journal article·2018-10-02

Quantification of delamination in a composite floor using a novel damage index

Nadom Khalifa Mutlib, Shahrizan Baharom

Publisher page

Abstract

The delamination of concrete from steel decking will reduce the strength and decrease the stiffness of the composite slab. Visual monitoring of delamination is typically not possible in many cases. A possible alternative is ultrasonic-based health monitoring. In this study, a novel damage index (DI) based on the absolute energy change (AEC) of the ultrasonic waves is adopted to quantify delamination damage in the composite floor. AEC-DI was constructed based on the decomposed signals provided by the wavelet transform. The monitoring process of the composite floor was conducted ultrasonically under flexural loading. An ultrasonic surface (Rayleigh) wave is employed for damage detection using gel-coupled piezoceramic sensors. The results revealed that the reliability and accuracy of AEC-DI in detecting composite floor separation is better than that of RMSD-DI.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Civil Techniques, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq

Department of Civil & Structural Engineering, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Bangi, Malaysia

Funding

Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Lawson RM. · 1993
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.050 ↗
3. 10.1155/2012/15658310.1155/2012/156583 ↗
4. 10.1007/s13349-013-0039-210.1007/s13349-013-0039-2 ↗
5. 10.1088/0964-1726/17/4/04501410.1088/0964-1726/17/4/045014 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.019 ↗
7. 10.1002/stc.150410.1002/stc.1504 ↗
8. Gutsalyak VM · Geophysical J · 1993 · 13 · 215
9. 10.1016/0148-9062(87)90668-110.1016/0148-9062(87)90668-1 ↗
10. 10.1190/1.144257810.1190/1.1442578 ↗
11. Haldorsen J · Oilfield Rev · 2006 · 18 · 34
12. 10.1088/0964-1726/13/4/03410.1088/0964-1726/13/4/034 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2006.12.00410.1016/j.flowmeasinst.2006.12.004 ↗
14. 10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/00310.1088/0964-1726/16/4/003 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.02910.1016/j.ymssp.2011.07.029 ↗
16. Arisa Y · IHI Eng Rev · 2013 · 46 · 15
17. 10.1121/1.147050310.1121/1.1470503 ↗
18. 10.1002/stc.180010.1002/stc.1800 ↗
19. Pavlakovic B · 1998
20. 10.1007/s13369-015-1925-110.1007/s13369-015-1925-1 ↗
21. 10.1007/978-1-84882-784-410.1007/978-1-84882-784-4 ↗
22. 10.1002/stc.1410.1002/stc.14 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00766.x10.1111/j.1467-8667.2012.00766.x ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.07.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2011.07.002 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.02.01310.1016/j.ultras.2004.02.013 ↗
26. 10.1002/stc.166010.1002/stc.1660 ↗
27. 10.1088/0964-1726/15/4/00910.1088/0964-1726/15/4/009 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.004 ↗
29. 10.1002/978047006162610.1002/9780470061626 ↗