Fuzzy logic expert system for automated damage detection from changes in strain energy mode shapes
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, researchers have developed several methods for damage detection in structures employing strain energy or curvature mode shapes. Experience shows that mode shape methods are highly sensitive to measurement noise. Such sensitivity is a direct result of the second derivative applied to the displacement mode shapes, which produces curvature mode shapes. Calculation of strain energy mode shapes includes calculation of curvature as well. Consequently, the artifact false peaks (normally an indicator of damage) appear on the strain energy mode shapes, reducing accuracy of damage recognition. Combined with the intrinsic variance in damage peak shapes and amplitudes dependent upon magnitude and location of damage, the false peaks create a major problem for automated detection of damage location. Most often, a highly qualified expert is required to analyze the data and to identify and locate damage. In an attempt to replace the human expert with a computer, this paper describes a fuzzy logic expert system designed to mimic the human decision process. An expert system allows for easy encoding of expert knowledge as a set of rules. "Fuzziness" of the expert system allows better treatment of the uncertainties of the problem and to simplify the expert system itself. The fuzzy expert system has been designed based on a finite element (FE) model of a simple beam and has provided reliable detection of damage for every tested damage scenario (100% recognition). The same system recognized damages with 100% accuracy, and no false positives or negatives on mode shapes acquired by impact testing and/or non-contact laser vibrometer techniques.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Health Monitoring Techniques · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B10.1016/0022-460X(91)90595-B ↗
2. 10.1006/jsvi.1997.096110.1006/jsvi.1997.0961 ↗
3. Petro, S.H., Chen, S.E. and GangaRao, H.V.S. "Damage detection using vibration measurements". Proc. 15th IMAC. Orlando, FL. pp.113–127.
4. Venkatappa, S. "Damage detection using vibration measurements"”. WV, USA: West Virginia University. M.S. Thesis
5. Osegueda, R.A., Carrasco, C.J. and Meza, R. "A modal strain energy distribution method to localize and quantify damage". Proc. Int. Modal Anal. Conf. (IMAC-XV). Orlando, FL. pp.1298–1304.
6. 10.1006/jsvi.1998.187810.1006/jsvi.1998.1878 ↗
7. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.216310.1006/jsvi.1999.2163 ↗
8. Yan, P. and Deng, Y. "Nondestructive damage detection of bridges based on strain mode". Proc. Int. Modal Anal. Conf. (IMAC-XVIII). San-Antonio, Texas. pp.1825–1830.
9. 10.1006/jsvi.1999.229510.1006/jsvi.1999.2295 ↗
10. Sazonov, E.S. "A case study for building an automated damage detection system"”. WV, USA: West Virginia University. M.S. Thesis
11. Jackson P. · 1999
12. 10.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-510.1016/0020-0255(75)90036-5 ↗
13. Kandel A. · 1991
14. 10.2307/258654110.2307/2586541 ↗
15. 10.1145/42338.4234410.1145/42338.42344 ↗
16. Hajek P. · 1992
17. Juuso, Esko K. "Intelligent systems design with linguistic equations". 9th Workshop Fuzzy Control des GMA-FA 5.22 am 4/5.11.1999. Dortmund, Germany. pp.177–196. Forschungsberict Nr. 0449 (Universitnt Dortmund, Facultat fur Electrotechnik, Dortmund)