.10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00236-3 ↗
29. Randolph, K.A., Myers, L.L. Basic Statistics in Multivariate Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2013.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199764044.001.0001 ↗
30. Rawlings, J.O., Pantula, S.G., Dickey, D.A. Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, USA, 2001.
31. Rosner, B. (1983) Percentage points for a generalized ESD many-outlier procedure. Technometrics 25:165–172.10.1080/00401706.1983.10487848 ↗
32. Sabourin, M., Wiseman, N., Vaughn, J., et al. (2001) Refining theory considerations for assessing pulp properties in the commercial manufacture of TMP. In: 55th Appita Annual Conference. Appita Inc.. pp. 195–204.
33. Strand, B. (1996) Model-based control of high-consistency refining. Tappi J. 10:140–146.
34. Strand, B., Grace, B. (2014) Implementation of advanced supervisory control within a TMP refiner quality control system. In: Int. Mech. Pulping Conf., Helsinki, Finland.