journal article·2024-08-17

Influence of tensile stress on the magnetic flux leakage signal of the coated steel belt

Zhaoting Liu, Yanlin Liu, Chuan Shen, Liming Wei, Jianbo Wu, Wenhui Yang, Kewen Huang, Piyu Miao

Publisher page

Abstract

The safety of coated steel belts (CSBs) is crucial for reliable elevator operation, as they are critical components in elevator systems. Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) testing is the preferred non-destructive method for evaluating CSBs due to its high sensitivity. Previous studies overlooked tensile stress's impact on in-service MFL testing of CSBs, potentially resulting in inaccurate defect assessments. This research aims to investigate the impact of tensile stress on the MFL signal of CSBs by developing a theoretical model, conducting finite element simulations, and performing experimental verification. In this paper, the rectangular edge defects are considered as the primary defect type in CSBs, and the applied stress on the CSBs varies from 30 MPa to 160 MPa. Under the above conditions, a linear relationship between MFL signal of CSBs and stress is established based on the simplified Jiles-Atherton model and magnetic dipole model suitable for CSBs. The finite element simulation and experiments further indicate that the MFL signal of CSBs increases linearly with the increasing tensile stress. The primary contributions of this study are establishing an MFL model suitable for CSBs and uncovering the linear relationship between the MFL signal of CSBs and tensile stress.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Properties and Applications · Concrete Corrosion and Durability

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Mechanical Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Technical Equipment Department, Tianjin Binhai New Area Pipe and Well Control Technical Service Branch Company, Tianjin, China

Office of Research Management, Chengdu Institute of Special Equipment Inspection and Testing, Chengdu, China

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Sichuan Science and Technology Program · Science and Technology Program of the State Administration for Market Regulation · Science and Technology Program of the Administration for Market Regulation of Sichuan Province

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1088/1742-6596/1048/1/01200910.1088/1742-6596/1048/1/012009 ↗
2. O’Donnell HJ. New lift rope technology-coated steel belts. Elevator Technology. 2001;11:104–112.
3. Zhao HZ, Cao DF, Shao HL, et al. Development of wire rope for elevator composite traction steel belt. Metal Products. 2019;45(6):8–10.
4. Chen S, Wang H, Liu YL, et al. Research on inspection and detection Technology of traction medium for elevator. Process Autom Instrum. 2022;43(1):15–18.
5. 10.1784/insi.2012.55.3.12610.1784/insi.2012.55.3.126 ↗
6. 10.1155/2012/75026110.1155/2012/750261 ↗
7. 10.1134/S106183091310006910.1134/S1061830913100069 ↗
8. Duan XP. Non-destructive testing of wire rope based on Microcapacitance Measurement [master]. Shenzhen: Harbin Institute of Technology; 2019.
9. 10.1109/ICMIC48233.2019.906859410.1109/ICMIC48233.2019.9068594 ↗
10. Guo BB, Shao P, Zheng B, et al. Simulation of Radially Magnetized Electromagnetic sensor for defect detection of traction steel strip. Chinese J Sens Actuators. 2021;34(8):1021–1026.
11. 10.1080/10589759.2022.213750810.1080/10589759.2022.2137508 ↗
12. 10.1080/10589759.2021.190084610.1080/10589759.2021.1900846 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16934110.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169341 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16988810.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169888 ↗
15. 10.1080/1058975080258801010.1080/10589750802588010 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2022.212771110.1080/10589759.2022.2127711 ↗
17. 10.1080/10589759.2019.159082710.1080/10589759.2019.1590827 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10876810.1016/j.measurement.2020.108768 ↗
19. 10.1109/FENDT.2014.692827410.1109/FENDT.2014.6928274 ↗
20. 10.1080/10589759.2022.212296810.1080/10589759.2022.2122968 ↗
21. 10.1784/insi.2016.58.3.13510.1784/insi.2016.58.3.135 ↗
22. 10.3390/s2203112810.3390/s22031128 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2018.01.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2018.01.004 ↗
24. 10.3390/s2304185710.3390/s23041857 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.368496910.1063/1.3684969 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2023.10281010.1016/j.ndteint.2023.102810 ↗
27. 10.1109/TMAG.2019.294611510.1109/TMAG.2019.2946115 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11771-012-1166-310.1007/s11771-012-1166-3 ↗
29. 10.1080/10589759.2011.62275810.1080/10589759.2011.622758 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.33865010.1063/1.338650 ↗
31. 10.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-110.1016/0304-8853(86)90066-1 ↗
32. 10.1109/20.11981310.1109/20.119813 ↗
33. 10.1063/1.502253410.1063/1.5022534 ↗
34. 10.1088/0022-3727/28/8/00110.1088/0022-3727/28/8/001 ↗
35. 10.1088/1402-4896/acbf8b10.1088/1402-4896/acbf8b ↗
36. 10.1080/10589759.2015.106412110.1080/10589759.2015.1064121 ↗
37. 10.1109/20.22103610.1109/20.221036 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.34060910.1063/1.340609 ↗
39. 10.1109/TIM.2019.295636310.1109/TIM.2019.2956363 ↗
40. 10.3390/ma1520736210.3390/ma15207362 ↗
41. 10.1520/JTE2017068710.1520/JTE20170687 ↗
42. 10.1109/TIM.2021.305840710.1109/TIM.2021.3058407 ↗
43. 10.1109/TMAG.2008.201189510.1109/TMAG.2008.2011895 ↗
44. 10.1088/0022-3727/36/20/00110.1088/0022-3727/36/20/001 ↗
45. 10.1117/12.226032110.1117/12.2260321 ↗
46. 10.1109/TIM.2021.309628810.1109/TIM.2021.3096288 ↗
47. 10.3390/app1210482910.3390/app12104829 ↗
48. 10.3233/JAE-17116910.3233/JAE-171169 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.01.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2010.01.005 ↗
50. 10.1109/JSEN.2021.305989910.1109/JSEN.2021.3059899 ↗
51. 10.1109/TMAG.2014.235046010.1109/TMAG.2014.2350460 ↗