journal article·2026-02-02

TA1 titanium alloy self-piercing riveted joints fatigue service non-destructive monitoring via dynamic characteristics

Huabin Zhang, Lei Lei, Ye Shi, Ming Yan, Huifeng Shi

Publisher page

Abstract

Self-piercing riveting (SPR) is increasingly applied in lightweight structures; however, reliable non-destructive evaluation of its fatigue service state remains challenging due to inaccessible internal damage. In this study, the fatigue behavior of TA1 titanium alloy SPR joints was investigated through dynamic response characterization and strength degradation tests. The evolution of natural frequency under cyclic loading exhibited a distinct three-stage degradation behavior corresponding to damage initiation, stable crack propagation, and rapid failure. Based on this relationship, a frequency-based residual life prediction model was developed using a Weibull framework, achieving prediction errors below 5% over the entire fatigue process. In addition, residual strength tests conducted at representative fatigue stages enabled the establishment of a strength degradation model with errors below 3%. By coupling natural frequency variation with strength attenuation, a dual-parameter prediction model was proposed to simultaneously estimate residual life and residual strength from real-time dynamic response data. Experimental validation confirmed that the predicted results consistently fell within the 95% confidence intervals, demonstrating the robustness and accuracy of the proposed method.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Welding Techniques Analysis · Fatigue and fracture mechanics · Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang

Imperial College London, London

Funding

China Scholarship Council · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Project of Higher Education Institutions of Liaoning Provincial Department of Education

References (39)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/ma1602083610.3390/ma16020836 ↗
2. Cecchel S. Materials and technologies for lightweighting of structural parts for automotive applications J. SAE Int J Mater Manu. 2021;14(1):81–98.10.4271/05-14-01-0007 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11099410.1016/j.matdes.2022.110994 ↗
4. M LC, Huang L, Li CL, et al. Research progress on hot deformation behavior of high-strength β titanium alloy: flow behavior and constitutive model J. Rare Met. 2022;41(5):1434–1455.10.1007/s12598-021-01861-7 ↗
5. Zhang Y, He XC, Zhang XL, et al. Tensile shear and fatigue properties of different connection methods for titanium alloy sheets J. Trans China Weld Inst. 2019;40(8):150–154+167–168.
6. Wang LD. Fatigue and fracture analysis of metallic materials in mechanical engineering J. Prod Reliab Rep. 2024;(6):117–118.
7. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10958310.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109583 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11204110.1016/j.tws.2024.112041 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.10546510.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105465 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2024.10422310.1016/j.ijmachtools.2024.104223 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.06410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.064 ↗
12. Jia Y, Huang Z, Zhang Y, et al. Forming quality and fatigue behavior of self‐piercing riveted joints of DP590 and AA6061 plates J. Adv Mater Sci Eng. 2021;2021(1):4381544.10.1155/2021/4381544 ↗
13. 10.3390/met1302032810.3390/met13020328 ↗
14. Zhang XL, Zhang Q, Fu WS, et al. Deformation characteristics and fatigue failure mechanism of aluminum alloy self-piercing riveted joints J. Forg Stamp Technol. 2024;49(8):115–124.
15. 10.1111/ffe.1264810.1111/ffe.12648 ↗
16. Lei FY, Xu XX, Zhao YM, et al. Effect of load conditions on fatigue performance and failure modes of 6082 aluminum alloy self-piercing riveted joints J. China Mech Eng. 2025;1–13.
17. 10.1088/2053-1591/ac4d5410.1088/2053-1591/ac4d54 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.03110.1016/j.jmrt.2022.03.031 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11306710.1016/j.tws.2025.113067 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.08.02010.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.08.020 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.04610.1016/j.prostr.2019.12.046 ↗
22. 10.3139/120.11157210.3139/120.111572 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.10919810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109198 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11197110.1016/j.tws.2024.111971 ↗
25. 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.1210.3221/IGF-ESIS.53.12 ↗
26. Woo A. Resistance spot weld fatigue life prediction method compatibility with self-piercing rivets D. University of Waterloo; 2022.
27. Woo A Behravesh B Malpot A et al. Compatibility of Rupp’s structural stress method for fatigue life prediction of self-piercing rivets R. SAE technical paper. 2023.10.4271/2023-01-0802 ↗
28. 10.1111/ffe.1446410.1111/ffe.14464 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.10894010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.108940 ↗
30. Li CS, Shang DG, Wang RJ, et al. Fatigue life prediction of spot welded joints under variable loading based on dynamic response characteristics. J Mech Eng. 2009;45(4):70–75.10.3901/JME.2009.04.070 ↗
31. 10.1142/S021945542550087710.1142/S0219455425500877 ↗
32. Yanhong MA, Yongfeng W, Cun W, et al. Nonlinear interval analysis of rotor response with joints under uncertainties. Chin J Aeronaut. 2020;33(1):205–218.10.1016/j.cja.2019.09.021 ↗
33. Köhler D, Stephan R, Kupfer R, et al. In-situ computed tomography and transient dynamic analysis of a single-lap shear test with a composite-metal clinch point C. WGP congress. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 265–275.
34. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.883.8910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.883.89 ↗
35. Reschke G, Brosius A. Investigations on continuous transient dynamic analysis of clinched aluminum sheets C.//Congress of the German Academic association for production technology. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2023. p. 74–83.
36. Reschke G, Köhler D, Kupfer R, et al. In-situ computed tomography and transient dynamic analysis–failure analysis of a single-lap tensile-shear test with clinch points J. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng. 2024:09544089241251646.
37. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10800110.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108001 ↗
38. 10.1111/ffe.1461210.1111/ffe.14612 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11212510.1016/j.tws.2024.112125 ↗