Expert-aware multi-stage AI-assisted image processing pipeline for accurate weld defect detection from radiographs: a use case for metal fabrication industries
Source abstract
Abstract
Radiography-based non-destructive testing is vital in shipbuilding, automotive, and aerospace industries, but manual inspection is labour-intensive and error-prone. While deep learning offers automation, it often lacks explain ability and expert-level insight. This paper presents a multi-stage, expert-aware AI pipeline for automated weld defect detection in radiographic images. The system targets five common defects: blowhole, porosity, wormhole, lack of fusion, and inclusion. Radiographic 16-bit DICOM images are enhanced and converted to 8-bit PNGs using histogram-based contrast adjustment guided by domain thresholds. Weld zones are detected using a YOLO v11 model (97.2% accuracy) and divided into square clips. Each clip undergoes binary classification via transfer learning (F1 score: 97%) to distinguish defective from non-defective regions. Defective clips are further analysed using a multi-label classifier to identify specific defect types. A secondary YOLO v11 model (93.1% accuracy) pinpoints defect locations, which are clustered and evaluated using ISO/NES standards. The pipeline integrates rules-based logic, simulated visual attention, and supervised learning to mirror expert inspection practices. It achieves 96% accuracy compared to human weld supervisors, offering a reliable, interpretable, and domain-informed solution for automated weld quality assessment.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur
Quality Assurance, Garden reach Shipbuilders and Engineers Limited
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-981-10-2955-4_1910.1007/978-981-10-2955-4_19 ↗
2. 10.1007/s40194-021-01229-610.1007/s40194-021-01229-6 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.62010.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.620 ↗
4. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000150710.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001507 ↗
5. 10.3151/jact.17.38110.3151/jact.17.381 ↗
6. Mehrabi A, Farhangdoust S. NDT methods applicable to health monitoring of ABC closure joints. Accelerated Bridge Construction University Transportation Center (ABC-UTC); 2019.
7. 10.17226/2301410.17226/23014 ↗
8. 10.1007/s10033-017-0122-410.1007/s10033-017-0122-4 ↗
9. 10.3390/s11030252510.3390/s110302525 ↗
10. 10.3390/app1120975710.3390/app11209757 ↗
11. Prajapati V, Jaiswal A, Patil Y, et al. Detection of weld metal defects using DT and NDT -A review. int Res J Eng Technol (irjet). 2020;7(2):315–318.
12. Hopwood II, Goff CFairchild J, et al. Nondestructive evaluation of steel bridges: methods and applications. University of Kentucky Transportation Center; 2016.
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.011 ↗
14. 10.1080/2374068X.2021.190933210.1080/2374068X.2021.1909332 ↗
15. 10.2139/ssrn.335636210.2139/ssrn.3356362 ↗
16. 10.1109/TETC.2021.310884410.1109/TETC.2021.3108844 ↗
17. 10.3390/ma1510369710.3390/ma15103697 ↗
18. 10.1080/17452759.2023.226665810.1080/17452759.2023.2266658 ↗
19. 10.3390/cryst1401005410.3390/cryst14010054 ↗
20. 10.1109/TASE.2022.321525810.1109/TASE.2022.3215258 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.00510.1016/j.jmsy.2022.12.005 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.02110.1016/j.jmsy.2020.07.021 ↗
23. Lavadiya DN, Dorafshan S. Deep learning models for analysis of non‐destructive evaluation data to evaluate reinforced concrete bridge decks: a survey. Eng Rep. 2023;7(1).
24. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.26810.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.268 ↗
25. 10.3390/a1602009510.3390/a16020095 ↗
26. 10.1088/1742-6596/1237/3/03200510.1088/1742-6596/1237/3/032005 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10729410.1016/j.measurement.2019.107294 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.11282110.1016/j.measurement.2023.112821 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-1-4471-6741-9_810.1007/978-1-4471-6741-9_8 ↗
30. 10.1088/2631-8695/acdf3f10.1088/2631-8695/acdf3f ↗
31. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10258510.1016/j.addma.2021.102585 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.09810.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.098 ↗
33. DeNale L, Carol R. A comparison of ultrasonics and radiography. Springer Sci, Bus Media New Y. 1989;1989:2003–2010.
34. 10.1007/s10921-021-00749-x10.1007/s10921-021-00749-x ↗
35. Beckmann J, Rachny S, Zscherpel U, et al. Improved procedure for computed radiography—A comparative study on welded tube sections by film radiography and computed radiography. In: 17th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing (WCNDT); 2008. p. 25–28.
36. Pardikar RJ. “Digital radiography and computed radiography for enhancing the quality and productivity of weldments in Boiler components.”. In: Paper 3 presented at the 17th World Conference on Non-Destructive Testing; Shanghai, China; 2008. p. 25–28.
37. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.12.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2003.12.004 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.08210.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.082 ↗
39. 10.1784/insi.2012.55.10.54810.1784/insi.2012.55.10.548 ↗
40. 10.1049/iet-ipr.2018.584010.1049/iet-ipr.2018.5840 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.00510.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.005 ↗
42. Sowmyalakshmi R, Anantha Padmanaban MRGirirajkumar SM, et al. Multi-step radiographic segmentation of weld defect images. Springer Singapore; 2020.
