journal article·2020-06-25

The influence of process parameters of screen-printed invasive plant paper electrodes on cyclic voltammetry

Urška Kavčič, Igor Karlovits

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Using disposable screen-printed electrodes is a convenient way of monitoring environmental pollution, production process control etc. Usually, commercially available screen-printed electrodes are used, but more and more studies are being carried out in the field of printing electrodes on thinner, low-cost and versatile substrates, including paper. In the present research, the comparison of screen-printed electrodes printed on different paper-based materials is presented. Two unique and innovative invasive plant-based papers made from (1) Japanese knotweed, (2) Canadian and Giant goldenrod and (3) commercially available cardboard were used as a printing material for the electrodes. The selected paper substrates were characterized, and screen-printed electrodes were printed. The influence of substrates’ properties and pre- or post-treatment of the screen-printed electrodes on the electrochemical behaviour is thoroughly analyzed. The results indicate that the printing substrate (roughness) had the most significant influence on the cyclic voltammetry response. Comparing pre- and post-treatment of screen-printed electrodes, it was shown that grinding influenced the electrochemical activity significantly, while corona discharge does not have as significant influence. Besides, it was shown that the invasive plant-based papers are viable alternatives to commercially available papers and can be used as low-cost and eco-friendly alternatives for disposable screen-printed electrodes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Biosensors and Analytical Detection · Electrochemical Analysis and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

187290 Pulp and Paper Institute , Bogišićeva ulica 8 , Ljubljana , Slovenia

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. BASi (2018) Cyclic Voltammetry – Data Analysis. Available from https://www.basinc.com/manuals/EC_epsilon/Techniques/CycVolt/cv_analysis.
2. Bollström, R. Paper for printed electronics and functionality. Department of Chemical Engineering. Åbo Akademi University, Finland, 2013. p. 100.
3. Cinti, S., et al. (2018) Low-cost and reagent-free paper-based device to detect chloride ions in serum and sweat. Talanta 179:186–192.10.1016/j.talanta.2017.10.030 ↗
4. Cinti, S., et al. (2017) Carbon Black-Modified Electrodes Screen-Printed onto Paper Towel, Waxed Paper and Parafilm M(®). Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 17(10):2267.10.3390/s17102267 ↗
5. Cumba, L. R., et al. (2016) Can the mechanical activation (polishing) of screen-printed electrodes enhance their electroanalytical response? Analyst 141(9):2791–2799.10.1039/C6AN00167J ↗
6. Desmet, C., et al. (2016) Paper electrodes for bioelectrochemistry: Biosensors and biofuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 76:145–163.10.1016/j.bios.2015.06.052 ↗
7. Du, C. X., et al. (2016) A novel procedure for fabricating flexible screen-printed electrodes with improved electrochemical performance. IOP Conf. Ser., Mater. Sci. Eng. 137(1):012060.10.1088/1757-899X/137/1/012060 ↗
8. Ebnesajjad, S. (2014) Theories of Adhesion. In: Surface Treatment of Materials for Adhesive Bonding. William Andrew Publishing. pp. 77–91.10.1016/B978-0-323-26435-8.00005-8 ↗
9. Eisby, J., Eisby, F. Corona treatment, Vetaphone. Available from http://www.vetaphone.com/UserFiles/File/pdf/Technical%20feature%20-%20Corona%20Treatment.pdf.
10. Enomae, T., Onabe, F. (1997) Characteristics of Parker Print-Surf Roughness as Compared with Bekk Smoothness. Sen’i Gakkaishi 53(3):86–95.10.2115/fiber.53.86 ↗
11. Fletcher, S. (2016) Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. In: Electrochemistry of Carbon Electrodes, Eds. Alkire, R. C., Bartlett, P. N., Lipkowski, J., pp. 425–444.10.1002/9783527697489.ch12 ↗
12. Garcia, D. E., et al. (2010) A Parametric Design Study of an Electrochemical Sensor. J. Assoc. Lab. Autom. 15(3):179–188.10.1016/j.jala.2010.01.007 ↗
13. Gusmão, R., et al. (2017) Screen-printed carbon electrodes doped with TiO2-Au nanocomposites with improved electrocatalytic performance. Mater. Today Commun. 11:11–17.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.02.003 ↗
14. Hayat, A., Marty, J. L. (2014) Disposable Screen Printed Electrochemical Sensors: Tools for Environmental Monitoring. Sensors 14(6):10432–10453.10.3390/s140610432 ↗
15. Ihalainen, P., et al. (2012) Influence of Surface Properties of Coated Papers on Printed Electronics. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 51(17):6025–6036.10.1021/ie202807v ↗
16. Jewell, E., et al. (2016) Improved Manufacturing Performance of Screen Printed Carbon Electrodes through Material Formulation. Biosensors 6(3):30.10.3390/bios6030030 ↗
17. Kavčič, U., Pleša, T. (2018) The influence of printing properties of screen printed electrodes on sensitivity measured with cyclic voltammetry. In: 9th International Symposium on Graphic Engineering and Design University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Department of Graphic Engineering and Design, Novi Sad, Serbia. pp. 253–259.10.24867/GRID-2018-p31 ↗
18. Li, M., et al. (2012) Recent developments and applications of screen-printed electrodes in environmental assays—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 734:31–44.10.1016/j.aca.2012.05.018 ↗
19. López-López, L., et al. (2017) Disposable electrochemical aptasensor for gluten determination in food. Sens. Actuators B, Chem. 241:522–527.10.1016/j.snb.2016.10.112 ↗
20. Määttänen, A., et al. (2013) A low-cost paper-based inkjet-printed platform for electrochemical analyses. Sens. Actuators B, Chem. 177:153–162.10.1016/j.snb.2012.10.113 ↗
21. Medina Rodríguez, B. Inkjet and screen printing for electronic applications. Universitat de Barcelona, Departament d’Enginyeries: Secció d’Electrònica. p. 225. 2016.
22. Menart, E., et al. (2017) Novel hydrazinium polyacrylate-based electrochemical gas sensor for formaldehyde. Sens. Actuators B, Chem. 238:71–75.10.1016/j.snb.2016.07.042 ↗
23. Mohamed, H. M. (2016) Screen-printed disposable electrodes: Pharmaceutical applications and recent developments. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 82:1–11.10.1016/j.trac.2016.02.010 ↗
24. Morrin, A., et al. (2003) Electrochemical Characterization of Commercial and Home-Made Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes. Anal. Lett. 36(9):2021–2039.10.1081/AL-120023627 ↗
25. Prasek, J., et al. (2012) Optimization of planar three-electrode systems for redox system detection. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7(3):1785–1801.10.1016/S1452-3981(23)13840-5 ↗
26. Wei, H., et al. (2007) Enhanced electrochemical performance at screen-printed carbon electrodes by a new pretreating procedure. Anal. Chim. Acta 588(2):297–303.10.1016/j.aca.2007.02.006 ↗
27. Zhao, C., et al. (2013) A microfluidic paper-based electrochemical biosensor array for multiplexed detection of metabolic biomarkers. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 14(5):054402.10.1088/1468-6996/14/5/054402 ↗