journal article·2024-10-02

Inspection of thick composites: a comparative study between microwaves, X-ray computed tomography and ultrasonic testing

Mohammed Saif Ur Rahman, Omar S. Hassan, Ademola A. Mustapha, Mohamed A. Abou-Khousa, Wesley J. Cantwell

Publisher page

Abstract

Inspection of thick and low-density multilayer composite structures is of paramount importance. X-ray computed tomography (CT) and phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) are widely employed modalities for non-destructive testing (NDT) of these composites. Owing to low density of constituent materials typically utilised to construct composites and rich wave scattering within their structures, inspecting them using X-ray CT and PAUT does not always yield acceptable flaw detection results. On the other hand, microwave NDT techniques have shown to be particularly suitable for inspecting thick multilayer non-carbon-based composites. However, the relative performance of emerging microwave NDT techniques and the widely accepted X-ray CT and PAUT is yet to be established. This paper provides first-of-its-kind experimental comparison between microwave, X-ray CT, and PAUT on a comprehensive set of thick composite samples with different defect types. It is demonstrated herein that microwave NDT performed on par with X-ray CT in terms of defect detection capability (qualitatively and quantitatively), and in many cases outperformed PAUT. A detailed summary overviewing the performance, advantages and shortcomings of each method for particualr defect types is included which disseminates new knowledge to benefit practitioners and researchers alike.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geophysical Methods and Applications · Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Department of Aerospace Engineering and the ADAM Center, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Funding

based upon work supported by Khalifa

References (70)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11295110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112951 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2014.04.010 ↗
3. 10.1177/095440541561934310.1177/0954405415619343 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.008 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11364010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113640 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.00310.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.003 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2013.06.008 ↗
8. 10.1177/1475921722109541510.1177/14759217221095415 ↗
9. 10.3390/jcs512031910.3390/jcs5120319 ↗
10. 10.1177/168781402091376110.1177/1687814020913761 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.00810.1016/j.prostr.2016.02.008 ↗
12. 10.3390/app1304273210.3390/app13042732 ↗
13. 10.1177/0892705723117267010.1177/08927057231172670 ↗
14. 10.1007/s10853-018-2045-610.1007/s10853-018-2045-6 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.05510.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.055 ↗
16. 10.1080/10589759.2022.213617410.1080/10589759.2022.2136174 ↗
17. 10.1080/10589759.2022.207016410.1080/10589759.2022.2070164 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11091910.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110919 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.procir.2015.07.04310.1016/j.procir.2015.07.043 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10883910.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108839 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12541-012-0157-510.1007/s12541-012-0157-5 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11500810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2020.10855310.1016/j.matdes.2020.108553 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10801610.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108016 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.03710.1016/j.compstruct.2011.11.037 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2015.05.003 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.infrared.2015.07.02110.1016/j.infrared.2015.07.021 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.06.004 ↗
29. 10.1080/0934984950940956810.1080/09349849509409568 ↗
30. Qaddoumi N, Ganchev S, Zoughi R, et al. Microwave imaging of thick composite panels with defects. MAT EVAL. 1995;53(8):926–929.
31. 10.1109/22.27743110.1109/22.277431 ↗
32. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.210-213.6910.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.210-213.69 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.012 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.02310.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.023 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.03110.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.031 ↗
36. Abou-Khousa MA, Ryley AC, Kharkovsky S, et al. Comparison of X-Ray, millimeter wave, shearography and through transmission ultrasonic methods for inspection of honeycomb composites. In: Proceedings of the Review of progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, Portland, Oregon, USA. 2006; 894: 999–1006.
37. 10.1109/TIM.2007.89984810.1109/TIM.2007.899848 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.290277110.1063/1.2902771 ↗
39. 10.1063/1.290277210.1063/1.2902772 ↗
40. 10.1109/TAP.2013.227017410.1109/TAP.2013.2270174 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.05010.1016/j.compstruct.2015.03.050 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.00210.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.002 ↗
43. 10.1109/TMTT.2016.262578510.1109/TMTT.2016.2625785 ↗
44. 10.1109/I2MTC.2018.840982410.1109/I2MTC.2018.8409824 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.02910.1016/j.compscitech.2018.04.029 ↗
46. 10.1109/TIM.2018.281543710.1109/TIM.2018.2815437 ↗
47. 10.1088/1361-6501/aad2cf10.1088/1361-6501/aad2cf ↗
48. 10.1007/s10921-020-00669-210.1007/s10921-020-00669-2 ↗
49. 10.1007/s12206-020-0212-610.1007/s12206-020-0212-6 ↗
50. 10.1109/TIM.2019.293753210.1109/TIM.2019.2937532 ↗
51. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.304814710.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048147 ↗
52. 10.1007/s10921-021-00839-w10.1007/s10921-021-00839-w ↗
53. 10.1109/IST50367.2021.965142110.1109/IST50367.2021.9651421 ↗
54. 10.1098/rsta.2019.058510.1098/rsta.2019.0585 ↗
55. 10.1080/10589759.2019.160560310.1080/10589759.2019.1605603 ↗
56. Li Z, Wang P. Review of microwave techniques used in the manufacture and fault detection of aircraft composites. Aeronaut J. 2020;125(1283):1–29.
57. 10.3390/coatings1108091310.3390/coatings11080913 ↗
58. 10.1109/TIM.2023.323803610.1109/TIM.2023.3238036 ↗
59. Thomson CD, Cox I, Ghasr MT, et al. Ultrasonic, microwave, and millimeter wave inspection techniques for adhesively bonded stacked open honeycomb core composites. In: AIP Conference Proceedings, Boise, Idaho, USA. 2015: 1650, pp. 1266–1274.
60. 10.1007/s10921-018-0526-910.1007/s10921-018-0526-9 ↗
61. 10.3390/s2007186710.3390/s20071867 ↗
62. Arhamnamazi SA, Arab NBM, Oskouei AR, et al. Accuracy assessment of ultrasonic C-scan and X-ray radiography methods for impact damage detection in glassfiber reinforced polyester composites. J Appl Comput Mech. 2019;5:258–268.
63. Shoukroun D, Massimi L, Endrizzi M, et al. Composites impact damage detection and characterization using ultrasound and x-ray NDE techniques. In: Proc. SPIE 11381, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems XIV, 22 April 2020, pp. 113810B.
64. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.025 ↗
65. Hughes B. Phoenix Nanotom M. [Online] https://www.bakerhughes.com/waygate-technologies/industrial-radiography-and-ct/phoenix-advanced-industrial-xray-and-ct/phoenix-nanotomr-m
66. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.11910.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.119 ↗
67. Olympus N. D. T. Phased array testing, Basic Theory for industrial applications. USA: Olympus NDT; 2014.
68. 10.1109/TAP.2011.217314510.1109/TAP.2011.2173145 ↗
69. 10.3390/s2002055910.3390/s20020559 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10928810.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109288 ↗