journal article·2025-11-27

Characterisation of the probability of detection for ultrasonic nondestructive testing of dirty white spots in GH4169

Guo Li, Xingyu Zhang, Huimin Zhou, Shuiting Ding, Yusheng Cai, Xin Xin

Publisher page

Abstract

The Dirty White Spot (DWS) defect in GH4169 (In718) alloy is a critical flaw known to cause catastrophic aviation accidents, yet its probability of detection (POD) via ultrasonic testing (UT) has remained unknown. To address this issue, this paper combined the model-assisted detection probability (MAPOD) method with experiments to evaluate the POD of DWSs. The MAPOD method was constructed based on a spherical wave model to predict the signal strength of DWS at different depths and sizes, reducing the number of experimental samples required. Experiments prepared samples containing artificial DWSs with varying depths, sizes, and grain sizes to obtain signals and noise, addressing the scarcity of natural defects. Finally, the ability of UT to detect DWSs was analysed and quantitatively characterised. Results showed that the average signal reflectance of DWS was less than 0.04 and was related to DWS grain size. The low signal reflectance of DWS makes its POD susceptible to depth effects, with an average maximum POD difference of 0.495 when the depth differs by 50 mm. This study provides a reference for assessing UT capabilities in damage tolerance analysis related to DWS in aeroengine disks.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Flow Measurement and Analysis · Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Beihang University

Civil Aviation University of China

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Funding

Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China · China Postdoctoral Science Foundation · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Tianmushan Laboratory (Laboratory of Aviation in Zhejiang Province), Hangzhou, China

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft accident report: United Airlines Flight 232 McDonnell Douglas DC-10–10 Sioux Gateway Airport. Washington D.C: National Transportation Safety Board; 1989. (No. NTSB/AAR-90/06).
2. National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft accident report: uncontained engine failure Delta Airlines flight 1288 McDonnell Douglas MD-88 N927DA. Washington D.C: National Transportation Safety Board; 1996. (No. NTSB/AAR-98/01).
3. National Transportation Safety Board. Aircraft accident report-uncontained engine failure and subsequent fire American Airlines flight 383 Boeing 767–323 N345AN. Washington D.C: National Transportation Safety Board; 2018. (No. NTSB/AAR-18/01).
4. National Transportation Safety Board. Materials laboratory factual report. Washington D.C: National Transportation Safety Board; 2017. (No. 17–034).
5. 10.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_153_16610.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_153_166 ↗
6. 10.1002/adem.20100036610.1002/adem.201000366 ↗
7. 10.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_125_13510.7449/1994/Superalloys_1994_125_135 ↗
8. 10.7449/1991/Superalloys_1991_193_20410.7449/1991/Superalloys_1991_193_204 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.62010.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.620 ↗
10. 10.1080/10589759.2024.240255210.1080/10589759.2024.2402552 ↗
11. 10.2514/6.1997-106810.2514/6.1997-1068 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10921-019-0628-z10.1007/s10921-019-0628-z ↗
13. American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM): standard practice for probability of detection analysis for hit/miss data. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2012. Standard No. E2862-12.
14. American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM): standard practice for probability of detection analysis for versus a data. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2015. Standard No. ASTM-E3023.
15. Department of Defense. Nondestructive evaluation system reliability assessment. Washington D.C: Department of Defense; 2009. (Report No. MIL-HDBK-1823A).
16. Thompson RB, Brasche LJ, Lindgren E, et al. Recent advances in model-assisted probability of detection. In: 4th European-American Workshop on Reliability of NDE. 2009 Jun 24–26; Berlin, Germany; 2009.
17. 10.1063/1.471621510.1063/1.4716215 ↗
18. 10.1007/BF0056640110.1007/BF00566401 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00021-910.1016/S0963-8695(00)00021-9 ↗
20. 10.1115/1.198935310.1115/1.1989353 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11874910.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118749 ↗
22. 10.1088/1361-665X/aba6ce10.1088/1361-665X/aba6ce ↗
23. 10.1063/1.359211210.1063/1.3592112 ↗
24. 10.1080/00401706.2013.81858010.1080/00401706.2013.818580 ↗
25. 10.1063/1.271817610.1063/1.2718176 ↗
26. 10.1063/1.271818410.1063/1.2718184 ↗
27. Harding C, Hugo G, Bowles S. Model-assisted probability of detection validation of automated ultrasonic scanning for crack detection at fastener holes. In: Proceedings of the 10th Joint FAA/DoD/NASA Conference on Aging Aircraft; 2007 April 16–19; Palm Springs, CA; 2007. p. 16–19.
28. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.10261810.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102618 ↗
29. 10.1080/10589759.2025.246882410.1080/10589759.2025.2468824 ↗
30. 10.1080/10589759.2024.236631710.1080/10589759.2024.2366317 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.10259610.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102596 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2025.11284810.1016/j.ymssp.2025.112848 ↗
33. Ganesan B, Klaassen R, Zandt NV. Improved ultrasonic inspection of nickel turbine disks through multi-zone, multi-angle inspection. In: 8th Pan American Conference for Nondestructive Testing 2025; 2025 June 9–12; Niagara Falls, Canada. e-Journal of Nondestructive Testing; 2025.
34. 10.1007/BF0264885310.1007/BF02648853 ↗
35. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_26410.1007/978-1-4615-5947-4_264 ↗
36. 10.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_26810.1007/978-1-4615-5339-7_268 ↗
37. Federal Aviation Administration. Fundamental studies of nickel billet materials—engine titanium consortium phase II. Washington (DC): Federal Aviation Administration; 2005. (No. DOT/FAA/AR-05/17).
38. 10.1063/1.271819010.1063/1.2718190 ↗
39. 10.1109/TIM.2022.314472810.1109/TIM.2022.3144728 ↗
40. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.63810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.989-994.638 ↗
41. 10.1016/S0963-8695(02)00043-910.1016/S0963-8695(02)00043-9 ↗
42. 10.1016/0963-8695(95)00011-L10.1016/0963-8695(95)00011-L ↗
43. 10.1007/978-3-319-30463-210.1007/978-3-319-30463-2 ↗
44. 10.1007/BF0322104910.1007/BF03221049 ↗