An approach for damage detection in noisy environments using DOG multi-scale space and fractal dimension
Source abstract
Abstract
The most prominent features of fractal dimension analysis are high sensitivity to damage and instant determination of damage location. However, an intrinsic deficiency is that it is difficult to identify damage in a structure while suppressing noise simultaneously. In addition, the vibration measurement with low-spatial-resolution is also the main factor restricting the accurate damage location. In this paper, a novel damage detection method based on fractal dimension is proposed, in order to provide the high-spatial-resolution vibration information, the phase-based optical flow is introduced, which is a vision-based measurement method that can calculate the structural vibration with high-spatial-resolution. Then, to detect damage in a structure while suppressing noise, an advanced signal analysis method is proposed, with this method, the fractal dimension (FRAC) is mapped into Difference of Gaussian (DOG) multi-scale space, producing the FRAC-DOG to reveal damage-induced singularities in mode shapes. Finally, a data fusion technique is applied to the proposed method to provide a reasonable damage detection result that maximises the elimination of uncertainty. The numerical and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can detect damage with high-precision in noisy environments by comparing it with the existing damage detection methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Optical measurement and interference techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and Equipment, Shenzhen, China
State Key Laboratory for Strength and Vibration of Mechanical Structures, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China
China Nuclear Power Engineering Co. Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
Funding
Basic Research Project Group
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.05010.1016/j.jsv.2018.01.050 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jsv.2020.11574110.1016/j.jsv.2020.115741 ↗
3. 10.1177/058310240606589810.1177/0583102406065898 ↗
4. Roy G, Panigrahi B, Pohit G. Crack identification in beam-type structural elements using a piezoelectric sensor[j]. Case Stud NondestrTest Eval. 2020;36(6):597–615.
5. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.02710.1016/j.ymssp.2019.06.027 ↗
6. 10.1006/mssp.2002.150610.1006/mssp.2002.1506 ↗
7. 10.1080/10589759.2018.151844510.1080/10589759.2018.1518445 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.08.02110.1016/j.jsv.2004.08.021 ↗
9. 10.12989/sss.2013.12.6.61910.12989/sss.2013.12.6.619 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.03.00510.1016/j.ymssp.2004.03.005 ↗
11. 10.1109/ICSMC.2005.157168510.1109/ICSMC.2005.1571685 ↗
12. 10.1007/s13349-016-0168-510.1007/s13349-016-0168-5 ↗
13. 10.1177/147592171770438510.1177/1475921717704385 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.000076510.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000765 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.00410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2007.08.004 ↗
16. 10.1177/147592171036541910.1177/1475921710365419 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00086-410.1016/S0888-3270(03)00086-4 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.01510.1016/j.ymssp.2005.11.015 ↗
19. 10.1177/107754631454808810.1177/1077546314548088 ↗
20. 10.12989/sss.2017.19.1.09110.12989/sss.2017.19.1.091 ↗
21. 10.1080/1058975090324252510.1080/10589750903242525 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.00310.1016/j.jsv.2013.11.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.00710.1016/j.ymssp.2011.06.007 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.03110.1016/j.ymssp.2014.05.031 ↗
25. 10.1088/1361-665X/aac24810.1088/1361-665X/aac248 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00686.x10.1111/j.1467-8667.2010.00686.x ↗
27. Eun H-C, Lee E-T. Damage detection of steel beam using frequency response function measurement data and fractal dimension[j]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics. 2015;137(034503):1–5.
28. 10.1177/107754631454808810.1177/1077546314548088 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.00610.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.07.006 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.483383710.1063/1.4833837 ↗
31. 10.1177/147592170607206210.1177/1475921706072062 ↗
32. 10.1142/S0218348X2050127310.1142/S0218348X20501273 ↗
33. 10.1088/0964-1726/23/6/06501410.1088/0964-1726/23/6/065014 ↗
34. 10.1155/2012/45456810.1155/2012/454568 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.491667810.1063/1.4916678 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.01.02410.1016/j.jsv.2015.01.024 ↗
37. 10.1007/BF0005677210.1007/BF00056772 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.08.04110.1016/j.ymssp.2016.08.041 ↗
39. 10.1002/stc.185110.1002/stc.1851 ↗
40. 10.1109/34.4905110.1109/34.49051 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2005.02.00610.1016/j.ymssp.2005.02.006 ↗
42. 10.1088/0964-1726/19/3/03500910.1088/0964-1726/19/3/035009 ↗
43. Jacobs DP, Trevisan V, Rayes MO. Characterization of Chebyshev numbers[j]. Algebra and Discrete Mathematics. 2008;2(6630):65–82.
44. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2020.10684710.1016/j.ymssp.2020.106847 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.10656010.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106560 ↗