Estimation of concrete strength by using artificial intelligence (AI) methods
Source abstract
Abstract
With advances in technology, non-destructive testing (NDT) combined with artificial intelligence (AI) offers a highly effective approach to determining concrete strength. Accurately estimating the strength of reinforced concrete without causing damage is essential for assessing both existing and under-construction structures. However, many studies in the literature rely solely on P-wave velocity or single concrete designs, often overlooking the effects of reinforcement and different curing conditions. This study presents an innovative AI-based approach to estimating the strength of both reinforced and unreinforced concrete under varying curing conditions. A total of 334 concrete samples were subjected to various curing treatments, and their strength was assessed using uniaxial compressive strength tests and ultrasonic methods. Data obtained from NDT techniques were analysed using machine learning (ML) algorithms, including Random Forest (RF), XGBoost (XGB), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). Key parameters such as p- and S-wave velocities, curing time, curing type, water/cement ratio, and reinforcement diameter were incorporated into the models. Among the tested AI methods, XGB demonstrated the highest accuracy in predicting concrete strength. XGB reduced RMSE by 12% compared to RF. These findings highlight the potential of machine learning in improving the efficiency and reliability of concrete strength estimation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Isparta University of Applied Sciences
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. Kosmatka SH, Kerkhoff B, Panarese WC. Design and control of concrete mixtures. 14th ed. Portland: Cement Association. 2002
2. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.04.00510.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.04.005 ↗
3. 10.5578/fmbd.6758810.5578/fmbd.67588 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.12210.1016/j.prostr.2019.08.122 ↗
5. 10.1007/s00603-020-02184-210.1007/s00603-020-02184-2 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00521-020-05546-710.1007/s00521-020-05546-7 ↗
7. Nasiri H, Homafar A, Chelgani SC. Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength and modulus of elasticity for travertine samples using an explainable artificial intelligence. Results Geophys Sci. 2021;8(100034):ISSN 2666–8289.
8. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10647010.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.106470 ↗
9. 10.3390/su1511883510.3390/su15118835 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2023.10353210.1016/j.advengsoft.2023.103532 ↗
11. 10.3390/math1107165010.3390/math11071650 ↗
12. 10.1080/19648189.2016.124669310.1080/19648189.2016.1246693 ↗
13. 10.1007/s11709-020-0684-610.1007/s11709-020-0684-6 ↗
14. 10.2298/SOS2103323E10.2298/SOS2103323E ↗
15. 10.1007/s40996-020-00513-710.1007/s40996-020-00513-7 ↗
16. Ekin N. Relationship between amplitude anisotropy and compressive strength of reinforced concrete depending on curing conditions. Indian J Eng Mater Sci. 2021;28(3):286–299.
17. 10.1515/mt-2021-005310.1515/mt-2021-0053 ↗
18. Asteris PG, Apostolopoulou M, Skentou AD, et al. Application of artificial neural networks for the prediction of the compressive strength of cementbased mortars. Comput Concr. 2019;24(4):329–345.
19. 10.1007/s00521-020-05244-410.1007/s00521-020-05244-4 ↗
20. Haykin S. Neural networks: a comprehensive foundation. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1999.
21. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.04.00910.1016/j.commatsci.2007.04.009 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.00110.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.001 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.15610.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.156 ↗
24. Hakim SJS, Noorzaei J, Jaafar MS, et al. Application of artificial neural networks to predict compressive strength of high-strength concrete. Int J Phys Sci. 2011;6:975–981.
25. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.01610.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.016 ↗
26. 10.1155/2015/84912610.1155/2015/849126 ↗
27. 10.1111/mice.1249710.1111/mice.12497 ↗
28. 10.1007/s00521-021-06004-810.1007/s00521-021-06004-8 ↗
29. 10.32604/sdhm.2021.01564410.32604/sdhm.2021.015644 ↗
30. 10.3390/app1109379810.3390/app11093798 ↗
31. 10.1007/s11709-022-0837-x10.1007/s11709-022-0837-x ↗
32. 10.1080/11104929.2019.166900510.1080/11104929.2019.1669005 ↗
33. 10.1007/s11709-022-0901-610.1007/s11709-022-0901-6 ↗
34. 10.1145/2939672.293978510.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
35. 10.1080/10589759.2023.224094010.1080/10589759.2023.2240940 ↗
36. 10.35193/bseufbd.119446010.35193/bseufbd.1194460 ↗
37. 10.46604/ijeti.2021.747910.46604/ijeti.2021.7479 ↗
38. Sabbağ N. Determination of concrete quality by geophysical methods [PhD thesis 172]. Suleyman Demirel University Institute of Science and Technology. Department of Geophysics Engineering Dept; 2016.
39. 10.1007/s10064-019-01501-610.1007/s10064-019-01501-6 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2007.07.011 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.014 ↗
42. Muthupriya P, Subramanian K, Vishnuram BG. Prediction of compressive strength and durability of high-performance concrete by artificial neural networks. Int J Optim Civ Eng. 2011;1:189–209.
43. Razavi S V, Jumaat M Z. EI-Shafie A H. Using feed-forward back propagation (FFBP) neural networks for compressive strength prediction of lightweight concrete made with different percentages of scoria instead of sand. Int J Phys Sci. 2011;6(6):1325–1331.
44. 10.1007/s13369-014-1139-y10.1007/s13369-014-1139-y ↗
45. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e0111510.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e01115 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.00710.1016/j.jobe.2018.01.007 ↗
47. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00345-810.1016/S0008-8846(00)00345-8 ↗
48. 10.1007/BF0033994310.1007/BF00339943 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.10836910.1016/j.jobe.2023.108369 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00004-X10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00004-X ↗
51. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
52. 10.3390/app908162110.3390/app9081621 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.05.00410.1016/j.jrmge.2021.05.004 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.01110.1016/j.jrmge.2020.05.011 ↗
55. 10.3390/min1206073110.3390/min12060731 ↗
56. 10.3390/app906104210.3390/app9061042 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.10230010.1016/j.jobe.2021.102300 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.aap.2020.10557410.1016/j.aap.2020.105574 ↗
59. 10.3390/app1210526910.3390/app12105269 ↗
60. 10.1007/s13721-016-0125-610.1007/s13721-016-0125-6 ↗
61. 10.1145/2487575.248762910.1145/2487575.2487629 ↗
62. Kenney JF, Keeping ES. Linear regression and correlation. Math Stat. 1962;1:252–285.
63. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2020.10616710.1016/j.cemconres.2020.106167 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.10644910.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106449 ↗