Free vibration analysis of functionally graded sandwich spherical shells with honeycomb core resting on Kerr foundation using the MITC4 element
Source abstract
Abstract
The main object of this paper is to further extend the MITC4 element to analyse the free vibration of FG sandwich spherical shells with a honeycomb core (so-called h-FGSS shells) resting on Kerr foundation (KF). The MITC4 originates from a three-dimensional continuum description degenerated to shell behaviour which can be applied to both thick and thin shells. The h-FGSS shell consists of an inner honeycomb core and two different FG skin layers. FSDT is used due to its simplicity and efficiency. The KF includes three parameters as upper springer stiffness (kU), upper springer stiffness (kL), and the shear layer stiffness (kS). The performance and accuracy of the present formulation are verified through comparative examples. Furthermore, the numerical and graphical results show a general picture of the influence of the input parameters on the free vibration of h-FGSS shells, especially the geometrical parameters of the honeycomb core.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Structural Analysis and Optimization · Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Le Quy Don Technical University
Nguyen Tat Thanh University
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/0045-7949(90)90028-Z10.1016/0045-7949(90)90028-Z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2015.10.008 ↗
3. Tahir SI, Tounsi A, Chikh A, et al. The effect of three-variable viscoelastic foundation on the wave propagation in functionally graded sandwich plates via a simple quasi-3D HSDT. Steel Compos Struct. 2022;42:501.
4. 10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00017-X10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00017-X ↗
5. Hadji M, Bouhadra A, Mamen B, et al. Combined influence of porosity and elastic foundation parameters on the bending behaviour of advanced sandwich structures. Steel Compos Struct. 2023;46(1):1–13.
6. Kouider D, Kaci A, Selim MM, et al. An original four-variable quasi-3D shear deformation theory for the static and free vibration analysis of new type of sandwich plates with both FG face sheets and FGM hard core. Steel Comp Struct Int J. 2021;41:167–191.
7. Tounsi A, Tahir S, Al-Osta M, et al. An integral quasi-3D computational model for the hygro-thermal wave propagation of imperfect FGM sandwich plates. Comput Concr. 2023;32:61–74.
8. Bounouara F, Sadoun M, Saleh MMS, et al. Effect of visco-Pasternak foundation on thermo-mechanical bending response of anisotropic thick laminated composite plates. Steel Compos Struct. 2023;47:693–707.
9. 10.1007/s00366-021-01475-810.1007/s00366-021-01475-8 ↗
10. 10.1142/S021945542450117710.1142/S0219455424501177 ↗
11. Ghorbanpour Arani A, Emdadi M, Ashrafi H, et al. Analysis of viscoelastic functionally graded sandwich plates with CNT reinforced composite face sheets on viscoelastic foundation. J solid mech. 2019;11(4):690–706.
12. Belabed Z, Tounsi A, Al-Osta MA, et al. On the elastic stability and free vibration responses of functionally graded porous beams resting on Winkler-Pasternak foundations via finite element computation. Geomech Eng. 2024;36:183.
13. Cuong BM, Tounsi A, van Thom D, et al. Finite element modelling for the static bending response of rotating FG-GPLRC beams with geometrical imperfections in thermal mediums. Comput Concr. 2024;33:91–102.
14. Bentrar H, Chorfi SM, Belalia SA, et al. Effect of porosity distribution on free vibration of functionally graded sandwich plate using the P-version of the finite element method. Struct Eng Mech. 2023;88:551.
15. Tien DM, van Thom D, Hai Van N, et al. Buckling and forced oscillation of organic nanoplates taking the structural drag coefficient into account. Comput Concr. 2023;32:553–565.
16. Mesbah A, Belabed Z, Amara K, et al. Formulation and evaluation a finite element model for free vibration and buckling behaviours of functionally graded porous (FGP) beams. Int J Adv Struct Eng. 2023;86:291–309.
17. Xia L, Wang R, Chen G, et al. The finite element method for dynamics of FG porous truncated conical panels reinforced with graphene platelets based on the 3-D elasticity. Adv Nano Res. 2023;14:375–389.
18. Katiyar V, Gupta A, Tounsi A. Microstructural/Geometric imperfection sensitivity on the vibration response of geometrically discontinuous bi-directional functionally graded plates (2D FGPs) with partial supports by using FEM. Steel Comp Struct Int J. 2022;45:621–640.
19. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.10474310.1016/j.euromechsol.2022.104743 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2016.07.01110.1016/j.ijengsci.2016.07.011 ↗
21. Zhang Y-W, Ding H-X, She G-L, et al. Wave propagation of CNTRC beams resting on elastic foundation based on various higher-order beam theories. Geomech Eng. 2023;33:381–391.
22. Bennedjadi M, Aldosari SM, Chikh A, et al. Visco-elastic foundation effect on buckling response of exponentially graded sandwich plates under various boundary conditions. Geomech Eng. 2023;32:159.
23. Belbachir N, Bourada F, Bousahla AA, et al. A refined quasi-3D theory for stability and dynamic investigation of cross-ply laminated composite plates on Winkler-Pasternak foundation. Struct Eng Mech. 2023;85:433.
24. 10.1007/s00366-021-01498-110.1007/s00366-021-01498-1 ↗
25. 10.1007/s00366-022-01679-610.1007/s00366-022-01679-6 ↗
26. Bouafia K, Selim MM, Bourada F, et al. Bending and free vibration characteristics of various compositions of FG plates on elastic foundation via quasi 3D HSDT model. Steel Compos Struct Inter J. 2021;41:487–503.
27. Mudhaffar IM, Tounsi A, Chikh A, et al. Hygro-thermo-mechanical bending behaviour of advanced functionally graded ceramic metal plate resting on a viscoelastic foundation. Structures: Elsevier; 2021. p. 2177–2189.
28. Merazka B, Bouhadra A, Menasria A, et al. Hygro-thermo-mechanical bending response of FG plates resting on elastic foundations. Steel Compos Struct Int J. 2021;39:631–643.
29. 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.10.00610.1016/j.euromechsol.2003.10.006 ↗
30. 10.1177/109963621455418010.1177/1099636214554180 ↗
31. 10.1080/15376494.2018.145593310.1080/15376494.2018.1455933 ↗
32. 10.1177/109963621667472910.1177/1099636216674729 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.00910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.009 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.04710.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.047 ↗
35. 10.1155/2020/630913010.1155/2020/6309130 ↗
36. 10.1007/s00366-021-01531-310.1007/s00366-021-01531-3 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11321310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113213 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10920310.1016/j.tws.2022.109203 ↗
39. 10.31814/stce.huce(nuce)2022-16(3)-0210.31814/stce.huce(nuce)2022-16(3)-02 ↗
40. Addou FY, Bourada F, Meradjah M, et al. Impact of porosity distribution on static behaviour of functionally graded plates using a simple quasi-3D HSDT. Comput Concr. 2023;32:87.
41. 10.1080/15376494.2022.207341010.1080/15376494.2022.2073410 ↗
42. Lafi DE, Bouhadra A, Mamen B, et al. Combined influence of variable distribution models and boundary conditions on the thermodynamic behavior of FG sandwich plates lying on various elastic foundations. Struct Eng Mech. 2024;89:103.
43. 10.1142/S021945542450117710.1142/S0219455424501177 ↗
44. Tounsi A, Mostefa AH, Attia A, et al. Free vibration investigation of functionally graded plates with temperature dependent properties resting on a viscoelastic foundation. Int J Adv Struct Eng. 2023;86:1–16.
45. Tounsi A, Mostefa AH, Bousahla AA, et al. Thermodynamical bending analysis of P-FG sandwich plates resting on nonlinear visco-Pasternak’s elastic foundations. Steel Compos Struct. 2023;49:307–323.
46. Mudhaffar IM, Chikh A, Tounsi A, et al. Impact of viscoelastic foundation on bending behavior of FG plate subjected to hygro-thermo-mechanical loads. Int J Adv Struct Eng. 2023;86:167–180.
47. 10.1016/j.csite.2023.10293410.1016/j.csite.2023.102934 ↗
48. 10.1142/S175882512250074010.1142/S1758825122500740 ↗
49. 10.1080/15397734.2023.221021410.1080/15397734.2023.2210214 ↗
50. 10.1080/10589759.2022.209437810.1080/10589759.2022.2094378 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11014610.1016/j.tws.2022.110146 ↗
52. 10.1201/b1240910.1201/b12409 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.08.00110.1016/j.ijmecsci.2009.08.001 ↗
54. 10.1108/eb02356210.1108/eb023562 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.00310.1016/j.jsv.2010.10.003 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2007.07.00610.1016/j.compstruct.2007.07.006 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.02.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2010.02.001 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.ast.2019.10535610.1016/j.ast.2019.105356 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11364310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113643 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.ast.2017.11.00410.1016/j.ast.2017.11.004 ↗