Non-destructive laser-based quantification of corrosion rates in reinforced concrete using ensemble machine learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Corrosion in reinforced concrete materials is a critical factor affecting the durability of structures and often leads to building collapse. In this research, we employed non-linear machine learning methods, including kernel-based support vector regression (SVR) and decision tree regression (DTR), to predict the corrosion rate in concrete based on the intensity of elemental constituents obtained via laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS). To enhance model performance, adaptive boosting mechanisms were utilised to build ensemble models, effectively predicting corrosion rates. Model performance was assessed using standard metric performance indicators: mean absolute error (MAE), correlation coefficient (CC), root mean square error (RMSE), and Nash Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE). The standalone SVR model demonstrated consistent performance across varying input feature combinations during the testing phase, with NSE = 0.9611 and CC = 0.9813. Overall, the ensemble models outperformed the standalone models, with SVR-ADB-Combo-3 achieving NSE = 0.9618 and CC = 0.9821, and DTR-ADB-Combo-2 achieving NSE = 0.9839 and CC = 0.9951, exhibiting the best prediction performance. The findings of this study will serve as a valuable guide for researchers and policymakers in designing construction materials and setting standards, contributing to improved durability and safety in reinforced concrete structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete Corrosion and Durability · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Smart Materials for Construction
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals (KFUPM)
Funding
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2023.225256410.1080/10589759.2023.2252564 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2025.245666810.1080/10589759.2025.2456668 ↗
3. 10.1080/10589759.2025.257716710.1080/10589759.2025.2577167 ↗
4. 10.1016/J.CSCM.2023.E0270610.1016/J.CSCM.2023.E02706 ↗
5. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.13421910.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.134219 ↗
6. 10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2014.12.01810.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2014.12.018 ↗
7. 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00086-010.1016/S0958-9465(02)00086-0 ↗
8. 10.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2017.03.02710.1016/J.MEASUREMENT.2017.03.027 ↗
9. 10.1617/s11527-023-02226-510.1617/s11527-023-02226-5 ↗
10. 10.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2015.09.00510.1016/J.CEMCONRES.2015.09.005 ↗
11. 10.1617/s11527-023-02292-910.1617/s11527-023-02292-9 ↗
12. 10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.13427310.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2023.134273 ↗
13. 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2022.11644710.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2022.116447 ↗
14. 10.1002/SUCO.20230022710.1002/SUCO.202300227 ↗
15. 10.1021/AC303220R10.1021/AC303220R ↗
16. 10.1039/C8JA00282G10.1039/C8JA00282G ↗
17. Buckley SG, Bauer AJR. Novel applications of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy. Appl Spectrosc. 2017 [cited 2023 Apr 6];71(4):553–566. Available from: https://opg.optica.org/abstract.cfm?uri=as-71-4-55310.1177/0003702817691527 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.sab.2013.06.00110.1016/j.sab.2013.06.001 ↗
19. 10.1366/000370299194546110.1366/0003702991945461 ↗
20. 10.1016/J.JPBA.2020.11315310.1016/J.JPBA.2020.113153 ↗
21. 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.13516810.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.135168 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.sab.2007.10.03710.1016/j.sab.2007.10.037 ↗
23. 10.1016/J.SAB.2017.06.00610.1016/J.SAB.2017.06.006 ↗
24. 10.1016/J.MATLET.2024.13759710.1016/J.MATLET.2024.137597 ↗
25. 10.1016/J.RINENG.2023.10120310.1016/J.RINENG.2023.101203 ↗
26. 10.1016/J.SNA.2023.11419310.1016/J.SNA.2023.114193 ↗
27. 10.1007/s13369-021-05927-710.1007/s13369-021-05927-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/J.MTCOMM.2024.11100510.1016/J.MTCOMM.2024.111005 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12378510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123785 ↗
30. 10.1007/S42107-023-00625-1/METRICS10.1007/S42107-023-00625-1/METRICS ↗
31. 10.1016/J.RSER.2022.11304510.1016/J.RSER.2022.113045 ↗
32. 10.1016/J.CEJ.2023.14294910.1016/J.CEJ.2023.142949 ↗
33. 10.1039/C7CP04531J10.1039/C7CP04531J ↗
34. 10.1016/j.mseb.2022.11568210.1016/j.mseb.2022.115682 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e0398110.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03981 ↗
36. 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2008.07.12710.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2008.07.127 ↗
37. 10.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2011.09.00110.1016/J.OPTLASTEC.2011.09.001 ↗
38. 10.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2008.05.01010.1016/J.COMMATSCI.2008.05.010 ↗
39. 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.13425010.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.134250 ↗
40. 10.1016/J.ENERGY.2006.11.01010.1016/J.ENERGY.2006.11.010 ↗
41. 10.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2022.10778410.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2022.107784 ↗
42. 10.1016/J.ENVRES.2024.12057010.1016/J.ENVRES.2024.120570 ↗
43. 10.1016/J.ECOLIND.2022.10933010.1016/J.ECOLIND.2022.109330 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11700010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117000 ↗
45. 10.1016/J.JKSUCI.2017.12.00410.1016/J.JKSUCI.2017.12.004 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10659510.1016/j.jobe.2023.106595 ↗
47. Pedregosa Fabianpedregosa F, Michel V, Grisel Oliviergrisel O, et al. Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python Gaël Varoquaux Bertrand Thirion Vincent Dubourg Alexandre Passos Pedregosa, Varoquaux, Gramfort et al. J Mach Learn Res. 2011 [cited 2021 Dec 26];12:2825–2830. Available from: http://scikit-learn.sourceforge.net
48. 10.1016/J.JECE.2023.11183510.1016/J.JECE.2023.111835 ↗
49. 10.1021/acsomega.3c0251410.1021/acsomega.3c02514 ↗