journal article·2026-03-04

A review on flow visualisation of wind turbine blades in operation

Qi Chen, Ruizhen Yang, Xiangyi Liu, Baoyuan Deng, Hongjin Wang, Yunze He

Publisher page

Abstract

For wind turbine blades (WTBs), boundary layer flow detection can help demonstrate their surface condition, indicate their early failures and global deformation, which becomes more important with the increasing number of in-service wind turbines. Compared with fluid dynamics (CFD) methods and blade element momentum (BEM) methods, flow visualisation method is an intuitive method, which can realise an unambiguous measurement of boundary layer flow on real wind turbines. As a result, some flow visualisation methods were proposed and improved by researchers in recent years. A comprehensive review on flow visualisation of wind turbine blades, especially in-service blades, is necessary to enable researchers to better understand this field and analyse the coming research trends. In this paper, flow visualisation methods were introduced, while emphasis was placed on infrared thermography (IRT) approaches. At last, an in-depth analysis of the future trends of IRT flow visualisation methods was given.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Wind Energy Research and Development · Wind and Air Flow Studies · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Hunan University

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Key Research and Development Program of Hunan Province · Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province · key laboratories of colleges and universities in Fujian Province

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.10644510.1016/j.ymssp.2019.106445 ↗
2. 10.1080/15376494.2025.245311410.1080/15376494.2025.2453114 ↗
3. 10.1080/00218464.2022.212631310.1080/00218464.2022.2126313 ↗
4. 10.1109/TIE.2023.333545510.1109/TIE.2023.3335455 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.02610.1016/j.rser.2016.02.026 ↗
6. 10.1080/09544828.2024.233212210.1080/09544828.2024.2332122 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.09810.1016/j.energy.2016.05.098 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.00310.1016/j.jweia.2017.11.003 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.energy.2018.11.08210.1016/j.energy.2018.11.082 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.tsep.2018.02.00710.1016/j.tsep.2018.02.007 ↗
11. 10.3390/aerospace909050710.3390/aerospace9090507 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.10502510.1016/j.jweia.2022.105025 ↗
13. 10.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/02202710.1088/1742-6596/2767/2/022027 ↗
14. 10.1109/ICIASF.2005.156992010.1109/ICIASF.2005.1569920 ↗
15. 10.2514/6.2011-381810.2514/6.2011-3818 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.10888910.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.108889 ↗
17. Barlow JB, Rae WH, Pope A. Low-speed wind tunnel testing. Hoboken: John wiley & sons; 1999.
18. 10.1109/LRA.2023.327074610.1109/LRA.2023.3270746 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.12319910.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123199 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.displa.2024.10270510.1016/j.displa.2024.102705 ↗
21. 10.3389/fenrg.2022.104306510.3389/fenrg.2022.1043065 ↗
22. 10.1201/9780203752876-910.1201/9780203752876-9 ↗
23. 10.1002/we.163410.1002/we.1634 ↗
24. 10.1115/1.292993810.1115/1.2929938 ↗
25. Wakes SJ Potonnier P-Y Gabriel G. Stall behaviour of the Thinair 102 single-bladed wind turbine. 2018.
26. 10.1299/jsmeb.48.15610.1299/jsmeb.48.156 ↗
27. 10.1115/GT2015-4340710.1115/GT2015-43407 ↗
28. 10.1088/1873-7005/aa855110.1088/1873-7005/aa8551 ↗
29. 10.1007/s12650-016-0365-710.1007/s12650-016-0365-7 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00348-020-02979-710.1007/s00348-020-02979-7 ↗
31. 10.1038/3508369810.1038/35083698 ↗
32. 10.1002/we.186010.1002/we.1860 ↗
33. 10.1016/0017-9310(68)90126-910.1016/0017-9310(68)90126-9 ↗
34. 10.2514/3.4614010.2514/3.46140 ↗
35. 10.1007/s00348-015-2011-x10.1007/s00348-015-2011-x ↗
36. 10.1007/s00348-014-1755-z10.1007/s00348-014-1755-z ↗
37. 10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.04.02510.1016/j.expthermflusci.2018.04.025 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.11610.1016/j.renene.2019.01.116 ↗
39. 10.1007/BF0018741110.1007/BF00187411 ↗
40. 10.2514/3.4601610.2514/3.46016 ↗
41. Quast AJTS. Detection of transition by infrared image techniques. Tech Soaring. 2006;30(1–2):33–38.
42. 10.1088/1361-6501/ad4d1110.1088/1361-6501/ad4d11 ↗
43. 10.3390/app1118870010.3390/app11188700 ↗
44. 10.3390/en1211210210.3390/en12112102 ↗
45. 10.1515/teme-2022-012010.1515/teme-2022-0120 ↗
46. 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/03202910.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032029 ↗
47. 10.3390/app1018655210.3390/app10186552 ↗
48. 10.3390/app1018655210.3390/app10186552 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.10852810.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2019.108528 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.infrared.2017.12.00110.1016/j.infrared.2017.12.001 ↗
51. 10.3390/app1403116610.3390/app14031166 ↗
52. 10.1002/we.279810.1002/we.2798 ↗
53. 10.1109/jsen.2023.325782410.1109/jsen.2023.3257824 ↗
54. 10.3389/fenrg.2023.124018310.3389/fenrg.2023.1240183 ↗
55. 10.1080/10589759.2024.239536310.1080/10589759.2024.2395363 ↗
56. 10.1109/TIE.2021.312047110.1109/TIE.2021.3120471 ↗