Exploring the performance of piezoresistive accelerometers: modelling, validation, and optimization
Source abstract
Abstract
In this article, we have chosen to explore the performance of the piezoresistive accelerometer, favoured for its comparative advantages over other accelerometers. Our approach includes modelling this accelerometer according to the law of motion and validating the model through simulation tests and experimental trials. With this approach, we can determine the optimal damping rate and frequency range for the piezoresistive accelerometer, the optimisation of these parameters is crucial to maximise the performance of the accelerometer in various operating conditions, ensuring high sensitivity and fast response while minimising distortions or errors in the collected data. These optimal values of damping rate and frequency range guarantee precise and reliable accelerometer measurements. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of sensor design principles and signal processing methods from a theoretical standpoint. Beginning with sensor design, we delve into the foundational aspects of transduction principles, emphasising the conversion of physical quantities into electrical signals. The selection and optimisation of sensing elements are explored, highlighting material properties, geometrical considerations, and packaging strategies to ensure sensitivity, linearity, and robustness.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies · Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems · Geophysics and Sensor Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mohamed Boudiaf University of M’sila
Badji Mokhtar University of Anaba
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12541-019-00154-510.1007/s12541-019-00154-5 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11220-018-0222-y10.1007/s11220-018-0222-y ↗
3. 10.1109/JSEN.2018.280576410.1109/JSEN.2018.2805764 ↗
4. 10.1155/2018/537043810.1155/2018/5370438 ↗
5. 10.1002/mop.3143610.1002/mop.31436 ↗
6. 10.1007/s13198-017-0622-810.1007/s13198-017-0622-8 ↗
7. 10.1109/ICEMPE57831.2023.1013942510.1109/ICEMPE57831.2023.10139425 ↗
8. 10.1109/PHM-Yantai55411.2022.994205610.1109/PHM-Yantai55411.2022.9942056 ↗
9. 10.1109/WCMEIM54377.2021.0009210.1109/WCMEIM54377.2021.00092 ↗
10. 10.1109/ICEPT56209.2022.987327710.1109/ICEPT56209.2022.9873277 ↗
11. 10.1109/ICHCE57331.2022.1004280010.1109/ICHCE57331.2022.10042800 ↗
12. 10.1007/s11220-021-00361-310.1007/s11220-021-00361-3 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10825-024-02134-z10.1007/s10825-024-02134-z ↗
14. 10.1177/107754631244559510.1177/1077546312445595 ↗
15. Khaoula RS, Ghemari Z, Benslimane T. Extraction of the relative sensitivity model and improvement of the piezoelectric accelerometer performances. 2018 International Conference on Signal, Image, Vision and their Applications (SIVA); Guelma, Algeria; 2018.
16. 10.1142/S021968671750014710.1142/S0219686717500147 ↗
17. 10.1109/PHM-Nanjing52125.2021.961280310.1109/PHM-Nanjing52125.2021.9612803 ↗
18. 10.1109/ECICE52819.2021.964572410.1109/ECICE52819.2021.9645724 ↗
19. 10.1109/CISCE55963.2022.985118410.1109/CISCE55963.2022.9851184 ↗
20. 10.1109/CATCON52335.2021.967053610.1109/CATCON52335.2021.9670536 ↗
21. 10.1109/ICEMS59686.2023.1034432810.1109/ICEMS59686.2023.10344328 ↗
22. 10.1109/JSEN.2012.221078910.1109/JSEN.2012.2210789 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00339-023-06644-810.1007/s00339-023-06644-8 ↗
24. 10.1007/s10470-018-01383-w10.1007/s10470-018-01383-w ↗
25. 10.1002/jnm.256810.1002/jnm.2568 ↗
26. 10.1142/S021968672150025610.1142/S0219686721500256 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10470-017-0970-y10.1007/s10470-017-0970-y ↗
28. 10.1177/014233121454957210.1177/0142331214549572 ↗
29. 10.1109/ICIEA58696.2023.1024188410.1109/ICIEA58696.2023.10241884 ↗
30. 10.1109/ICFST51577.2020.929476610.1109/ICFST51577.2020.9294766 ↗
31. 10.1109/CONESCAPAN60431.2023.1032841010.1109/CONESCAPAN60431.2023.10328410 ↗
32. 10.1109/AIE57029.2022.0006610.1109/AIE57029.2022.00066 ↗
33. 10.1177/107754631348650710.1177/1077546313486507 ↗
34. 10.1142/S021968671750004410.1142/S0219686717500044 ↗
35. 10.1109/ICoSC.2015.715275710.1109/ICoSC.2015.7152757 ↗
36. 10.1109/ICoSC.2013.675094310.1109/ICoSC.2013.6750943 ↗
37. 10.1109/SMS44485.2018.910138710.1109/SMS44485.2018.9101387 ↗
38. 10.1109/ICMIC.2016.780417210.1109/ICMIC.2016.7804172 ↗
39. 10.1109/ICSENS.2012.641132010.1109/ICSENS.2012.6411320 ↗
40. 10.1109/EIConRus49466.2020.903941810.1109/EIConRus49466.2020.9039418 ↗
41. 10.1109/RSM52397.2021.951159910.1109/RSM52397.2021.9511599 ↗
42. 10.1109/PRIME.2016.751950910.1109/PRIME.2016.7519509 ↗
43. 10.1080/10589759.2023.227352210.1080/10589759.2023.2273522 ↗
44. 10.1109/JSEN.2023.333334810.1109/JSEN.2023.3333348 ↗
45. 10.1109/SSD.2019.889321010.1109/SSD.2019.8893210 ↗
46. 10.1109/ICMIAE57032.2022.0002910.1109/ICMIAE57032.2022.00029 ↗
47. 10.1109/TCPMT.2023.329579910.1109/TCPMT.2023.3295799 ↗
48. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232763910.1080/10589759.2024.2327639 ↗
49. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232414910.1080/10589759.2024.2324149 ↗
50. 10.1109/JSEN.2014.229849310.1109/JSEN.2014.2298493 ↗
51. 10.1109/MIM.2023.1014656310.1109/MIM.2023.10146563 ↗
52. 10.1109/CISTEM.2018.861361210.1109/CISTEM.2018.8613612 ↗
53. Ghemari Z, Belkhiri S, Morakchi MR et al. Enhancing the piezoelectric accelerometer for effective monitoring and diagnosis of engineering structures. Rom J Acoust Vibr. 2024;20(1):12–19.
54. 10.1080/00150193.2016.113402410.1080/00150193.2016.1134024 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2024.11011810.1016/j.nanoen.2024.110118 ↗
56. 10.1002/adfm.20230181610.1002/adfm.202301816 ↗
57. 10.1109/STA56120.2022.1001899110.1109/STA56120.2022.10018991 ↗