43. 10.1784/insi.2007.49.10.57210.1784/insi.2007.49.10.572 ↗
44. 10.1080/0934984059100823510.1080/09349840591008235 ↗
45. 10.1049/iet-ipr.2014.071610.1049/iet-ipr.2014.0716 ↗
46. 10.1109/jsen.2021.305986010.1109/jsen.2021.3059860 ↗
47. 10.1784/insi.2010.52.10.54010.1784/insi.2010.52.10.540 ↗
48. 10.1134/s106183091901012110.1134/s1061830919010121 ↗
49. 10.1784/insi.2014.56.6.30810.1784/insi.2014.56.6.308 ↗
50. 10.3233/xst-16053110.3233/xst-160531 ↗
51. 10.1784/insi.2005.47.10.63110.1784/insi.2005.47.10.631 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10921-015-0305-910.1007/s10921-015-0305-9 ↗
53. 10.1080/10589759.2011.64582010.1080/10589759.2011.645820 ↗
54. 10.1007/s10921-025-01212-x10.1007/s10921-025-01212-x ↗
55. 10.1016/j.enganabound.2025.10620410.1016/j.enganabound.2025.106204 ↗
56. 10.1080/10589759.2024.241038710.1080/10589759.2024.2410387 ↗
57. 10.1080/10589759.2024.242969110.1080/10589759.2024.2429691 ↗
58. 10.1080/10589759.2024.233443110.1080/10589759.2024.2334431 ↗
59. 10.1080/10589759.2024.244081610.1080/10589759.2024.2440816 ↗
60. 10.1080/10589759.2015.101825410.1080/10589759.2015.1018254 ↗
61. 10.1080/10589759.2018.154425110.1080/10589759.2018.1544251 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10921-020-0655-910.1007/s10921-020-0655-9 ↗
63. 10.1080/10589759.2011.59179510.1080/10589759.2011.591795 ↗
64. 10.1080/0278089920895315210.1080/02780899208953152 ↗
65. 10.1080/1058975920895301010.1080/10589759208953010 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.04410.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.044 ↗
67. 10.1016/s0957-4174(03)00010-110.1016/s0957-4174(03)00010-1 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.10.00710.1016/j.ndteint.2004.10.007 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.00310.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.003 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2003.10.004 ↗
71. 10.1016/s0963-8695(97)00042-x10.1016/s0963-8695(97)00042-x ↗
72. 10.1016/s0963-8695(02)00025-710.1016/s0963-8695(02)00025-7 ↗
73. 10.1784/insi.45.10.676.5295210.1784/insi.45.10.676.52952 ↗
74. Nacereddine N, Tridi M. Computer-aided shape analysis and classification of weld defects in industrial radiography based invariant attributes and neural networks. In: ISPA. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis. IEEE; 2005. p. 88–93.
75. 10.3390/app1005187810.3390/app10051878 ↗
76. 10.1016/s0165-0114(97)00307-210.1016/s0165-0114(97)00307-2 ↗
77. 10.1016/s0020-0255(00)00016-510.1016/s0020-0255(00)00016-5 ↗
78. Zhang X-G, Xu J-J, Ge G-Y. Defects recognition on X-ray images for weld inspection using SVM. In: Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Shanghai, China (IEEE Cat. No.04EX826). IEEE; 2004. Vol. 6. p. 3721–3725.
79. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.02.00410.1016/j.ndteint.2009.02.004 ↗
80. 10.1016/s0167-8655(00)00098-210.1016/s0167-8655(00)00098-2 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.aei.2023.10196310.1016/j.aei.2023.101963 ↗
82. 10.1080/0951192X.2024.231478410.1080/0951192X.2024.2314784 ↗
83. 10.1063/1.504876610.1063/1.5048766 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.01110.1016/j.measurement.2018.09.011 ↗
85. Mypati O, Mukherjee AMishra D, et al. A critical review on applications of artificial intelligence in manufacturing. Springer Netherlands; 2023.
86. 10.1016/j.cie.2024.11010610.1016/j.cie.2024.110106 ↗
87. 10.1109/TIM.2025.355185210.1109/TIM.2025.3551852 ↗
88. 10.1109/TII.2025.356849910.1109/TII.2025.3568499 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2025.10546710.1016/j.ijpvp.2025.105467 ↗
90. 10.1016/j.knosys.2022.10833810.1016/j.knosys.2022.108338 ↗
91. 10.1016/j.knosys.2025.11417410.1016/j.knosys.2025.114174 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.engappai.2024.10896110.1016/j.engappai.2024.108961 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.11179210.1016/j.engappai.2025.111792 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.12638610.1016/j.eswa.2025.126386 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.12742810.1016/j.eswa.2025.127428 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10276410.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102764 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10326010.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103260 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.10330610.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103306 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2025.10352110.1016/j.ndteint.2025.103521 ↗
100. 10.1080/10589759.2025.249173910.1080/10589759.2025.2491739 ↗