journal article·2025-07-22

A novel physical constraint-guided quadratic neural networks for interpretable bearing fault diagnosis under zero-fault sample

You Keshun, Gu Yingkui, Lin Yanghui, Wang Yajun

Publisher page

Abstract

To increase confidence in intelligent damage assessment models, research often emphasizes interpretability but neglects essential physical fault mechanisms. Addressing this gap, we propose a novel hybrid learning framework combining a dynamic physical model with a data-driven Quadratic Neural Network and Bidirectional LSTM (QNN-Bi-LSTM). Acceleration and velocity equations of the rolling element, derived physically, are embedded as constraints into the loss function, guiding learning. This Physical Constraint-Guided (PCG) learning aligns physical laws with features from real-world vibration data. To enhance generalization under zero fault samples, a genetic algorithm adaptively balances physical and cross-entropy losses. Experiments show the model achieves near 100% accuracy no-load and 95% heavy-load with zero fault samples, exhibiting strong robustness. Compared to conventional models, it significantly enhances interpretability, credibility, and reliability. This highlights a new direction for NDE and condition monitoring, especially for insufficient fault scenarios. Integrating physical principles and nonlinear feature learning offers a promising, generalizable solution for intelligent damage assessment in critical systems like rolling bearings.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques · Gear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis · Fault Detection and Control Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of South China

Jiangxi University of Science and Technology

Fujian Makeng Mining Co., Ltd

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China · Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department

References (42)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.10979310.1016/j.ress.2023.109793 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240448910.1080/10589759.2024.2404489 ↗
3. Shao H, Lai Y, Liu H, et al. LSFConvformer: A lightweight method for mechanical fault diagnosis under small samples and variable speeds with time-frequency fusion. Mech Sys Sig Proc. 2025;36:113016.10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.113016 ↗
4. 10.1080/10589759.2024.242581310.1080/10589759.2024.2425813 ↗
5. Keshun Y, Guangqi Q, Yingkui G, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries using EM-PF-SSA-SVR with gamma stochastic process. Meas Sci Tech. 2023;35(1):015015.10.1088/1361-6501/acfbef ↗
6. 10.1080/10589759.2022.211874710.1080/10589759.2022.2118747 ↗
7. 10.1109/jiot.2024.337773110.1109/jiot.2024.3377731 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.12859210.1016/j.eswa.2025.128592 ↗
9. Xiao Y, Shao H, Liu B, et al. Evaluating calibration of deep fault diagnostic models under distribution shift. Computers in Industry. 2025;171:104334.10.1016/j.compind.2025.104334 ↗
10. You K, Qiu G, Gu Y. Rolling bearing fault diagnosis using hybrid neural network with principal component analysis. Sensors. 2022;22(22):8906.10.3390/s22228906 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.engappai.2020.10367810.1016/j.engappai.2020.103678 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.04310.1016/j.measurement.2018.07.043 ↗
13. 10.1109/jsen.2023.329667010.1109/jsen.2023.3296670 ↗
14. 10.1088/1361-6501/acd5ef10.1088/1361-6501/acd5ef ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10703110.1016/j.engappai.2023.107031 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.01210.1016/j.compind.2018.12.012 ↗
17. 10.1109/JIOT.2023.334074510.1109/JIOT.2023.3340745 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ress.2023.10914210.1016/j.ress.2023.109142 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10850210.1016/j.measurement.2020.108502 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compind.2019.01.00110.1016/j.compind.2019.01.001 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2023.11093610.1016/j.ymssp.2023.110936 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11000110.1016/j.ress.2024.110001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.11122810.1016/j.measurement.2022.111228 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11025210.1016/j.ress.2024.110252 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.neunet.2020.01.00710.1016/j.neunet.2020.01.007 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.engappai.2021.10441510.1016/j.engappai.2021.104415 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.11619710.1016/j.eswa.2021.116197 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11071-024-10157-110.1007/s11071-024-10157-1 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.07810.1016/j.neucom.2018.06.078 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ress.2024.11055610.1016/j.ress.2024.110556 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10998010.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109980 ↗
32. 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.321300910.1109/TNNLS.2022.3213009 ↗
33. 10.3390/s2002042010.3390/s20020420 ↗
34. 10.1109/TII.2020.296837010.1109/TII.2020.2968370 ↗
35. 10.1109/tii.2023.324567710.1109/tii.2023.3245677 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.10396710.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2020.103967 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.10434410.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104344 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.measurement.2021.11024210.1016/j.measurement.2021.110242 ↗
39. 10.1109/TII.2019.295554010.1109/TII.2019.2955540 ↗
40. 10.3390/s2018511210.3390/s20185112 ↗
41. 10.1109/TIM.2023.332616110.1109/TIM.2023.3326161 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10761610.1016/j.measurement.2020.107616 ↗