Multi-scale spatiotemporal feature fusion MSCRA-GRU method for simultaneous faults diagnosis in aviation environmental control system
Source abstract
Abstract
Fault diagnosis in aviation environmental control systems (ECS) faces significant challenges under simultaneous fault conditions due to high feature overlap, especially in critical components such as pressure regulated shutoff valves (PRSOV) operating under extreme conditions, including thermal shock, pressure transients, and vibrational fatigue. Conventional methods rely on static or single-fault hypotheses, which often struggle to distinguish overlapping fault characteristics, leading to misdiagnosis and delayed response. To overcome these limitations, this study proposes a novel multi-scale one-dimensional convolutional neural network with the residual module and attention mechanism, combined with the gated recurrent unit (MSCRA-GRU). The proposed method employs three parallel convolutional branches for hierarchical feature extraction, augmented by GRU to capture the temporal dynamics in PRSOV operational states, thereby enhancing spatiotemporal feature representation for both single and simultaneous fault scenarios. Validated on a multi-condition pressure dataset encompassing extreme operational scenarios, the MSCRA-GRU model achieves a diagnostic accuracy of 99.71% with a training time of only 77.65 seconds, demonstrating high computational efficiency. Comparison and validation with existing methods confirm that the proposed method outperforms traditional techniques in handling complex and overlapping dynamic signals, providing a practical solution with high accuracy and low latency for the intelligent maintenance of aerospace systems.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Fault Detection and Control Systems · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Beihang University
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/sys.2165110.1002/sys.21651 ↗
2. 10.1088/1361-6501/aca21910.1088/1361-6501/aca219 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.11510.1016/j.energy.2019.01.115 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.11492510.1016/j.applthermaleng.2020.114925 ↗
5. Herzog J Electrification of the environmental control system. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences; Hamburg, Germany; Vol. 3. p. 2006–2008. [2006 Sep 3–8].
6. de Assis Silva L, Sano HH, Junior CLN. Degradation estimation analysis of an aeronautical pneumatic valve using machine learning. In: 2022 IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon); 2022 (Montreal, QC, Canada). doi: 10.1109/SysCon53536.2022.9773917
7. 10.35894/jtk.v7i1.4810.35894/jtk.v7i1.48 ↗
8. Aircraft on ground (AOG) - the causes and costs of a grounded aircraft. [cited 2017 Jul 26]. Available from: https://www.proponent.com/causes-costs-behind-grounded-aircraft/
9. Baptista M. Machine learning and deep learning for prognostics and predictive maintenance of aeronautical equipment [PhD thesis]. Lisbon Portugal: Universidade de Lisboa; 2018.
10. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11550410.1016/j.eswa.2021.115504 ↗
11. 10.3390/app1212614410.3390/app12126144 ↗
12. 10.1109/TIM.2023.330040910.1109/TIM.2023.3300409 ↗
13. 10.1109/TR.2020.302554810.1109/TR.2020.3025548 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2022.209113310.1080/10589759.2022.2091133 ↗
15. 10.1080/10589759.2024.237234010.1080/10589759.2024.2372340 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2023.218395310.1080/10589759.2023.2183953 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.10923510.1016/j.measurement.2021.109235 ↗
18. 10.1109/TIM.2024.337079110.1109/TIM.2024.3370791 ↗
19. 10.1080/10589759.2025.245177210.1080/10589759.2025.2451772 ↗
20. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.305087710.1109/ACCESS.2021.3050877 ↗
21. 10.1504/IJHM.2024.13823110.1504/IJHM.2024.138231 ↗
22. 10.32604/csse.2022.02113210.32604/csse.2022.021132 ↗
23. 10.1109/JIOT.2024.337671510.1109/JIOT.2024.3376715 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ast.2019.10542310.1016/j.ast.2019.105423 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00521-022-07167-810.1007/s00521-022-07167-8 ↗
26. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.339718410.1109/ACCESS.2024.3397184 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.03210.1016/j.neucom.2017.01.032 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10887310.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108873 ↗
29. 10.1109/TIM.2024.352267810.1109/TIM.2024.3522678 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.aei.2025.10312310.1016/j.aei.2025.103123 ↗
31. 10.1080/10589759.2025.245006310.1080/10589759.2025.2450063 ↗
32. Castilho HM, Nascimento CL, Vianna WOL. Aircraft bleed valve fault classification using support vector machines and classification trees. In: 2018 Annual IEEE International Systems Conference (SysCon); 2018 (Vancouver, BC, Canada). doi: 10.1109/SYSCON.2018.8369568
33. Xiong Q, Zhang S. Fault injection and diagnosis for civil aircraft cabin pressure control system. In: 2018 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Chongqing); 2018 (Chongqing, China). doi: 10.1109/PHM-Chongqing.2018.00060
34. 10.1109/TIM.2020.304230010.1109/TIM.2020.3042300 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.11056310.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110563 ↗
36. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232875010.1080/10589759.2024.2328750 ↗
37. Pollok A, Casella F. High-fidelity modelling of self-regulating pneumatic valves. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Modelica Conference; Versailles, France; 2015. p. 118.
38. 10.1177/1687814021104100710.1177/16878140211041007 ↗
39. 10.5753/eniac.2019.928410.5753/eniac.2019.9284 ↗
40. 10.5753/eniac.2022.22757510.5753/eniac.2022.227575 ↗
41. 10.1088/1361-6501/acf0df10.1088/1361-6501/acf0df ↗
42. 10.1109/TGRS.2023.332988110.1109/TGRS.2023.3329881 ↗
43. 10.1109/TIM.2022.321093310.1109/TIM.2022.3210933 ↗
44. 10.1109/TIM.2025.355101110.1109/TIM.2025.3551011 ↗
45. 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.335120410.1109/ACCESS.2024.3351204 ↗
46. 10.1088/1361-6501/acd8e110.1088/1361-6501/acd8e1 ↗
47. 10.1080/10589759.2025.248792710.1080/10589759.2025.2487927 ↗
48. 10.1007/s00466-021-02112-310.1007/s00466-021-02112-3 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.measurement.2024.11592710.1016/j.measurement.2024.115927 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.10995910.1016/j.asoc.2022.109959 ↗
51. 10.1109/TIE.2023.332924510.1109/TIE.2023.3329245 ↗
52. 10.1080/10589759.2025.247229210.1080/10589759.2025.2472292 ↗
53. 10.1109/TII.2019.295554010.1109/TII.2019.2955540 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.00110.1016/j.neunet.2021.01.001 ↗
55. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad69b310.1088/1361-6501/ad69b3 ↗
56. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240867010.1080/10589759.2024.2408670 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.12518810.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125188 ↗
58. Turcio W, Yoneyama T, Moreira F. Quasi-LPV gain-scheduling control of a nonlinear aircraft pneumatic system. In: 21st Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation; 2013 (Platanias, Greece). doi: 10.1109/MED.2013.6608744
59. 10.1007/s10845-020-01600-210.1007/s10845-020-01600-2 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10721910.1016/j.measurement.2019.107219 ↗