Detection and quantification of tube-melting defects in tube-to-tubesheet welding based on angle patch embedding and Transformer
Source abstract
Abstract
Tube-to-tubesheet welding is a critical connection technique in heat exchangers, but tube melting defects may occur during welding process due to abnormal current fluctuations and other factors. However, most existing defect detection approaches fail to achieve accurate tube melting defect localisation and quantitative measurement. To address this challenge, a new approach is designed to detect and quantify the tube melting defects in tube-to-tubesheet welding based on angle patch embedding and Transformer. The main work is as follows: (1) An angle patch embedding module (APEM) is designed, which applies semantic segmentation, polar coordinate transformation, and patch embedding to convert annular welding images into circumferential feature sequence suitable for Transformer models; (2) A tube melting defect quantitative detection module is developed, utilising Transformer to model global circumferential dependencies, enabling high-precision regression of inner and outer tube boundaries and tube melting defect detection, based on which the angle-wise tube melting rates (TMRs) are calculated; (3) A tube-to-tubesheet welding image acquisition system is constructed, and a tube melting defect dataset is established. Experiments indicate that the proposed method achieves accurate identification of tube melting defects and provides quantitative detection results with angular resolution, offering a novel non-destructive testing approach for welding quality assessment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shandong Jianzhu University
Shandong Aotai Electric Co. Ltd., Robotics Division
Funding
Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41598-025-08261-210.1038/s41598-025-08261-2 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11665-024-09428-010.1007/s11665-024-09428-0 ↗
3. 10.1007/s10973-023-12265-310.1007/s10973-023-12265-3 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.10579810.1016/j.engfailanal.2021.105798 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11282110.1016/j.measurement.2023.112821 ↗
6. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232074810.1080/10589759.2024.2320748 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10297410.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102974 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.aei.2024.10287910.1016/j.aei.2024.102879 ↗
9. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240506210.1080/10589759.2024.2405062 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10276410.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102764 ↗
11. 10.1080/10589759.2025.246883110.1080/10589759.2025.2468831 ↗
12. 10.1080/10589759.2023.225349410.1080/10589759.2023.2253494 ↗
13. Simonyan K Zisserman A. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 2014.
14. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image. In: Recognition[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA; 2016. p. 770–778.
15. 10.1109/5.72679110.1109/5.726791 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.03310.1016/j.jmapro.2020.05.033 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jksuci.2024.10204910.1016/j.jksuci.2024.102049 ↗
18. Zhang K, Liao L, Wang Y. Discrete wavelet transform based detection transformer for battery weld defect detection. In: IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement; 2024.
19. 10.1016/j.measurement.2025.11687210.1016/j.measurement.2025.116872 ↗
20. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, et al. Faster r-cnn: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015;28.
21. Khanam R Hussain M. Yolov11: an overview of the key architectural enhancements. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.17725 2024.
22. 10.1080/03772063.2022.204038710.1080/03772063.2022.2040387 ↗
23. 10.1177/0020294022109203010.1177/00202940221092030 ↗
24. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.324700610.1109/JSEN.2023.3247006 ↗
25. 10.1080/10589759.2024.238291510.1080/10589759.2024.2382915 ↗
26. Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic. In: Segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA; 2015. p. 3431–3440.
27. 10.1109/TPAMI.2016.264461510.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615 ↗
28. C CL, Zhu Y, Papandreou G, et al. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image. In: Segmentation[C]//Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Munich, Germany; 2018. p. 801–818.
29. Ronneberger O Fischer P Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation[C]//International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention. 2015;234–241.10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 ↗
30. 10.3390/electronics1302028310.3390/electronics13020283 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10316510.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103165 ↗
32. Zhang S, Wang X, Zhang T. Combining multi-scale U-Net with transformer for welding defect detection of oil/gas pipeline. In: IEEE Access; 2024.
33. He K, Gkioxari G, Dollár P, et al. In: Mask r-cnn[C]//Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy; 2017. p. 2961–2969.
34. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11296910.1016/j.measurement.2023.112969 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10456810.1016/j.autcon.2022.104568 ↗
36. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad67f910.1088/1361-6501/ad67f9 ↗
37. Ma N, Zhang X, Zheng HT, et al. Shufflenet v2. In: Practical guidelines for efficient cnn architecture design[C]//Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany; 2018. p. 116–131.
38. 10.1038/s41598-024-69813-610.1038/s41598-024-69813-6 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10812710.1016/j.engappai.2024.108127 ↗