journal article·2026-02

Numerical simulation and experimental verification of ultrasonic wave radiation and diffraction by crack-like flaws

Lejuan Xie, Shuzeng Zhang, Fengling Wang, Lei Wang

Publisher page

Abstract

The modelling of ultrasonic fields in the presence of flaws in materials is of great interest to researchers in the area of non-destructive testing and evaluation (NDT&E). In this work, we provide an efficient method to model ultrasonic wave fields generated by a transducer of finite size in materials and scattered by internal crack-like flaws. The incident wave fields generated by the transducer and the wave fields scattered by and diffracted through the flaws are modelled using the Rayleigh integral expression and calculated using a Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) method. Since this method does not require assumptions for approximating the geometry of flaws or wave propagation, it is applicable to area flaws with complex geometries or even volumetric flaws, as long as the surfaces of these flaws can be accurately constructed. The effects of flaw sizes, curvatures, and inclination angles on the wave fields diffracted through crack-like flaws are investigated. The provided simulation results are verified both theoretically and experimentally. The proposed method, characterised by its high efficiency and accuracy, provides valuable insights into wave propagation in materials containing internal crack-like defects, facilitating the quantitative assessment of these defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Geophysical Methods and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Central South University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10589759.2021.192416810.1080/10589759.2021.1924168 ↗
2. 10.1080/10589759.2024.230646910.1080/10589759.2024.2306469 ↗
3. 10.1109/TUFFC.2024.345961910.1109/TUFFC.2024.3459619 ↗
4. 10.1115/1.314143610.1115/1.3141436 ↗
5. 10.1080/10589759.2023.227400610.1080/10589759.2023.2274006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.16443510.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164435 ↗
7. 10.1109/TUFFC.2010.175310.1109/TUFFC.2010.1753 ↗
8. Schmerr LW. Fundamentals of ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation-a modeling approach. 2nd ed. New york(NY): Springer; 2020.
9. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.10222310.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102223 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ultras.2022.10688510.1016/j.ultras.2022.106885 ↗
11. 10.1121/1.502602410.1121/1.5026024 ↗
12. 10.1088/1361-665X/aba6ce10.1088/1361-665X/aba6ce ↗
13. 10.1080/10589759.2024.232321810.1080/10589759.2024.2323218 ↗
14. 10.1190/1.144481610.1190/1.1444816 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.03.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.03.028 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.03.00910.1016/j.ultras.2017.03.009 ↗
17. 10.1177/1077546322110221010.1177/10775463221102210 ↗
18. 10.3390/s1910235210.3390/s19102352 ↗
19. 10.3390/app1216796210.3390/app12167962 ↗
20. 10.1121/10.001341110.1121/10.0013411 ↗
21. 10.1504/IJMPT.2006.00898210.1504/IJMPT.2006.008982 ↗
22. 10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.7.1310.1093/ietfec/e90-a.7.13 ↗
23. 10.1121/10.000297210.1121/10.0002972 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ultras.2023.10700210.1016/j.ultras.2023.107002 ↗
25. 10.1121/1.38102210.1121/1.381022 ↗
26. 10.1006/jcph.1995.120910.1006/jcph.1995.1209 ↗
27. 10.1017/S096249291300004410.1017/S0962492913000044 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.10870010.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108700 ↗