Identification method of circumferential declination based on amplitude reduction of pipeline ultrasonic internal inspection signals
Source abstract
Abstract
The echo signal of ultrasonic internal inspection is highly sensitive to the incident deflection angle between the probe and the measured surface of the pipeline, which is the key factor affecting the accuracy of ultrasonic inspection. In practical engineering, the echo signal of ultrasonic inspection is easy to be interfered by the external environment, which makes it difficult to identify the deflection angle. The data of defect echo signal under different circumferential declination were collected by the pipeline ultrasonic internal inspection system, and the characteristics of signal variation in time domain under different circumferential declination were analysed. The results show that the existence of circumferential declination reduced the absolute value of the overall amplitude of ultrasonic echo signal. A signal processing method based on amplitude reduction is proposed to reduce the sampling random error. Comparative analysis shows that the circumferential declination can be identified based on amplitude reduction method, and the accuracy of ultrasonic recognition can be improved. By extracting the characteristic value of waveform, the empirical formula is obtained. Within 2°, the maximum deviation is 0.137°. The research results have certain guiding significance for the identification of circumferential declination in practical engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation · Flow Measurement and Analysis · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Southwest Petroleum University
PipeChina West East Gas Pipeline Company
Funding
Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Yang J, Qiu C, Gao H, et al. Research progress of piezoelectric ultrasonic based pipeline corrosion in-line inspection technology. Oil & Gas Storage Transp. 2018;37(6):608–612.
2. 10.1109/ElConRus51938.2021.939620010.1109/ElConRus51938.2021.9396200 ↗
3. 10.4236/ajor.2015.5402110.4236/ajor.2015.54021 ↗
4. Yan X, Dong S, Xu B. Cepstrum analysis method for surface acoustic wave signal time delay estimation. Vibr Shock. 2013;32(12):159–162.
5. 10.1109/TIM.2008.92640810.1109/TIM.2008.926408 ↗
6. 10.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.11.03910.3969/j.issn.0438-1157.2014.11.039 ↗
7. Li H, Cheng Y, Xi H. Application of correlation matching in characteristic extraction of ultrasonic signal. China Test. 2015;41(3):96–98.
8. 10.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2016.10.02910.16183/j.cnki.jsjtu.2016.10.029 ↗
9. 10.3901/JME.2018.18.01110.3901/JME.2018.18.011 ↗
10. 10.1109/MEMSYS.2017.786363210.1109/MEMSYS.2017.7863632 ↗
11. Zhang H, Yue B, Deng X, et al. The influence of temperature on the results of time-of-flight diffraction detection. China Test. 2019;45(3):41–45.
12. 10.1080/10589759.2015.107423110.1080/10589759.2015.1074231 ↗
13. 10.1080/10589759.2015.104152310.1080/10589759.2015.1041523 ↗
14. 10.1080/10589759.2014.100283810.1080/10589759.2014.1002838 ↗
15. 10.1109/I2MTC.2017.796983110.1109/I2MTC.2017.7969831 ↗
16. 10.1109/SYNASC.2014.2010.1109/SYNASC.2014.20 ↗
17. Guan L. Inversion and recognition of echo signal from ultrasonic detection of volumetric pipeline defects. Southwest Pet Univ. 2024.
18. Shen P. Study on ultrasonic sensing characteristics of pipeline defect detection array. Southwest Pet Univ. 2015.
19. 10.3901/JME.2018.18.01110.3901/JME.2018.18.011 ↗
20. Zhang X. Research on eccentric axis ultrasonic detection and defect intelligent identification method. Shenyang University of Chemical Technology; 2022.