Assessing the efficacy of non-destructive testing methods to detect pitting corrosion
Source abstract
Abstract
Calibration of the non-destructive testing (NDT) methods for pipeline inspections is commonly done via machined defects with simple shapes and known sizes. However, such defects do not represent, e.g. an actual pit morphology observed in the field, which could lead to the unreliable interpretation of the inspection results. This work proposed a systematic approach to create and characterise real pits in stainless steel pipe specimens to assess the sensitivity of selected NDT methods. Pipe samples with three different diameters and thicknesses were used. Pits of different geometries and dimensions were generated by electrochemical methods, and immersion in an acidic ferric chloride solution filled in pre-drilled holes on the external surface of the specimens. NDT methods including radiography, Eddy current and dye penetrant testing were used for detecting and sizing the pits. The results were then compared with true pit depths obtained from cross-section analysis. Radiography and Eddy current methods failed to detect small pits with depths less than 70 µm. The porous metal cover on the pit mouth affected the detectability of radiography, while it had little impact on Eddy current testing. The findings of this investigation could be used to design training and calibration blocks for NDT methods.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Hydrogen embrittlement and corrosion behaviors in metals · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Curtin Corrosion Centre, Western Australian School of Mines: Minerals, Energy and Chemical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
Woodside Energy Ltd., Perth, WA, Australia
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmst.2018.06.00610.1016/j.jmst.2018.06.006 ↗
2. 10.20964/2019.04.0210.20964/2019.04.02 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.10498610.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104986 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.08.00110.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.08.001 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10850610.1016/j.corsci.2020.108506 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.12.00410.1016/j.corsci.2009.12.004 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.05.00110.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.05.001 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.62010.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.620 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.sna.2019.05.02610.1016/j.sna.2019.05.026 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.57210.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.572 ↗
11. 10.1016/0308-9126(84)90108-110.1016/0308-9126(84)90108-1 ↗
12. Standard practice for electromagnetic (Eddy Current) examination of seamless and welded tubular products, titanium, austenitic stainless steel and similar alloys. ASTM. 2016;E426. http://doi.org/10.1520/E0426-16R2110.1520/E0426-16R21 ↗
13. Standard practice for ultrasonic testing of metal pipe and tubing. ASTM. 2020;E213. http://doi.org/10.1520/E0213-2010.1520/E0213-20 ↗
14. ASME boiler and pressure vessel code, section V: nondestructive examination. ASME. 2019.
15. 10.1016/0010-938X(89)90039-510.1016/0010-938X(89)90039-5 ↗
16. 10.1149/1.206945810.1149/1.2069458 ↗
17. 10.1149/1.240398310.1149/1.2403983 ↗
18. 10.1149/1.137611910.1149/1.1376119 ↗
19. 10.1016/S0010-938X(01)00133-010.1016/S0010-938X(01)00133-0 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0010-938X(97)00049-810.1016/S0010-938X(97)00049-8 ↗
21. 10.1016/S0010-938X(65)90614-110.1016/S0010-938X(65)90614-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.06.02310.1016/j.corsci.2015.06.023 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.corsci.2019.10840610.1016/j.corsci.2019.108406 ↗
24. 10.5006/1.328399810.5006/1.3283998 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.01610.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.016 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.04.02210.1016/j.corsci.2006.04.022 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10008-020-04586-210.1007/s10008-020-04586-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.10008410.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100084 ↗
30. 10.1016/0010-938X(94)90060-410.1016/0010-938X(94)90060-4 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.01910.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.08.019 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.corsci.2003.09.01710.1016/j.corsci.2003.09.017 ↗
33. 10.1126/science.110135810.1126/science.1101358 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.corsci.2007.08.00210.1016/j.corsci.2007.08.002 ↗
35. 10.1149/2.0381613jes10.1149/2.0381613jes ↗
36. 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.03.00210.1016/j.corsci.2005.03.002 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0010-938X(97)00043-710.1016/S0010-938X(97)00043-7 ↗